/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2019/06/25/#ubuntu-devel.txt

tsimonq2vorlon: ack, thanks.00:32
mitya57xnox: thanks to you :)06:49
LocutusOfBorgxnox, boxbackup merge/sync please? there is an openssl 1.1 build fix10:20
LocutusOfBorgalso xonsh might be syncable now...10:20
LocutusOfBorgalso meson and something more...10:22
xnoxLocutusOfBorg:  can try these.10:32
=== TJ_Remix is now known as TJ-
LocutusOfBorgta11:00
xnoxLocutusOfBorg:  i beleive meson will require a merge, but can try doing force sync to see if it got better or not11:04
=== Wryhder is now known as Lucas_Gray
LocutusOfBorgxnox, yes that was my intention, prepare a merge and upload or not based on autopkgtests11:12
odcthe launchpad.net certificate has expired :(12:06
odcor is it just me?12:06
LocutusOfBorgSeptember 15, 201912:06
LocutusOfBorgI would say just you12:07
rikmillsbugs.launchpad.net has expired12:07
LocutusOfBorgthat one is expired, indeed12:07
odcyes, it only happens on bugs.lp.net12:07
odcthought it was the same12:07
rikmillsjust been flagged to #canonical-sysadmin channel12:07
LocutusOfBorgnotAfter=Jun 25 12:00:00 2019 GMT12:08
=== ricab is now known as ricab|lunch
LocutusOfBorgx12:36
LocutusOfBorgsahid, hello, I fixed your python-ddt upload, otherwise cinder was not building at all12:37
LocutusOfBorgplease be careful about your upstream tarballs next time :)12:37
LocutusOfBorgand sync from Debian if possible12:37
LocutusOfBorgmismatching tarballs are PITA to have12:37
LocutusOfBorgxnox, looks lie boxbackup needs help...12:38
sahidLocutusOfBorg: yes true i was actually working on it, how did you fixed it?12:59
sahidI can't see your change in ubuntu-server-dev12:59
sahidthe problem is that debian.net does not provide doc with the tarball12:59
sahidand jamespage just proposed to me to use the one from debian experimental13:00
jamespagesahid, LocutusOfBorg: pkg-openstack in debian generally snapshot from git, so they don't use a sdist generated tarball13:03
jamespagehence why the version in experimental has the docs subfolder.13:04
LocutusOfBorgsahid, that one, syncing from experimental did the trick13:09
LocutusOfBorgI don't honestly care about how debian generated it :) it works13:10
LocutusOfBorgmaybe bugging upstream about fixing their tarball is worth doing13:10
sahidLocutusOfBorg: in all cases thanks for your help on it :)13:24
=== ricab|lunch is now known as ricab
jamespageLocutusOfBorg: yup - that was the next step (patch upstream to include docs folder in release sdist)13:38
jamespageok so now for a broader eoan question - I know python2.7 is going to universe this cycle; do we have an objective to remove all of the python-* packages in archive?13:40
jamespagedebian experimental seems to contain alot of pre-work towards that goal13:41
jamespageLocutusOfBorg: python-ddt being a case in point - the reverse-depends list of binary:python-ddt is quite long13:41
jamespagewhich is why we had not synced (yet)13:44
LocutusOfBorgjamespage, uploading a broken 1.2.1-0ubuntu1 makes no difference wrt syncing 1.2.1-1 from experimental... does it?14:34
EickmeyerWorking on some packaging and I'm having trouble getting some lintian-overrides to take. Any idea what I'm doing wrong? https://code.launchpad.net/~eeickmeyer/+git/raysession (I'm still learning)14:51
vorlonEickmeyer: I see you've created debian/source/lintian-overrides.  I don't recall if this is a supported path (the path I'm used to is debian/source.lintian-overrides; debian/source/lintian-overrides may be supported nowadays but it looks jarring to me to include this in debian/source which is otherwise instructions to dpkg-source).  But the real problem is that the overrides you're declaring there14:55
vorlonare overrides for binary packages, not for the source14:55
vorlonEickmeyer: you need a debian/$binary_package.lintian-overrides for the binary-level overrides14:55
Eickmeyervorlon: Thanks, I'll give that a shot.14:56
cjwatsonvorlon: It's the path that Lintian prefers and documents nowadays14:57
cjwatsonThere's a pedantic-severity tag for using debian/source.lintian-overrides14:58
cjwatson(Not disagreeing with you about debian/$binary_package.lintian-overrides)14:58
Eickmeyercjwatson, vorlon: Yeah, that's what I read in the documentation.14:59
vorloncjwatson: :)15:03
tsimonq2@pilot in15:32
=== udevbot changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Open | 19.04 Released! | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Trusty-Disco | If you can't send messages here, authenticate to NickServ first | Patch Pilots: tsimonq2
tsimonq2https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2019-June/040751.html15:33
tsimonq2Wimpress, popey: Would someone with more experience with snaps than I be able to confirm that this bugfix works? bug 180248315:37
ubottubug 1802483 in libnotify (Ubuntu) "Notifications emitted by a snap with local files or desktop files use wrong namespace" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/180248315:37
tsimonq2It's been in the sponsorship queue for a while.15:37
LaneyThat fix needs properly reviewing15:41
tsimonq2Laney: I agree.15:42
tsimonq2Bug 1770093 needs review from someone who works with Pi stuff more than I do; I have a Pi 3 and I'll circle back once I can get an SD card for it later this week, if needed.15:43
ubottubug 1770093 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Ubiquity crashes with mount points that are FAT16/32" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/177009315:43
tsimonq2sil2100: Poke on reviewing bug 1814118 when you get the chance.15:45
ubottubug 1814118 in rpi.gpio (Ubuntu Cosmic) "Make RPi.GPIO work on arm64" [Low,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/181411815:45
tsimonq2bluesabre: I'm looking at bug 1822380 and I wanted to get your feedback as to what's left here. I don't see any other debdiff specifically that needs sponsoring, so I'll unsubscribe sponsors, but it does seem there's a GTK bug here.15:48
ubottubug 1822380 in gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu) "Thunar right-click menu not expanded" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/182238015:48
tsimonq2Hmm, it looks like the upstream GTK issue isn't getting much traction. https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/issues/184315:50
tsimonq2I'm willing to bet a Git bisect will reveal the issue. I'll circle back later this week when I look at Pi stuff.15:50
tsimonq2Well, I do see a random patch from an obscure forum post. What could go wrong? :P15:52
tsimonq2jamespage: Would you (or someone else with knowledge of the swift package) be able to take a look at bug 1827340? It's been in the sponsorship queue for a bit.16:10
ubottubug 1827340 in swift (Ubuntu) "swift-container package is missing Upstart and System V files for the container-sharder service" [Low,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/182734016:10
tsimonq2juliank: Debian bug 927876 's Ubuntu counterpart, bug 1766068, has been in the sponsorship queue for a bit. Would you be able to review the patch when you can?16:18
ubottuDebian bug 927876 in command-not-found "zsh: Does not print 'command not found' message if handler does not match" [Important,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/92787616:18
ubottubug 1766068 in command-not-found (Ubuntu) "Using Zsh, it doesn't show an error message when command not found" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/176606816:18
tsimonq2cyphermox: Did you plan on driving the SRU for bug 1828948 as well?16:22
ubottubug 1828948 in dkms (Ubuntu Bionic) "OBSOLETE_BY in DKMS.CONF not work" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/182894816:22
cyphermoxtsimonq2: yes16:31
tsimonq2cyphermox: Sounds good, thanks.16:32
Eickmeyervorlon: RE: lintian-overrides, that did not work. lintian is still throwing invalid errors on the binary.16:34
vorlonEickmeyer: I don't believe ' binary' is part of the expected content of the override16:35
vorloni.e. it should be $bin_pkg_name: $lintian_tag_name $other_info16:35
Eickmeyervorlon: Thanks for the hint, will make the change.16:36
Eickmeyervorlon: That didn't work. Does it need "#/usr/bin/python3" appended?16:46
Eickmeyerrather, #!/usr/bin/python316:50
tsimonq2@pilot out16:51
=== udevbot changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Open | 19.04 Released! | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Trusty-Disco | If you can't send messages here, authenticate to NickServ first | Patch Pilots:
tsimonq2https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2019-June/040752.html16:52
Eickmeyertsimonq2: I (very quickly) provided the links you requested.16:56
=== laptop26 is now known as laptop2
tsimonq2Eickmeyer: Thanks.17:44
Eickmeyervorlon: Answered my own question. It needed the #! line too. Thanks!17:46
sarnoldis that the lintian thing?17:50
Eickmeyersarnold: Yep. You can look for yourself at what it needed.17:50
EickmeyerIf you want...17:50
sarnoldwoot17:50
Eickmeyer\o/17:51
bdmurrayahasenack: We, the foundations team, would close bug 1810780 but it is assigned to you. Are you still planning on doing any work there?18:41
ubottubug 1810780 in lftp (Ubuntu) "FTBFS: missing zlib1g-dev" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/181078018:41
ahasenackoh, ow18:41
ahasenacklet me check18:41
ahasenackbdmurray: it can be closed. My mp was rejected because debian fixed in while it was in review, so no changes needed.18:42
ahasenackbdmurray: is cosmic still affected, though?18:42
ahasenackmy mp was for disco18:43
bdmurrayahasenack: It could be but end of life for cosmic is near18:43
ahasenackI see. Well, I'm not working on that, and if this package needs an sru for another reason, the ftbfs fix is simple enough18:44
ahasenackI think this is fix released for disco, and a cosmic task may or may not be added18:44
ahasenackadjusted18:46
julianktsimonq2: Sure, but note that Ubuntu is upstream, Debian is downstream19:31
juliankDebian tracks the latest LTS version of c-n-f, and software-properties19:31
juliankI'll be tracking stuff more aggressively post buster I think, as this improves quality for everyone19:32
=== dannf` is now known as dannf
bdmurrayahasenack: Thanks!20:10

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!