[01:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-d3-contour [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [1.3.2-1]
[01:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-dagre-layout [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [0.8.8-1]
[01:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-request-promise-core [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [1.1.2-1]
[01:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-d3-fetch [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [1.1.2+dfsg-1]
[01:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-define-properties [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [1.1.2-1]
[08:00] <acheronuk> xnox: might need slightly more thought it seems
[08:00] <acheronuk> ftbs
[08:02] <acheronuk> bdmurray: hi, apport seems to have regressed on its i386 test since last upload LP: #1832120
[09:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: papi [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [5.7.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[09:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: papi [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/universe) [5.7.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[09:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: papi [i386] (eoan-proposed/universe) [5.7.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[09:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: papi [arm64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [5.7.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[09:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: papi [armhf] (eoan-proposed/universe) [5.7.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[10:50] <koza> Hey everybody. I am using bionic and I have added arm64 architecture via sudo dpkg --add-architecture arm64 however now the apt update renders lots of 404 errors (like: 404  Not Found [IP: 153.19.251.225 80]) Is it normal? What is the way to add another architecture?
[10:53] <cjwatson> arm64 lives on ports.ubuntu.com rather than archive.ubuntu.com, which requires some sources.list finagling
[10:54] <cjwatson> Something like adding [arch=amd64] just after the "deb " on each archive.ubuntu.com line in sources.list, and then adding "deb [arch=arm64] http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports bionic main restricted universe multiverse" (and similarly for bionic-updates)
[10:54] <cjwatson> Likewise for security.ubuntu.com
[10:55] <cjwatson> You can read "man sources.list" for more details
[10:56] <cjwatson> Oh, also, this is not a release management question, please use #ubuntu for this kind of thing next time
[10:58] <koza> cjwatson: thanks
[14:32] <LocutusOfBorg> hello, can we please have diaspora-installer/0.7.6.1+debian1/armhf hinted? it is regressed in release (it is just a downloader), and I have reported it upstream https://github.com/codahale/bcrypt-ruby/issues/201
[14:33] <LocutusOfBorg> but not something we can easily fix in Ubuntu side, since gems are handled on rubygems.org website, not internally
[15:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1041.46] (kernel)
[15:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-glance-store (cosmic-proposed/main) [0.26.1-0ubuntu2.1 => 0.26.1-0ubuntu2.2] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[15:25] <acheronuk> vorlon: could I perhaps get a skiptest for konsole in proposed please? the i386 apport test fail is not the fault of konsole. LP: #1832120
[16:01] <vorlon> acheronuk: badtested apport instead
[16:01] <acheronuk> vorlon: thanks! that is fair enough
[16:17] <teward> vorlon: i'm seeing a lot of openssl-related things, including a note that openssl has been released, yet it still only shows in proposed for me, i take it that's normal in this case?
[16:17] <teward> even though that SRU is marked as "Fix Released"
[16:32] <vorlon> teward: the emails arrive before the archive publishing is visible on the mirror
[16:32] <teward> ah, okay.  so EVENTUALLY it'll be fully published.
[16:32] <teward> as soon as things sync up.
[17:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (bionic-proposed/main) [2.525.26 => 2.525.27] (desktop-core)
[18:23] <ddstreet> is the xenial sru queue still getting reviewed?
[18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-tornado [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.5.3-1ubuntu0.1]
[18:34] <vorlon> ddstreet: yes, though speaking only for myself I tend to look at queues in reverse chronological order, and I never made it to xenial on Friday because d/c/b kept me busy
[18:35] <Eickmeyer> Looks like both budgie and studio failed to build today, but can't see that it's for the same reasons. In Studio's case it appears to be a conflict with the nvidia drivers? I was in the process of adding them to the seed, but hadn't finished processing the meta yet.
[18:38] <Eickmeyer> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/427666228/buildlog_ubuntu_eoan_amd64_ubuntustudio_BUILDING.txt.gz
[20:34] <rbasak> ddstreet, vorlon: FWIW, usually I review the queues in forward chronological order of release, but I tend to skip big and/or complicated SRUs on my first pass, and rarely get to a second.
[22:15]  * cjwatson removes gcc-defaults-ports/cosmic-proposed because it's causing the publisher to OOPS; commented on bug 1828171 with an explanation