tjaalton | lotuspsychje: which nvme does your machine have? | 07:42 |
---|---|---|
tjaalton | ssd | 07:42 |
lotuspsychje | tjaalton: its an 860 EVO 250GB sata | 07:42 |
lotuspsychje | samsung | 07:42 |
tjaalton | try nvme_core.default_ps_max_latency_us=0 | 07:43 |
lotuspsychje | ok | 07:43 |
tjaalton | with 5.0 | 07:43 |
tjaalton | distro | 07:43 |
tjaalton | sata? | 07:43 |
lotuspsychje | its not an nvme one, classic sata | 07:44 |
tjaalton | sorry, not nvme | 07:44 |
tjaalton | right | 07:44 |
lotuspsychje | still try it? | 07:44 |
tjaalton | no, it won't do anything | 07:44 |
lotuspsychje | allrighty | 07:44 |
tjaalton | https://www.mail-archive.com/intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org/msg145779.html | 07:45 |
lotuspsychje | tjaalton: noticed a new bug, but not sure its related to mine: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1839353 | 07:45 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1839353 in linux-signed-hwe (Ubuntu) "Login screen and desktop corruption (18.04.2)" [Undecided,New] | 07:45 |
tjaalton | that's fairly old, but still weird | 07:45 |
tjaalton | radeon | 07:46 |
tjaalton | not related | 07:46 |
lotuspsychje | kk | 07:46 |
lotuspsychje | tjaalton: padoka or oibaf ppa drivers wont do much neither i suppose? | 07:47 |
tjaalton | but, another one where 19.04 works fine, backport is busted | 07:47 |
tjaalton | no | 07:47 |
lotuspsychje | tjaalton: i also tryed the makelinuxfastagain kernel param, but no dice | 07:48 |
tjaalton | what's that? | 07:48 |
lotuspsychje | noibrs noibpb nopti nospectre_v2 nospectre_v1 l1tf=off nospec_store_bypass_disable no_stf_barrier mds=off mitigations=off | 07:48 |
lotuspsychje | https://make-linux-fast-again.com/ | 07:48 |
tjaalton | aha | 07:49 |
lotuspsychje | tjaalton: another weird fact is, i only had 1 call yet from an ubuntu customer updated to 5.0.0.23 yet | 07:50 |
lotuspsychje | and i installed surely alot on bionic hwe | 07:50 |
lotuspsychje | puzzle bug :p | 07:51 |
lotuspsychje | or maybe they didnt update yet.. | 07:51 |
tjaalton | apw: can you kick the drm-intel-next/2019-07-31 mainline build now that there's space? it'd be nice to have that for future debugging | 07:51 |
tjaalton | lotuspsychje: apparently the tiniest change to power management can change things, which is why my build of 5.0 worked and distro doesn't | 07:52 |
tjaalton | which is probably why the bisect results were "weird" | 07:52 |
lotuspsychje | i see | 07:53 |
tjaalton | maybe try https://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/drm-tip/current/ | 07:53 |
lotuspsychje | got this one in my list, is it the same? vmlinuz-5.3.0-994-generic | 07:54 |
tjaalton | this is built daily | 07:54 |
lotuspsychje | ah ok, on it | 07:54 |
tjaalton | which version is yours? | 07:54 |
tjaalton | apt-cache policy linux-image-5.3.0-994-generic | 07:55 |
lotuspsychje | not a daily for sure | 07:55 |
tjaalton | "994" is drm-tip | 07:55 |
tjaalton | that part doesn't change | 07:55 |
lotuspsychje | hmm, installed: none | 07:55 |
tjaalton | 997 is drm-intel-next | 07:55 |
tjaalton | ok, removed already | 07:55 |
lotuspsychje | lemme try your daily holdon | 07:56 |
lotuspsychje | tjaalton: yeah, thats working Linux Rootbox 5.3.0-994-generic #201908072204 SMP Thu Aug 8 02:09:23 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux | 08:00 |
tjaalton | ok | 08:00 |
=== lotus|i5 is now known as lotuspsychje | ||
fling | I got the linus tree! | 12:14 |
fling | What kernel versions include shiftfs patch? | 12:15 |
sforshee | fling: only ubuntu kernels have shiftfs currently | 12:16 |
fling | But what versions? | 12:16 |
fling | I'm trying to extract the shiftfs patch :P | 12:16 |
sforshee | 19.04 onward, so 5.0+ | 12:17 |
fling | ok | 12:17 |
fling | So how would I clone the repo containing 5.1 properly? | 12:18 |
sforshee | we don't have a tree that we currently maintain with 5.1, for 5.2 you can use https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-kernel/ubuntu/+source/linux/+git/eoan | 12:19 |
sforshee | or for 5.0: https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-kernel/ubuntu/+source/linux/+git/disco | 12:19 |
fling | hmmm | 12:20 |
fling | zfs does not work with 5.2 yet | 12:20 |
fling | and no 5.0 sources in portage anymore :P | 12:20 |
fling | Can still use 5.0… | 12:20 |
sforshee | the patches from either ought to work fine with 5.1 too, I don't recall any updates being needed between those versions | 12:21 |
fling | are 5.0 and 5.2 shiftfs the same? | 12:21 |
fling | I should probably compare | 12:22 |
sforshee | I'm fairly sure they are the same | 12:22 |
fling | sforshee: can't figure out how to glue commits together to form a single patch | 14:32 |
sforshee | fling: if you apply the whole set you can then use 'git rebase -i' and squash them into one | 14:42 |
cjwatson | Or if you're just trying to inspect a series in bulk then you can use "git diff" from the start to the end of the series | 14:43 |
amitk | /quit | 16:07 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!