-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware [source] (disco-proposed) [1.178.2] | 05:22 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1.175.6] | 05:26 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.173.8] | 05:28 | |
rbalint | rbasak could you please release cosmic's initramfs-tools today? there is a new one in unapproved and i'd also like to piggyback on it with LP: #1814355 | 08:38 |
---|---|---|
ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1814355 in snapd (Ubuntu) "snapd remove /usr/local/bin from the PATH for all systemd unit (bionic SRU regression)" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1814355 | 08:38 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: initramfs-tools (cosmic-proposed/main) [0.131ubuntu15.2 => 0.131ubuntu15.3] (core) | 08:40 | |
xnox | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/cosmic/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=initramfs-tools | 08:46 |
xnox | the one from 6 minutes ago, superseeds the unapproved upload from 11th of june | 08:46 |
rbasak | rbalint: I'm out this morning. I'll try and look this afternoon for you. | 09:02 |
rbalint | rbasak, thanks! | 09:10 |
=== pieq_ is now known as pieq | ||
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-signed-hwe-edge (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-19.20~18.04.1 => 5.0.0-19.20~18.04.1] (kernel) (sync) | 10:25 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-signed-hwe-edge (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-19.20~18.04.1 => 5.0.0-19.20~18.04.1] (kernel) (sync) | 10:31 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected linux-signed-hwe-edge [sync] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-19.20~18.04.1] | 10:39 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-signed-hwe-edge [sync] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-19.20~18.04.1] | 10:39 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-signed-hwe-edge (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-19.20~18.04.1 => 5.0.0-19.20~18.04.1] (kernel) (sync) | 11:04 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-signed-hwe-edge [sync] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-19.20~18.04.1] | 11:05 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-signed-hwe-edge (bionic-security/main) [5.0.0-19.20~18.04.1 => 5.0.0-19.20~18.04.1] (kernel) (sync) | 11:17 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-signed-hwe-edge (bionic-updates/main) [5.0.0-19.20~18.04.1 => 5.0.0-19.20~18.04.1] (kernel) (sync) | 11:17 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-signed-hwe-edge [sync] (bionic-security) [5.0.0-19.20~18.04.1] | 11:34 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-signed-hwe-edge [sync] (bionic-updates) [5.0.0-19.20~18.04.1] | 11:34 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-signed (disco-security/main) [5.0.0-20.21 => 5.0.0-19.20] (core, kernel) (sync) | 11:41 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-signed (disco-updates/main) [5.0.0-20.21 => 5.0.0-19.20] (core, kernel) (sync) | 11:41 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-signed [sync] (disco-security) [5.0.0-19.20] | 11:45 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-signed [sync] (disco-updates) [5.0.0-19.20] | 11:45 | |
=== jdstrand_ is now known as jdstrand | ||
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: jsonnet [s390x] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.13.0+ds-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 11:47 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: jsonnet [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.13.0+ds-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 11:49 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: jsonnet [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.13.0+ds-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 11:49 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: jsonnet [i386] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.13.0+ds-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 11:49 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: jsonnet [armhf] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.13.0+ds-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 11:52 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: jsonnet [arm64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.13.0+ds-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 11:53 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-control-center (disco-proposed/main) [1:3.32.2-0ubuntu1 => 1:3.32.2-0ubuntu1.1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 12:57 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem-osp1 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.0.0-1012.13] (no packageset) | 13:04 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem-osp1 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-1012.13] | 13:07 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (xenial-proposed/main) [229-4ubuntu21.21 => 229-4ubuntu21.22] (core) | 13:09 | |
ddstreet | ubuntu-sru team, please reject my systemd upload in xenial unapproved queue from 1 month ago, i just re-uploaded with an additional patch from rbalint | 13:10 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed gnome-control-center from desktop-core in disco | 13:15 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added gnome-control-center to ubuntu-desktop in disco | 13:15 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected systemd [source] (xenial-proposed) [229-4ubuntu21.22] | 13:44 | |
apw | ddstreet, ^ | 13:44 |
ddstreet | apw thanks, hopefully new uplaod won't be in unapproved for a month :) | 14:07 |
apw | changing systemd is always mentally challenging | 14:09 |
apw | its unreliable enough as it is | 14:09 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (xenial-proposed/main) [2.39.2 => 2.39.2ubuntu0.1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 15:35 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.39.2ubuntu0.1] | 15:47 | |
tsimonq2 | [2019-06-26 16:36:21] lb_chroot_hooks | 16:42 |
tsimonq2 | P: Begin executing hooks... | 16:42 |
tsimonq2 | ... | 16:42 |
tsimonq2 | AttributeError: 'Package' object has no attribute 'section' | 16:42 |
tsimonq2 | Ooh, fun. | 16:43 |
tsimonq2 | Who broke the archive? :P | 16:43 |
* tsimonq2 wonders if this is an apt issue. | 16:57 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1045.50] (kernel) | 17:21 | |
tsimonq2 | It doesn't seem like it's an apt issue; reverting to an older version of apt in a PPA and then doing a test livefs build shows the same error. | 17:51 |
tsimonq2 | (known good version of apt, that is) | 17:51 |
=== mapreri_ is now known as mapreri | ||
tsimonq2 | Aha! https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-apt/1.9.0 says "- Remove Package.section attributes" which is relevant because "pkg is the python-apt Package object for this package" | 18:18 |
tsimonq2 | vorlon, juliank: The latest update to python-apt broke apt-xapian-index by removing the (admittedly legacy) Package.section attribute. This is a problem because it's included by default on Lubuntu images (and probably more), and is causing the ISO build to fail. I see there being two potential solutions here: 1) Fix the apt-xapian-index build in eoan-proposed and fix apt-xapian-index itself | 18:24 |
tsimonq2 | (either by doing Ubuntu-specific changes or via Debian in the bug I'm about to file); 2) Revert the commit removing those attributes in python-apt for now until 1) is in place. | 18:24 |
tsimonq2 | 2) is easy for now, but I don't want to touch python-apt without talking to juliank first. | 18:25 |
tsimonq2 | I'm absolutely exploring why this wasn't caught during p-m. | 18:29 |
tsimonq2 | That will be another bug I file in Debian, because this should have been caught earlier. | 18:30 |
tsimonq2 | Oh, it's orphaned. Coooool. | 18:34 |
tsimonq2 | https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=931133 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=931132 | 19:00 |
ubot5 | Debian bug 931133 in apt-xapian-index "apt-xapian-index: unusable after recent python-apt update due to usage of deprecated Package.section attribute" [Important,Open] | 19:00 |
ubot5 | Debian bug 931132 in apt-xapian-index "apt-xapian-index: please enable autopkgtests" [Important,Open] | 19:00 |
teward | tsimonq2: > orphaned since 1243 days. < yeah probably not going to get fixed heh | 19:05 |
tsimonq2 | teward: Become a DD and then adopt it. :P | 19:06 |
tsimonq2 | Or a DM. | 19:06 |
teward | tsimonq2: no thanks I don't want it :P | 19:06 |
Eickmeyer | Can anybody shed light on why Studio's build failed? https://launchpadlibrarian.net/430720022/buildlog_ubuntu_eoan_amd64_ubuntustudio_BUILDING.txt.gz | 19:28 |
Eickmeyer | I don't know if it's related to tsimonq2's apt-xapian-index bug or not. | 19:28 |
tsimonq2 | Eickmeyer: Yes it is. | 19:29 |
Eickmeyer | tsimonq2: kthx. :) | 19:29 |
wxl | ah they are similar with | 19:30 |
wxl | AttributeError: 'Package' object has no attribute 'section' | 19:30 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp-edge [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.18.0-1015.16~18.04.1] (kernel) | 19:34 | |
wxl | https://salsa.debian.org/apt-team/python-apt/commit/fedd51be48be53d00d386c45eab8f63f462db202#faf51da27adfc87e2950af44dc159112540aed75_0_10 | 19:34 |
wxl | * The `section` attribute has been removed from :class:`apt_pkg.Package` | 19:34 |
wxl | and :class:`apt.package.Package` | 19:34 |
tsimonq2 | Yeah, it's the same bug. | 19:36 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp-edge [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.18.0-1015.16~18.04.1] | 19:53 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1045.50] | 19:53 | |
juliank | tsimonq2: We need to fix reverse depends. The python-apt change cannot be reverted, it is following apt's removal of that field | 20:09 |
juliank | Eickmeyer: I fixed that yesterday, but livecd-rootfs got stuck in proposed and pyython-apt migrated | 20:09 |
tsimonq2 | juliank: ack | 20:09 |
juliank | If somebody could hint that ubuntu-image failure that's blocking livecd-rootfs, image building will be back on | 20:11 |
juliank | I don't have the repo on this machine, and finding it, branching it, and pushing it back seems like it's a lot of work right now :) | 20:12 |
Eickmeyer | juliank: ack, but can't do the hint. | 20:14 |
juliank | tsimonq2: I filed the other apt 1.9 migration bugs as normal in Debian, not important, as the move to unstable is still way off; I also attach patches to them all :) | 20:14 |
juliank | But maybe I missed some | 20:15 |
tsimonq2 | juliank: ok, feel free to adjust my bug reports :) | 20:16 |
juliank | tsimonq2: If you see other such issues and forward them, it'd be nice if you could User: deity@lists.debian.org\nUsertags: apt-1.9.0 :) | 20:17 |
juliank | tsimonq2: I'll have a look at apt-xapian-index shortly and see if I can add static typing information, that could cover any future API breaks at least - though not sure when to run them yet, gotta work on a solution for automatic python type testing, as there are regressions due to mypy updates and semantic changes all the time :/ | 20:18 |
tsimonq2 | juliank: ack, thanks | 20:18 |
juliank | I added the usertag to your bug btw | 20:19 |
juliank | tracking list: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=deity@lists.debian.org;tag=apt-1.9.0 | 20:19 |
tsimonq2 | Sweet | 20:21 |
juliank | So, like PEP8 tests we don't want to run mypy tests during autopkgtests or build I think, as it can regress due to changes in mypy | 20:21 |
juliank | -> example: 0.710 complains if I re-define a variable with the same type, 0.670 does not | 20:22 |
juliank | the question is: if we don't want to do this, how can we ensure to catch type failures? | 20:22 |
juliank | OTOH, if the tests depend on mypy, a new mypy will only migrate after all tests are fixed, so maybe we are good? | 20:23 |
juliank | oh ffs, ubuntu-image fails in different places in different runs | 20:31 |
juliank | here's the hint: https://code.launchpad.net/~juliank/britney/hints-ubuntu--livecd-rootfs-2-598/+merge/369363 | 20:35 |
juliank | skiptested livecd-rootfs upload as the ubuntu-image failure is super weird and i did not want to badtest it | 20:36 |
juliank | please merge! | 20:36 |
* juliank also retried it a second time and hopes either thing happens before the next image build | 20:39 | |
=== msalvatore_ is now known as msalvatore |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!