[01:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lubuntu-default-settings (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.54.2 => 0.54.3] (no packageset)
[06:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (eoan-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu3 => 2.04-1ubuntu3] (core)
[06:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libinput (bionic-proposed/main) [1.10.4-1 => 1.10.4-1ubuntu0.18.04.1] (desktop-core)
[06:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (eoan-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu3 => 2.04-1ubuntu3] (core)
[07:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem-osp1 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-1016.18]
[07:39] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, you tested python3 tests against itself, and it failed... can we hint it for some days to let e.g. ncurses migrate or is somebody going to fix testsuites?
[07:41] <LocutusOfBorg> AssertionError: 'Ubuntu' != 'Fedora'
[07:41] <LocutusOfBorg> I agree that Ubuntu is not Fedora, yes python, thanks for telling that to me :)
[07:49] <LocutusOfBorg> actually that test failed since the begin... meh
[07:56] <LocutusOfBorg> looks like an ssl-related failure...
[08:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1038.40] (kernel)
[08:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: backport-iwlwifi-dkms (eoan-proposed/primary) [7906-0ubuntu1]
[08:38] <sil2100> LocutusOfBorg: I'm looking at that one today, will try to resolve it one way or the other
[09:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1048.55] (kernel)
[09:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1012.12] (core, kernel)
[09:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1013.13] (core, kernel)
[10:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1038.40]
[10:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-1013.13]
[10:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1048.55]
[10:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-1012.12]
[11:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu3]
[11:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu3]
[11:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dkms (xenial-proposed/main) [2.2.0.3-2ubuntu11.7 => 2.2.0.3-2ubuntu11.8] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[12:02] <ginggs> would someone please 'force-badtest python-sparse/0.2.0-1/i386' ? - it has regressed in release
[12:02] <ginggs> also please 'force-badtest satpy/0.16.1-1'
[13:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dkms [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.2.0.3-2ubuntu11.8]
[13:31] <LocutusOfBorg> can anybody please process https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flower/+bug/1838213 ?
[14:01] <LocutusOfBorg> and also, arthemis changed from arch:any to arch:all, please drop NBS proposed "missing build on arm64: artemis (from 17.0.1+dfsg-1)£"
[14:24] <LocutusOfBorg> reverse-depends should take care of debian/tests/control too, because otherwise lots of python2 dropped packages will have testsuite failures, e.g. python-ceilometerclient
[14:24] <LocutusOfBorg> it migrates because the old python2 package is still in the archive?
[14:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added dpf-plugins to ubuntustudio in eoan
[14:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added ubuntustudio-menu-add to ubuntustudio in eoan
[14:34] <ahasenack> tjaalton: hi there
[14:34] <ahasenack> tjaalton: thoughts on sssd 2.2?
[14:34] <ahasenack> they jumped from 1.16 to 2.0, 2.1 and now 2.2?
[14:34] <ahasenack> ops, wrong channel
[14:34] <ahasenack> -> #ubuntu-devel
[15:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (bionic-proposed/main) [2:12.0.6-0ubuntu2 => 2:12.0.6-0ubuntu3] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[15:19] <coreycb> sil2100: infinity: hi there, by any chance can we fast-track neutron 2:12.0.6-0ubuntu3 into bionic-proposed and bionic-updates (with testing of course)? it fixes a regression in 2:12.0.6-0ubuntu1 and 2:12.0.6-0ubuntu2.
[15:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mutter [source] (disco-proposed) [3.32.2+git20190711-2ubuntu1~19.04.1]
[15:48] <sil2100> coreycb: hey! I can take a look at the neutron upload
[15:48] <coreycb> sil2100: thanks!
[15:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (bionic-proposed) [2:12.0.6-0ubuntu3]
[15:58] <sil2100> coreycb: ok, accepted - since this is basically a -updates regression and a reintroduction of a patch invalidly dropped, let's think about getting this out faster
[15:58] <sil2100> coreycb: can you also run some sanity-tests on the package, besides the required bug verification that the reporter will perform?
[15:58] <coreycb> sil2100: thanks. yes i can do that, no problem.
[15:59] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: looks to me like a fixed python3.7 is in -proposed now
[16:00] <sil2100> vorlon: I uploaded the same fix for 3.8 some hour ago
[16:01] <sil2100> The packages are still building
[16:01] <vorlon> sil2100: huzzah, thanks
[16:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cinder (disco-proposed/main) [2:14.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 2:14.0.1-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[16:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: horizon (disco-proposed/main) [3:15.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 3:15.1.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[17:07] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, if you have spare time (sigh, I know you are all overbusy), please process the last 4 bugs https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-archive/+bugs?orderby=-id&start=0
[17:07] <LocutusOfBorg> they should be all good, I checked reverse-deps and other stuff
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nova (bionic-proposed/main) [2:17.0.10-0ubuntu2 => 2:17.0.11-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[17:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (bionic-proposed/main) [2:12.0.6-0ubuntu3 => 2:12.1.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[17:43] <LocutusOfBorg>  I think passing from "neutral" to "failure" is wrong, in dh-cargo context. if some new package was "bd-uninstallable" doesn't mean it should be good when build deps are in place
[17:43] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, ^^ do you agree?  e.g. http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/r/rust-doc-comment/eoan/amd64
[21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit (disco-backports/universe) [198-1~ubuntu19.04.1 => 199-1~ubuntu19.04.1] (no packageset)
[21:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit [source] (disco-backports) [199-1~ubuntu19.04.1]
[21:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit (bionic-backports/universe) [198-1~ubuntu18.04.1 => 199-1~ubuntu18.04.1] (no packageset)
[21:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit [source] (bionic-backports) [199-1~ubuntu18.04.1]
[22:41] <bdmurray> LocutusOfBorg: E117 is about "indentation" - notice the n before the first d.
[23:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: logwatch (bionic-proposed/main) [7.4.3+git20161207-2ubuntu1 => 7.4.3+git20161207-2ubuntu1.1] (ubuntu-server)