/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2019/08/07/#juju.txt

wallyworldkelvinliu: hpidcock: i need food so will ping you guys in a bit01:11
kelvinliuyep01:12
wallyworldhpidcock: forgot to mention - that podspec set commit fix should also land in 2.601:12
hpidcockok01:13
wallyworldkelvinliu: hpidcock: is now ok for hangout?01:40
hpidcockgive me a sec01:40
wallyworldnp just ping when ready01:41
kelvinliuim ok, we will wait hpidcock01:41
hpidcockwallyworld kelvinliu01:43
timClicksbabbageclunk, wallyworld: vSAN PR be good; once you're happy there is some unit test churn to fix then I'll rebase02:27
wallyworldawesome, i'll let babbageclunk +1 it02:28
timClicksok02:28
timClicks*should be good02:29
babbageclunktimClicks: looking now02:29
hpidcockwallyworld: https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/10488 not sure if this is how you would backport or if I should give the PR the same description as the one that landed in develop.02:58
babbageclunktimClicks: reviewed - the scoping thing's a bit hard to explain, let me know if you want more detail03:00
=== _thumper_ is now known as thumper
timClicksbabbageclunk: could you please take a look to see if I've fixed that?03:10
babbageclunkyup yup03:11
babbageclunktimClicks: you don't need to assign to err on line 253 - just the normal return will set err for the deferred func03:15
babbageclunkbut other than that yes that'll fix it03:16
timClicksbabbageclunk: should be fixed03:18
wallyworldhpidcock: we can go either way. sometimes a copy of the description is useful03:20
hpidcockok cool, thank-you03:24
timClicksbabbageclunk: could you please click resolve convo if you're happy with that error scoping fix03:42
babbageclunkwilco03:44
babbageclunktimClicks: sorry, otp but will straight after03:47
timClicksnp03:47
babbageclunktimClicks: approved04:17
timClickswhaaaat04:18
hpidcockhttps://github.com/juju/juju/pull/10492 merge 2.6 into develop, no changes, just forward-porting a merge commit that makes merging confusing for the next person.05:23
wallyworldkelvinliu: there's a few things to look at in the actions PR. could you go through the comments from me and harry and fix those you agree with and we can talk about the rest05:45
kelvinliusure05:46
kelvinliuwallyworld: now?05:46
wallyworldkelvinliu: we can chat now if you want - have a read of the comments and ping me?05:48
kelvinliuwallyworld: i think we can go through now if you r free05:55
wallyworldok05:55
kelvinliuand hpidcock05:55
hpidcockoops sorry, was in the zone07:00
hpidcockwallyworld: the juju.io/cloud node annotations used for detecting substrate, it appears compileK8sCloudCheckers() doesn't have rules to match openstack07:02
wallyworldhpidcock: yeah, i can believe that. i can't recall offhand what the solution is there. i think we'll need to check the charm source code to see what it sets up07:06
hpidcockalready on it07:07
wallyworldhpidcock: i think there may even be something in CDK kube-master charm which when related does something07:09
wallyworldi can check with cory tomorrow07:09
hpidcockLooks like it's done inside the kubernetes-worker charm and only for gce, ec2 and azure07:18
wallyworldit was on the todo list07:21
wallyworldi'll follow up07:21
hpidcockthank-you07:25
stickupkidanyone around for a CR https://github.com/juju/jsonschema-gen/pull/309:54
achilleasastickupkid: looking ^^^10:00
achilleasastickupkid: done10:02
stickupkidachilleasa, whilst you're at it https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/1047110:35
achilleasastickupkid: sure. will look in 10min if that's OK with you10:36
stickupkidachilleasa, fine with me10:36
stickupkidachilleasa, manadart approved the now closed develop version https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/10467 if that helps10:48
achilleasastickupkid: done. sorry for the delay11:28
stickupkidachilleasa, nps, ty11:28
stickupkidCR for merging 2.6 into develop https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/1049312:17
achilleasastickupkid: I 've noticed that hpidcock also has a forward merge PR (https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/10492) for his changes (which are included in your PR as well).12:20
rick_hachilleasa:  with john and joe out can you please give thumper some time on https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/1049112:23
achilleasarick_h: sure thing12:25
stickupkidrick_h, ah, i'll merge his and then redo mine12:58
stickupkidachilleasa, correct 2.6 into develop after hpidcock was merged https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/1049514:10
achilleasastickupkid: approved14:11
stickupkidachilleasa, ta14:12
rick_hstickupkid:  ok'd the one, started to look at the other but it needs updating based on the first so going to hold off then if that's cool14:16
stickupkidrick_h, yes of course14:16
pmatulisis there a bug whereby a model cannot be removed if CMR is in use?15:34
rick_hpmatulis:  https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1768682 I think15:35
mupBug #1768682: cross model breakage <juju:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1768682>15:35
pmatulisrick_h, thank you15:36
pmatulisrick_h, in the help for remove-relation there is the example 'juju remove-relation 4' . where is the ID of '4' exposed/visible?15:57
rick_hpmatulis:  hmm, good question. So there's a relation id that's used in hooks/etc. I'd have to poke around to see if that's exposed in the normal UX in any way16:06
pmatulisrick_h, alright. i'm having quite a hard time recovering from trying to remove this model. looks like i have to wipe out the controller16:33

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!