=== rgrant is now known as [rg] === pieq_ is now known as pieq === G_ is now known as G === cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer === Wryhder is now known as Lucas_Gray === ricab is now known as ricab|lunch === Wryhder is now known as Lucas_Gray [12:50] xnox: I got two +1s in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/1833039 [12:50] Launchpad bug 1833039 in apache2 (Ubuntu Cosmic) "18.04/Apache2: rejecting client initiated renegotiation due to openssl 1.1.1" [Undecided,Confirmed] [12:50] xnox: I'll prepare the sru [12:51] I used https://git.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/apache2/tree/debian/patches/disable-ssl-1.1.1-auto-retry.patch?h=bionic-client-cert-auth-fix [12:52] just the first hunk of that upstream commit. The other bit is for tls v1.3 from what I could tell, which is not enabled in that apache version [12:53] nice === fginther is now known as fginther` === ricab|lunch is now known as ricab === fginther` is now known as fginther [13:58] mvo: do you have the power to approve subiquity.pot on https://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+imports?field.filter_extension=pot&field.filter_status=NEEDS_REVIEW&batch=75&direction=backwards&memo=2400&start=2325 ? [13:59] xnox: let me look [13:59] i think ~katie can, and i guess the launchpad translator admins.... [14:00] mvo: if you can't, i might need to invoke c j watson [14:00] xnox: I just checked, I can't [14:12] mvo: I'm pretty terrible with the translations app, but I think I've managed to do it [14:13] xnox: -^ [15:00] !dmb-ping [15:00] cyphermox, jbicha, micahg, rbasak, sil2100, slashd, tsimonq2: DMB ping. [15:03] mvo: cjwatson: thanks! it looks like it worked, because https://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/subiquity now looks populated === M_hc[m] is now known as _hc [18:29] infinity, doko: I get this error on arm64 and armhf when building qtquickcontrols-opensource-src in https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/3709/+packages: [18:29] /usr/bin/ld: error: /usr/lib/gcc/aarch64-linux-gnu/8/../../../aarch64-linux-gnu/crti.o(.plt) section size (0xf20 bytes) is larger than file size (0x5a0 bytes) [18:29] Is it a bug in glibc? [18:31] Oh, now happens with qtwebengine too, with a different file name: [18:31] /usr/bin/ld: error: /usr/lib/gcc/aarch64-linux-gnu/8/../../../aarch64-linux-gnu/Scrt1.o(.plt) section size (0xa40 bytes) is larger than file size (0x6a8 bytes) [18:31] Did not happen on Friday 2019-06-28, so something recent broke it. [18:32] * mitya57 blames today's binutils upload [18:53] mitya57: no, most likely https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2019-07/msg00019.html [18:53] sourceware.org bug 2019 in kprobes "Race in recovery of recursive probes" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] [18:55] doko: so “no” to my first guess (bug in glibc) but “yes” to my second guess (blaming today's binutils upload), right? [18:56] yes, likely [19:20] mitya57, thx for mentioning it, I had a similar error in activity-log-manager today and was wondering what it could be [19:22] oh, and gnome-calendar is the same [19:23] so looks like any armhf build? [19:24] doko, should we remove the binutils from eoan-proposed meanwhile to unscrew archive builds? [19:24] seb128: if you remove all depending builds as well, sure [19:25] why would that be needed? [19:25] diff is missing on https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/2.32.51.20190701-1ubuntu1 :-/ [19:43] doko, so what do you suggest doing? we should at least sent a fyi email to the mailing list so others don't waste time trying to understand what's going on [19:53] uploading a fixed binutils [19:57] By the way Debian experimental is affected too. [20:04] doko: does that mean you are suggesting someone else upload a fixed one, or are you saying that you are uploading a fixed one? [20:15] I am currently building [20:29] doko, thx [23:20] doko: whoopsie still FTBFS w/ binutils 2.32.51.20190701-1ubuntu2