[03:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby2.5 (bionic-proposed/main) [2.5.1-1ubuntu1.4 => 2.5.1-1ubuntu1.5] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) [03:25] \o/ [06:58] sorry bdmurray I fixed 4 packages and left one n in one of them... [06:58] feel free to correct! [08:02] LocutusOfBorg: we treat neutral like pass at the minute, which is not ideal [08:02] but nobody's gotten around to updating our copy of britney yet to have better handling there [08:02] ... [08:29] sil2100: I'll try to look this week btw (sorry for slow reply, was travelling back from .br) [08:30] but need to get some of GNOME 3.33.4 out really, so I have to work on that first [08:30] keep uncovering transitions and sub-transitions so it's a bit slow [08:33] Laney: sure thing! Yeah, I can imagine that - anyway, thanks and good luck o/ [09:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-56.62~16.04.1] (kernel) [09:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-56.62~16.04.1] (kernel) [09:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.4.0-158.186] (core, kernel) [09:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-56.62~16.04.1] [09:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-158.186] [09:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-56.62~16.04.1] [09:44] please hint alt-ergo/*/armhf because it is not built there anymore [09:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-23.24] (core, kernel) [09:58] please hint coyote/2019.02.25-1/ppc64el, regressed in release [09:58] apw, ^^ can you pleeease do the two hints? [09:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-23.24~18.04.1] (kernel) [09:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-23.24] (core, kernel) [09:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-23.24~18.04.1] (kernel) [09:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-23.24~18.04.1] (kernel) [10:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-23.24~18.04.1] [10:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-23.24~18.04.1] [10:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-23.24~18.04.1] [10:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-23.24] [10:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-23.24] [10:02] LocutusOfBorg: eh, are you actually testing the changes you are releasing to ubuntu-image? [10:02] LocutusOfBorg: because your latest upload will make the pep8 tests fail, since now there's 3 E501 line too long errors [10:03] It's always best to submit one upload that fixes all issues than 5 uploads in a row [10:04] LocutusOfBorg, alt-ergo appears to be attempting to build on armhf and fialing ? [10:04] Especially that all it needs is running 'tox' on the source to see if the tests are clean [10:20] sil2100, I did test it [10:20] yes apw [10:20] it has been removed from Debian/armhf [10:20] that isn't the same as no-longer-built-on-armhf [10:21] but it has not been removed in the version we have [10:21] apw, update_excues is not complaining about "missing build on armhf"... [10:22] sil2100, you right, I ran flake8 . --count --select=E9,F63,F72,F82 --show-source --statistics [10:22] instead of flake8 . --count --show-source --statistics [10:23] I was focusing on the failing test... [10:32] apw, autopkgtest for gazebo/9.6.0-2: amd64: Pass, arm64: Regression ♻ , armhf: Regression ♻ , i386: Pass, ppc64el: Regression ♻ , s390x: Always failed [10:32] same here, it is an NBS now [10:32] LocutusOfBorg, it is FTBFS on armhf, i assume it was not an architecture in the old version [10:33] alt-ergo | 1.30+dfsg1-2 | disco/universe | source, amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x [10:33] alt-ergo | 1.30+dfsg1-2 | eoan/universe | source, amd64, arm64, i386, ppc64el, s390x [10:33] my ppa's s390x libnfs tests on eoan don't show up, while i think one aready finished (tried running it several times) https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-eoan-rbalint-scratch3/?format=plain [10:33] apw, it was I guess, sorry but I don't follow you :) [10:34] submit succeeded, am i doing it in the wrong way? [10:34] LocutusOfBorg, it is all just a lot inconsistent with the world [10:34] rbalint, what is the line you do to trigger it? [10:35] apw, I think the new version has been removed from archive, the old one recopied before release, but without armhf [10:35] does it sound right? [10:36] rbalint your test is still running? http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/running [10:37] LocutusOfBorg, two is running, but i think i started 3 [10:37] LocutusOfBorg, also i submitted the first around 12 hours ago [10:39] it's dead jim :) [10:39] LocutusOfBorg, :-) [10:40] LocutusOfBorg, now only one is running, maybe there is something with copying the results [10:40] LocutusOfBorg, start line https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=eoan&arch=s390x&package=libnfs&ppa=rbalint/scratch3&trigger=valgrind/1:3.15.0-1ubuntu1&trigger=libnfs/3.0.0-2ubuntu1~rbalint1 [10:42] looks good to me [10:43] it started the job fine, i just can't see the results [10:44] LocutusOfBorg, i think i found the issue, a bad systemd is getting in from the ppa [10:46] this should fix the reboot, i still should have got the logs even when the testbed fails to reboot [10:46] something in the dependencies or the PPA is making the test machine fail to come up and autopkgtest usually blames itself there rather than the maintainer [10:46] I can fix it so you get blamed :-) [10:47] Laney, hm, interesting options [10:47] done, you should start to see results soon [10:49] Laney, thanks, but if the machines fail to come up very often due to issues unrelated to packages i'm ok with keeping them configured that way [10:50] it's a per package switch [10:50] if you triggered with systemd this would already have happened [10:50] Laney, so i got it for libnfs? [10:50] but PPAs always fulfil dependncies so you can get a bit unlucky there [10:50] yes [10:51] it basically assumes most packages aren't likely to break the boot themselves [10:51] can rbalint be blamed also for my faults 😂? [10:51] but clearly some do have that capacity [10:51] you see, rbalint was trying to test his packages before putting them in the archive [10:51] so he wins here :-) [10:52] :-D [10:52] my problem is not about missing testing, is about bad testing :D [11:14] would someone please 'force-badtest python-sparse/0.2.0-1/i386' ? - it has regressed in release [11:14] also please 'force-badtest satpy/0.16.1-1' [12:26] LocutusOfBorg, coyote isn't even in release to regress there [12:28] ginggs, python-sparse seems to need 'six' to migrate if i am reading the testing right [12:31] apw: ah i see LocutusOfBorg tested those together, i can do that for the new scipy [12:33] ginggs, that one is less obvious but worth a shot; let me know [12:39] LocutusOfBorg: I'm crossing finger for this upload of ubuntu-image to pass ;) I want to unblock grub2 :p [13:10] RAOF, bdmurray: could you please release ubuntu-meta to disco in your sru cycles? [13:21] didrocks, I did upload for that reason... [13:22] force-badtest python-asdf/2.3.2-2/s390x <-- apw can you please bump that hint? 2.3.3-1 is the current version [13:22] autopkgtest for coyote/2019.02.25-1: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass, armhf: Pass, i386: Pass, ppc64el: Regression ♻ , s390x: Pass [13:22] apw, ^^ not sure why but autopkgtests things this is a regression= [13:22] LocutusOfBorg: yeah, I bet ;) still 20 minutes to go, let's see [13:23] didrocks, it is fine [13:24] I tested on ppa [13:25] ah great, thanks for this! :) [13:32] the first failure was tested with pep8, but I introduced another because I tested only that specific code [13:32] the second one was tested with ppa [13:52] apw: http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/p/python-sparse/eoan/i386 passed when triggered with six \o/ [13:52] ginggs, that is a thing at least [13:53] apw: did you look at satpy? it seems to have regressed in release on all archs [13:55] ginggs, i did not, is that a six consumer by any chance [13:56] apw: hmm, yes [13:57] ginggs, so perhaps a retest of something against that just in case it is a slew of the same thing [13:57] apw: trying now, thanks [14:55] didrocks, enjoy your new grub [15:03] LocutusOfBorg: yep, got the email ;) [15:09] rbalint, RAOF: I've released ubuntu-meta [15:11] Thanks! I'm at the roadmap sprint, so a bit less SRUy than my normal Wednesday 😀 [15:12] apw: triggering with six didn't help the satpy tests [15:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ruby2.5 [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.5.1-1ubuntu1.5] [15:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1019.21~16.04.1] (kernel) [15:45] sil2100, can you look at makedumpfile in excuse page for ppc64el. seems like it doesn't find a crashdump in /var/crash and fails, but it doesn't seem related to the change I have sponsored, since same problem with eoan-proposed version -1 : http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/m/makedumpfile/eoan/ppc64el [15:45] vorlon, ^ since you also have an uploaded affected by that makedumpfile failure ^ [15:46] slashd, hi o/ [15:47] sil2100, vorlon : could it be an infra issue ? [15:53] ginggs: not sure why six would fix that, looks like a change in pygac to me and you need to supply a config file now [15:54] hopefully an easy fix [16:02] slashd: hm, indeed it looks like a constant failure for both old and new version [16:03] slashd: not sure if infra version, maybe something changed in its dependencies (kernel?) that causes this failure [16:03] sil2100, indeed [16:03] sil2100, possibly, hard to test without local testing ;/ [16:03] and I don't have access to the failing arch [16:04] sil2100, what i can tell with the data we have is that the change I have upload have nothing to do with this failure. [16:05] gpiccoli, ^ fyi [16:05] slashd: sure you do (canonistack-bos01) [16:06] Tnx slashd [16:06] Laney, indeed we have that machine, I'm gonna try to reproduce the failure there [16:06] gpiccoli, Laney thanks [16:07] But I guess Eric's comment is accurate, if we are failing the current proposed version and the latest one (already released), it's not something introduced by the change proposed [16:07] sil2100, how do you want to proceed ? us testing locally first ? and see how it goes ? or ignore the failure since we know it was there before my upload ? [16:07] if we could possibly do it in parallel, that'd be amazing! [16:08] gpiccoli, right the failure can be worked on separately IMHO [16:08] agreed =) [16:17] slashd: I would say we should first try to investigate the failure, see what could have caused the issue, fill in a bug and if it's not something we can easily figure out or fix, hint it [16:18] slashd: maybe we could get someone from the kernel team to take a look? [16:19] sil2100, cascardo is the kdump guy, he's PTO for now, I'll take a look and sync with him [16:19] gpiccoli, sil2100 sound good thanks guys [16:21] Laney: ack, yes, and I saw your comments in #debci [16:22] not related to the particular failure itself, but we should have caught it === rsalveti_ is now known as rsalveti [16:56] gpiccoli, slashd: thanks! [17:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-rollup-plugin-alias [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.5.2-1] (no packageset) [18:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted librsync [s390x] (eoan-proposed) [2.0.2-1] [18:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-rollup-plugin-alias [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [1.5.2-1] [18:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-go.opencensus [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [0.22.0-1] [18:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted librsync [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [2.0.2-1] [18:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted librsync [i386] (eoan-proposed) [2.0.2-1] [18:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted librsync [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [2.0.2-1] [18:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted librsync [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [2.0.2-1] [18:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted librsync [armhf] (eoan-proposed) [2.0.2-1] [18:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: plasma-discover [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [5.16.4-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu) [18:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: plasma-discover [i386] (eoan-proposed/universe) [5.16.4-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu) [18:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: plasma-discover [s390x] (eoan-proposed/universe) [5.16.4-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu) [18:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: plasma-discover [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/universe) [5.16.4-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu) [18:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted aodh [source] (disco-proposed) [8.0.0-0ubuntu1.1] [18:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted spice-html5 [source] (disco-proposed) [0.1.7-3ubuntu0.19.04.1] [18:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: plasma-discover [arm64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [5.16.4-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu) [18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: plasma-discover [armhf] (eoan-proposed/universe) [5.16.4-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu) [18:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd-glib [source] (disco-proposed) [1.49-0ubuntu0.19.04.0] [18:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd-glib [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.49-0ubuntu0.18.04.0] [18:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-flashback [source] (disco-proposed) [3.30.0-1ubuntu6.1] [18:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-flashback [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.0-1ubuntu1.4] [18:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nss [source] (disco-proposed) [2:3.42-1ubuntu2.2] [18:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nss [source] (bionic-proposed) [2:3.35-2ubuntu2.4] [19:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nss [source] (xenial-proposed) [2:3.28.4-0ubuntu0.16.04.7] [19:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libblockdev [source] (disco-proposed) [2.20-7ubuntu0.1] [19:08] bdmurray: if you have a moment, we've regression tested bug 1838263 successfully. since it fixes a regression I'd like to see if we can get it to -updates asap. frickler was going to test but wasn't able to get machines today. it's just adding a patch back that was inadvertently dropped, so personally i think we're good on testing. [19:08] bug 1838263 in neutron (Ubuntu Bionic) "[SRU] Fix neutron 2:12.0.6-0ubuntu1 queens regression" [Critical,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1838263 [19:21] coreycb: Isn't comment #5 in bug 1838263 the same as comment #2 in bug 1830341? The point being if the tests let this through before is it really a good test? [19:21] bug 1838263 in neutron (Ubuntu Bionic) "[SRU] Fix neutron 2:12.0.6-0ubuntu1 queens regression" [Critical,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1838263 [19:21] bug 1830341 in nova (Ubuntu Bionic) "[SRU] queens stable releases" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1830341 [19:25] bdmurray: that's a fair point. part of regression testing is to verify base functionality isn't regressed, but agree it didn't catch this one. [19:36] coreycb: I've gone ahead and released it [19:36] bdmurray: thanks [20:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1019.21~16.04.1] [20:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1019.21] (kernel) [20:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cinder [source] (disco-proposed) [2:14.0.1-0ubuntu1] [20:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1019.21] [20:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted horizon [source] (disco-proposed) [3:15.1.0-0ubuntu1] [20:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted logwatch [source] (bionic-proposed) [7.4.3+git20161207-2ubuntu1.1] [20:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libinput [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.10.4-1ubuntu0.18.04.1] [20:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-react [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [16.2.0-3build1] (no packageset) [21:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lubuntu-default-settings [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.54.3] [21:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libarchive [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.2.2-3.1ubuntu0.4] [22:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-340 [source] (bionic-proposed) [340.107-0ubuntu0.18.04.3] [22:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted spice-html5 [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.1.4-1ubuntu1.16.04.1] [23:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted software-properties [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.96.20.9]