| === nickv1985_ is now known as nickv1985 | ||
| seb128 | vorlon, retrying n-m autopkgtests isn't going to work, the log is having those kernels errors that seem the issue/a fallout from the new gcc | 07:24 |
|---|---|---|
| seb128 | error: ‘-mindirect-branch’ and ‘-fcf-protection’ are not compatible | 07:24 |
| seb128 | (e.g https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-eoan/eoan/i386/n/network-manager/20190708_231002_6fa4a@/log.gz) | 07:24 |
| seb128 | also dkms/nvidia drivers seem broken now, would be good to have some autopkgtest to prevent gcc migrating if it breaks drivers next time maybe? | 07:26 |
| seb128 | doko, ^ | 07:26 |
| seb128 | vorlon, the n-m warnings look like bug #1835764 | 07:29 |
| ubottu | bug 1835764 in virtualbox (Ubuntu) "Multiple DKMS kernel drivers fail to build with gcc-9 [error: ‘-mindirect-branch’ and ‘-fcf-protection’ are not compatible]" [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1835764 | 07:29 |
| doko | seb128: please see the announcement from amurray and contact the security team for the hardening changes | 08:03 |
| seb128 | doko, what announcement de amurray? | 08:03 |
| seb128 | from* | 08:03 |
| amurray | seb128: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2019-June/040741.html | 08:04 |
| seb128 | amurray, ah, thanks, that's some week old and scrolled out from my first page | 08:05 |
| seb128 | doko, would have been nice to include a reminder to that one in your gcc transition email, maybe a tip for next time :) | 08:05 |
| seb128 | since that only got active with the gcc change | 08:06 |
| amurray | the best fix for this would be to update the eoan kernel to add -fcf-protection=none I think | 08:06 |
| amurray | seb128: it *should* have been in gcc-8 already | 08:06 |
| seb128 | amurray, doko, it seems a bit backward to have landed the changes before fixing the kernel | 08:06 |
| seb128 | now we are in a situation were drivers are broken on eoan archive | 08:06 |
| seb128 | nothing even blocked that breakage to limit it to proposed :-/ | 08:07 |
| doko | dude, the kernel team is just binary copying kernels to eoan, and yes, they know about that | 08:07 |
| amurray | seb128: apologies, it slipped off my radar with some embargoed security stuff which just went out the door | 08:07 |
| seb128 | what has how they upload to do with that? | 08:07 |
| seb128 | amurray, no worry, I just wodner if we need some sort of autopkgtest to avoid having $things migrated when dkms gets screwed next time | 08:08 |
| amurray | doko: oh well that fixes my mental model then - I was wondering why the eoan kernel builds weren't failing as well but if they are being done on disco gcc that would make sense | 08:08 |
| * amurray will look at cooking up something for the eoan kernel and will discuss with kernel-team | 08:09 | |
| doko | ta | 08:09 |
| seb128 | amurray, thx | 08:09 |
| * seb128 brb, need to change location for a meeting | 08:10 | |
| * amurray dinner etc - back later | 08:12 | |
| seb128 | cyphermox, hey, what's the status of the grub2 buildfix for eoan? any chance that lands this week? | 08:53 |
| sladen | bout time | 08:58 |
| Unit193 | Hrm, it seems to me when you select a compressor in /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf, mkinitramfs shouldn't silently bail if the compressor is missing. | 09:17 |
| Unit193 | Something like http://paste.openstack.org/show/M6SOlCnADce7eUXS1W4c | 09:19 |
| seb128 | powersj, hey, unsure if you are the right person to ping about that but do you know if daily ISO utah test env is having issue? seems like bionic/eoan test are bailing out on an error 7 | 09:22 |
| rbasak | Could someone review https://code.launchpad.net/~racb/ubuntu-transition-tracker/mysql-8/+merge/369878 please? I've not done this before, and I can't figure out how to test locally (seems that ben can't download from Ubuntu and the go script is a workaround but not suitable for use outside the machine it runs on) | 10:24 |
| rbasak | paride: see seb128's question from about an hour ago please - can you help? ^ | 10:34 |
| paride | seb128, oh yes jibel and me were looking at the issue | 10:36 |
| paride | seb128, error 7 is defined as a command line parsing error, but it seems that what's actually happen is that a URLChecker method is failing, probably because of networking issues | 10:36 |
| paride | and the error is deceptive | 10:36 |
| paride | (thanks rbasak for the ping) | 10:37 |
| seb128 | rbasak, paride, thx! do you know what needs to be done? | 11:23 |
| paride | seb128, looks like it's back to normal, but let me re-launch another couple of jobs manually | 11:38 |
| seb128 | paride, thx | 11:39 |
| seb128 | paride, I'm curious but what part of the log hinted out that it was an infra issue? just the knowledge of what is behind error7 ? (can you point me to where those are defined?) | 11:40 |
| paride | seb128, the log wasn't really useful. We observed a couple of things: (1) nothing was changed on venonat, utah, or the job definitions (2) the build didn't always fail, but they were very flaky (3) utah took a long time to parse its arguments, hinting it was trying to do something over the network (4) there is this URLChecker class which the parser | 11:46 |
| paride | uses to check if the URL which are passed to UTAH are valid, but which actually makes things more difficult to debug | 11:46 |
| paride | and so that's what we're blaming and why | 11:46 |
| seb128 | paride, k, thx for the details, let's see how the retries goes then! | 11:46 |
| paride | seb128, if you want to have a look, `git clone lp:utah`, grep URLChecker and follow it back | 11:47 |
| seb128 | k | 11:47 |
| seb128 | thx! | 11:47 |
| paride | yw! | 11:47 |
| seb128 | paride, seems it worked, I got 'back to normal' emails for bionic and eoan now ;-) | 11:50 |
| seb128 | and the pending ISO migrated to be current | 11:51 |
| paride | excellent :) | 11:51 |
| === balkamos_ is now known as balkamos | ||
| rbasak | Could someone review https://code.launchpad.net/~racb/ubuntu-transition-tracker/mysql-8/+merge/369878 please? I've not done this before, and I can't figure out how to test locally (seems that ben can't download from Ubuntu and the go script is a workaround but not suitable for use outside the machine it runs on) | 12:52 |
| === ricab is now known as ricab|lunch | ||
| Laney | rbasak: it looks reasonable, I suggest just committing it and seeing what happens | 13:37 |
| rbasak | Laney: thanks! | 14:03 |
| cyphermox | seb128: I have the fix staged, I'm finishing up on testing the new grub post-merge | 14:06 |
| seb128 | cyphermox, ok, so likely this week? | 14:07 |
| cyphermox | yes, likely | 14:08 |
| seb128 | ups | 14:08 |
| seb128 | cyphermox, great :) | 14:08 |
| seb128 | cyphermox, oh, also what's the status for the plymouth patches upstreaming/new version update from your side? I had it on my june backlog but failed to got to it, I plan to try again this month! | 14:09 |
| kenvandine | vorlon: can you please promote xdg-desktop-portals and xdg-desktop-portals-gtk in bionic per bug 1750069 and bug 1749672 | 14:13 |
| ubottu | bug 1750069 in xdg-desktop-portal-gtk (Ubuntu Bionic) "[MIR] xdg-desktop-portal-gtk" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1750069 | 14:13 |
| ubottu | bug 1749672 in xdg-desktop-portal (Ubuntu Bionic) "[MIR] xdg-desktop-portal" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1749672 | 14:13 |
| kenvandine | vorlon: i'm trying to update the seed now, but Laney said i need them promoted first | 14:14 |
| === ricab|lunch is now known as ricab | ||
| cyphermox | seb128: I have not yet had time to look at plymouth this cycle | 14:24 |
| seb128 | cyphermox, do you think you are going to be able to squeeze some time for that in the next weeks? | 14:26 |
| seb128 | cyphermox, I will try to have a go at that update since we would like to see the new version in but let me know if you start poking as well so we don't dup work | 14:34 |
| LocutusOfBorg | xnox, hello, your dh-cargo merge il blocking a bunch of rust packages... | 14:41 |
| === Foxtrot is now known as foxtrot | ||
| ahasenack | doko: dealing with some gcc9 fallout, | 14:55 |
| ahasenack | doko: stuff like this: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/nSBdGN3xy4/ and https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88780 | 14:55 |
| ubottu | gcc.gnu.org bug 88780 in middle-end "[8/9/10 Regression] bogus -Wstringop-truncation for copying as many bytes from a string as its length" [Normal,Assigned] | 14:55 |
| ahasenack | doko: googling brought up https://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4969, is that a thing for gcc9? | 14:55 |
| ahasenack | er, switch the bugs, "is that a thing" is the gcc bug | 14:55 |
| ahasenack | let me refrase | 14:56 |
| ahasenack | doko: stuff like this: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/nSBdGN3xy4/ and https://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4969 | 14:56 |
| ahasenack | doko: googling brought up https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88780, is that a thing for gcc9? | 14:56 |
| ubottu | gcc.gnu.org bug 88780 in middle-end "[8/9/10 Regression] bogus -Wstringop-truncation for copying as many bytes from a string as its length" [Normal,Assigned] | 14:56 |
| doko | ahasenack: are you seeing this with GCC 9 only? according to the report it should be in 8 as well | 15:00 |
| ahasenack | yeah, the squid build works with gcc8 | 15:01 |
| ahasenack | the gcc 9 release notes say that this stringop-truncation check was expanded a bit | 15:01 |
| ahasenack | I'm still digging, for example, it only happened with -O2 or higher | 15:01 |
| doko | well, -Wno-error=stringop-truncation is your friend ... | 15:02 |
| ahasenack | with just -Wall -Werror -Wstringop-truncation it works, but if I add -O2 then it fails | 15:02 |
| vorlon | seb128: hopefully the new kernel in eoan-proposed has fixed this - I'm retrying those nm tests with --all-proposed to see | 16:05 |
| vorlon | kenvandine: bionic only, or both bionic and xenial? | 16:07 |
| kenvandine | please promote both | 16:08 |
| kenvandine | vorlon: i haven't prepared the seed for xenial yet, but i will be this week | 16:08 |
| vorlon | kenvandine: also, it is normally the case that we add things to seeds /first/ and then change the archive, so that we can use component-mismatches as a guide for what needs promoting; we don't generate c-m reports for !devel, but I'm not sure why it should be promoted before the seed change anyway | 16:09 |
| kenvandine | the update script won't find it | 16:09 |
| vorlon | update script? | 16:09 |
| kenvandine | Laney said we need to promote it first | 16:09 |
| kenvandine | in ubuntu-meta | 16:09 |
| vorlon | oh, you do need to promote it before reuploading ubuntu-meta, yes | 16:09 |
| kenvandine | yes | 16:09 |
| vorlon | but the ordering is (normally) seed change -> archive promotion -> ubuntu-meta upload | 16:10 |
| kenvandine | right, for devel | 16:10 |
| seb128 | vorlon, thx | 16:19 |
| vorlon | kenvandine: the xdg-desktop-portal dependencies look a bit strange on xenial; Depends: default-dbus-session-bus | dbus-session-bus | dbus-x11 but only the third of these exists in the release | 16:24 |
| kenvandine | yeah | 16:24 |
| kenvandine | there are other packages in xenial that followed that pattern as well | 16:25 |
| kenvandine | so the packaging matched debian, for example | 16:25 |
| vorlon | mm | 16:25 |
| kenvandine | i can change it | 16:26 |
| vorlon | anyway, promotions done on both series | 16:26 |
| kenvandine | thanks | 16:26 |
| GunnarHj | bdmurray: Just replied to your question at bug #1834406. Any other idea how to reach out to CJK users willing to help out? | 18:08 |
| ubottu | bug 1834406 in fonts-noto-cjk (Debian) "Upgrade Noto Sans CJK fonts to version 2.001" [Unknown,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1834406 | 18:08 |
| bdmurray | GunnarHj: I think the ubuntu-quality list used to be used for calls for testing but I'm not sure how active that list is now | 18:12 |
| GunnarHj | bdmurray: I don't know either, but that's an idea. Do you think the statements so far are insufficient, so I should try that way? (Personally, and unlike my last dubious SRU proposal, I feel this is a safe one.) | 18:17 |
| bdmurray | GunnarHj: I was following along with sil2100's comment. | 18:18 |
| bdmurray | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-noto-cjk/+bug/1834406/comments/4 | 18:18 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1834406 in fonts-noto-cjk (Debian) "Upgrade Noto Sans CJK fonts to version 2.001" [Unknown,New] | 18:18 |
| GunnarHj | bdmurray: Right, and that's the reason for the efforts so far. | 18:19 |
| bdmurray | GunnarHj: Okay, I'd asked about the call for testing because I wasn't sure what calls had been made. | 18:22 |
| bdmurray | GunnarHj: Either way let's give it a bit more time to age though. | 18:24 |
| GunnarHj | bdmurray: Sure, no problem. The new era started May 1, so it's late anyway.. TBH I would have expected some Japanese users to act as drivers to have it tested, so I'm a bit disappointed. | 18:27 |
| GunnarHj | bdmurray: Maybe it would help if you added a comment to the bug about the decision to wait a bit due to few test reports? | 18:30 |
| Unit193 | LocutusOfBorg: Ah, you already commented on the opensips report, was just about to do that now. Very well then. | 22:25 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!