[00:08] <rbasak> rafaeldtinoco: cacti dep8 failed against the new dbconfig-common and mysql-8.0
[00:08] <rbasak> Despite your latest change I was expecting ubuntu1 to pass against MySQL?
[00:09] <rbasak> I should have checked that before upload
[00:10] <rafaeldtinoco> I tested it :/
[00:10] <rafaeldtinoco> rbasak: will give a look in a few
[00:14] <rafaeldtinoco> oh it's armhf
[00:15] <rafaeldtinoco> no that's dbconfig
[00:19] <rafaeldtinoco>  mysql said: ERROR 1419 (HY000) at line 9: You do not have the SUPER privilege and binary logging is enabled (you *might* want to use the less safe log_bin_trust_function_creators variable)
[00:19] <rafaeldtinoco> this is new
[00:20] <rafaeldtinoco> I'll investigate and try to mitigate this
[00:29] <xibalba> on ubuntu server 18, selinux is not enabled by default. correct?
[00:29] <sarnold> correct
[00:29] <xibalba> thanks. i just found my answer on ask ubuntu too
[00:37] <rafaeldtinoco> rbasak: ERROR 2061 (HY000): Authentication plugin 'sha256_password' reported error: Authentication requires SSL encryption.
[00:38] <rafaeldtinoco> armhf is already fixed in the git repo I provided
[00:59] <Casper26> Anyone know how i can prevent when booting ubuntu server with usb external drive connected it;s get labled as sda prevent the server from booting i have it in fstab by uuid to mount?
[01:00] <RoyK> possibly something in /etc/default/grub
[01:01] <RoyK> or perhaps a BIOS setting if it tries to boot off the USB thing before the main disk
[01:03] <rafaeldtinoco> Casper26: e2fsck -LNEWLABEL /dev/yourpendrive
[01:04] <rafaeldtinoco> change /etc/fstab to use LABEL if you want (or UUID)
[01:04] <rafaeldtinoco> sorry tune2fs
[01:04] <rafaeldtinoco> so tune2fs -LPENDRIVE /dev/sdb
[01:04] <rafaeldtinoco> tune2fs -LROOT /dev/sda1
[01:04] <rafaeldtinoco> mkswap -LSWAP /dev/sda2
[01:04] <rafaeldtinoco> in /etc/fstab:
[01:04] <rafaeldtinoco> LABEL=ROOT ...
[01:04] <rafaeldtinoco> (this is ¨o
[01:04] <rafaeldtinoco> one way of doing this)
[02:27] <rafaeldtinoco> rbasak: https://code.launchpad.net/~rafaeldtinoco/+git/cacti/+ref/master
[02:27] <rafaeldtinoco> fixed
[02:27] <rafaeldtinoco> running autopkgtests now
[02:27] <rafaeldtinoco> will need another upload unfortunately
[02:28] <rafaeldtinoco> fixed upstream: https://github.com/Cacti/cacti/pull/2882
[02:28] <rafaeldtinoco> maintainer asked to pull request against version 1.2.x
[02:28] <rafaeldtinoco> and he will include in the next version (he said asap)
[02:28] <rafaeldtinoco> after tests will push this to cacti on salsa as well
[02:29] <rbasak> rafaeldtinoco: thanks!
[02:29] <rafaeldtinoco> rbasak: ive made 2 mistakes sorry
[02:29] <rafaeldtinoco> 1) changed cacti.sql thinking it would be good
[02:29] <rafaeldtinoco> and ran autopkgtests before that change
[02:29] <rafaeldtinoco> sorry about that =)
[02:29] <rbasak> rafaeldtinoco: OK so not ready for upload yet?
[02:29] <rafaeldtinoco> wont repeat, now ill run autopkgtests in between ¨ls¨
[02:29] <rafaeldtinoco> rbasak: gimme 5 min
[02:29] <rafaeldtinoco> and it will be
[02:30] <rbasak> ack
[02:30] <rafaeldtinoco> want to confirm tests
[02:30] <rbasak> rafaeldtinoco: can you please rebase against the debian/changelog amendment in my actual upload too please
[02:31] <rafaeldtinoco> ooh, yep, definitely
[02:31] <rafaeldtinoco> rbasak: where is your upload again ?
[02:31] <rafaeldtinoco> cacti is not imported, is it ?
[02:32] <rafaeldtinoco> sorry I context switched too much
[02:33] <rbasak> rafaeldtinoco: you can grab using pull-lp-source
[02:33] <rafaeldtinoco> ah alright, regular uploaded source
[02:33] <rafaeldtinoco> sure, let me finish tests and ill do it
[02:34] <rbasak> rafaeldtinoco: and in the git-ubuntu source tree, there's a tool called git-dsc-commit if you want to use that.
[02:34] <rbasak> It adds a new commit that is exactly what a dsc has
[02:34] <rafaeldtinoco> nice
[02:34] <rafaeldtinoco> rbasak: did I wake you ?
[02:35] <rafaeldtinoco> sorry if I did
[02:35] <rafaeldtinoco> i want leaving msgs for tomorrow =)
[02:35] <rbasak> No
[02:35] <rbasak> I'm not crazy enough to allow myself to be woken by IRC pings :)
[02:35] <rafaeldtinoco> phew
[02:35] <rafaeldtinoco> =)
[02:35] <rbasak> I don't even get interrupted during the work day by IRC pings. I have to actually look at IRC to see any pings
[02:36] <rbasak> (which is why I often don't notice them for an hour or two)
[02:36] <rafaeldtinoco> thats actually a good practice
[02:52] <rafaeldtinoco> im having some problems to fix yet, looks like mysql cant create the function with the user permissions created by dbconfig, im fixing it right now (SET GLOBAL log_bin_trust_function_creators=1;) and running tests, etc.. not sure im holding you or not
[02:59] <rbasak> No problem. I'll check in the morning.
[02:59] <rafaeldtinoco> ok
[02:59] <rbasak> Also feel free to finish for the day! It must be beyond your EOD too.
[03:00] <rbasak> I can take over the morning.
[03:00] <rafaeldtinoco> nah, ill fix this now
[03:00] <rafaeldtinoco> dpkg -i works good, autopkgtest fails
[03:00] <rafaeldtinoco> almost there =)
[03:10] <Sky_Scraper> Hi guys, don't know if it's the right place to ask but I try cos for shure you are experts in server managements. I'm buying my first server =D I'm really zero expert in servers or how to choose or manage them, very skilled with normal pcs of every kind but zero on server. So I cannot choose between this 2 configs for almost the same price: [model: HP DL380 G7 - CPU: Intel X5650 x 2 , 2.66GHz, Hex core - 24 GB of RAM PC3
[03:10] <Sky_Scraper> 10600R]  OR [HP ProLiant DL360e Generation 8 - 2 x 8-Core Intel Xeon E5-2450L(20M Cache, 1.8GHz/8 -core/8.0GT-s) - RAM 48GB PC3] ---> so, given that my goal is to use them for intensive virtualization with 20-30 virtual machines for web scraping purposes, with the firstone I will have 2 x 6cores CPU at 2.66Ghz, so 24 Threads, and 24GB ram --- With the second one I will have 2 x 8 cores, so 32 threads, BUT ONLY 1.80GHz,
[03:10] <Sky_Scraper> but 48GB ram. What is the best, if you are planning to have maximum number of cirtual machine possible with more ore less 1GB ram each? The second seams more flexible, but is possible that 1.80Ghz of processor will be worst also with more cores and more ram?? cannot understand. What's your opinion?
[03:12] <rbasak> Seems like a big investment to be making when you're not sure about workload requirements. Maybe considering renting from a provider first?
[03:12] <rbasak> Eg. use a cloud provider initially.
[03:12] <Sky_Scraper> Just want to clarify before questions that no, I don't want to go in cloud or use other kind of hardware or adopt any other kind of solution or start a conversation about many different techniques I can apply or start talking about the problem of having a physical refurbished server instead of renting online
[03:12] <mybalzitch> Sky_Scraper: I wonder if you checked benchmarks if that e5-2450L is faster than a spaceheater x5650
[03:13] <Sky_Scraper> mybalzitch, no I didn't, I checked the intel website spechs for the 2 models
[03:13] <rbasak> I don't think any other answer is reasonable then.
[03:13] <rbasak> Nobody can know what your bottleneck will be if you don't know yourself.
[03:14] <mybalzitch> I'm leaning towards the second server, more threads and more ram.
[03:14] <Sky_Scraper> thanks mybalzitch, I was on the same line
[13:18] <avg_joe> hello. is this the correct place to ask about stress-ng? or could you point me to the correct channel.(i'm running it on debian actually).
[13:29] <supaman> avg_joe: if you installed stress-ng from a debian package then its on topic in #debian on oftc network
[13:31] <avg_joe> thank you supaman.
[14:29] <rbasak> rafaeldtinoco: I've been looking at your latest debdiffs.
[14:29] <rbasak> I was wondering why we didn't pick up the dbconfig-common problem before, but I think I've just figured it out.
[14:30] <rafaeldtinoco> rbasak: because i didnt go through autopkgtest for mariadb with cacti
[14:30] <rafaeldtinoco> i thought i had when i started merging it quickly for you
[14:30] <rafaeldtinoco> forgot it was a todo, it was my bad sorry
[14:30] <rafaeldtinoco> lessons learned
[14:30] <rafaeldtinoco> and thinking little bit more about this
[14:31] <rafaeldtinoco> dbconfig-mysql is showing auth plugins, but they´re most mysql ones
[14:31] <rbasak> Yeah so it's not exercised unless testing cacti
[14:31] <rafaeldtinoco> (only sha256_password) is for both
[14:31] <rafaeldtinoco> which could be fair
[14:32] <rafaeldtinoco> rbasak: ill get them now and fix upstream (debian/cacti)
[14:33] <rafaeldtinoco> rbasak: how would u like to proceed with them now ?
[14:34] <rafaeldtinoco> i have to forward upstream and fix DEP3 for cacti´s patch
[14:36] <rbasak> rafaeldtinoco: are your latest pastebins still appropriate for upload to Ubuntu?
[14:37] <rafaeldtinoco> rbasak: i guarantee they work and autopkgtests pass
[14:37] <rafaeldtinoco> but i´ll do the upstream forward and fix dep3 now
[14:37] <rafaeldtinoco> if you wait a few might be better
[14:57] <rbasak> rafaeldtinoco: minor adjustemetns to dbconfig-common debdiff: s/Mysql/MySQL/ and s/bellow/below/
[15:01]  * rafaeldtinoco fixing
[15:03] <rafaeldtinoco> re-pushed to debian
[15:07] <rafaeldtinoco> rbasak: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/XGqDksHBWD/
[15:07] <rafaeldtinoco> uploaded to debian
[15:07] <rafaeldtinoco> if you are +1 both are the same
[15:07] <rafaeldtinoco> im pilling changes in the same MR in debian now
[15:07] <Ussat> OK, REALLY basic question but brain is not functioning this am: On my Ununtu 18.04LTS I use rsyslog.  If I want to catch all error and above ONLY be forwarded to a remote server, it is err.*@remote_server
[16:32] <FaTaL_G> I have an ubuntu machine that was 16.04 running a asus pcie-ac88u (broadcom) and using interfaces & hostapd I ran it as a router AP successfully for over a year. I upgraded to 18.04, now its not working
[16:35] <FaTaL_G> I get an error, even though it seems the driver is loading it wont activate
[16:37] <FaTaL_G> eg: kernel: [55270.802443] brcmfmac: brcmf_run_escan: error (-4)
[16:44] <Casper26> If /boot is it's partion can it be unmounted without taking down the system?
[17:04] <dami0> hi, i have netplan 0.36 on ubuntu 18.04, can i set a route through ifup scripts and have it work fine with netplan? i need a route with source defined which doesn't work on netplan 0.36
[18:15] <avg_joe> Casper25: hmm not sure but i don't see why the system would need /boot partiton after bootup. however do it at your own risk since if you update kernel or something with apt, it's probably going to break your system.
[18:15] <avg_joe> so always remember to remount it.
[18:20] <tomreyn> Casper26 CP'd to #ubuntu, and got replies there, too