| The_Ball | Where can I find git repos for how packages are built? Debian uses salsa.debian.org, is there an equivalent for Ubuntu? | 05:41 |
|---|---|---|
| Skuggen | The_Ball: It's often specified in the package metadata | 05:53 |
| Skuggen | If you run apt-cache showsrc <package>, see if there are "Vcs-" fields | 05:54 |
| The_Ball | Skuggen, ah, thank you very much | 05:55 |
| Skuggen | Many Ubuntu packages are just synced from Debian (or with small patches applied on top) | 05:56 |
| The_Ball | Skuggen, doesn't look like python-twisted has the vcs fields, but I was able to find the source -> git clone https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/twisted | 05:57 |
| The_Ball | The twisted package is lagging a bit from Debian so I have to backport one fix | 05:58 |
| Skuggen | Looks like it's just synced directly from debian. At least on bionic it has a debian version string | 05:58 |
| === kklimonda_ is now known as kklimonda | ||
| === coreycb_ is now known as coreycb | ||
| === rsalveti_ is now known as rsalveti | ||
| === dkessel_ is now known as dkessel | ||
| === fabiomirmar_ is now known as fabiomirmar | ||
| === popey__ is now known as popey | ||
| cjwatson | Yep, it's in sync between Debian unstable and Ubuntu eoan right now | 06:27 |
| LocutusOfBorg | vorlon, xnox I'm syncing mono, the s390x build has been successful! | 08:29 |
| xnox | nice | 08:30 |
| LocutusOfBorg | xnox, to be honest, instead of building with -O0, Debian decided to disable docs generation on s390x with --with-mcs-docs=no | 08:36 |
| * LocutusOfBorg updates bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mono/+bug/1525454 | 08:36 | |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1525454 in mono (Ubuntu) "bootstrapping mono compiler fails at mdoc" [Undecided,Fix released] | 08:36 |
| LocutusOfBorg | bdrung, https://launchpad.net/~videolan/+members#active can you please add me back? | 09:01 |
| teward | tsimonq2: i noticed in the tests that they are using snapped Chromium to power Selenium. I wonder if that's what's broken on their test... | 15:03 |
| Laney | blorp | 15:04 |
| teward | Laney: TL;DR it's broken and it's your fault :p | 15:04 |
| teward | just kidding ;) | 15:04 |
| Laney | I feel like that *should* work | 15:05 |
| Laney | teward: can you file a bug please? | 15:05 |
| teward | Laney: bug on...? | 15:05 |
| Laney | will ask if oSoMoN can take a look | 15:05 |
| Laney | kopano thing | 15:05 |
| teward | ah yes | 15:05 |
| teward | Laney: if you can take a peek at the autopkgtest failures as well and see if I'm right that it's Chromium related | 15:05 |
| teward | and if I can badtest it temporarily | 15:05 |
| teward | or get it badtested* | 15:06 |
| Laney | I would expect that's the relevant change | 15:06 |
| teward | probably. | 15:06 |
| teward | https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-eoan/eoan/amd64/k/kopano-webapp/20190624_082152_0ef6d@/log.gz https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-eoan/eoan/arm64/k/kopano-webapp/20190624_084645_0ef6d@/log.gz | 15:07 |
| teward | https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-eoan/eoan/armhf/k/kopano-webapp/20190624_082623_0ef6d@/log.gz | 15:07 |
| teward | https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-eoan/eoan/i386/k/kopano-webapp/20190624_082523_0ef6d@/log.gz the 4 buildfailures | 15:07 |
| teward | s/buildfailures/test failures/ | 15:07 |
| teward | 3 of them are CHromium crashes | 15:07 |
| teward | 4th said something about snaps not working on the arch | 15:07 |
| teward | Laney: bug against chromium or the kopano-webapp package? | 15:08 |
| Laney | probably chromium for now | 15:08 |
| teward | Laney: i filed an autopkgtest failures bug against kopano-webapp reporting the test failures; if it's indeed a Chromium issue they can still look into it. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kopano-webapp/+bug/1834052 | 15:11 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1834052 in kopano-webapp (Ubuntu) "autopkgtest failures: Chromium-Related" [Undecided,New] | 15:11 |
| Laney | thanks | 15:11 |
| Laney | kenvandine: ^---- is ok to ask Olivier to look at this? | 15:12 |
| teward | Laney: may still ask for it to be badtested if "No Easy Fix" is the problem here. | 15:12 |
| teward | since one of them was some complaint about incompatible architecture or something | 15:12 |
| Laney | yeah maybe, but I feel like we should be able to run snaps there | 15:13 |
| Laney | give us a couple of days | 15:13 |
| teward | Laney: indeed. armhf seems to be the hjeadache: ==> Installing the chromium snap error: system does not fully support snapd: apparmor detected but insufficient permissions to use it | 15:14 |
| teward | but i'm more concerned with the chromium crashes on the other ones | 15:14 |
| teward | i'm also confused WHY the test pulls in Chromium just to test what's in the title of the navbar | 15:14 |
| teward | they could just curl that... | 15:14 |
| teward | (seems like an overly heavy test IMO) | 15:15 |
| Laney | Not sure - I'm just concerned that we don't break Selinium on Chromium | 15:15 |
| teward | ack | 15:15 |
| teward | the only reason I care as of late is because I pushed the distropatch from TJ that fixes NGINX's pidfile race conditions in SystemD | 15:16 |
| teward | which are addressed by changing how NGINX handles pidfiles | 15:16 |
| teward | and it SEEMS to work in production | 15:16 |
| Laney | 🤘 | 15:19 |
| seb128 | cpaelzer, thanks for the lmdb MIR review! | 15:19 |
| cpaelzer | yw seb128 | 15:24 |
| kenvandine | Laney: check with seb128, oSoMoN is on his team now | 15:36 |
| seb128 | Laney, create a card on the trello board please and yes it's fine to ping Olivier about it | 15:37 |
| Laney | ah sry I forgot that | 15:39 |
| Laney | I am making a card, it's a -proposed item after all :> | 15:39 |
| seb128 | thx | 15:40 |
| === dannf is now known as dannf` | ||
| === acheronuk is now known as rikmills | ||
| ginggs | https://ubuntu.com/blog/statement-on-32-bit-i386-packages-for-ubuntu-19-10-and-20-04-lts \o/ | 20:09 |
| ginggs | now that we know i386 will only be running on amd64 hardware, is it possible to raise the baseline to i386+sse2 or so? | 20:10 |
| tsimonq2 | doko, vorlon: ^ | 20:24 |
| mitya57 | xnox: hi, have you seen bug 1832295? | 21:01 |
| ubottu | bug 1832295 in lighttpd (Ubuntu) "lighttpd broken by OpenSSL update" [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1832295 | 21:01 |
| === hays_ is now known as hays | ||
| xnox | mitya57: thanks! | 23:13 |
| vorlon | ginggs, tsimonq2, doko: making a change to raise the baseline for i386 introduces the possibility of build regressions; I think we should certainly consider i386 to be in maintenance mode | 23:51 |
| sarnold | is it worth selecting which packages we will build i386? or which packages we will not? (I'm thinking specifically of The Big Browsers and LO.. ceph?) | 23:53 |
| vorlon | sarnold: https://blog.ubuntu.com/2019/06/24/statement-on-32-bit-i386-packages-for-ubuntu-19-10-and-20-04-lts explicitly says we will select, with community input | 23:56 |
| sarnold | vorlon: yay, thanks | 23:58 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!