[07:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: erlang-p1-tls (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.0.23-2 => 1.0.23-2ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)
[08:57] <acheronuk> seb128 Laney: filled out lmdb MIR bug as best I could based on previous examples. no doubt it needs some adjustment, but hopefully that is an ok starting point
[08:58] <rbasak> wxl: the relevant policy documentation for that is https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#New_upstream_microreleases
[08:58] <Laney> acheronuk: thx, link?
[08:58] <Laney> I think I subscribed the team last week
[08:58] <rbasak> wxl: the changes will need to be reviewed, so I suggest a tracking bug for the microrelease and a breakdown of the changes included if you want to do that
[08:58] <acheronuk> Laney: LP: #1833745
[08:58] <rbasak> wxl: together with documentation of how those policy criteria are met
[08:58] <seb128> acheronuk, the MIR looks good to me , thx!
[08:59] <seb128> well I mean the description, I'm not a MIR reviewer/didn't look at the package :)
[08:59] <seb128> you can add in the description that desktop-packages is subscribed
[08:59] <acheronuk> I understood :)
[09:03] <acheronuk> seb128: I see desktop-packages under the 'may be notified'. is that good enough for this?
[09:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/main) [4.18.0-1022.22] (kernel)
[09:06] <seb128> acheronuk, yes, the team is subscribed which is what the MIR process ask for, that's just how launchpad shows subscriptions
[09:07] <acheronuk> updated then
[09:10] <seb128> thx
[09:21] <doko> apw: please could you check that kernels built with the new hardening flags build and run in eoan? no rush
[09:21] <apw> doko, fun, thanks for the heads up
[10:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted erlang-p1-tls [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1.0.23-2ubuntu0.1]
[10:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [4.18.0-1022.22]
[10:17] <jamespage> morning - please can the ceph 13.2.6 uploads in the unapproved queues for cosmic and disco be rejected
[10:17] <jamespage> the patch picked for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1833079 is foobar
[10:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.4.0-153.180] (core, kernel)
[10:52]  * apw looks a queuebot ... hello ?
[10:52]  * apw notes he accepted that linux-signed binary New about 2m after it appeared; and yet ... queuebot has not noticed
[10:53] <apw> oh she is gone
[10:54] <apw> stgraber, is queuebot still in your balywick ?
[10:56] <jamespage> thanks vorlon
[12:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apparmor [source] (disco-proposed) [2.13.2-9ubuntu6.1]
[12:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-edge [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-19.20~18.04.1] (kernel)
[12:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.18.0-24.25~18.04.1] (kernel)
[12:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-19.20] (core, kernel)
[12:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-edge [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-19.20~18.04.1] (kernel)
[12:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.18.0-24.25~18.04.1] (kernel)
[12:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/main) [4.18.0-24.25] (core, kernel)
[12:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-19.20] (core, kernel)
[12:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed/main) [4.18.0-24.25] (core, kernel)
[12:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-edge [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-19.20~18.04.1]
[12:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.18.0-24.25~18.04.1]
[12:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [4.18.0-24.25]
[12:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-19.20]
[12:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-edge [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-19.20~18.04.1]
[12:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed) [4.18.0-24.25]
[12:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [4.18.0-24.25~18.04.1]
[12:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-19.20]
[13:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (disco-proposed) [1:19.04.16.6]
[13:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1:18.10.11.9]
[13:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:18.04.34]
[14:02] <sil2100> ddstreet: ^ I rejected the bionic upload due to unrelated noise in the upload, can you re-upload it without those unneeded changes?
[14:03] <ddstreet> sil2100 that noise is intentional, see comment from bdmurray re: running pre-build.sh in #ubuntu-devel
[14:03] <sil2100> ddstreet: I know that seems to happen from time to time for u-r-u, mostly because it has some symlinks to the host directories?
[14:05] <ddstreet> sil2100 well i thought my chat with him was in u-devel, having trouble finding it in scrollback now
[14:06] <sil2100> ddstreet: if Brian is fine with it then I'm fine with that as well then
[14:06] <sil2100> Maybe it was -release?
[14:06] <ddstreet> yep just found it, was last week wed in this channel
[14:06] <ddstreet> june 19
[14:07] <sil2100> ddstreet: ah, see it, but yeah, basically the mirrors.cfg and DistUpgradeVersion.py pieces are good, but there's also some other changes for just the bionic upload
[14:08] <ddstreet> oh?  ok lemme check that, sorry
[14:08] <sil2100> ddstreet: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/429506242/ubuntu-release-upgrader_1%3A18.04.33_1%3A18.04.34.diff.gz <- nothing serious (as mentioned in my rejection message), but still, a test sources.list got removed and a variable name changed
[14:08] <ddstreet> sil2100 ah, apt_btrfs_snapshot.py
[14:08] <ddstreet> that gets pulled in from the running system
[14:08] <sil2100> Yeah
[14:09] <ddstreet> that's also part of pre-build.sh:
[14:09] <ddstreet> echo "copying apt_btrfs_snapshot.py for the upgrader tarball"
[14:09] <ddstreet> cp /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/apt_btrfs_snapshot.py DistUpgrade
[14:09] <sil2100> I mean, the variable name change is a no-op, but I don't know if that sources.list wasn't used somewhere in the testing?
[14:10] <sil2100> Since tests/data-sources-list-test/sources.list got dropped
[14:10] <sil2100> bdmurray: ^
[14:10] <ddstreet> that happened during pre-build.sh as well
[14:10] <sil2100> bdmurray: do you remember if that file is used anywhere during testing?
[14:13] <ddstreet> i looked at later releases, it's removed from those already in his last update apr 2019
[14:14] <bdmurray> sil2100: iirc sources.list is copied to for every test so yes its used but it gets overwritten all the time
[14:14] <ddstreet> last commit of that file in b-e: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/pHnSjqsxZN/
[14:15] <ddstreet> it's gone in all except b
[14:16] <bdmurray> Right, I seem to recall make sure the cleanup of the tests worked so sources.list wasn't left over
[14:24] <ddstreet> yep, i confirmed the step in pre-build.sh that runs 'xvfb-run nosetests3' removes the sources.list file
[14:32] <teward> can someone provide a second set of eyes on some autopkgtest failures please?  I'm pretty certain the test is bad because of a Selenium / Chromium snap issue, and therefore the test is bad, but I want a second opinion...
[14:32] <sil2100> ddstreet, bdmurray: ok then, let me accept it out of Rejected then
[14:32] <sil2100> Thanks
[14:33] <teward> kopano-webapp/3.5.6+dfsg1-1 failures on amd64, arm64, armhf, and i386.  I think those tests need to be marked as 'bad tests' if possible, 'cause a dependency inside there is either not compatible with the arch or just outright crashing...
[14:35] <teward> (it's blocking nginx in proposed, currently, but from what I can tell on the logs it's literally a Chromium crashing problem.
[14:35] <teward> and since it's snapped Chromium...)
[15:00] <Laney> what's changed to make tzdata not be installed in my eoan schroot?
[15:01] <Laney> I guess mozjs60 not {Build-,}Depending on it is technically a bug even in Debian (Priority: required), but ...
[15:04] <cjwatson> I made livecd-rootfs install it in the buildd subproject again recently ...
[15:05] <cjwatson> dunno if you're using that though
[15:05] <teward> Laney: you could always amend your sbuild envs by adding it to the pristines manually
[15:06] <Laney> I probably used mk-sbuild to build it
[15:24] <stgraber> apw: yep
[15:30] <apw> stgraber, she was on holiday for a bit
[16:07] <teward> release team: can someone either failure-ignore or badtest the kopano-webapp test for armhf?  Since Chromium has moved to snaps, armhf is saying the system can't run snaps there.  Or at least, not the Chromium snap.  The remaining autopkgtest failures for kopano-webapp seem Chromium related, and Laney's looking at that since it's now been snapped.
[16:07] <teward> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kopano-webapp/+bug/1834052 is a bug about the autopkgtest failures, and is related.
[16:08] <teward> armhf returns: error: system does not fully support snapd: apparmor detected but insufficient permissions to use it
[16:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntustudio-menu-add [source] (eoan-proposed) [0.1]
[16:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntustudio-menu-add [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.1] (no packageset)
[16:44] <Eickmeyer> sil2100: Thanks!
[17:09] <wxl> rbasak: does that hold true because we consider debian an upstream? the ultimate source did not do a microrelease.
[17:15] <rbasak> wxl: no point going into semantics. The effect of what you're requesting is the same as an upstream microrelease, and so that policy section applies, IMHO.
[17:15] <wxl> rbasak: well, devil's in the details. just being sure. works for me.
[17:15] <rbasak> wxl: you have a few choices here.
[17:16] <rbasak> wxl: you can cherry-pick a minimal fix which is the default SRU position.
[17:16] <rbasak> wxl: or, if you want, you can "cherry-pick" all the changes, with regular SRU paperwork for each change, as long as each individually qualifies for SRU.
[17:17] <rbasak> wxl: alternatively, the SRU microrelease policy allows the concession, under the documented terms, in a common case where that is onerous.
[17:18] <wxl> rbasak: i think this suggestion that has been made to me was for the purposes of convenience, but i think ultimately it would be better if i just go default. thanks for the advice.
[17:18] <rbasak> You're welcome. I hope that made it clear, and it sounds reasonable?
[17:19] <wxl> absolutely!
[17:19] <wxl> thanks a lot :)
[17:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntustudio-menu-add [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [0.1]
[17:51] <acheronuk> vorlon: thanks for qtbase/pinentry hint :)
[18:56] <vorlon> rikmills: n/p
[19:01] <teward> thanks to sil and the rest of the AAs for accepting ubuntustudio-menu-add - pretty sure that Eickmeyer is very happy about that :)
[19:22] <Eickmeyer> teward: Not so much me, but OvenWerks. Also gives me another package under my belt. :)
[19:24] <teward> :P
[21:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-firmware (disco-proposed/main) [1.178.1 => 1.178.2] (core, kernel)
[21:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-firmware (cosmic-proposed/main) [1.175.5 => 1.175.6] (core, kernel)
[21:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-firmware (bionic-proposed/main) [1.173.7 => 1.173.8] (core, kernel)
[22:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[22:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/main) [4.18.0-25.26] (core, kernel)
[22:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[22:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-54.58] (core, kernel)
[22:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [arm64] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-20.21] (core, kernel)
[22:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed/main) [4.18.0-25.26] (core, kernel)
[22:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-54.58] (core, kernel)
[22:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-20.21]
[22:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-20.21]
[22:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [arm64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-20.21]
[22:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [4.18.0-25.26]
[22:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed) [4.18.0-25.26]
[22:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-54.58]
[22:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-54.58]
[22:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1036.38] (kernel)
[22:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gke-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1036.38] (no packageset)
[22:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1017.19] (kernel)
[23:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1036.38]
[23:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1017.19]
[23:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gke-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1036.38]
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lighttpd (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.4.45-1ubuntu3 => 1.4.45-1ubuntu3.18.10] (no packageset)