| mborzecki | morning | 05:19 |
|---|---|---|
| mborzecki | that's a new none - Download snap "test-snapd-openvswitch-support" (11) from channel "stable" (stream error: stream ID 1; PROTOCOL_ERROR) | 05:40 |
| zyga | good morning | 06:24 |
| zyga | mborzecki: how are you :) | 06:24 |
| mborzecki | zyga: hey | 06:24 |
| zyga | mborzecki: we saw some of that last week, cause unknown but not investigated either | 06:24 |
| mborzecki | zyga: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/bboozzoo/snapcraft/ | 06:25 |
| mborzecki | packaged the damned thing eventually | 06:25 |
| zyga | excellent | 06:26 |
| zyga | what's your plan for flock? | 06:26 |
| mborzecki | zyga: we've updated the slide deck, snapcraft is kind of packaged, i got the snapcore/go-gettext package approved and need sponsoring (got some reviews to do) | 06:28 |
| mborzecki | zyga: other than that, cover the important bits and improvise | 06:29 |
| zyga | mborzecki: if someone asks, what's the outlook for using snapcraft on fedora using fedora bases | 06:29 |
| jamesh | zyga: hi. Was there supposed to be some review comments with https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7197#issuecomment-517256824 ? | 06:29 |
| mup | PR #7197: usersession: track connections to session agent for exit on idle and peer credential checks <Created by jhenstridge> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7197> | 06:29 |
| zyga | jamesh: hey, I don't know from the top of my head | 06:29 |
| mborzecki | zyga: tbh, the question is what's the outlook for non-ubuntu bases | 06:29 |
| zyga | jamesh: last week was rather busy, and I had little chance to look at PRs | 06:30 |
| jamesh | zyga: it looks like you might have had unsaved review comments at some point and clicked send | 06:30 |
| zyga | jamesh: oh, it still shows pending here. | 06:30 |
| mborzecki | zyga: this topic seems to be progressing really slow https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/base-runtime-freedesktop-sdk-runtime-19-08/11153 | 06:30 |
| zyga | jamesh: github UX snafu, I'm sorry about that | 06:30 |
| jamesh | zyga: fair enough. I know you were busy last week | 06:31 |
| zyga | I just sent it, it is only one comment though | 06:31 |
| jamesh | thanks | 06:31 |
| zyga | jamesh: I didn't go deeper than that function | 06:31 |
| === pstolowski|afk is now known as pstolowski | ||
| pstolowski | morning | 07:09 |
| pstolowski | hey zyga, welcome back! | 07:10 |
| mborzecki | pstolowski: hey | 07:12 |
| zyga | pstolowski: hey, it's good to be back :) | 07:28 |
| zyga | pstolowski: ETOOMANYMILES | 07:28 |
| pstolowski | :) | 07:29 |
| pstolowski | hey mborzecki | 07:29 |
| zyga | pstolowski: one idea from the sprint https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7205 | 07:33 |
| mup | PR #7205: rfc: introduce confinement options failsafe flag <Created by zyga> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7205> | 07:33 |
| zyga | pstolowski: it's not fleshed out fully | 07:33 |
| zyga | but should help when we have bugs that we don't know about | 07:34 |
| pstolowski | zyga: right, i saw this PR, was wondering if there was any discusson behind it, good! | 07:35 |
| zyga | pstolowski: only at the sprint | 07:35 |
| zyga | pstolowski: one more aspect to explore is to allow a specific interface endpoint to fail | 07:36 |
| zyga | without failing all of the device setup | 07:36 |
| zyga | (in failsafe mode) | 07:36 |
| zyga | e.g. allow serial-port-abc to fail without breaking snapd/core | 07:36 |
| pstolowski | zyga: added a comment | 07:47 |
| jamesh | zyga: for the mount namespace case, it might just mean that problems in the non fail-safe never get reported because they appear to work | 07:47 |
| zyga | jamesh: indeed, we can expand it to talk to the error tracker if needed | 07:55 |
| zyga | jamesh: but we also need to be mindful of a single error down in the guts propagating to effective DOS on snapd | 07:55 |
| * dot-tobias says hi | 09:16 | |
| dot-tobias | sergiusens: Can you give me a quick hint here please? (outdated snapcraft homebrew formula) https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/install-snapcraft-on-macos/9607/4 | 09:27 |
| mborzecki | google:debian-sid-64:tests/main/sbuild keeps failing | 09:45 |
| mborzecki | the debug log isn't helpful :/ | 09:46 |
| zyga | mborzecki: do you have a sample? | 09:46 |
| mborzecki | zyga: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/yjjz4S9ndQ/ | 09:46 |
| mborzecki | zyga: heh E: Build failure (dpkg-buildpackage died) | 09:47 |
| zyga | hmmm | 09:47 |
| zyga | is this on master or on your branch? | 09:47 |
| mborzecki | on my branches | 09:52 |
| mup | PR snapd#7209 opened: firstboot: queue service cmds before mark-seeded <Created by stolowski> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7209> | 09:56 |
| zyga | mborzecki: are you changing dependencies? | 10:02 |
| zyga | mborzecki: network failed? | 10:06 |
| mborzeck1 | zyga: duh, graphics froze, cpu fan 100% | 10:06 |
| mborzeck1 | zyga: i.e. the year of linux desktop is upon us | 10:06 |
| zyga | mborzeck1: laptop or desktop? | 10:06 |
| mborzeck1 | zyga: laptop | 10:07 |
| zyga | x230? | 10:07 |
| zyga | or x250? | 10:07 |
| mborzeck1 | zyga: 250 | 10:08 |
| === mborzeck1 is now known as mborzecki | ||
| zyga | mborzecki: does ohmygiraffe work for you on arch? | 10:34 |
| zyga | mborzecki: it crashes on TW | 10:35 |
| * zyga needs to update to 2.40 | 10:35 | |
| mborzecki | zyga: used to work | 10:37 |
| mborzecki | zyga: yup works | 10:38 |
| * pstolowski lunch | 11:33 | |
| === ricab is now known as ricab|lunch | ||
| mborzecki | zyga: https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7210 | 12:39 |
| mup | PR #7210: packaging/debian-sid: set GOCACHE to a known writable location <Created by bboozzoo> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7210> | 12:40 |
| mup | PR snapd#7210 opened: packaging/debian-sid: set GOCACHE to a known writable location <Created by bboozzoo> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7210> | 12:40 |
| zyga | mborzecki: what is that -pkgdir? | 12:59 |
| zyga | mborzecki: I have slight preference for /tmp/ for GOCACHE | 12:59 |
| zyga | but not strong one | 12:59 |
| mborzecki | zyga: -pkgdir is set by dh-golang | 13:00 |
| mborzecki | zyga: and afaiu dh-golang sets GOCACHE to point to _build as well | 13:00 |
| * zyga goes for lunch | 13:29 | |
| === ricab|lunch is now known as ricab | ||
| mborzecki | - Fetch and check assertions for snap "test-snapd-tools_6" (6) (cannot fetch assertion: got unexpected HTTP status code 408 via GET to "https://api.snapcraft.io/api/v1/snaps/assertions/snap-declaration/16/eFe8BTR5L5V9F7yHeMAPxkEr2NdUXMtw?max-format=3") | 13:37 |
| mborzecki | pff | 13:37 |
| mborzecki | btw. PROTOCOL_ERROR has this in debug log: DEBUG: Not retrying: http.http2StreamError{StreamID:0x1, Code:0x1, Cause:error(nil)} | 13:38 |
| mborzecki | soo that does look like HTTP2 level issue | 13:38 |
| mborzecki | well, at least the sbuild fix PR didn't fail in sbuild :) | 13:39 |
| cachio | mborzecki, did you see that today? | 13:43 |
| mborzecki | cachio: yes, 3-4 times already | 13:48 |
| mborzecki | cachio: last time in https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7210 | 13:49 |
| mup | PR #7210: packaging/debian-sid: set GOCACHE to a known writable location <Created by bboozzoo> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7210> | 13:49 |
| cachio | mborzecki, good, I'll see that with the store team | 13:50 |
| cachio | mborzecki, thanks for the info | 13:51 |
| zyga | cachio: I'll get back to you on the 2.40 release plan soon | 13:53 |
| cachio | zyga, ok | 13:56 |
| cachio | zyga, I' have an app with my accountant in 30 minutes | 13:56 |
| cachio | zyga, just ping me and I'll ping you back once I am back | 13:57 |
| zyga | sure | 13:57 |
| sil2100 | zyga: hey! Since we'll be preparing the 18.04.3 point-release ubuntu-core images soon (both for 16 and 18), just wanted to touch base if the current snapd in stable is good to go to the new official stable images | 14:13 |
| sil2100 | zyga: is the current stable snapd good for refreshed image release? ;) | 14:14 |
| * cachio afk | 14:14 | |
| pstolowski | ogra: hey, i've a task to look at failure scenarios where a device fails at first boot setup and is rebooted, and doesn't come back (doesn't boot anymroe); i've heard you experienced such issues before, do you have any concrete examples, reproducers, or logs? | 14:51 |
| pstolowski | also ondra ^ ? | 14:53 |
| ondra | pstolowski yeah it's easy one | 14:55 |
| ondra | pstolowski when anything fails during first boot seeding, we do revert 'uninstall' all snaps | 14:55 |
| ondra | pstolowski this actually removes kernel and core snap sym links from 'vat/lib/snapd/snap' | 14:56 |
| ondra | pstolowski I think to make first boot more robust, we should do two changes, in snapd and initrd. | 14:56 |
| ondra | pstolowski when we look for core and kernel snap, we should consider two locations '/var/lib/snapd/snaps' '/var/lib/snapd/seed/snaps' | 14:57 |
| ondra | pstolowski so we have fallback when snaps are removed | 14:57 |
| pstolowski | ondra: ack, thanks, i need to look at the code | 14:59 |
| ondra | pstolowski easy way to reproduce is to make gadget snap with malformed gadget.yaml, and build image with it | 15:03 |
| ondra | pstolowski e.g. and non supported role: | 15:04 |
| ogra | pstolowski, ondra there is also the core18 case where snapd doesnt properly get seeded and you end up with an error from console-conf "snap command not found" or some such | 15:07 |
| ogra | coe18 is a lot more fragile in that due to the singling out of snapd | 15:07 |
| zyga | cachio: postponed till next week | 15:19 |
| zyga | sil2100: current as in 2.39.x? | 15:19 |
| zyga | sil2100: I think anything in stable is good, I don't know of any blockers that would affect images | 15:20 |
| zyga | sil2100: what's the time frame? we will publish 2.40 to stable next week | 15:20 |
| sil2100 | zyga: it's all happening this week, with a ETA for the release this Thursday | 15:22 |
| ondra | ogra yes this is same case | 15:23 |
| sil2100 | zyga: thanks for the heads up then o/ | 15:23 |
| zyga | sil2100: In that case do use 2.39.x, 2.40 will bake and we can try next time :) | 15:23 |
| pstolowski | ondra, ogra thanks, i need to digest it and think about this | 15:23 |
| zyga | willcooke: help, I cannot create topics on the WSL category | 15:47 |
| zyga | I wrote the whole thing and saved it to clipboard | 15:47 |
| zyga | willcooke: when I attempt to save all I get is "You are not permitted to view the requested resource." | 15:47 |
| willcooke | zyga, zoiks! One sec... | 15:49 |
| zyga | mborzecki: udev rewrite tests running, I think it will be green | 15:49 |
| zyga | mborzecki: I will need to sit down and think how to test it, I will start by writing simple unit tests tomorrow | 15:49 |
| willcooke | zyga, hm. "everyone" can create/reply/see. Investigating | 15:50 |
| willcooke | zyga, I think this might have been a "user trust level" thing. I've bumped you up, can you try now? | 15:54 |
| zyga | willcooke: https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/using-snapd-in-wsl2/12113 | 15:55 |
| willcooke | zyga, \m/ \m/ thank you! | 15:55 |
| zyga | pleasure :) | 15:55 |
| zyga | diddledan: ^ I think you have more experience with this | 15:55 |
| zyga | perhaps you can expand on the topic | 15:56 |
| cachio | zyga, ok, thanks for the update | 16:00 |
| * zyga EODs | 16:08 | |
| pstolowski | cachio: ping | 16:08 |
| cachio | pstolowski, yes | 16:27 |
| === pstolowski is now known as pstolowski|afk | ||
| mup | PR snapd#7211 opened: tests: add more debug information to see the root cause of the protocol error <⛔ Blocked> <Created by sergiocazzolato> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/7211> | 17:55 |
| ogra | jdstrand, pocketbeagle is my gadget ... no need to notify me about it ;) | 18:27 |
| jdstrand | ogra: ah, I missed that. can you request a manual review? | 18:28 |
| ogra | will do :) | 18:28 |
| diddledan | popey: you about? | 19:03 |
| popey | Sup? | 19:59 |
| diddledan | ooh, ello, pm a sec, popey ? | 20:03 |
| popey | Sho thang | 20:04 |
| * diddledan /msgs | 20:04 | |
| mup | PR snapcraft#2654 opened: click: update to 7.0 <Created by cjp256> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/2654> | 20:22 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!