[04:33] <vorlon> tjaalton: why is icl-backport.diff only in the bionic mesa upload, not in the disco one?  what happens to users who upgrade from bionic to disco?
[04:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mesa [source] (bionic-proposed) [19.0.8-0ubuntu0~18.04.1]
[05:07] <tjaalton> vorlon: disco kernel doesn't support icl
[05:08] <tjaalton> so I thought it wouldn't matter there
[05:09] <vorlon> tjaalton: well, a) why not, isn't it expected that the kernels in the later non-LTS releases include the same features as the LTS kernels? (I see linux-oem-osp1 is present in bionic and disco at roughly the same versions)
[05:09] <vorlon> and b), what does happen to a user of one of these machines when they upgrade to disco?
[05:10] <tjaalton> vorlon: well, true, if a user is on osp1 kernel on bionic it should still have it after upgrade..
[05:15] <tjaalton> but what happens is that things won't suddenly break. in fact we've had the stock disco mesa while enabling icl and I haven't heard any complaints yet
[05:16] <tjaalton> the patches do fix some issues like the dri driver complaining that icl is still 'premature' if an app is launched from the terminal, for instance
[05:16] <vorlon> ok
[13:50] <ginggs> would someone please 'force-badtest python-sparse/0.2.0-1/i386' ? - it has regressed in release
[14:37] <ginggs> also please 'force-badtest satpy/0.16.1-1'