[00:03] <babbageclunk> timClicks: I just saw the missing VMDK issue again. :(
[00:03] <timClicks> !
[00:04] <babbageclunk> it was after I removed some applications from a model (which removed some machines) so I'm going to see if that's the cause.
[03:52] <wallyworld> anastasiamac: sorry about delay, +1 on pr
[03:54] <wallyworld> kelvinli_: there's definitely something amis with the 2.6 ci runs not being triggered
[03:54] <wallyworld> i'll have to kick off another by hand
[03:55] <kelvinli_> wallyworld: ok, i will have a look
[05:21] <timClicks> am in the process of rewriting our project's README.. if you would like to take a look at where I've got to, you're welcome to preview the draft here https://github.com/timClicks/juju/tree/develop-docs--readme-upgrade
[08:22] <stickupkid> manadart, can you come up with a suggestion to the ports one, so i can look at other comments in ineffassign branch - pretty please :D
[08:22] <parlos> Good Morning!
[08:23] <stickupkid> morning parlos
[08:27] <parlos> Is it possible to add an 'endpoint' to an already deployed application? Im testing something, and I've deployed a 'ubuntu', application (juju deploy ubuntu). Now I want to a proxy to forward traffic to port 80 on the device.
[08:30] <manadart> stickupkid: Didn't I put the suggestion there?
[08:30] <stickupkid> manadart, dunno, there are A LOT of comments, just wading through
[08:30] <stickupkid> manadart,  if you did, ta
[10:12] <manadart> stickupkid: Any chance you can QA https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/10520 today?
[10:13] <manadart> Got an approval based on code review from hml already.
[10:13] <stickupkid> manadart, any chance england can win today?
[10:13] <stickupkid> manadart, of course, give me a sec
[10:14] <manadart> stickupkid: Hopefully it dries out and goes flat as a road before breaking up on day 4/5 :)
[10:14] <stickupkid> haha
[10:14] <stickupkid> i wish
[11:48] <rick_h> parlos:  you have to add support for that on the charm. You can run it via juju run "open-port 80" and then expose it I think, but it's kind of hacky
[11:48] <rick_h> stickupkid:  hah sorry, I asked in the team meeting for everyone to go through as much as possible
[11:49] <rick_h> stickupkid:  cause I know you love comments so much!
[11:50] <parlos> rick_h thanks for the info, it was just for proof-of-concept. Gave up, and took a different path.
[11:50] <rick_h> parlos:  ok
[11:51] <rick_h> parlos:  so the key to the port opening is going to be the open-port hook tool and then exposing an application. Normally it's baked into the charm's hooks, but you can juju run stuff in a hook context for hacky purposes
[11:55] <parlos> rick_h; so I was using two charms, gitlab and and and ssl proxy. The gitlab deployed version 9.x something. So, I deployed a clean ubuntu, and placed the new 12.1 version on it. Then I wanted to point the proxy to the service/app on the new host, and there was the problem..
[11:56] <rick_h> parlos:  I see, yea that needs to be done more officialy with relations/etc working right
[11:56] <parlos> rick_h; so solution, find another charm of gitlab, and then change the version that it deployed (as that version supported taht)
[11:56] <rick_h> yep, sounds about right :)
[13:22] <parlos> Have a nice day!
[14:34] <magicaltrout> i'm assuming the answer is no but can you not run-action on every unit?
[15:44] <aisrael> Has anyone run into "ERROR: Cannot uninstall 'PyYAML'. It is a distutils installed project and thus we cannot accurately determine which files belong to it which would lead to only a partial uninstall." while deploying a (reactive) charm?
[15:44] <aisrael> in the install hook
[16:05] <stickupkid> anyone want to CR this one https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/10508