| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1049.54] (kernel) | 07:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1049.54] | 07:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceph (disco-proposed/main) [13.2.4+dfsg1-0ubuntu2 => 13.2.6-0ubuntu0.19.04.1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 09:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceph (cosmic-proposed/main) [13.2.4+dfsg1-0ubuntu0.18.10.1 => 13.2.6-0ubuntu0.18.10.1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 09:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron-fwaas (cosmic-proposed/main) [1:13.0.1-0ubuntu1 => 1:13.0.1-0ubuntu1.1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 09:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron-fwaas (disco-proposed/main) [1:14.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 1:14.0.0-0ubuntu1.1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 09:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lighttpd (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.4.45-1ubuntu3 => 1.4.45-1ubuntu3.18.04] (no packageset) (sync) | 10:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (bionic-proposed/main) [237-3ubuntu10.23 => 237-3ubuntu10.24] (core) | 10:15 | |
| rbasak | bdmurray, RAOF: ^ I'm just looking at lighttpd, as it's regression-update (complete HTTPS breakage with new OpenSSL AIUI) | 10:16 |
|---|---|---|
| rbalint | RAOF, bdmurray: please accept the systemd to bionic in your sru cycles, the fix was already in -proposed once, it just got overwritten by an other upload | 10:20 |
| rbalint | rbasak, if you feel like looking at systemd, too, that would be appreciated :-) | 10:21 |
| rbalint | (i'm preparing the xenial fix, too) | 10:21 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lighttpd [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.4.45-1ubuntu3.18.04] | 10:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lighttpd [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1.4.45-1ubuntu3.18.10] | 10:23 | |
| rbasak | rbalint: this one isn't regression-update I don't think? | 10:24 |
| rbasak | I really need to get back to what I was doing ;-/ | 10:25 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qtbase-opensource-src (disco-proposed/universe) [5.12.2+dfsg-4ubuntu1 => 5.12.2+dfsg-4ubuntu1.1] (kubuntu, qt5) | 10:30 | |
| rbalint | rbasak, np, i thought you are just having some sru fun :-) | 10:32 |
| === TJ_Remix is now known as TJ- | ||
| xnox | rbasak: bdmurray: well "not complete" just tlsv1.3 connections =) | 10:43 |
| xnox | rbasak: and thanks | 10:43 |
| rbasak | xnox: all current browsers though, presumably? | 10:45 |
| xnox | rbasak: aha | 10:45 |
| rbasak | xnox: thank you for the prompt fix :) | 10:45 |
| rbasak | xnox: does this one need a skipping of the ageing period too? | 10:46 |
| xnox | rbasak: let me verify it first out of the archive. | 10:46 |
| xnox | rbasak: and yeah, i think so. | 10:46 |
| rbasak | OK | 10:46 |
| rbasak | Maybe bdmurray could provide a third review/opinion on that when he gets in | 10:46 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: friendly-recovery (disco-proposed/main) [0.2.39 => 0.2.39ubuntu0.19.04.1] (core) | 13:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: friendly-recovery (xenial-proposed/main) [0.2.31ubuntu2 => 0.2.31ubuntu2.1] (core) | 13:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: friendly-recovery (bionic-proposed/main) [0.2.38ubuntu1 => 0.2.38ubuntu1.1] (core) | 13:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: friendly-recovery (cosmic-proposed/main) [0.2.39 => 0.2.39ubuntu0.18.10.1] (core) | 13:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/main) [4.18.0-1023.24] (kernel) | 14:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-54.58~16.04.1] (kernel) | 14:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-54.58~16.04.1] (kernel) | 14:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [4.18.0-1023.24] | 14:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-54.58~16.04.1] | 14:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-54.58~16.04.1] | 14:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1010.10] (core, kernel) | 14:56 | |
| ddstreet | rbalint i noticed your patch for lp #1771858, i wonder if i should just add that and re-upload, since my systemd in xenial-unapproved has been there almost a month | 15:05 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1771858 in snapd (Ubuntu) "/snap/bin not in default PATH for units, snapd should ship system-environment-generators to inject /snap/bin into $PATH" [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1771858 | 15:05 |
| rbalint | ddstreet, i'm waiting for review from xnox, but i'd be ok with that | 15:17 |
| rbalint | ddstreet, why is is sitting there for so long? | 15:17 |
| ddstreet | rbalint i have no idea why it's been in unapproved queue for a month | 15:17 |
| rbalint | ddstreet, i also checked the packaging repo, but found no pending new commit for upload | 15:17 |
| rbalint | ddstreet, well i poke sru vanguards every day when i have something in :-) | 15:18 |
| ddstreet | yeah...i have been discouraged from doing that for my stuff | 15:19 |
| ddstreet | so... | 15:19 |
| ddstreet | it waits for a month :) | 15:19 |
| rbalint | ddstreet, also could you please use the packaging repo, too, and file mps? | 15:24 |
| ddstreet | rbalint my problem is it's not based on git ubuntu | 15:24 |
| ddstreet | so it's a real pain to use | 15:24 |
| ddstreet | and what's file mps? | 15:25 |
| rbalint | ddstreet, file merge proposals | 15:25 |
| ddstreet | ah mp the 'file' part confused me | 15:25 |
| rbalint | ddstreet, 'git ubuntu' does not support multiple commits between package updates, thus is is only good for importing archive state then preparing uploads in one shot | 15:26 |
| rbalint | ddstreet, not for preparing uploads together | 15:27 |
| ddstreet | well that's not really true, you can stage as many separate commits on top of the git-ubuntu repo as you like | 15:27 |
| ddstreet | then just rebase after it's released | 15:27 |
| ddstreet | that's what i do | 15:27 |
| rbalint | ddstreet, i use it as a reference, but prepare uploads on top of the packaging repo | 15:27 |
| rbalint | ddstreet, how do you review and merge them to the team repo? | 15:28 |
| ddstreet | you mean the ubuntu-core-dev repo? i don't, that has to be merged from the released package | 15:28 |
| ddstreet | i asked xnox about the u-c-d systemd repo and he suggested i just ignore it | 15:29 |
| ddstreet | so i do | 15:29 |
| rbalint | well, that's an interesting position | 15:29 |
| vorlon | rbalint: last I checked, said repo is also currently out of date for eoan | 15:30 |
| rbalint | xnox, if you want people to ignore the packaging repo whey do you list it in debian/control? | 15:30 |
| vorlon | which annoyed me | 15:30 |
| ddstreet | i'm not sure that having both the git-ubuntu repo, and a separate special repo with different history, is a good thing | 15:30 |
| rbalint | vorlon, because people just upload | 15:30 |
| vorlon | rbalint: when I looked, the people was xnox | 15:31 |
| rbalint | vorlon, he may have had unpushed changes | 15:31 |
| vorlon | rbalint: yes, e.g. the entire ubuntu-eoan branch which does not exist in the repo | 15:31 |
| vorlon | :) | 15:31 |
| marcustomlinson | vorlon: remember that libreoffice bionic sru you pushed back because of an incorrect -v option? Could you approve it now/soon? Pretty pleeeease :) | 15:32 |
| vorlon | marcustomlinson: I do remember it but don't remember what release it was in | 15:33 |
| vorlon | bionic? | 15:33 |
| marcustomlinson | yeah | 15:33 |
| rbalint | vorlon, i see eoan in the repo https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+git/systemd/+ref/ubuntu-eoan | 15:33 |
| vorlon | 3 weeks have passed since? sorry about that | 15:33 |
| marcustomlinson | vorlon: I don't like being a nag :P | 15:34 |
| vorlon | marcustomlinson: I had meant to do it soon after, but hit EOD before getting to it | 15:34 |
| vorlon | rbalint: hmm something's very strange here then, I don't see it with a git remote update | 15:35 |
| rbalint | vorlon, 'git fetch --all' ? | 15:35 |
| vorlon | rbalint: oh, that's not the remote I'm using, hmm, did this change? | 15:36 |
| rbalint | vorlon, if you disclose your current remote i can tell :-) | 15:36 |
| vorlon | rbalint: my previous remote was git+ssh://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/+git/systemd | 15:37 |
| rbalint | vorlon, it seems it moved but you can find the current in Vcs-Git | 15:40 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:6.0.7-0ubuntu0.18.04.7] | 15:40 | |
| vorlon | rbalint: yeah, confirmed | 15:41 |
| rbalint | vorlon, lp terribly overcomplicated git repository naming and that does not help | 15:41 |
| vorlon | rbalint: the uris were so similar my eyes skipped over when reading | 15:41 |
| rbalint | vorlon, in the sru process imo it would be beneficial to check if the changes in unapproved are present in the packaging repository if there is any repo | 15:45 |
| rbalint | ddstreet, xnox ack-ed my xenial change out of band, feel free to include it in your upload | 15:47 |
| vorlon | rbalint: I'm not signing up to implement this, or to require additional round trips through the queue in the event that Vcs-* in an SRU contains stale data (and even in this example, systemd gets it wrong because the Vcs-Git doesn't say which is the correct branch). But anybody could run their own checker against the SRU queue and yell at uploaders :) | 15:47 |
| rbalint | vorlon, Vcs-Git: https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu/+source/systemd -b ubuntu-bionic | 15:50 |
| vorlon | like so, yes | 15:50 |
| vorlon | is currently wrong in eoan | 15:50 |
| rbalint | vorlon, if there is no interest in making having the commits in the repo there is no point in having repos | 15:51 |
| rbalint | vorlon, because every core dev can happily ignore it | 15:51 |
| vorlon | rbalint: I am interested, but reject the idea that SRU team be responsible for enforcing this | 15:55 |
| vorlon | because compliance today is so terrible, including on devel series, and with my SRU team hat on I don't agree to accept the additional workload | 15:56 |
| rbalint | vorlon, should not they vote or something? | 15:56 |
| vorlon | I'm happy to put it on the SRU team agenda | 15:56 |
| vorlon | (done, on agenda for next meeting) | 15:57 |
| tsimonq2 | Well, this could be solved once git-ubuntu has imported all of the repositories and the workflow is moving along with that. pull-lp-source could then yell about that. However, that day is not today. | 15:58 |
| vorlon | rbalint: next meeting is in 3 weeks, so feel free to not block on SRU team doing this work ;) | 15:58 |
| rbalint | tsimonq2, it could be solved without git-ubuntu importing anything | 16:00 |
| tsimonq2 | rbalint: Are you proposing a solution that does not require as much manual work as previously implied? :) | 16:01 |
| rbalint | tsimonq2, Debian has an implementation that works ok https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/vcswatch?package=wireshark | 16:03 |
| rbalint | tsimonq2, i'm not proposing inventing anything | 16:03 |
| tsimonq2 | rbalint: Ahh. | 16:03 |
| rbasak | rbalint: what I'd like, in the long term, is to add checks for this kind of thing to "git ubuntu lint", and have a bot run that on MPs. Then it'd be minimal effort on both contributors and reviewers. I don't think it's worth imposing further checks now, until something like that is ready. | 16:04 |
| rbalint | rbasak, having a bot linting .changes in the quenue seem to be a better direction | 16:05 |
| rbasak | rbalint: example: submit an MP against the systemd git-ubuntu branches, and a bot will relay the lint warning that Vcs-Git appears to be valid, but the MP isn't against that branch. | 16:05 |
| marcustomlinson | vorlon: just checking you're aware of a libreoffice-l10n package in the queue too? | 16:06 |
| vorlon | marcustomlinson: I thought I had already accepted the -l10n one last time around | 16:06 |
| rbalint | rbasak, this is not the problem | 16:06 |
| vorlon | marcustomlinson: ok reviewing that also, thanks for pointing it out | 16:06 |
| marcustomlinson | that was the problematic one | 16:06 |
| rbalint | rbasak, also mps across not official packaging repos is fine | 16:07 |
| bdmurray | xnox: Were you looking for a "speedy delivery" of lighttpd to -updates? | 16:07 |
| rbasak | bdmurray: I believe he did, yes, based on earlier conversation here | 16:07 |
| rbasak | 11:46 <xnox> rbasak: and yeah, i think so. | 16:07 |
| rbasak | In response to | 16:07 |
| rbasak | 11:46 <rbasak> xnox: does this one need a skipping of the ageing period too? | 16:07 |
| rbalint | rbasak, if there is an mp against the wrong branch it is usually pretty easy to spot | 16:07 |
| rbalint | rbasak, since the diff is very different | 16:08 |
| rbasak | rbalint: by "wrong branch" I meant "against git-ubuntu pkg/ubuntu/<foo>-devel" instead of "~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu/+source/systemd ubuntu-bionic" | 16:08 |
| rbasak | That's a case where the diff would be identical. | 16:08 |
| xnox | bdmurray: yes can publish lighttpd. i prepared & verfied the sru; rbasak did the code review. i think we should publish the sru, last time i looked there was adt regressions (i retried them) and so far there were no comments from not-me that the update works. | 16:15 |
| xnox | bdmurray: well, it's green in bionic now, still one regression in cosmic | 16:16 |
| rbasak | Perhaps we could wait for one person affected to confirm that the fix works? | 16:17 |
| bdmurray | xnox, rbasak: the "codepath appears to still be the same-ish" didn't fill me with confidence. You two think its good? | 16:17 |
| rbasak | bdmurray: the patch looked sane to me, but I didn't code-review in further detail than just examining the diff. | 16:17 |
| rbasak | I didn't examine to consider edge cases, for example. | 16:18 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice-l10n [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:6.0.7-0ubuntu0.18.04.7] | 16:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-1010.10] | 16:18 | |
| bdmurray | I'll plan on releasing it later during the day to give some time for more feedback. | 16:22 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: golang-google-grpc (disco-proposed/universe) [1.6.0-3ubuntu0.19.04.1 => 1.6.0-3ubuntu0.19.04.2] (ubuntu-mate) | 16:31 | |
| tsimonq2 | sil2100: ^ you were working on this at one point, sponsored. | 16:34 |
| xnox | bdmurray: green in both bionic and cosmic | 16:38 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kylin-nm (disco-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-1 => 1.0.0-1ubuntu0.1] (ubuntukylin) | 16:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rpi.gpio (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.6.3-1ubuntu4 => 0.6.5-1ubuntu0.18.04.1] (no packageset) | 17:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.4.0-154.181] (core, kernel) | 17:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: 73 entries have been added or removed | 18:15 | |
| bdmurray | The release upload queues have a lot of pending diffs, is there something going on with Launchpad? | 18:25 |
| === dannf` is now known as dannf | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-154.181] | 20:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-settings-daemon (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.1-0ubuntu1.2 => 3.28.1-0ubuntu1.3] (ubuntu-desktop) | 20:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (xenial-proposed/main) [2.408.49 => 2.408.50] (desktop-core) | 20:59 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.18.0-1023.24~18.04.1] (kernel) | 21:00 | |
| cjwatson | bdmurray: the diff queue got stuck on Friday; we unstuck it this morning but it has a huge backlog as a result, which it is continuing to work through | 21:01 |
| bdmurray | cjwatson: got it, thanks! | 21:02 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.18.0-1023.24~18.04.1] | 21:02 | |
| cjwatson | I'm afraid I can't easily tell exactly how long the backlog is (need better metrics there), only that it's successfully processing jobs at the moment | 21:02 |
| * rbasak plugs "git ubuntu queue sync", which for packages in main, allows for "git log -p -1" for a queue diff :) | 21:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/main) [4.18.0-1015.16] (kernel) | 21:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [4.18.0-1015.16] | 21:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1036.38~16.04.1] (kernel) | 21:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1017.19~16.04.2] (kernel) | 21:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.408.50] | 21:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1036.38~16.04.1] | 21:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1017.19~16.04.2] | 21:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-settings-daemon [source] (disco-proposed) [3.32.1-0ubuntu1] | 22:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1010.10] (core, kernel) | 22:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-1010.10] | 22:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (cosmic-proposed) [2:13.0.3-0ubuntu2] | 23:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (bionic-proposed) [237-3ubuntu10.24] | 23:48 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!