[06:01] <nuche> i've been really impressed with the ubuntu fork elementary os over the last several years. has there been any consideration of bringing it under the actual ubuntu umbrella?
[06:02] <nuche> i've been thinking that perhaps - if not - it would be well worth looking closely at the effort and integrating a more macos centric development design effort into the ubuntu methodology.
[06:04] <nuche> arguably the #1 problem of linux has been not only the severe fractionalization over the last couple decades, but also the fact that no real standardization has taken hold comprehensively and apple truly has that market cornered right now (i'm not going to debate the different ui implementations, but i've been in this industry for 40 years and i ca
[06:04] <nuche> n say that bar none next/nextstep -> macos have ruled the roost as far as ui dev and well focussed innovation go)
[06:05] <nuche> we truly need a serious initiative to harness this kind of focus and to spearhead it for linux that surpasses the current leadership that's pushing gnome (and even kde, although it's arguably a bit better than the gnome guys)
=== Nafallo_ is now known as Nafallo
[09:51] <alkisg> I had this idea a few years back, and I'm still wondering who would oppose to it:
[09:51] <alkisg> Why can't we convince Debian to feature-freeze at the same time as Ubuntu LTS releases, and then "release when it's ready"?
[09:51] <alkisg> Wouldn't this make packaging and testing and bug fixing easier, and even make more upstream developers align their release schedules to that same feature freeze date?
[16:11] <tenplus1> hi folks, is anyone else having weird issues with the snap version of chromium browser after update ?