| === ricab is now known as ricab|lunch | ||
| === ogra is now known as Guest43551 | ||
| === ricab|lunch is now known as ricab | ||
| === ricab_ is now known as ricab | ||
| rbasak | xnox: please could you look at bug 1798786? Claimed to be a regression caused by libssl bump. | 14:27 |
|---|---|---|
| ubottu | bug 1798786 in fetchmail (Ubuntu Bionic) "can't retrieve gmail emails. fetchmail: OU=No SNI provided; please fix your client./CN=invalid2.invalid" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1798786 | 14:27 |
| * rbasak doesn't see how that's "In progress" | 14:28 | |
| rbasak | ahasenack: ^ ah, just noticed the timing of your comment | 14:29 |
| rbasak | I added the regression-update tag. | 14:29 |
| ahasenack | yep, uploading to the sru queue as we speak | 14:29 |
| ahasenack | meant to ping xnox just to let him know | 14:29 |
| rbasak | Because I feel this should feed back to the SRU team on regression considerations for the SSL work. | 14:29 |
| rbasak | Ah. Thanks! | 14:30 |
| xnox | rbasak: SNI is real, one must send SNI. SO that sru should ship, if it hasn't yet - https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/fetchmail/+git/fetchmail/+merge/368713 | 14:30 |
| ahasenack | doing it right now | 14:30 |
| ahasenack | just checking the version number, I might have made a mistake there | 14:30 |
| ahasenack | ah, yeah | 14:31 |
| ahasenack | 6.3.26-3build1 | bionic | 14:31 |
| ahasenack | 6.3.26-3ubuntu0.1 | cosmic-updates | 14:31 |
| rbasak | xnox: sure. No objection to the SRU. I just mean that for the libssl work, it's "Regression Potential" that might have been missed. | 14:31 |
| rbasak | (this could be a class of bugs and not just one) | 14:31 |
| ahasenack | what version can I use for bionic in this case? Cosmic has the fix already | 14:32 |
| rbasak | xnox: do we need to actively look for others, for example, to make sure that we haven't created other regressions? | 14:32 |
| ahasenack | I need something between 3build1 and 3ubuntu0.1 | 14:32 |
| ahasenack | 3ubuntu0.1~18.04.1? | 14:32 |
| rbasak | ahasenack: +1 | 14:32 |
| rbasak | Interesting odd case :) | 14:32 |
| xnox | rbasak: we have fixed half-a-dozen of these SNI things in all the things already. all of those SRUs landed in bionic, prior to landing 1.1.1 sru. | 14:33 |
| xnox | but obviously missed fetchmail | 14:33 |
| rbasak | xnox: ack. I was just asking if it needs to be thought about, not knowing what had already been considered. | 14:34 |
| xnox | rbasak: all good. SNI was called out as Regression Potential in the openssl 1.1.1 sru.... =) | 14:35 |
| xnox | we did anticipate, plan, fix things for it. | 14:35 |
| rbasak | Ah, OK :) | 14:35 |
| rbasak | ahasenack: when you upload, do you want a fast review for that? Seems appropriate. | 14:36 |
| ahasenack | sure | 14:36 |
| ahasenack | rbasak: mp is/was https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/fetchmail/+git/fetchmail/+merge/368713 | 14:36 |
| ahasenack | I'll just have to update the version number, then maybe you can take a quick look, since cpaelzer's +1 was for the former? | 14:36 |
| rbasak | Possibly warrants an aging period ignore too, given that it's a regression and the fix is well tested in other series. | 14:37 |
| rbasak | Sure | 14:37 |
| cpaelzer | yep | 14:38 |
| cpaelzer | ahasenack: did you push a new version number to not collide? | 14:38 |
| ahasenack | cpaelzer: rbasak: just now | 14:38 |
| rbasak | ahasenack: +1. Sorry I think I stole the wrong review slot. | 14:43 |
| rbasak | (there are no longer any team ones) | 14:43 |
| rbasak | ahasenack: (please upload) | 14:44 |
| ahasenack | rbasak: done | 14:45 |
| rbasak | Does anyone think that a quick verification and release into -updates immediately is a bad idea for this one? | 14:50 |
| rbasak | The source is identical to what is in Cosmic now anyway, sans changelog | 14:51 |
| ahasenack | it's even the same version from cosmic | 14:51 |
| ahasenack | yeah | 14:51 |
| ahasenack | the test is super easy, I can do it as soon as it's available | 14:51 |
| rbasak | So only risk is of the rebuild environment being different (which, to be fair, we know it is, because of so much work in Bionic) | 14:51 |
| ahasenack | rbasak: well there is a new ssl being picked up this time :) | 14:51 |
| rbasak | :) | 14:51 |
| === ricab_ is now known as ricab | ||
| ahasenack | rbasak: fetchmail verification done | 15:30 |
| rbasak | ahasenack: thanks! | 15:32 |
| rbasak | vorlon: your comment introduces some doubt. Do you think I should wait before releasing? | 15:33 |
| rbasak | xnox: do you think you could help with vorlon's question in bug 1798786 please? I don't see you subscribed. | 15:33 |
| ubottu | bug 1798786 in fetchmail (Ubuntu Bionic) "can't retrieve gmail emails. fetchmail: OU=No SNI provided; please fix your client./CN=invalid2.invalid" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1798786 | 15:33 |
| xnox | rbasak: vorlon: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fetchmail/+bug/1798786/comments/27 | 15:36 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1798786 in fetchmail (Ubuntu Bionic) "can't retrieve gmail emails. fetchmail: OU=No SNI provided; please fix your client./CN=invalid2.invalid" [High,Fix committed] | 15:36 |
| rbasak | xnox: sounds like you're confident - are you happy for me to release? | 15:37 |
| vorlon | rbasak, xnox: thanks | 15:37 |
| xnox | rbasak: yes. | 15:41 |
| rbasak | Done. Thanks! | 15:41 |
| rbasak | (and to Andreas) | 15:41 |
| rbasak | (and Christian, and Steve!) | 15:42 |
| TJ- | is there a way to auto-generate an initial man-page for a built binary from its --help prior to custom editing it? | 18:45 |
| ahasenack | TJ-: I used txt2man in the past to bootstrap a new manpage | 19:28 |
| bryce | +1 to txt2man | 19:32 |
| bryce | (if the tool's --help is sensibly formatted) | 19:33 |
| TJ- | ahasenack: thanks! I ended up doing it manually. I'm packaging dmzadm (for dm-zoned) SMR drive management etc | 19:52 |
| ahasenack | good luck, and thanks for thinking about the manpages :) | 19:53 |
| TJ- | ahasenack: I live in man-pages; couldn't be without :) | 19:58 |
| ahasenack | :) | 19:58 |
| TJ- | am I correct in thinking, for the version, if I publish initially in a PPA that -0ubuntu1-xxxx (so that there's no Debian version number) is the way to go? | 20:07 |
| TJ- | hmmm that should be -0ubuntu1~xxxx "~" of course | 20:09 |
| ahasenack | ~, yes | 20:09 |
| ahasenack | I use ~ppaN | 20:09 |
| TJ- | I'm doing (test) builds for 18.04>19.10 so I add ~YYMM[.minor] | 20:41 |
| TJ- | In case anyone wants to test dmzadm with the dm_zoned device-mapper module, for SMR ZAC/ZBC (host managed) shingled drives, https://launchpad.net/~tj/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/ | 21:48 |
| Unit193 | txt2man? Seems like you mean help2man. | 21:50 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!