[08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-rustyline [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [5.0.0-1] (no packageset)
[08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-rustyline [s390x] (eoan-proposed/universe) [5.0.0-1] (no packageset)
[08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-rustyline [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/universe) [5.0.0-1] (no packageset)
[08:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-rustyline [arm64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [5.0.0-1] (no packageset)
[08:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-rustyline [i386] (eoan-proposed/universe) [5.0.0-1] (no packageset)
[08:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-rustyline [armhf] (eoan-proposed/universe) [5.0.0-1] (no packageset)
[08:21]  * LocutusOfBorg untangles java, please don't step on his toes
[08:45] <RikMills> sil2100: have finished verifying as much of the plasma SRU as practically can
[08:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-spacetime [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [1.2-2+dfsg-1]
[08:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-aws-sdk-core [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [3.56.0-1]
[08:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-rustyline [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [5.0.0-1]
[08:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-rustyline [armhf] (eoan-proposed) [5.0.0-1]
[08:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-rustyline [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [5.0.0-1]
[08:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-ahoy-matey [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [3.0.0-1]
[08:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-rustyline [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [5.0.0-1]
[08:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-rustyline [s390x] (eoan-proposed) [5.0.0-1]
[08:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-google-cloud-core [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [1.2.0-1]
[08:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-rustyline [i386] (eoan-proposed) [5.0.0-1]
[08:50] <sil2100> RikMills: awesome, thanks o/ I'll look into releasing it, most probably tomorrow during my SRU shift
[08:50] <sil2100> But I'll see if I can get to it today
[08:51] <RikMills> thanks :)
[09:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-ext-pack (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [5.2.18-1~ubuntu18.04.1 => 5.2.32-1~ubuntu18.04.1] (no packageset)
[09:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-guest-additions-iso (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [5.2.18-1~ubuntu18.04.1 => 5.2.32-1~ubuntu18.04.1] (no packageset)
[10:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [5.2.18-dfsg-2~ubuntu18.04.5 => 5.2.32-dfsg-0~ubuntu18.04.1] (ubuntu-cloud)
[10:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-hwe (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [5.2.18-dfsg-3~ubuntu18.04.3 => 5.2.32-dfsg-0~ubuntu18.04.1] (no packageset)
[10:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-aws-sdk-kms [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.22.0-1] (no packageset)
[11:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-aws-sdk-kms [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [1.22.0-1]
[11:19] <sil2100> Eickmeyer, teward: if anything, I'll be looking at the dpf-plugins package in NEW again
[12:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apache2 (bionic-proposed/main) [2.4.29-1ubuntu4.7 => 2.4.29-1ubuntu4.8] (ubuntu-server)
[12:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apache2 (cosmic-proposed/main) [2.4.34-1ubuntu2.2 => 2.4.34-1ubuntu2.3] (ubuntu-server)
[12:54] <teward> sil2100: good to know heh.  been busy I take it :P
[12:57] <Laney> sil2100: what do you think about turning of sru comment emails until the false mail stuff is fixed?
[13:00] <sil2100> Laney: did that happen again?
[13:00] <sil2100> Laney: +1 on disabling it though
[13:00] <sil2100> The code looked fine, but I guess I need to dig down a bit deeper
[13:01] <Laney> I saw it on my livecd-rootfs uploads yesterday
[13:01] <Laney> thx, will do
[13:03] <Laney> done
[13:04] <sil2100> BRITNEY WHY DO YOU DO THIS TO ME
[13:04] <sil2100> Ok, then it wasn't a singular thing, meaning I'll just card it and work on it this week
[13:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-aws-sdk-s3 [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.43.0-1] (no packageset)
[13:12] <Laney> the tests failed us there, annoying as they look to be right
[13:14] <LocutusOfBorg> hello sil2100, can you please reject virtualbox*5.2.30* from bionic queue and accept virtualbox*5.2.32* instead?
[13:30] <sil2100> Laney: I assume it's some strange combination, since it obviously should never do anything when there is no autopkgtest issues in the blocking excuse - but maybe I missed some edge case, or some transient state
[13:31] <sil2100> I need to read up the autopkgtest policy code a bit in more details
[13:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: landscape-client (bionic-proposed/main) [18.01-0ubuntu3.3 => 18.01-0ubuntu3.4] (ubuntu-server)
[13:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ironic-ui [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [3.4.0-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[13:57] <Laney> sil2100: maybe https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/hvGjCJpWcR/ would help? checking what autopkgtest would actually set if there's a failure
[13:57] <Laney> not completely sure how this could happen (so this might not be right), but if a test is still running there would be an 'autopkgtest' reason
[13:59] <Laney> maybe the autopkgtest policy needs to add another reason for running / regression / alwaysfail?
[14:13] <sil2100> Laney: well, we could try this, but from what I checked when there are still autopkgtests running, the policy verdict should be REJECTED_TEMPORARILY
[14:14] <Laney> unless something else upgraded it
[14:14] <Laney> it will *definitely* be REJECTED_PERMANENTLY if autopkgtest rejects it due to tests though
[14:18] <Laney> I was thinking that the block might be interfering somehow but I don't actually see that setting the verdict so I think that theory doesn't make sense
[14:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gdb [source] (bionic-proposed) [8.1-0ubuntu3.1]
[14:27] <tkamppeter> rbasak,  on bug 1763520, what are exactly the regressions Lukasz is complaining about? I do not see them.
[14:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-meta [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.417.2]
[14:52] <Eickmeyer> sil2100: ack
[14:56] <seb128> tkamppeter, they failed on infrastructure issue, I retried them and it worked so it's all good now, unsure how the SRU team want to deal with such cases though and what sort of "it's good now" they want (like on the bug or if they check themself the status or if their bot should add another comment if they go green)
[14:57] <tkamppeter> seb128, OK, thank you. So Now I need to see whther someone (the OP?) verifies the fix?
[14:58] <seb128> yes
[14:58] <seb128> still check with the SRU team if they need to be reassured the autopkgtest problem was not one and how
[15:28] <Laney> I'd think that commenting on the bug is the best thing to do.
[15:43] <sil2100> Eickmeyer, teward: hey! Regarding dpf-plugins, one last issue: https://bugs.launchpad.net/dpf-plugins/+bug/1829562/comments/14
[15:43] <Eickmeyer> sil2100: I have questions, hang on...
[15:44] <Eickmeyer> sil2100: You're correct, those are really the only two applicable architectures.
[15:45] <Eickmeyer> sil2100: So, no questions.
[15:48] <sil2100> Eickmeyer: ok, in such cases I'm a fan of restricting the arches - I'll switch all the 'any' to 'amd64 i386' in this case and then accept
[15:48] <sil2100> Eickmeyer: does that sound reasonable?
[15:48] <Eickmeyer> sil2100: That does. Thanks!
[15:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: librabbitmq (xenial-proposed/universe) [0.7.1-1 => 0.7.1-1ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)
[15:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: librabbitmq (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.8.0-1build1 => 0.8.0-1ubuntu0.18.04.1] (no packageset)
[15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected dpf-plugins [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.2-0ubuntu1]
[15:59] <teward> Eickmeyer: you might need to do similar in Debian too.  If simon ever gets off his butt and sponsors I mean.  Ping me over Telegram when you have changes ready for upload
[15:59] <teward> *returns to lunch things*
[15:59] <teward> sil2100: thanks, sorry to keep having to get this changed xD
[16:00] <Eickmeyer> teward: I haven't been working on those in Debian, but I might do the same to lsp-plugins since the same issue exists.
[16:00] <teward> ack
[16:01] <Eickmeyer> teward: Also, I think sil2100 was just going to upload & accept in this case? (unless I read that wrong)
[16:01] <Eickmeyer> Make the trivial changes, that is, then upload and accept.
[16:01] <teward> Eickmeyer: not sure, that'd be a question for sil2100 :P
[16:01] <teward> happy to do the sponsoring anyways if sil2100 wants me to
[16:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: librabbitmq (cosmic-proposed/universe) [0.8.0-1build1 => 0.8.0-1ubuntu0.18.10.1] (no packageset)
[16:02] <teward> ... but after lunch please :)
[16:02]  * teward is hungry
[16:02] <sil2100> Yeah, I'll be doing this to avoid a round-trip ;)
[16:03] <teward> cool cool
[16:03] <Eickmeyer> :thumbsup:
[16:03] <teward> ahhh i see, yeah the reject reason explains that
[16:03] <teward> i just moved all my mail to a different mail server soooo
[16:03] <teward> my mail is still catching up :)
[16:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: dpf-plugins (eoan-proposed/primary) [1.2-0ubuntu1]
[16:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dpf-plugins [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.2-0ubuntu1]
[16:06] <teward> @sil2100 it's nice when the change is so minor and you've already gone through and id'd that as the last issue that you can JFDI huh :P
[16:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dpf-plugins [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[16:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dpf-plugins [i386] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[16:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dpf-plugins [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [1.2-0ubuntu1]
[16:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dpf-plugins [i386] (eoan-proposed) [1.2-0ubuntu1]
[16:19] <teward> thanks sil2100 :)
[16:19] <sil2100> teward, Eickmeyer: yw!
[16:22] <Laney> sil2100: in case you don't get emails, filed some suggestions about the sru regression emails as LP bugs and subscribed you
[16:23]  * Laney often doesn't trust people in their LP bug handling ;-) (applies to me sometimes too)
[16:23] <teward> Laney: so you don't trust yourself with handling bugs then too :p
[16:23] <Laney> correct
[16:24] <Laney> I don't trust myself with very much :P
[16:24] <sil2100> Laney: uh oh!
[16:24]  * sil2100 looks
[16:24] <sil2100> Yeah, my bugmail goes who-knows-where
[16:24] <Laney> nah just small suggestions
[16:24] <sil2100> Need to fix that ;p
[16:24] <teward> sil2100: also not sure if you saw my poke previously but the nginx sru, that test regression was actually an env error :|
[16:24] <Laney> well, apart from the false positive thing
[16:24] <teward> not sure why some autopkgtests just explode networking randomly tho
[16:24] <Laney> teward: comment on the bug
[16:24] <teward> already did ;)
[16:25]  * Laney thinks that using sil210_0's personal account for those mails encourages these IRC pings
[16:25] <teward> lol
[16:27] <xnox> sil2100:  just fake any from: using canonical smtp!
[16:27] <sil2100> Laney: thanks for the bugs! All are good
[16:27] <sil2100> xnox: yeah ;) Well, I have everything ready to switch this to a bot account
[16:28] <sil2100> So soon a bot account will be spamming bugs instead
[16:28] <sil2100> But I didn't have the cycles to do that yet
[16:28] <Laney> great
[17:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apache2 [source] (cosmic-proposed) [2.4.34-1ubuntu2.3]
[17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apache2 [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.29-1ubuntu4.8]
[17:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: zaqar-ui [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [7.0.0~b1~git2019071614.472d462-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[18:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-os-net-config [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [11.0.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[23:29] <enyc> 11:26 -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-hwe (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [5.2.18-dfsg-3~ubuntu18.04.3 => 5.2.32-dfsg-0~ubuntu18.04.1] (no packageset)
[23:29] <enyc> Hrrm, I would like  updated  virtualbox for bionic,  but couldn't seem to eget iti ni bionic-proposed repo at first experimentantion on that
[23:30] <enyc> any $clue  what thats about / what  Unapproved:  (no packageset)  means here? ;-)
[23:38] <valorie> enyc: that means that no flavor of ubuntu maintains that package
[23:47] <Ukikie> (Packagesets are more than just flavors)
[23:51] <valorie> true
[23:51] <valorie> I should have said no *team*