[05:08] <didrocks> good morning
[05:12] <duflu> Morning didrocks
[05:16] <didrocks> hey duflu
[06:18] <jibel> hi all
[06:23] <didrocks> salut jibel
[06:25] <oSoMoN> good morning desktoppers
[06:25] <oSoMoN> salut didrocks, jibel
[06:26] <duflu> Hi jibel and oSoMoN
[06:31] <didrocks> hey oSoMoN
[06:32] <oSoMoN> hey duflu
=== pstolowski|afk is now known as pstolowski
[07:36] <Wimpress> o/
[07:36] <duflu>       \o
[07:36] <jamesh> Wimpress: had fun in Montreal?
[07:37] <Wimpress> Yep, was the most successful Snapcraft Summit so far.
[07:37] <Wimpress> I'll be sending a summary out later.
[07:37] <jamesh> It's lucky they didn't send you there during the winter :-)
[07:38] <Wimpress> Used to work in Montreal quite a bit. I am familiar with the winter climate there ❄️🙂
[07:39] <didrocks> hey Wimpress, jamesh
[08:02] <Trevinho> morning guys!
[08:03] <didrocks> hey Trevinho
[08:03] <duflu> Hello euro-Trevinho
[08:04] <duflu> 🇪🇺
[08:04] <Trevinho> duflu and didrocks: hey :-)
[08:04] <Trevinho> lovely flag
[08:08] <marcustomlinson> morning all. Happy Fathers day to all the dads
[08:09] <marcustomlinson> or happy belated fathers day rather
[08:09] <didrocks> hey marcustomlinson ;)
[08:14] <duflu> Morning marcustomlinson
[08:14] <willcooke> morning all
[08:18] <seb128> hey there, good morning desktopers :-)
[08:18] <didrocks> hey willcooke seb128, good week-end?
[08:18] <willcooke> hi seb128, hi didrocks.
[08:19] <seb128> lut didrocks, ouais, nickel, et toi ?
[08:19] <duflu> Morning willcooke and seb128
[08:19] <seb128> spent the week/w.e in France, we drove back yesterday
[08:19] <willcooke> didrocks, not too bad.  Kids party yesterday, always fun.  How about you?
[08:19] <willcooke> afternoon duflu
[08:19] <didrocks> plus court, mais bien :)
[08:20] <seb128> the kid didn't sleep at first in the car but decided that 6pm was a good nap time, then didn't sleep enough, was angry but didn't want to go to bed in the evening and wouldn't want to get out of bed this morning!
[08:20] <seb128> hey duflu willcooke
[08:21] <seb128> thanks to whoever synced pygtk for me, it was stil not published on wednesday evening
[08:21] <seb128> I guess L_aney :)
[08:22] <marcustomlinson> morning didrocks duflu willcooke seb128
[08:23] <willcooke> hi marcustomlinson
[08:23] <seb128> hey marcustomlinson
[08:32] <Trevinho> hi seb128!
[08:33] <seb128> hey Trevinho, how are you! back to european tz? ;)
[08:33] <Trevinho> seb128: yeah, I'm in the sun sprint place so, here I can enjoy mornings more :)
[08:34] <seb128> ah, nice!
[08:34] <seb128> enjoy!
[08:42] <Trevinho> seb128: ah maybe you can review https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/gnome-shell/merge_requests/23/
[08:43] <seb128> Trevinho, k, I'm adding to my todolist :-)
[09:01] <oSoMoN> marcustomlinson, well done on the SRU for bug #1798074
[09:01] <ubot5> bug 1798074 in libreoffice-l10n (Ubuntu Bionic) "LIbreoffice crashes on startup" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1798074
[09:01] <marcustomlinson> thanks :)
[09:02] <marcustomlinson> vorlon sent the bionic one to the back of the queue though unfortunately as libreoffice-l10n was built with the wrong -v option apparently
[09:03] <marcustomlinson> Not a biggy, he fixed it, but yeah, will have to make it's way through the queue again
[09:14] <jamesh> On a scale of 1 to 10, how crazy would it be to try and move Xenial over to having the D-Bus session bus started by systemd?
[09:36] <didrocks> seb128: any chance of looking at grubzfs-testsuite? I have a new upload ready (but would prefer to have that separated) now that zfs-linux and our grub changes are entering the distro
[09:36] <seb128> didrocks, yeah, it's on my list for today, I didn't get to it previous week since I was off thursday/friday, sorry for the delay
[09:37] <didrocks> np
[09:55] <lis> Laney: hey :)   lemme know if/how i can help validate the SRU
[09:55] <lis> seb128, didrocks, Trevinho: hi hi :)
[09:56] <didrocks> hey lis ;)
[09:56] <willcooke> jamesh, sounds like a L_aney question.  He's back tomorrow
[09:57] <seb128> hey lis! L_aney is off today
[09:57] <jamesh> willcooke: I hope the answer is "that's a batshit crazy idea that we'll never do"
[09:57] <lis> good to know :)
[09:57] <seb128> lis, but SRU verifications are easy, it's basically "install the package, follow the testcase, comment/tag the bug"
[09:57] <willcooke> jamesh, I think you're probably on the money there
[09:57] <lis> seb128: dunno where to find the package lol
[09:58] <seb128> lis, https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html has the pointers to uploads/bugs
[09:58] <seb128> willcooke, jamesh, I would stay away from doing such changes to xenial
[09:58] <lis> seb128: ya.  that's where i looked, but the glib sru mentioned in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/+bug/1832457 doesn't seem to be there
[09:58] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1832457 in glib2.0 (Ubuntu Disco) "[SRU] 2.60.4" [Undecided,In progress]
[09:58] <seb128> I don't like the idea to do complex changes there, it's risky and probably not the best serie to spend efforts on
[09:59] <seb128> lis, ah, that's because it hasn't been reviewed/approved by the SRU team yet, they will comment on the bug when that happens
[09:59] <seb128> it's still in the review queue
[09:59] <lis> lovely.  i'll take a break, then :)
[09:59] <jamesh> seb128: this is the context: https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/a-user-session-agent-for-snapd/11426/7
[09:59]  * lis never understood this packaging stuff, even when she was working here
[10:01] <seb128> jamesh, right, I wonder if xenial has much desktop snaps users
[10:01] <seb128> well, I would stay away from a such changes
[10:02] <seb128> we every now and then get reports from xenial users who install dbus-user-session and get e.g their gnome-keyring screwed
[10:02] <seb128> so for sure it would require work
[10:03] <jamesh> seb128: I implemented something that works on Xenial without any workarounds.  What they're asking for would require the changes to how the session bus is launched.
[10:03] <seb128> bug #1689825
[10:03] <ubot5> bug 1689825 in dbus (Ubuntu) "gnome-keyring not unlocked on xenial when dbus-user-session is installed" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1689825
[10:03] <seb128> jamesh, tell them it's a not go and they should take your other solution :)
[13:10] <didrocks> seb128: FYI, I forgot in 0.2 to update with the vendor directory content in debian/copyright. Here is the commit with the update: https://github.com/ubuntu/grubzfs-testsuite/commit/cea44e576e114fc7415a0959971d1079fa2e583c. I want to include it in 0.3 (updating once grub2 is in release pocket), so the upload should be quickly after 0.2 in grubzfs-testsuite.
=== apw_ is now known as apw
[15:10] <seb128> didrocks, k
=== jdstrand_ is now known as jdstrand
=== pstolowski is now known as pstolowski|afk
[17:18] <willcooke> g'night all
[20:03] <kenvandine> robert_ancell: your latest changes to snap-store actually failed to build
[20:03] <kenvandine> meson.build:1:0: ERROR:  Meson version is 0.47.0 but project requires >=0.50.0.
[20:03] <kenvandine> from https://launchpadlibrarian.net/428871714/buildlog_snap_ubuntu_bionic_amd64_snap-store_BUILDING.txt.gz
[20:04]  * kenvandine fixes
[20:36] <kenvandine> robert_ancell: fixed
[20:37] <kenvandine> the libxmlb submodule had bumped the meson version
[21:04] <robert_ancell> kenvandine, ah, thanks.
[21:05] <robert_ancell> kenvandine, does the meson plugin pull in different build packages?
[21:06] <kenvandine> It doesn't use the packaged version if you specify the version
[21:06] <kenvandine> otherwise it will get the meson package from bionic
[21:06] <robert_ancell> kenvandine, nice that it does the work for you - In some snaps I've been working on I thought I'd have to rely on older versions.
[21:07] <robert_ancell> kenvandine, are you still going to pull out the headers and .pc files? I couldn't work out the snapcraft magic to do tht.
[21:08] <kenvandine> i did that already
[21:08] <robert_ancell> kenvandine, oh, what was the commit?
[21:09] <kenvandine> 640771e4d0171a8caffaed6d59593f3223c2eab1
[21:09] <robert_ancell> ta
[22:21] <robert_ancell> kenvandine, is the candidate snap-store failing to launch for you?
[22:22] <kenvandine> It was working fine for me an hour ago
[22:23] <kenvandine> Not at a computer now though
[22:28] <robert_ancell> oh, it was trying to contact an already running version.
[22:29] <robert_ancell> kenvandine, that was evince that was triggering the permission issues right? It's not showing here (snap-store candidate, stable evince)
[22:31] <kenvandine> It was evince