[05:24] <didrocks> good morning
[05:36] <duflu> Morning didrocks
[05:41] <didrocks> hey duflu
[07:13] <oSoMoN> good morning desktoppers
[07:17] <duflu> Hi oSoMoN
[07:17] <didrocks> salut oSoMoN, ça va ?
[07:17] <oSoMoN> hey duflu
[07:17] <oSoMoN> salut didrocks! bien, et toi?
[07:18] <didrocks> ça va :)
[07:22] <seb128> hey oSoMoN didrocks duflu, how are you?
[07:22] <duflu> seb128, heh, see #systems. How are you?
[07:22] <seb128> I'm good!
[07:23] <seb128> I'm sleeping better since the heat dropped which is nice
[07:24] <marcustomlinson> morning oSoMoN duflu didrocks and seb128
[07:25] <duflu> Hi marcustomlinson
[07:25] <Wimpress> o/
[07:26] <duflu> Morning Wimpress
[07:26] <marcustomlinson> and Wimpress
[07:26] <seb128> hey marcustomlinson Wimpress! how is snappy world today?
[07:27] <marcustomlinson> crackling and popping
[07:27] <seb128> lol
[07:28] <didrocks> hey marcustomlinson, Wimpress, seb128
[07:28] <didrocks> I'm good, thanks
[07:29] <oSoMoN> good morning seb128, marcustomlinson, Wimpress
[07:50] <willcooke> morning all
[07:50] <seb128> hey willcooke, how are you today?
[07:51] <willcooke> not awake yet, give me a few minutes to decide....
[07:51] <willcooke> :)
[07:51] <seb128> :-)
[07:52] <seb128> k, I'm moving back to my desk, trying to be back online for when the channel starts being active :)
[07:53] <duflu> Morning willcooke
[07:54] <oSoMoN> good morning willcooke
[08:00] <didrocks> hey willcooke
[08:00] <willcooke> hi duflu oSoMoN didrocks
[08:02] <Laney> hey hey
[08:03] <duflu> Morning Laney
[08:06] <Laney> hey duflu
[08:10] <Trevinho> hi guyz
[08:11] <Trevinho> Laney: as per mutter, i was in the middle of finishing one branch, so I wanted to get that out first, I'll do it in few hours
[08:11] <Laney> hi Trevinho
[08:11] <oSoMoN> morning Laney, Trevinho
[08:12]  * Laney thinks you don't like speakking in #debian-gnome ;-)
[08:12] <didrocks> hey Trevinho, Laney
[08:12] <Trevinho> hi oSoMoN and didrocks
[08:12] <duflu> Hi Trevinho
[08:12] <Laney> Trevinho: ok, it's just that you sounded like it was urgent for you to get uploaded so I was expecting it
[08:12] <Laney> hi oSoMoN didrocks
[08:12] <Trevinho> Laney: I do.... but I forgot where you pinged me though :P
[08:13] <Trevinho> Laney: yeah, but also context switch... you know :P
[08:32] <clobrano> hey, just passing by to say Hi 0/  :)
[08:33] <didrocks> hey clobrano
[08:33] <clobrano> hi didrocks, how is it going?
[08:36] <seb128> hey clobrano, how is your summer going?
[08:38] <clobrano> hi seb128, very well, except some days of exaggerated hot temperatures, how about yours?
[08:39] <seb128> things are going well here, nicer with a bit less hot weather indeed :-)
[08:43] <didrocks> clobrano: I'm good, thansk, yourself?
[08:44] <oSoMoN> hi clobrano
[08:44] <clobrano> didrocks: very well, even more now that we're below 40 degrees :D
[08:59] <willcooke> hi clobrano
[09:01] <didrocks> clobrano: heh, I bet :)
[09:02] <seb128> clobrano, where do you live?
[09:05] <clobrano> seb128: in the south of Sardinia
[09:05] <seb128> ah, that explains the temperatures :-)
[09:19] <clobrano> :)
[09:40] <tkamppeter> seb128, thanks for sponsoring the GTK SRU.
[09:40] <seb128> tkamppeter, you're welcome, thanks for working on the fix and handling the SRU!
[09:59] <jibel> mpt, the reason why users should reboot after an upgrade of the drivers https://wiki.ubuntu.com/NVidiaUpdates#Driver_Upgrades
[10:06] <mpt> Thanks jibel
[10:13] <GunnarHj> seb128: Thanks for sponsoring the ibus patch so quickly. Your note about patch naming made me think that also ubuntu-use-distinguishable-abstract-address.patch should be renamed and moved. It was upstreamed afterwards.
[10:16] <Laney> ubuntu- implies (to me) that it is somehow Ubuntu specific and can't be forwarded
[10:16] <GunnarHj> Laney: Yeah, I realize that now. Makes sense.
[10:16] <seb128> hey GunnarHj
[10:17] <seb128> Laney, Gunnar is commenting on the fact that I renamed is ubuntu- patch to be git- before sponsoring his changes :)
[10:17] <seb128> so yeah, we are in agreement I think :)
[10:17] <Laney> I wasn't stating a disagreement
[10:17] <seb128> (the patch was a backport from an upstream commit)
[10:17] <seb128> right, well I didn't know if you had all the  context
[10:18] <Laney> okey
[10:18] <Laney> I think ubuntu-use-distinguishable-abstract-address.patch is a different one to the one that was added in 1.5.19-4ubuntu2 though
[10:19] <GunnarHj> Laney: How? Because it was upstreamed only after the inclusion in Ubuntu?
[10:20] <Laney> Nooooooooooooooooooooooo, because that was git-support-common_name-in-ISO-639.patch (it is literally a different patch)
[10:20] <Laney> as in, you are talking about a second patch that you're saying is in the same situation
[10:24] <GunnarHj> Laney: I don't claim they are the same patch, just that they are both in substance applied upstream and will cease to be needed going forward.
[10:26] <oSoMoN> kenvandine, the chromium snap in the candidate channel should fix bug #1821765, I'd appreciate if you could confirm when you get a chance
[10:26] <Laney> sorry, I'm obviously failing to get my point across
[10:26] <GunnarHj> Laney: Which I understand is what the git- prefix intends to say.
[10:26] <Laney> wtf
[10:26] <Laney> It doesn't matter
[10:26] <Laney> I'm going to shut up
[10:27] <GunnarHj> :)
[10:27] <Laney> sorry it got complicated, I was just trying to state what I thought ubuntu- meant.
[10:27] <GunnarHj> I see no disagreement on anything here.
[10:28] <seb128> yeah, I think everyone agrees and we should just move on to normal business :)
[10:29] <Laney> After Seb commented I was trying to assist Gunnar by pointing out that he was referencing a *second* patch which is in a similar situation to that first one
[10:29] <Laney> There. Hope that helps.
[10:30] <GunnarHj> seb128: Btw, are you possibly in sponsoring mode? ;) I'm seeking someone who can look at https://mentors.debian.net/package/ibus-avro .
[10:32] <seb128> Laney, right, thanks I think it was just miscommunication, my comment was to state the context because I don't know if you had seen the activity on that sponsoring request/knew exactly what happened with the other patch not to suggest any disagreement ... anyway, all good I think so let's move on
[10:33] <seb128> GunnarHj, I had it in my lower priority backlog
[10:35] <GunnarHj> seb128: "Lower priority" sounds worrying. But backlog is better than nothing, I suppose. :)
[10:37] <seb128> GunnarHj, sorry but there is lot to do, see our trello board :)
[10:38] <tomreyn> hi everyone. do you think it's a good idea to list bug 1396379 in release notes as a known bug (for all affected releases)? #ubuntu and the bug tracker keeps attracting (understandably) irated people affected by this long standing issue.
[10:38] <GunnarHj> seb128: Understood; I may listen around with others in the meantime.
[10:40] <seb128> tomreyn, it's quite specific, unsure it's impacting enough users to be in the release notes
[10:43] <tomreyn> seb128: it's non-specific enough to have two dupes, 25 listed as affected. i agree that's not a huge amount. another approach might be to ensure it gets handled soon. ;)
[10:45] <seb128> tomreyn, try tagging rls-ee-incoming and see if foundations triaged
[10:48] <tomreyn> seb128: i tagged it as "rls-ee-incoming" (a tag the auto completion is not aware of, maybe misspelled?). i do not know what "foundations triggered" means, will try to look this up now. thanks.
[10:49] <tomreyn> oh 'ee' will be eoan, and it's probably not in the auto complete, yet, i see.
[10:49] <seb128> tomreyn, that's the team maintaining those components, they should pick it up from the tag
[10:49] <seb128> right
[10:49] <tomreyn> thank you.
[10:49] <seb128> unsure those rls tags are 'official' / get autocomplete
[10:49] <seb128> np
[11:23]  * Laney eyes this clutter/glib thing
[11:46] <marcustomlinson> oSoMoN: hey, I've addressed your review: https://github.com/ubuntu/snapcraft-desktop-helpers/pull/190
[11:46] <gitbot> ubuntu issue (Pull request) 190 in snapcraft-desktop-helpers " Run configurations in parallel" [Open]
[12:50]  * Laney looks suspicious
[12:50] <Laney> 🕵
[12:51] <Laney> thinking that this glib bug is something to do with its build environment
[12:51] <oSoMoN> marcustomlinson, ack, thanks
[14:09] <Laney> <lunch passes>
[14:09] <Laney> rebuilding glib with gcc-8 makes clutter's tests pass
[14:09] <Laney> fml
[14:10] <seb128> doookoooo :)
[14:10] <Laney> guess I should try to turn off those new flags
[15:29] <Laney> doko: can you help me please? clutter's tests hang if run with a glib that was built with gcc-9 but they work when the same glib is rebuilt on gcc-8
[15:30] <Laney> it's not those new hardening flags, I disabled those
[18:30] <willcooke_> night all
[23:49] <amurray> hey desktoppers - who is the authoritative source on snap-store?