| === not_phunyguy is now known as phunyguy | ||
| === vicamo_ is now known as vicamo | ||
| RikMills | rbasak: hi, is there any progress on fixing systemd -> udisk2 post install failure in armhf lxd autopkgtest runners? now seeing this impact tests on latest KDE framewworks | 07:35 |
|---|---|---|
| RikMills | rbalint ^^^ I mean! | 07:35 |
| rbalint | RikMills, i'm bisecting the regressions and will upload a package in much better shape today/tomorrow | 09:48 |
| RikMills | rbalint: thank you | 10:12 |
| === ricab is now known as ricab|lunch | ||
| ricotz | doko, hi, are there built gcc-7 packages which are working on there own? it seems packages from ubuntu-toolchain-r/test are relying on later uploads | 12:27 |
| ricotz | ah sorry, for 16.04/Xenial | 12:27 |
| === Wryhder is now known as Lucas_Gray | ||
| === ricab|lunch is now known as ricab | ||
| doko | ricotz: no, but you edit debian/rules.defs and regenerate the control file | 13:46 |
| ricotz | doko, I assume with_common_libs and with_common_pkgs are the important vars in this case? | 13:49 |
| doko | yes | 13:49 |
| doko | ricotz: but why would you need that? | 13:50 |
| ricotz | doko, I am trying to build libreoffice (6.3 requires gcc 7) on xenial | 13:51 |
| ricotz | and avoid interferences with newer commons libs | 13:52 |
| ricotz | or is there still a chance that xenial will receive such a toolchain update? | 13:53 |
| ricotz | like bionic getting gcc-8 | 13:53 |
| doko | no, bionic was already released with gcc-8 | 13:56 |
| ricotz | hmm I see | 13:58 |
| GunnarHj | Hi mapreri, did you see my latest mail last night? | 14:49 |
| mapreri | GunnarHj: I did, but I'm caught up in something else today | 15:02 |
| mapreri | so it's there, in my inbox | 15:02 |
| GunnarHj | mapreri: Ok, good. Let's talk when you have a minute. | 15:10 |
| mapreri | I have a minute right now, but not much more | 15:20 |
| mapreri | GunnarHj: i.e., bring your query ;) | 15:20 |
| GunnarHj | mapreri: Not much of a query, really. Just hoping that you'll find the time to upload the backports based on current eoan. The reasoning is in the mail. | 15:22 |
| mapreri | GunnarHj: aye, I think I will. Maybe tonight or tomorrow. | 15:23 |
| GunnarHj | mapreri: Sounds great! See ya. | 15:23 |
| mapreri | o/ | 15:23 |
| juliank | Laney: That black thing looks really interesting, I'm about to run it on python-apt | 15:29 |
| juliank | It's a shame there's no git-black which only formats the hunks you are changing | 15:29 |
| juliank | (Like clang-format does for C(++); what we use in apt to progressively fix formatting) | 15:30 |
| Laney | juliank: why you highlight me? | 15:36 |
| Laney | but thanks for pointing me to it, TIL :P | 15:36 |
| juliank | Laney: Wasn't it you who pointed me to it? | 15:36 |
| Laney | nope | 15:36 |
| juliank | then it was ahasenack? | 15:36 |
| * juliank is confused | 15:37 | |
| ahasenack | what did I break? | 15:37 |
| * ahasenack reads | 15:37 | |
| Laney | haha | 15:37 |
| juliank | _someone_ mentioned black to me at debconf in hacklab | 15:37 |
| doko | tsimonq2: please could you change all the kde-l10n-* packages to b-d on python3 instead of python? | 15:38 |
| juliank | but who? | 15:38 |
| connor_k | I tidied up a package's debian/patches/ directory and added a few other patches to resolve build issues. However, creating a debdiff from the *.dsc files that resulted from `debuild -S -d` is only creating a debdiff that sees my changes to the changelog, but none of my other patches. The only notable difference from my usual workflow that produces "correct" debdiffs is that I renamed some of the patches in debian/patches | 16:03 |
| connor_k | and updated the series file accordingly. Does anyone have a suggestion for where I could begin troubleshooting this? | 16:03 |
| rbasak | connor_k: did you make sure that quilt was fully popped before changing the patches in debian/patches/ and the series file? | 16:25 |
| rbasak | I'm not quite sure how not doing so would give you exactly the behaviour you describe, but if you didn't do that then you'd certainly end up in trouble. | 16:26 |
| connor_k | rbasak, aha! Thank you! I "started over" after backing up my changelog and debian/patches directory, did a quilt pop -a, and copied in my backed up changes and the debdiff certainly looks more correct | 16:31 |
| connor_k | thank you very much :-) | 16:31 |
| rbasak | connor_k: you're welcome! | 16:31 |
| bdmurray | rafaeldtinoco: Could you answer rbasak in bug 1810857? | 17:09 |
| ubottu | bug 1810857 in cloud-utils (Ubuntu Disco) "Typo in cloud-guest-utils: "reserveration-id"" [Low,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1810857 | 17:09 |
| rafaeldtinoco | bdmurray: sure | 17:10 |
| vorlon | infinity, stgraber, kees: TB meeting? | 19:01 |
| mapreri | GunnarHj: looks like I also had to add -backports to the package, I didn't realize u.U | 19:14 |
| GunnarHj | mapreri: Do you mean the first line in d/changelog? In that case I follow you. | 19:17 |
| GunnarHj | mapreri: Ok, I see that it's in both the -proposed and -backports new queues. Then we have spread our bets, so to say. ;) | 19:38 |
| GunnarHj | mapreri: Anyway, thanks! That will be easy to sort out. | 19:39 |
| GunnarHj | bdmurray: Do you have time to remove a couple of uploads which ended up in the wrong pocket? | 19:41 |
| bdmurray | GunnarHj: Depending on what you mean, I'm not an AA. | 19:56 |
| GunnarHj | bdmurray: Ah, I thought you were. It's ibus-avro, which was just uploaded to the xenial/bionic/disco new queues. It's intended for the -backports pocket, but was first uploaded by mistake to -proposed too. So if you have the necessary access, it would be great if you could delete them from -proposed. | 20:01 |
| seb128 | GunnarHj, I can do that | 20:01 |
| GunnarHj | seb128: Ah, nice! | 20:01 |
| seb128 | GunnarHj, mapreri, bdmurray, done | 20:03 |
| GunnarHj | seb128: Thanks! | 20:03 |
| mapreri | seb128: well, you rejected everything :D | 20:06 |
| mapreri | guess I'll re-upload the -bpo ones | 20:06 |
| GunnarHj | I think seb128 needs some sleep. :) | 20:07 |
| mapreri | alright, back afk! o/ | 20:08 |
| seb128 | GunnarHj, mapreri, sorry, I didn't know backport was in the same queue, I though those were 2 buggy uploads | 20:09 |
| seb128 | I see it's reupload so we should be good :) | 20:09 |
| GunnarHj | seb128, mapreri: Right, now all is as it should be. Thanks!4 | 20:10 |
| tsimonq2 | doko: Don't quote me on this, but those are KDE 4 and should be nuked anyway. | 23:39 |
| * sarnold runs to wikiquote | 23:40 | |
| Unit193 | sarnold: Why there when you can just remove them with 'tsimonq2 says these can be removed'? | 23:44 |
| sarnold | Unit193: so it can be mirrored everywhere! | 23:44 |
| tsimonq2 | XD | 23:46 |
| Unit193 | Might as well send something to ubuntu-devel-discuss while we're at it. | 23:46 |
| tsimonq2 | My personal opinion is that we should have nuked all of Qt 4 anyway cycles ago. | 23:49 |
| Unit193 | But that kills so much stuff! | 23:56 |
| Unit193 | Like...Uh...Synergy? | 23:57 |
| tsimonq2 | Bah. :P | 23:59 |
| Unit193 | I'm kidding, barrier is a good replacement. | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!