amurray | bigon: (qa-regression-testing) QRT is a separate test framework, generally used by the Ubuntu Security Team - https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/qa-regression-testing/+git/qa-regression-testing - I'm not familiar with the dep8 + QRT intersection but I am guessing it is so dep8 tests can reuse the QRT tests | 00:59 |
---|---|---|
bigon | amurray: thx | 07:00 |
=== ricab is now known as ricab|lunch | ||
maks_piechota | Hi, I'm new in Ubuntu Development. I've found a little bug reported in subiquity that is actually a string modification. My question is if it is installer - how should I build it and test? Shall I modify somehow installer on live CD? Maybe you have some sites with instructions for that to recommend? I would appreciate your help. | 12:31 |
rbasak | maks_piechota: mwhudson might be able to help you, but he's in UTC+12 so you may have to wait a while. | 12:59 |
dreamcat4 | having an issue whilst testing my debian package, --force-confold is not being respected | 13:21 |
dreamcat4 | $ sudo DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive dpkg --force-confold -i teleport_4.0.0-rc.4-42-5_amd64_41633__expires-14.49pm-mon-05-aug-2019.deb | 13:21 |
dreamcat4 | "Installing new version of config file /etc/teleport.yaml ..." | 13:22 |
dreamcat4 | but the whole point of specifying the "--force-confold" flag is so that it doesn't do that !!!! | 13:23 |
sahid | jamespage, LocutusOfBorg o/ - I updated sphinxcontrib-pecanwsme to 0.10.0 that is required by the ironic project | 13:27 |
sahid | https://salsa.debian.org/sahid-guest/sphinxcontrib-pecanwsme/tree/debian/unstable | 13:27 |
sahid | if one of you can have a look whn a moment | 13:27 |
sahid | coreycb: ^ | 13:27 |
=== ricab|lunch is now known as ricab | ||
rbasak | dreamcat4: is /etc/teleport.yaml a conffile or is the package using ucf? | 13:32 |
LocutusOfBorg | sahid, do you want it on Debian, right? | 13:43 |
LocutusOfBorg | you can ask zigo, send him a merge request directly on salsa.d.o | 13:44 |
LocutusOfBorg | he is on OFTC/#debian-devel | 13:44 |
sahid | LocutusOfBorg: yes then we could just copy the packages in ubuntu i guess | 13:44 |
sahid | ok thanks i will do that | 13:44 |
LocutusOfBorg | that will be the best and easiest solution | 13:46 |
dreamcat4 | rbasak: its specified to be a conf file, i checked here: | 14:07 |
dreamcat4 | https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/n1Ml8oUY/ | 14:07 |
dreamcat4 | created the package with fpm, its not using ucf | 14:08 |
rbasak | Oh | 14:09 |
rbasak | You're not developing Ubuntu itself then? | 14:09 |
dreamcat4 | trying to find a -Dxxxx debug level to get some detailed trace of what is happening. but it's not clear which -D flag i should specify. they dont seem to add anything more relevant to the log output | 14:09 |
rbasak | This channel is for development of Ubuntu itself. | 14:09 |
rbasak | We don't do fpm here. | 14:10 |
dreamcat4 | so where do i go for my issue ? | 14:10 |
rbasak | I'm not sure. | 14:10 |
rbasak | We understand it's really painful for third parties to make packages outside the distribution that integrate properly. That's why we made snaps. | 14:10 |
rbasak | Maybe look for fpm community support? | 14:11 |
rbasak | That's a community that does exactly what you're doing, right? | 14:11 |
rbasak | There's also #ubuntu-packaging, for making packages _for_ Ubuntu. | 14:11 |
dreamcat4 | ok thanks | 14:11 |
dreamcat4 | maybe i should also check the control file too | 14:11 |
dreamcat4 | but it's kindda beyond me why this isn't some bug in dpkg | 14:12 |
dreamcat4 | according to its man page anyhow | 14:13 |
rbasak | I'm pretty sure that we'd have noticed a bug like that in dpkg by now.] | 14:13 |
dreamcat4 | yeah | 14:13 |
rbasak | But if you really think there is one, please file it with full steps to reproduce. | 14:13 |
rbasak | Without using fpm or other unsupported stuff. | 14:13 |
dreamcat4 | ok then. thanks for your help here today | 14:13 |
dreamcat4 | bye then | 14:14 |
dreamcat4 | turned out everything was fine. dpkg just was not logging / saying the decision was when it detected the previous version of the config file had not been edited from the default the old config file | 14:31 |
dreamcat4 | i guess i can file a bug / enhancement for that | 14:32 |
cjwatson | dreamcat4: I don't think it would be a bug, since it's (IMO) clearly documented to behave that way. Maybe could have clearer logging. | 15:34 |
cjwatson | (I mean, not a bug in the sense of "incorrect behaviour", though maybe an entry in the bug database.)( | 15:35 |
dreamcat4 | yeah that's what i meant cjwatson - have now filed a request in debian bug tracker for "clearer logging" as you put it | 15:40 |
dreamcat4 | enhancement / whatever. they can ignore it if they want to | 15:40 |
cjwatson | Sounds reasonable | 15:43 |
infinity | tjaalton: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel-hwe-18.04/+bug/1838698 | 16:26 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1838698 in xserver-xorg-video-intel-hwe-18.04 (Ubuntu) "Cannot boot ISO unless using nomodeset" [Undecided,New] | 16:26 |
tjaalton | infinity: 64bit works, not too worried.. fossfreedom, attach logs, at least dmesg | 17:35 |
fossfreedom | tjaalton: k ... will boot to live session with nomodeset and attach anything I can find ... unless there is a specific way to collect the most useful logs? | 17:38 |
tjaalton | uh | 17:39 |
tjaalton | sorry | 17:39 |
tjaalton | no use for logs with nomodeset | 17:39 |
tjaalton | and with nomodeset you get software emulation, meaning llvmpipe | 17:40 |
fossfreedom | Umm ... how do I collect logs during the middle of the boot sequence? | 17:40 |
tjaalton | you'd need to install it, then boot without nomodeset and collect logs from the bad boot afterwards | 17:41 |
fossfreedom | Ok will do. Will have to be tomorrow since I am travelling. Thx | 17:42 |
mwhudson | maks_piechota: hi | 21:13 |
mwhudson | maks_piechota: i have this terrible command line for testing changes, one sec | 21:14 |
mwhudson | git diff --no-ext-diff --exit-code && git diff --no-ext-diff --exit-code --cached && sudo ls && git clean -ffdx && snapcraft snap && sudo ~/src/subiquity/scripts/inject-subiquity-snap.sh ~/isos/bionic-live-server-amd64.iso ~/src/subiquity/subiquity*.snap ~/isos/custom.iso && kvm -m 1024 -boot d -cdrom ~/isos/custom.iso -hda ~/images/root.img | 21:14 |
mwhudson | ah this is mostly bundled up into ./scripts/test-this-branch.sh | 21:15 |
mwhudson | er what's the best way to test a change to ubiquity | 21:29 |
mwhudson | i guess i can build it in a ppa, run a live session, add the ppa, upgrade ubiquity from my ppa and then run it? | 21:31 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!