| babbageclunk | timClicks: I just saw the missing VMDK issue again. :( | 00:03 |
|---|---|---|
| timClicks | ! | 00:03 |
| babbageclunk | it was after I removed some applications from a model (which removed some machines) so I'm going to see if that's the cause. | 00:04 |
| wallyworld | anastasiamac: sorry about delay, +1 on pr | 03:52 |
| wallyworld | kelvinli_: there's definitely something amis with the 2.6 ci runs not being triggered | 03:54 |
| wallyworld | i'll have to kick off another by hand | 03:54 |
| kelvinli_ | wallyworld: ok, i will have a look | 03:55 |
| timClicks | am in the process of rewriting our project's README.. if you would like to take a look at where I've got to, you're welcome to preview the draft here https://github.com/timClicks/juju/tree/develop-docs--readme-upgrade | 05:21 |
| stickupkid | manadart, can you come up with a suggestion to the ports one, so i can look at other comments in ineffassign branch - pretty please :D | 08:22 |
| parlos | Good Morning! | 08:22 |
| stickupkid | morning parlos | 08:23 |
| parlos | Is it possible to add an 'endpoint' to an already deployed application? Im testing something, and I've deployed a 'ubuntu', application (juju deploy ubuntu). Now I want to a proxy to forward traffic to port 80 on the device. | 08:27 |
| manadart | stickupkid: Didn't I put the suggestion there? | 08:30 |
| stickupkid | manadart, dunno, there are A LOT of comments, just wading through | 08:30 |
| stickupkid | manadart, if you did, ta | 08:30 |
| manadart | stickupkid: Any chance you can QA https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/10520 today? | 10:12 |
| manadart | Got an approval based on code review from hml already. | 10:13 |
| stickupkid | manadart, any chance england can win today? | 10:13 |
| stickupkid | manadart, of course, give me a sec | 10:13 |
| manadart | stickupkid: Hopefully it dries out and goes flat as a road before breaking up on day 4/5 :) | 10:14 |
| stickupkid | haha | 10:14 |
| stickupkid | i wish | 10:14 |
| rick_h | parlos: you have to add support for that on the charm. You can run it via juju run "open-port 80" and then expose it I think, but it's kind of hacky | 11:48 |
| rick_h | stickupkid: hah sorry, I asked in the team meeting for everyone to go through as much as possible | 11:48 |
| rick_h | stickupkid: cause I know you love comments so much! | 11:49 |
| parlos | rick_h thanks for the info, it was just for proof-of-concept. Gave up, and took a different path. | 11:50 |
| rick_h | parlos: ok | 11:50 |
| rick_h | parlos: so the key to the port opening is going to be the open-port hook tool and then exposing an application. Normally it's baked into the charm's hooks, but you can juju run stuff in a hook context for hacky purposes | 11:51 |
| parlos | rick_h; so I was using two charms, gitlab and and and ssl proxy. The gitlab deployed version 9.x something. So, I deployed a clean ubuntu, and placed the new 12.1 version on it. Then I wanted to point the proxy to the service/app on the new host, and there was the problem.. | 11:55 |
| rick_h | parlos: I see, yea that needs to be done more officialy with relations/etc working right | 11:56 |
| parlos | rick_h; so solution, find another charm of gitlab, and then change the version that it deployed (as that version supported taht) | 11:56 |
| rick_h | yep, sounds about right :) | 11:56 |
| parlos | Have a nice day! | 13:22 |
| magicaltrout | i'm assuming the answer is no but can you not run-action on every unit? | 14:34 |
| aisrael | Has anyone run into "ERROR: Cannot uninstall 'PyYAML'. It is a distutils installed project and thus we cannot accurately determine which files belong to it which would lead to only a partial uninstall." while deploying a (reactive) charm? | 15:44 |
| aisrael | in the install hook | 15:44 |
| stickupkid | anyone want to CR this one https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/10508 | 16:05 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!