[00:18] <vorlon> Unit193: the problem should be reproducible that HAVE_SYSFS_ACPI is undefined
[00:18] <vorlon> Unit193: s/that/anywhere that/
[00:20] <vorlon> Unit193: which is the case if /sys/class/power_supply is absent from the build environment; which could be true based on kernel settings or virtualization type, I don't know
[00:20] <Unit193> vorlon: Huh, OK.  Thanks.
[00:21] <Unit193> Not precisely sure why they'd have it and Ubuntu not, but oh well.
[00:22] <vorlon> it's definitely a bug in the upstream source, which means to have this code disabled with HAVE_SYSFS_ACPI unset but misses an #ifdef somewhere
[00:22] <Unit193> Indeed.
[00:26] <Unit193> Makes knowing if you've fixed it a bit more complicated.
[07:51] <Unit193> Perhaps related to the dwz issue I was having http://sourceware.org/git/?p=dwz.git;a=commit;h=96eba5d6ffaf57d019287dcf908219e5eff741ab
[12:06] <LocutusOfBorg> Unit193, I am now, but I'm leaving
[12:17] <tomreyn> tsimonq2: regarding the calamares + secret key (not just initial but repeat) mkinitramfs umask issue, i noticed there is (also?) https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=931373
[12:19] <tomreyn> now this debian package creates /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/initramfs-permissions whereas upstreams' https://github.com/calamares/calamares/commit/c9b675cbc64ac5aab35ddd86a64311abd50f7720#diff-933952de88b4fa3e887c2f40385fb527 creates /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/calamares-safe-initramfs.conf - hopefully the debian maintainers don't end up with two configration includes now.
[12:48] <cjwatson> xnox: You're TIL on debian-archive-keyring - please could you either merge it or say it's OK for me to do so?  We need to get LP's keys updated for Debian imports
[12:49] <cjwatson> (And these days we normally do that by backporting it from Ubuntu devel)
[12:50] <doko> he's away for ten days without laptop
[12:52] <cjwatson> Oh, thanks.  Maybe I'll just steal TIL on that then
[12:52] <cjwatson> (But tomorrow, probably)
[14:38] <ginggs> cjwatson: already done by mapreri
[15:40] <mapreri> cjwatson: in case you are interested, there is an open bug on that package asking to do SRUs of it.  maybe somebody could do that as well.
[17:06] <cjwatson> Thanks.  I probably don't have the effort (or need) for SRUs though
[22:01] <mwhudson> good morning