[00:22] Eickmeyer[m]: I have added a postinst to lowlatency, I have added a README.lowlatency. [00:22] Eickmeyer[m]: how be the gut? [00:24] Better. They're thinking it was viral gastroenteritis, and largely gone. They couldn't see anything apparently wrong, so that's the only thing they've got. [00:25] Eickmeyer[m]: I am thinking to make an RT (if exists) default and then lowlatency with generic being the backup. On second thought... I will make the order lowlatency, generic and then RT [00:25] Careful with that. We don't want to implicitly support an RT kernel if we don't provide one. [00:25] I think lowlatency should be default because that is what we support as default. Then generic as the other one ubuntu suports [00:26] if there is no RT kernel it will not show up in the menu [00:26] I understand, but by putting it in the code, that implies that we support it. [00:27] Well, thats easy, I won't add it for now, I don't have it anyway, so I don't have an itch to scratch in that direction... [00:27] :) [00:28] Other than that, yes. lowlatency by default, generic second if it's available. [13:04] * OvenWerks doesn't knpow why he bothered explaining... [14:44] OvenWerks: The "Why would I need low latency" thing made me cringe, tbh. [14:45] I think what is latency was the real question [14:48] Well, they were being really stubborn and, quite frankly, rude. [14:50] That was part of the reason I didn't say much till late in the conversation ;) [16:03] On the other hand, it does point out the need for a per audio device set up... I don't know if we will get there this cycle or even next. [19:34] Eickmeyer: my work on a grub module is 19.10 only. I am seeing that 10_linux has changed somewhat since I first created 09_lowlatency. So the 19.10 version will be based on the changes. [19:36] I will keep a diff to see if we can run that against new versions of grub as they show up. [19:37] I am wondering if this may have anything to do with differences in performance from 16.* to 19.* [19:50] Very, very p;ossible