| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby2.5 (bionic-proposed/main) [2.5.1-1ubuntu1.4 => 2.5.1-1ubuntu1.5] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 03:00 | |
| Ukikie | \o/ | 03:25 |
|---|---|---|
| LocutusOfBorg | sorry bdmurray I fixed 4 packages and left one n in one of them... | 06:58 |
| LocutusOfBorg | feel free to correct! | 06:58 |
| Laney | LocutusOfBorg: we treat neutral like pass at the minute, which is not ideal | 08:02 |
| Laney | but nobody's gotten around to updating our copy of britney yet to have better handling there | 08:02 |
| Laney | ... | 08:02 |
| Laney | sil2100: I'll try to look this week btw (sorry for slow reply, was travelling back from .br) | 08:29 |
| Laney | but need to get some of GNOME 3.33.4 out really, so I have to work on that first | 08:30 |
| Laney | keep uncovering transitions and sub-transitions so it's a bit slow | 08:30 |
| sil2100 | Laney: sure thing! Yeah, I can imagine that - anyway, thanks and good luck o/ | 08:33 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-56.62~16.04.1] (kernel) | 09:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-56.62~16.04.1] (kernel) | 09:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.4.0-158.186] (core, kernel) | 09:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-56.62~16.04.1] | 09:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-158.186] | 09:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-56.62~16.04.1] | 09:29 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | please hint alt-ergo/*/armhf because it is not built there anymore | 09:44 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-23.24] (core, kernel) | 09:57 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | please hint coyote/2019.02.25-1/ppc64el, regressed in release | 09:58 |
| LocutusOfBorg | apw, ^^ can you pleeease do the two hints? | 09:58 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-23.24~18.04.1] (kernel) | 09:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-23.24] (core, kernel) | 09:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-23.24~18.04.1] (kernel) | 09:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-23.24~18.04.1] (kernel) | 09:59 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-23.24~18.04.1] | 10:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-23.24~18.04.1] | 10:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-23.24~18.04.1] | 10:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-23.24] | 10:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-23.24] | 10:00 | |
| sil2100 | LocutusOfBorg: eh, are you actually testing the changes you are releasing to ubuntu-image? | 10:02 |
| sil2100 | LocutusOfBorg: because your latest upload will make the pep8 tests fail, since now there's 3 E501 line too long errors | 10:02 |
| sil2100 | It's always best to submit one upload that fixes all issues than 5 uploads in a row | 10:03 |
| apw | LocutusOfBorg, alt-ergo appears to be attempting to build on armhf and fialing ? | 10:04 |
| sil2100 | Especially that all it needs is running 'tox' on the source to see if the tests are clean | 10:04 |
| LocutusOfBorg | sil2100, I did test it | 10:20 |
| LocutusOfBorg | yes apw | 10:20 |
| LocutusOfBorg | it has been removed from Debian/armhf | 10:20 |
| apw | that isn't the same as no-longer-built-on-armhf | 10:20 |
| apw | but it has not been removed in the version we have | 10:21 |
| LocutusOfBorg | apw, update_excues is not complaining about "missing build on armhf"... | 10:21 |
| LocutusOfBorg | sil2100, you right, I ran flake8 . --count --select=E9,F63,F72,F82 --show-source --statistics | 10:22 |
| LocutusOfBorg | instead of flake8 . --count --show-source --statistics | 10:22 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I was focusing on the failing test... | 10:23 |
| LocutusOfBorg | apw, autopkgtest for gazebo/9.6.0-2: amd64: Pass, arm64: Regression ♻ , armhf: Regression ♻ , i386: Pass, ppc64el: Regression ♻ , s390x: Always failed | 10:32 |
| LocutusOfBorg | same here, it is an NBS now | 10:32 |
| apw | LocutusOfBorg, it is FTBFS on armhf, i assume it was not an architecture in the old version | 10:32 |
| LocutusOfBorg | alt-ergo | 1.30+dfsg1-2 | disco/universe | source, amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x | 10:33 |
| LocutusOfBorg | alt-ergo | 1.30+dfsg1-2 | eoan/universe | source, amd64, arm64, i386, ppc64el, s390x | 10:33 |
| rbalint | my ppa's s390x libnfs tests on eoan don't show up, while i think one aready finished (tried running it several times) https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-eoan-rbalint-scratch3/?format=plain | 10:33 |
| LocutusOfBorg | apw, it was I guess, sorry but I don't follow you :) | 10:33 |
| rbalint | submit succeeded, am i doing it in the wrong way? | 10:34 |
| apw | LocutusOfBorg, it is all just a lot inconsistent with the world | 10:34 |
| LocutusOfBorg | rbalint, what is the line you do to trigger it? | 10:34 |
| LocutusOfBorg | apw, I think the new version has been removed from archive, the old one recopied before release, but without armhf | 10:35 |
| LocutusOfBorg | does it sound right? | 10:35 |
| LocutusOfBorg | rbalint your test is still running? http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/running | 10:36 |
| rbalint | LocutusOfBorg, two is running, but i think i started 3 | 10:37 |
| rbalint | LocutusOfBorg, also i submitted the first around 12 hours ago | 10:37 |
| LocutusOfBorg | it's dead jim :) | 10:39 |
| rbalint | LocutusOfBorg, :-) | 10:39 |
| rbalint | LocutusOfBorg, now only one is running, maybe there is something with copying the results | 10:40 |
| rbalint | LocutusOfBorg, start line https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=eoan&arch=s390x&package=libnfs&ppa=rbalint/scratch3&trigger=valgrind/1:3.15.0-1ubuntu1&trigger=libnfs/3.0.0-2ubuntu1~rbalint1 | 10:40 |
| LocutusOfBorg | looks good to me | 10:42 |
| rbalint | it started the job fine, i just can't see the results | 10:43 |
| rbalint | LocutusOfBorg, i think i found the issue, a bad systemd is getting in from the ppa | 10:44 |
| rbalint | this should fix the reboot, i still should have got the logs even when the testbed fails to reboot | 10:46 |
| Laney | something in the dependencies or the PPA is making the test machine fail to come up and autopkgtest usually blames itself there rather than the maintainer | 10:46 |
| Laney | I can fix it so you get blamed :-) | 10:46 |
| rbalint | Laney, hm, interesting options | 10:47 |
| Laney | done, you should start to see results soon | 10:47 |
| rbalint | Laney, thanks, but if the machines fail to come up very often due to issues unrelated to packages i'm ok with keeping them configured that way | 10:49 |
| Laney | it's a per package switch | 10:50 |
| Laney | if you triggered with systemd this would already have happened | 10:50 |
| rbalint | Laney, so i got it for libnfs? | 10:50 |
| Laney | but PPAs always fulfil dependncies so you can get a bit unlucky there | 10:50 |
| Laney | yes | 10:50 |
| Laney | it basically assumes most packages aren't likely to break the boot themselves | 10:51 |
| LocutusOfBorg | can rbalint be blamed also for my faults 😂? | 10:51 |
| Laney | but clearly some do have that capacity | 10:51 |
| Laney | you see, rbalint was trying to test his packages before putting them in the archive | 10:51 |
| Laney | so he wins here :-) | 10:51 |
| rbalint | :-D | 10:52 |
| LocutusOfBorg | my problem is not about missing testing, is about bad testing :D | 10:52 |
| ginggs | would someone please 'force-badtest python-sparse/0.2.0-1/i386' ? - it has regressed in release | 11:14 |
| ginggs | also please 'force-badtest satpy/0.16.1-1' | 11:14 |
| apw | LocutusOfBorg, coyote isn't even in release to regress there | 12:26 |
| apw | ginggs, python-sparse seems to need 'six' to migrate if i am reading the testing right | 12:28 |
| ginggs | apw: ah i see LocutusOfBorg tested those together, i can do that for the new scipy | 12:31 |
| apw | ginggs, that one is less obvious but worth a shot; let me know | 12:33 |
| didrocks | LocutusOfBorg: I'm crossing finger for this upload of ubuntu-image to pass ;) I want to unblock grub2 :p | 12:39 |
| rbalint | RAOF, bdmurray: could you please release ubuntu-meta to disco in your sru cycles? | 13:10 |
| LocutusOfBorg | didrocks, I did upload for that reason... | 13:21 |
| LocutusOfBorg | force-badtest python-asdf/2.3.2-2/s390x <-- apw can you please bump that hint? 2.3.3-1 is the current version | 13:22 |
| LocutusOfBorg | autopkgtest for coyote/2019.02.25-1: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass, armhf: Pass, i386: Pass, ppc64el: Regression ♻ , s390x: Pass | 13:22 |
| LocutusOfBorg | apw, ^^ not sure why but autopkgtests things this is a regression= | 13:22 |
| didrocks | LocutusOfBorg: yeah, I bet ;) still 20 minutes to go, let's see | 13:22 |
| LocutusOfBorg | didrocks, it is fine | 13:23 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I tested on ppa | 13:24 |
| didrocks | ah great, thanks for this! :) | 13:25 |
| LocutusOfBorg | the first failure was tested with pep8, but I introduced another because I tested only that specific code | 13:32 |
| LocutusOfBorg | the second one was tested with ppa | 13:32 |
| ginggs | apw: http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/p/python-sparse/eoan/i386 passed when triggered with six \o/ | 13:52 |
| apw | ginggs, that is a thing at least | 13:52 |
| ginggs | apw: did you look at satpy? it seems to have regressed in release on all archs | 13:53 |
| apw | ginggs, i did not, is that a six consumer by any chance | 13:55 |
| ginggs | apw: hmm, yes | 13:56 |
| apw | ginggs, so perhaps a retest of something against that just in case it is a slew of the same thing | 13:57 |
| ginggs | apw: trying now, thanks | 13:57 |
| LocutusOfBorg | didrocks, enjoy your new grub | 14:55 |
| didrocks | LocutusOfBorg: yep, got the email ;) | 15:03 |
| bdmurray | rbalint, RAOF: I've released ubuntu-meta | 15:09 |
| RAOF | Thanks! I'm at the roadmap sprint, so a bit less SRUy than my normal Wednesday 😀 | 15:11 |
| ginggs | apw: triggering with six didn't help the satpy tests | 15:12 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ruby2.5 [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.5.1-1ubuntu1.5] | 15:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1019.21~16.04.1] (kernel) | 15:42 | |
| slashd | sil2100, can you look at makedumpfile in excuse page for ppc64el. seems like it doesn't find a crashdump in /var/crash and fails, but it doesn't seem related to the change I have sponsored, since same problem with eoan-proposed version -1 : http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/m/makedumpfile/eoan/ppc64el | 15:45 |
| slashd | vorlon, ^ since you also have an uploaded affected by that makedumpfile failure ^ | 15:45 |
| gpiccoli | slashd, hi o/ | 15:46 |
| slashd | sil2100, vorlon : could it be an infra issue ? | 15:47 |
| Laney | ginggs: not sure why six would fix that, looks like a change in pygac to me and you need to supply a config file now | 15:53 |
| Laney | hopefully an easy fix | 15:54 |
| sil2100 | slashd: hm, indeed it looks like a constant failure for both old and new version | 16:02 |
| sil2100 | slashd: not sure if infra version, maybe something changed in its dependencies (kernel?) that causes this failure | 16:03 |
| slashd | sil2100, indeed | 16:03 |
| slashd | sil2100, possibly, hard to test without local testing ;/ | 16:03 |
| slashd | and I don't have access to the failing arch | 16:03 |
| slashd | sil2100, what i can tell with the data we have is that the change I have upload have nothing to do with this failure. | 16:04 |
| slashd | gpiccoli, ^ fyi | 16:05 |
| Laney | slashd: sure you do (canonistack-bos01) | 16:05 |
| gpiccoli | Tnx slashd | 16:06 |
| gpiccoli | Laney, indeed we have that machine, I'm gonna try to reproduce the failure there | 16:06 |
| slashd | gpiccoli, Laney thanks | 16:06 |
| gpiccoli | But I guess Eric's comment is accurate, if we are failing the current proposed version and the latest one (already released), it's not something introduced by the change proposed | 16:07 |
| slashd | sil2100, how do you want to proceed ? us testing locally first ? and see how it goes ? or ignore the failure since we know it was there before my upload ? | 16:07 |
| gpiccoli | if we could possibly do it in parallel, that'd be amazing! | 16:07 |
| slashd | gpiccoli, right the failure can be worked on separately IMHO | 16:08 |
| gpiccoli | agreed =) | 16:08 |
| sil2100 | slashd: I would say we should first try to investigate the failure, see what could have caused the issue, fill in a bug and if it's not something we can easily figure out or fix, hint it | 16:17 |
| sil2100 | slashd: maybe we could get someone from the kernel team to take a look? | 16:18 |
| gpiccoli | sil2100, cascardo is the kdump guy, he's PTO for now, I'll take a look and sync with him | 16:19 |
| slashd | gpiccoli, sil2100 sound good thanks guys | 16:19 |
| ginggs | Laney: ack, yes, and I saw your comments in #debci | 16:21 |
| Laney | not related to the particular failure itself, but we should have caught it | 16:22 |
| === rsalveti_ is now known as rsalveti | ||
| sil2100 | gpiccoli, slashd: thanks! | 16:56 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-rollup-plugin-alias [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.5.2-1] (no packageset) | 17:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted librsync [s390x] (eoan-proposed) [2.0.2-1] | 18:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-rollup-plugin-alias [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [1.5.2-1] | 18:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-go.opencensus [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [0.22.0-1] | 18:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted librsync [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [2.0.2-1] | 18:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted librsync [i386] (eoan-proposed) [2.0.2-1] | 18:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted librsync [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [2.0.2-1] | 18:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted librsync [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [2.0.2-1] | 18:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted librsync [armhf] (eoan-proposed) [2.0.2-1] | 18:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: plasma-discover [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [5.16.4-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu) | 18:07 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: plasma-discover [i386] (eoan-proposed/universe) [5.16.4-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu) | 18:07 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: plasma-discover [s390x] (eoan-proposed/universe) [5.16.4-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu) | 18:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: plasma-discover [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/universe) [5.16.4-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu) | 18:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted aodh [source] (disco-proposed) [8.0.0-0ubuntu1.1] | 18:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted spice-html5 [source] (disco-proposed) [0.1.7-3ubuntu0.19.04.1] | 18:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: plasma-discover [arm64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [5.16.4-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu) | 18:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: plasma-discover [armhf] (eoan-proposed/universe) [5.16.4-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu) | 18:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd-glib [source] (disco-proposed) [1.49-0ubuntu0.19.04.0] | 18:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd-glib [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.49-0ubuntu0.18.04.0] | 18:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-flashback [source] (disco-proposed) [3.30.0-1ubuntu6.1] | 18:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-flashback [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.0-1ubuntu1.4] | 18:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nss [source] (disco-proposed) [2:3.42-1ubuntu2.2] | 18:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nss [source] (bionic-proposed) [2:3.35-2ubuntu2.4] | 18:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nss [source] (xenial-proposed) [2:3.28.4-0ubuntu0.16.04.7] | 19:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libblockdev [source] (disco-proposed) [2.20-7ubuntu0.1] | 19:07 | |
| coreycb | bdmurray: if you have a moment, we've regression tested bug 1838263 successfully. since it fixes a regression I'd like to see if we can get it to -updates asap. frickler was going to test but wasn't able to get machines today. it's just adding a patch back that was inadvertently dropped, so personally i think we're good on testing. | 19:08 |
| ubot5 | bug 1838263 in neutron (Ubuntu Bionic) "[SRU] Fix neutron 2:12.0.6-0ubuntu1 queens regression" [Critical,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1838263 | 19:08 |
| bdmurray | coreycb: Isn't comment #5 in bug 1838263 the same as comment #2 in bug 1830341? The point being if the tests let this through before is it really a good test? | 19:21 |
| ubot5 | bug 1838263 in neutron (Ubuntu Bionic) "[SRU] Fix neutron 2:12.0.6-0ubuntu1 queens regression" [Critical,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1838263 | 19:21 |
| ubot5 | bug 1830341 in nova (Ubuntu Bionic) "[SRU] queens stable releases" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1830341 | 19:21 |
| coreycb | bdmurray: that's a fair point. part of regression testing is to verify base functionality isn't regressed, but agree it didn't catch this one. | 19:25 |
| bdmurray | coreycb: I've gone ahead and released it | 19:36 |
| coreycb | bdmurray: thanks | 19:36 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1019.21~16.04.1] | 20:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1019.21] (kernel) | 20:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cinder [source] (disco-proposed) [2:14.0.1-0ubuntu1] | 20:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1019.21] | 20:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted horizon [source] (disco-proposed) [3:15.1.0-0ubuntu1] | 20:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted logwatch [source] (bionic-proposed) [7.4.3+git20161207-2ubuntu1.1] | 20:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libinput [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.10.4-1ubuntu0.18.04.1] | 20:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-react [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [16.2.0-3build1] (no packageset) | 20:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lubuntu-default-settings [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.54.3] | 21:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libarchive [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.2.2-3.1ubuntu0.4] | 21:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-340 [source] (bionic-proposed) [340.107-0ubuntu0.18.04.3] | 22:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted spice-html5 [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.1.4-1ubuntu1.16.04.1] | 22:59 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted software-properties [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.96.20.9] | 23:01 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!