/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2019/08/20/#ubuntu-devel.txt

vorlonmwhudson: autopkgtest retries needed with all-proposed=1?00:25
vorlonah, no, the package is dep-wait00:26
mwhudsonvorlon: yeah it's build-side01:18
mwhudsonvorlon: i think someone must have uploaded things in a very careful order to debian while we weren't importing, or something like that01:19
seb128cyphermox, hey, did you get anywhere with ffmpeg/armhf?07:18
tjaaltonwhat's wrong with my sbuilder.. it refuses to install libudev-dev/libsystemd-dev07:32
tjaaltoneoan07:33
tjaaltonproposed enabled or not doesn't matter07:33
seb128tjaalton, what's the error?07:36
tjaaltonDepends: libsystemd-dev but it is not going to be installed07:44
tjaaltonis libudev-dev gone?07:45
tjaalton libudev-dev : Depends: libudev1 (= 240-6ubuntu9) but 243~rc1-0ubuntu2 is to be installed07:46
tjaaltonah07:46
tjaaltonproposed had that version for a while it seems07:47
tjaaltonbut no longer07:47
seb128243~rc1 had been deleted from proposed because not ready07:47
seb128yeah07:47
seb128has*07:47
tjaaltonhad to downgrade libudev1, libsystemd0 that's all07:52
lennybHi, what is a procedure to import pkg to Ubuntu bionic. This pkg exists in debian (https://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=sourcenames&keywords=networking-mlnx )08:42
rbasaklennyb: that depends. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates or https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports. I suggest you start with a PPA though.10:19
rbasaklennyb: looks like it was removed from Bionic because of an incompatiblity with neutron10:20
rbasakhttps://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/networking-mlnx/+publishinghistory10:20
Locutusofborgcpaelzer, hello, nspr sync?11:59
cpaelzerI haven't looked at nspr for a while Locutusofborg12:02
LocutusofborgI'm trying a sync on my ppa... lets see12:02
LocutusofborgI'm not sure if the fix was about a build failure or something else... debian might have fixed it differently12:03
cpaelzeryeah12:03
cpaelzerI'm not 100% sure that "Set LD_LIBRARY_PATH when running tests. Closes: #925790" covers what we had to do12:03
cpaelzerif it builds fine in your ppa then you should be good to go12:04
cpaelzerat least it is the same debian bug that our delta was created for12:04
cpaelzerand LD_LIBRARY_PATH should be cleaner than relying on --disable-new-dtags implicitly changing the rpaths12:05
* cpaelzer would never have thought LD_LIBRARY_PATH could be the cleaner solution than anything else12:05
LocutusofborgLOL12:10
Locutusofborgthat one was good!12:10
Locutusofborgand it works LOL12:15
lennybrbasak, thanks. We have some bug fixes that we would like to backport into Debian. how can I know on which debian version this failed pkg was based on? Are there any logs12:25
rbasaklennyb: examine debian/changelog, and you might find my writeup at http://www.justgohome.co.uk/blog/2015/01/ubuntu-package-versions.html helpful12:27
=== ricab is now known as ricab|lunch
GunnarHjHi Locutusofborg, do you possibly have time to sponsor bug #1731459? Only upstream patch. Pre-verified via PPA.14:10
ubottubug 1731459 in sane-backends (Ubuntu Disco) "genesys_gl847 scanners produce a black band in scanned images on Ubuntu 17.10+, 18.04 LTS and 18.10 Cosmic cuttlefish" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/173145914:10
=== ricab|lunch is now known as ricab
=== cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer
LocutusofborgGunnarHj, ack14:58
GunnarHjLocutusofborg: Thanks a lot!15:24
blackboxswvorlon: thanks for the suggestion on cloud-init use of debconfig-loadtemplate for ubuntu-drivers work. The only wrinkle here is that cloud-init doesn't currently have a dependency on debconf-utils package.  I'd like to avoid adding that new strict package dependency if we can to avoid bloat (57K) on most cloud-init deployments which don't try to configure ubuntu-drivers.     one option is for cloud-init to17:02
blackboxswinstall debconf-utils if we are already processing ubuntu-drivers in cloud-config.       Are there any other alternatives you would suggest?17:02
vorlonblackboxsw: oh, sorry, I overlooked that the command was in the non-default debconf-utils.  You can also use the X_LOADTEMPLATE debconf protocol extension to load it without having to install other packages17:07
blackboxswahh /me rtfms now thanks17:08
vorlonso then you just have to talk the debconf protocol, no big deal :P17:08
blackboxswSMOP :)17:08
blackboxswvorlon: looks like we'll have db_x_loadtemplatefile in /usr/share/debconf/confmodule so that should be a big help as it's delivered by debconf proper17:15
blackboxswok we can work with this17:16
blackboxswthanks again17:16
vorlonblackboxsw: yeah, you're just then subjected to implementing in shell in order to use /usr/share/debconf/confmodule but otherwise ok :)17:16
blackboxswvorlon: or maybe I could push a patch back to python3-debconf to support x_loadtemplatefile as it seems like that would be a trivial upstream commit as it seems the only command not supported by the python library17:22
blackboxswmaybe I'll try both routes, and cloud-init can adopt the python3-debconf library in the future17:22
vorlonah, given that python3-debconf is already in the server task (which I hadn't realized), that seems like the better approach IMHO17:23
vorlonthough we'd then have to SRU it back17:23
blackboxswyeah and we'd need to MIR in xenial : /17:24
blackboxswas it looks like it's only back to bionic17:24
* blackboxsw checks state of /usr/share/debconf/confmodule in xenial too17:24
blackboxswdb_x_loadtemplatefile exists in xenial  /usr/share/debconf/confmodule17:25
blackboxswhrm, ok so need to weigh using subp shell to source db_x_loadtemplatefile /usr/share/debconf/confmodule  vesus just installing debconf-utils if ubuntu-drivers cloud-config is specified17:26
blackboxswvs. rolling our own simple wire write of debconf cmds for X_LOADTEMPLATEFILE support17:26
vorlonblackboxsw: there's no expectation that we'll have these drivers on xenial fwiw19:02
Odd_BlokeIs there any way to change the make target that dh_auto_test will run, or should I just override it and run `make not_quite_test_but_so_close` myself?22:30
Odd_Bloke(`make test` runs both Py2 and Py3 tests, I'm looking at dropping the python2 binary packages produced, so don't want to install the Python 2 build deps to make the tests run.)22:31
rbasakhttps://sources.debian.org/src/debhelper/12.5.3/lib/Debian/Debhelper/Buildsystem/makefile.pm/#L16722:54
rbasakDoesn't look like it - not for the "make" buildsystem implementation22:54
rbasakAssuming you're using the make buildsystem and not one of the Python ones22:56
rbasakSo overriding it seems like the appropriate mechanism to use22:56
mwhudsonLocutusofborg: um how many rebuilds is this golang-google stuff going to take? :)23:23
mwhudsonLocutusofborg: fwiw it seems the grpc failure is real23:23

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!