| jiffe | if I have a drive mounted which has ubuntu server installed on it, is there a way to see what packages were installed on it? | 00:54 |
|---|---|---|
| sarnold | if there's enough of it there, the easy way is to chroot to it and then use dpkg -l | 00:56 |
| jiffe | no there's not enough | 00:58 |
| jiffe | dpkg: error while loading shared libraries: libpcre.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory | 00:58 |
| sarnold | dang | 00:59 |
| sarnold | jiffe: I think all the data is in /var/lib/dpkg/status | 00:59 |
| sarnold | Package: libasan0 | 01:00 |
| sarnold | Status: install ok installed | 01:00 |
| sarnold | etc | 01:00 |
| jiffe | gotcha | 01:00 |
| sarnold | hm. maybe you could move your desktop's copy aside, drop that one in place, and try dpkg -l? :) see if that works out. | 01:00 |
| jiffe | nah status file is good enough, thanks | 01:04 |
| tomreyn | see also the files in /var/backups/ | 03:29 |
| jamespage | mdeslaur: the xenial ceph update regresssion tested ok as well | 04:30 |
| jamespage | coreycb: ftr autopkgtest-pkg-python does not work with the oslo.* packages | 05:03 |
| jamespage | it can't deal with the switch from oslo.X to oslo_X inside the package | 05:03 |
| jamespage | I have submitted bugs with patches | 05:03 |
| jamespage | mdeslaur: thanks for those ceph security updates btw | 05:37 |
| blackflow | cephcurity updates! ;) | 05:41 |
| === andol_ is now known as andol | ||
| jamespage | coreycb: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=884181 | 06:25 |
| ubottu | Debian bug 884181 in autodep8 "autodep8: Fix autopkgtest-pkg-python module import test for python{3}-oslo.*" [Normal,Open] | 06:25 |
| sahid | jamespage, coreycb, I have version bump for python-ddt and python-os-traits ready | 08:03 |
| jamespage | sahid: lp:~ubuntu-server-dev/ubuntu/+source/python-falcon | 08:04 |
| sahid | oh sorry i was sure have checked for python-falcon | 08:06 |
| st4rf0x64 | Good morning, I am looking for a simple way to bring a number of Ubuntu Servers into a Windows Active Directory for the sake of using accounts in said AD for verification with the Ubuntu Servers. | 08:27 |
| odc | st4rf0x64: you are probably looking for this: https://help.ubuntu.com/lts/serverguide/sssd-ad.html | 09:41 |
| mdeslaur | jamespage: awesome, thanks for testing them! :) I'll release them on tuesday (mon is a holiday for me) | 11:07 |
| Walex | st4rf0x64: what "odc" says is probably the simplest method. If your requirements are straighforward. | 11:37 |
| Walex | st4rf0x64: that that the AD needs to have the POSIX or UNIX account schemas merged in. | 11:38 |
| Walex | st4rf0x64: for things like home directory path; there are several howtos. | 11:38 |
| st4rf0x64 | Well ideally we would like to use the same administration identification that we use elsewhere, on the ubuntu machines. currently we are doing it all through root. | 11:47 |
| jamespage | mdeslaur: fair nuff - I've uploaded the 13.2.6 releases for cosmic and disco ready for when they roll out | 12:38 |
| jamespage | sahid: no you where right - I just created that repo | 12:38 |
| coreycb | jamespage: thanks for submitting those patches! that should clear up some of the failures in proposed. | 12:57 |
| jamespage | coreycb: yeah but not anytime soon with the autodep8 stuff | 12:58 |
| jamespage | coreycb: the problem is we've move from a in -tree import test that passes to the autodep8 one which is unhappy | 12:58 |
| coreycb | jamespage: ok i can restore the old tests and add a note with link to the bug | 12:58 |
| jamespage | so we're blocked - we might want to switch back to in-tree to unblock | 12:58 |
| jamespage | coreycb: +1 | 12:58 |
| coreycb | jamespage: seems like an XS- field would be a reasonable general solution | 13:01 |
| coreycb | jamespage: anyway i'll cycle through the oslo's right now and restore them and then look at proposed failures in my afternoon | 13:02 |
| jamespage | coreycb: thankyou | 13:02 |
| jamespage | cpaelzer: ok so what's the right way to set the vhost-user and vhost-perm with DPDK 18.11 via OVS? | 13:54 |
| teward | rbasak: sarnold: do we want to consider going to NGINX Mainline for Eoan? There's only been one 1.17.x release thus far. Or do we want to stick with Stable branch? | 14:01 |
| rbasak | teward: I don't know. What do you think? :) | 14:14 |
| rbasak | teward: F will be an LTS, so will we definitely be on nginx stable again by then? | 14:15 |
| teward | rbasak: that remains the 'dilemma' | 14:15 |
| rbasak | :) | 14:15 |
| teward | because they release **around the same time we do** | 14:15 |
| teward | so unless we get a total release bump exception for LTS to jump from 1.16.x stable to 1.18.x stable post-release (which includes ALL the features)... | 14:16 |
| rbasak | Do they do that deliberately? | 14:16 |
| teward | rbasak: no, it's coincidental that their 'new stable branch' release cycle happens to land on/around our release time | 14:16 |
| teward | been that way since ever | 14:16 |
| teward | rbasak: in other news though, starting in Eoan, we won't have to worry about the 1CPU SystemD PIDFile race conditions | 14:17 |
| teward | you can thank TJ- for that patch when they show up next | 14:17 |
| teward | (i just uploaded that to Eoan) | 14:17 |
| rbasak | Nice. Thanks! | 14:17 |
| lopta | Can Ubuntu Server provide desktops to RDP terminals or would I need X terminals? | 14:51 |
| === yokel_ is now known as yokel | ||
| lordcirth | lopta, you mean clients logging in to an Ubuntu server over RDP, and getting desktops? | 15:21 |
| lopta | lordcirth: Hopefully. :-) | 15:22 |
| lordcirth | lopta, "sudo apt install ubuntu-desktop xrdp; systemctl enable xrdp". Then give it a try. I don't know if you can have multiple users simultaneously, though. | 15:23 |
| lopta | lordcirth: Thanks! I will test that! | 15:24 |
| kinghat | if you have a backup drive, do you keep it powered on all the time or do you power it up when you want to make the backup and then back off? | 16:38 |
| sarnold | teward: let me guess, nginx's plans include releasing their next stable release about two weeks after we release ours? | 16:59 |
| teward | sarnold: as they *typically* do every year | 17:03 |
| teward | or same-week when we're in absolute final freeze | 17:03 |
| lordcirth | kinghat, You should probably unplug it, and preferably store it a distance away | 17:16 |
| kinghat | this is just another option for my 3x1TB setup i have now. figuring out what to do with my extra 1TB drive | 17:17 |
| kinghat | unplugging/off site is not in the cards. something automated and attached to the same puter. | 17:18 |
| ahasenack | rafaeldtinoco: that import commit you got, that is what you have to "split" | 17:48 |
| rafaeldtinoco | yep, i did, missing changelog only | 17:48 |
| rafaeldtinoco | now im doing last commit before --continue | 17:48 |
| ahasenack | k | 17:49 |
| rafaeldtinoco | i saw in git diff changelog is good to go | 17:49 |
| rafaeldtinoco | i thought it would be ugly (Import....) but its not | 17:49 |
| ahasenack | what do you mean? | 17:52 |
| rafaeldtinoco | ahasenack: i thought the changelog would have import patches-unapplied version XXXX | 17:53 |
| rafaeldtinoco | but saw that the changelog was actually good already (for the single commit I had to split) | 17:53 |
| rafaeldtinoco | so I committed changelog as "changelog" and continued the rebase | 17:54 |
| rafaeldtinoco | now im tagging split | 17:54 |
| ahasenack | no, that was just the commit message | 17:54 |
| ahasenack | yep | 17:54 |
| lordcirth | kinghat, you could use systemd automounting to take care of cleaning up / spinning it down after | 17:57 |
| kinghat | well i mean maybe thats not even worth it? which is what i was wondering? if using it to backup a mirror, would it be better to power up/down daily for a backup, if thats my frequency, or to just leave it on and perform a backup daily? | 17:58 |
| lordcirth | kinghat, I don't think it's very important to make sure it spins down. | 17:59 |
| kinghat | for some reason i thought that it might be worse for the drive to power it on/off than to just leave it running. | 17:59 |
| rafaeldtinoco | ahasenack: should I drop all merge-changelogs, update-maintainer commits or just the last one ? (i got 2 from a previous ubuntu merge) | 18:02 |
| rafaeldtinoco | (after the tag split phase) | 18:02 |
| rafaeldtinoco | im doing the "logical" delta iirc | 18:02 |
| ahasenack | rafaeldtinoco: logical must not have changelog/update-metadata commits | 18:06 |
| rafaeldtinoco | cool i dropped it all | 18:06 |
| rafaeldtinoco | it worked :o) | 18:06 |
| ahasenack | the split phase must remain identical to what was there before | 18:06 |
| ahasenack | in terms of git diff old/ubuntu | 18:06 |
| rafaeldtinoco | it does a update-maintainer and reconstruct-changelog at the end | 18:06 |
| ahasenack | merge finish does that, yes | 18:08 |
| rafaeldtinoco | yep, its perfect i suppose | 18:08 |
| rafaeldtinoco | nice, will verify and propose it again | 18:08 |
| rafaeldtinoco | try to build, etc etc | 18:08 |
| rafaeldtinoco | it was good to re-do, now with a split need | 18:08 |
| rafaeldtinoco | i could understand better =) | 18:08 |
| rafaeldtinoco | argh | 18:15 |
| rafaeldtinoco | +Signed-off-by: Rafael David Tinoco <rafaeldtinoco@ubuntu.com> | 18:15 |
| rafaeldtinoco | reconstruct-changelog brought by signed-off | 18:16 |
| rafaeldtinoco | let me rebase this | 18:16 |
| ahasenack | rafaeldtinoco: this is a great command to check merges | 19:07 |
| ahasenack | git range-diff rafaeldtinoco/old/debian..rafaeldtinoco/logical/1%9.11.5.P4+dfsg-4ubuntu2 rafaeldtinoco/new/debian..rafaeldtinoco/eoan-bind9-merge | 19:07 |
| ahasenack | that will show if there have been changes between old delta and new delta | 19:07 |
| rafaeldtinoco | humm | 19:07 |
| rafaeldtinoco | yep, ive used it before, but i have to get used to the tag names and meaning | 19:08 |
| rafaeldtinoco | having "ubuntu" was a wrapper makes git to have some "black holes" in what we're doing, so i have to recap from time to time | 19:08 |
| ahasenack | old/debian..logical is the old delta (logical, no changelog) | 19:09 |
| ahasenack | new/debian..HEAD is what you are proposing on top of the new debian package, aka, the new delta | 19:09 |
| ahasenack | but this one has changelog in the last few commits | 19:09 |
| rafaeldtinoco | yep got it | 19:10 |
| rafaeldtinoco | ahasenack: so it says basically the difference is the metadata itself | 19:11 |
| rafaeldtinoco | merge-changelogs, reconstruct-changelog, update-maintainer | 19:11 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!