[05:09] <cpaelzer> jdstrand: interesting in all local autopkgtests the only occurring issue was the output order change (which was reliable)
[05:10] <cpaelzer> thanks for the info, I'll take a second look at it
[08:47] <cpaelzer> jdstrand: yes the ufw patch was for for compatibility with iptables 1.8.3
[08:47] <cpaelzer> odd that it seems to hang on the tests
[08:48] <cpaelzer> the upload itself (as you have seen in the MP that I set you as reviewer to be aware) just adds another allowed result for one of the tests
[08:48] <cpaelzer> Locutusofborg: it worked in local autpkgtest VMs, but it seems something odd happened on the actual upload
[08:48] <cpaelzer> Locutusofborg: I don't know details yet
[09:00] <cpaelzer> hmm, I see a bunch of those tests all 37 minutes old - so I assume one of you has recently restarted them
[09:00] <cpaelzer> that seemed reasonable as half of them was failing on some unrelated kernel install dependency
[09:01] <cpaelzer> but is seems they now all fail at Test get_netfilter_capabilities() ...
[09:01] <cpaelzer> that matches the long running/hanging tests ahasenack has seen
[09:06] <cpaelzer> this test just worked before, even against iptables 1.8.3
[09:07] <cpaelzer> I have alocal VM based run ongoing hoping that it breaks there as well
[09:28] <cpaelzer> jdstrand: Locutusofborg: I started to track things in bug 1840633
[09:39] <cpaelzer> interesting this fail is not part of the test but instead part of the build it does for "build-needed"
[09:40] <cpaelzer> There are 13 stuck tests in the queue hanging I'll ask to cancel them
[09:41] <cpaelzer> actually where would I ask for that ... ?
[09:41] <cpaelzer> let me spam the channels a bit :-/
[09:43] <cpaelzer> There are currently 13 UFW tests on http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/running#pkg-ufw; all are stuck on "Test get_netfilter_capabilities() ..." in the "build-needed" stage. This will not recover due to bug 1840633. It would be great if someone could cancel them. FYI: Since I don't exactly know who can do this I posted this on multiple channels.
[09:54] <rbasak> jamespage: o/ did you manage to look at mysql-router from my PPA at all? I'm about to add it to src:mysql-8.0 in the archive, so now would be a good time to fix any problems :)
[10:03] <seb128> cpaelzer, hey, thx for the zsys MIR review!
[10:04] <cpaelzer> np
[10:04] <cpaelzer> I had a lot to criticize and request, I wonder that you are so happy about it :-)
[10:07] <EoflaOE> Hello, what is the purpose of this channel?
[10:09] <cpaelzer> EoflaOE: see title "Devel of Ubuntu (not support)"
[10:09] <cpaelzer> EoflaOE: see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/IRC/ChannelList for an overview of Ubuntu channels
[10:12] <EoflaOE> cpaelzer: Thanks, but is this channel also for requesting packages?
[10:15] <cpaelzer> EoflaOE: I doubt a lot will happen if you just post that here, there is much more of an official process and usually done together with Debian (unless it is explicitly Ubuntu-only for some reason) https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/NewPackages
[10:16] <cpaelzer> step1 usually is finding someone to package and maintain it
[10:20] <EoflaOE> cpaelzer: Thanks.
[10:25] <seb128> cpaelzer, right, well I didn't read the details of the review yet so will comment on that in a bit ... :-)
[10:33] <dwmw2> tkamppeter: is there any way I can import your NetworkManager 1.10.14-0ubuntu2 packages from bionic-proposed into a PPA of my own without rebuilding them?
[10:33] <dwmw2> my users really need the fix for CVE-2018-1000135
[12:55] <ddstreet> rbalint what's the plan for systemd in eoan?  seems it's back to 240-6ubuntu9 now, will e get released with that version?
[15:49] <seb128> cyphermox, hey, did you manage to get anywhere with ffmpeg/armhf?
[16:03] <cyphermox> seb128: negative, but will be looking into this today
[16:04] <seb128> cyphermox, k, thx
[16:04] <seb128> I'm pondering going ahead with the poppler transition since ff is coming and libvpx isn't getting nearer from being unblocked
[16:05] <seb128> but that would probably not be popular with some persons...
[16:26] <cyphermox> well tbh I'd look more into libvpx thans others myself
[23:46] <mwhudson> i'm completely confused by the blockage around hugo in proposed
[23:46] <mwhudson> i think there might be some circular dependencies going on ...