/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2019/08/20/#ubuntu-release.txt

-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-1017.18]01:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-1017.18~18.04.1]01:07
cpaelzerLaney: bug 1840633 tries to resist to be reproduced outside of autopkgtest-infra build-needed step :-/07:02
ubot5bug 1840633 in ufw (Ubuntu) "autopkgtests get stuck in Eoan with iptables 1.8.3" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/184063307:02
cpaelzerLaney: there are again a bunch of hanging tests that could be killed, but I'd need to ask you to again "run a few commands"07:03
cpaelzerThis time I'd ask if you could fetch the debug symbols from the PPA which is tested https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/3790/+packages and then get a gdb backtrace (or an apport reports or what you prefer) of the hanging iptables process?07:04
cpaelzerI feel bad for asking you, but lacking any alternative way to trigger it that would be the next step that I see available to understand what is going on07:05
RikMillsMorning. If an AA has a few secs, could these 2 removal get done. Thanks LP: #1840744 #184074307:29
ubot5Launchpad bug 1840744 in krecipes (Ubuntu) "Remove krecipes from Eoan" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/184074407:29
RikMillsLP: #184074307:29
ubot5Launchpad bug 1840743 in smokegen (Ubuntu) "Remove smokegen from Eoan" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/184074307:29
Locutusofborghello release team! src:hy is not an arch:all package, and removed python-hy package... can anybody please NBS-cleanup-proposed it?07:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: colord [s390x] (eoan-proposed/main) [1.4.4-1~ubuntu1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)08:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: colord [i386] (eoan-proposed/main) [1.4.4-1~ubuntu1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)08:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: colord [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/main) [1.4.4-1~ubuntu1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)08:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: colord [amd64] (eoan-proposed/main) [1.4.4-1~ubuntu1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)08:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: colord [arm64] (eoan-proposed/main) [1.4.4-1~ubuntu1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)08:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: colord [armhf] (eoan-proposed/main) [1.4.4-1~ubuntu1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)08:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted colord [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [1.4.4-1~ubuntu1]08:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted colord [armhf] (eoan-proposed) [1.4.4-1~ubuntu1]08:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted colord [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [1.4.4-1~ubuntu1]08:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted colord [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [1.4.4-1~ubuntu1]08:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted colord [s390x] (eoan-proposed) [1.4.4-1~ubuntu1]08:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted colord [i386] (eoan-proposed) [1.4.4-1~ubuntu1]08:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (disco-proposed) [2.40+19.04]08:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.40+18.04]08:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.40]08:31
cpaelzerLaney: and in addition to the gdb request of 2h ago, since it hangs on creating a new chain like "iptables -N ufw-tmpsuffix" it would be great if you could also run "iptables -L" and check if any other new "iptables -N ufw-tmpsuffix" will hang as well09:01
cpaelzerif it does hang maybe an strace -ff of such a hanging iptables would be helpful as well09:01
Laneycpaelzer: be with you in a bit09:03
RikMillsanother Qt4/KDE4 removal if possible LP: #184076211:24
ubot5Error: Could not gather data from Launchpad for bug #1840762 (https://launchpad.net/bugs/1840762). The error has been logged11:25
RikMillsnice11:25
tjaaltonRikMills: what's up with kservice tests?11:28
RikMillstjaalton: looking...11:32
RikMillstjaalton: looks like a regression in upstream code/tests that failed on KDE CI but wasn't fixed by the last release. There is a fix I will try applying. if that doesn't work we can the then current version to be badtested until the next release11:37
RikMills*then ask11:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libio-socket-ssl-perl (bionic-security/main) [2.060-3~ubuntu18.04.1 => 2.060-3~ubuntu18.04.1] (core) (sync)11:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openssl (bionic-security/main) [1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.4 => 1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.4] (core) (sync)11:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python2.7 (bionic-security/main) [2.7.15-4ubuntu4~18.04 => 2.7.15-4ubuntu4~18.04] (core) (sync)11:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python3.7 (bionic-security/universe) [3.7.3-2~18.04.1 => 3.7.3-2~18.04.1] (no packageset) (sync)11:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-openssl (bionic-security/universe) [2.0.9-0ubuntu1 => 2.0.9-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) (sync)11:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libwww-perl (bionic-security/main) [6.31-1ubuntu0.1 => 6.31-1ubuntu0.1] (core) (sync)11:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python3.6 (bionic-security/main) [3.6.8-1~18.04.1 => 3.6.8-1~18.04.1] (core) (sync)11:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby2.5 (bionic-security/main) [2.5.1-1ubuntu1.5 => 2.5.1-1ubuntu1.5] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) (sync)11:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-cryptography (bionic-security/main) [2.1.4-1ubuntu1.3 => 2.1.4-1ubuntu1.3] (core) (sync)11:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-cran-openssl (bionic-security/universe) [1.0.1-1ubuntu1.1 => 1.0.1-1ubuntu1.1] (no packageset) (sync)11:44
tjaaltonRikMills: ok, cool11:46
mdeslaurcan someone please approve those? ^ they are the openssl syncs to bionic-security12:06
mdeslaurs/can/could/12:06
mdeslauroh, actually, looks like I can do it, so never mind12:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libio-socket-ssl-perl [sync] (bionic-security) [2.060-3~ubuntu18.04.1]12:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openssl [sync] (bionic-security) [1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.4]12:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python2.7 [sync] (bionic-security) [2.7.15-4ubuntu4~18.04]12:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python3.7 [sync] (bionic-security) [3.7.3-2~18.04.1]12:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-openssl [sync] (bionic-security) [2.0.9-0ubuntu1]12:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libwww-perl [sync] (bionic-security) [6.31-1ubuntu0.1]12:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python3.6 [sync] (bionic-security) [3.6.8-1~18.04.1]12:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby2.5 [sync] (bionic-security) [2.5.1-1ubuntu1.5]12:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-cryptography [sync] (bionic-security) [2.1.4-1ubuntu1.3]12:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-cran-openssl [sync] (bionic-security) [1.0.1-1ubuntu1.1]12:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (xenial-proposed/main) [1:16.04.15 => 1:16.04.16] (core)12:50
Laneyseb128: moving hint question here, looks like onioncircuit could be skipped and ubuntu-release-upgrader retried? (done)13:36
seb128Laney, better channel, indeed, thx13:37
seb128Laney, onioncircuit test depends on python-dogtail that got replaced by python3-dogtail (but the tests need more work with python3, I reported to Debian for now)13:38
Laneyk, but it looks like we should have not called that a regression anyway13:40
Laneyhttp://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/o/onioncircuits/eoan/amd6413:40
Laneycpaelzer__: oops, sorry, I forgot to come back to you13:45
Laneybut good news, I've made that thing happen in Canonistack13:45
Laneyhttps://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/nR6WtTr-HFpMhycWyDCY2w13:46
Laneyit hung at "Test get_netfilter_capabilities() ...", that's the right place right?13:47
LaneyI did build an adt image, hmm, hopefully you can use that13:48
Laneygoing to blacklist ufw for now I think14:02
cpaelzer__Laney: yes that is the right function14:15
Laneycpaelzer__: sorry I ctrl-ced it by mistake, but did you want to try my command?14:15
cpaelzer__yeah I'll try to run it14:16
cpaelzer__replacing with my canonistack creds of course14:16
Laneyyes14:16
LaneyI tried to "share" that adt image I used with you, I think the command to accept that is "openstack image set --accept e9f6a83f-5712-4f03-b655-fa06e1960352"14:16
Laneythen it should show up in "openstack image list"14:17
cpaelzer__Could not find resource e9f6a83f-5712-4f03-b655-fa06e196035214:18
cpaelzer__never had to do anything with openstack image sharing oO14:18
Laneytry again14:18
Laneyif not tell me your $OS_PROJECT_NAME, it appears not to validate that14:18
Laney...14:18
cpaelzer__still no available14:19
cpaelzer__project is "paelzer_project"14:19
Laneyah I had prepended a c14:19
Laneyok now14:19
cpaelzer__still saying it that it can't find it14:20
Laneywtf14:20
Laneyone second14:20
cpaelzer__I'm logging into the dashboard as well, in case there is something the console won't show/allow me14:21
Laneyhttps://paste.ubuntu.com/p/VMdptD6hCk/14:21
Laneymaybe there's some latency before you can accept?14:21
cpaelzer__it is not in my image list (not even as pending)14:22
cpaelzer__lets give it 10 minutes in case it needs to copy to a pool or so14:22
Laneyshouldn't be until you accept it I don't think14:23
cpaelzer__in the dashboard I can select "shared with project" but that view is empty as well14:25
cpaelzer__still not available to be accepted14:25
Laneydunno14:25
Laneysorry :(14:25
Laneymaybe you can wrangle create-nova-image-new-release yourself14:25
Laneyor ask IS if they can do it14:25
Laneyit -> make the share work14:25
=== cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer
cpaelzerLaney: I guess you did "openstack image set --shared e9f6a83f-5712-4f03-b655-fa06e1960352" right?14:27
cpaelzerand ".. add project ..."14:27
Laneyright14:27
cpaelzerpending is documented as "until I accept it"14:27
Laneythat's why it shows up in the pending list of shares (my pastebin)14:27
cpaelzerI'll ask in #is internally14:29
Laneyif an admin just wants to make it public temporarily as a workaround they can14:30
Laney(mortals don't have permissions for that)14:30
gpiccolivorlon, sorry to annoy, I have a MP for badtest in makedumpfile; it may block the release for eaon before the freeze if not approved. Can you take a look?14:40
gpiccolihttps://code.launchpad.net/~gpiccoli/britney/hints-ubuntu/+merge/37147914:40
lordcirthDid the root-on-ZFS installer option make it into 19.10? I don't see it in the daily ISO14:43
cpaelzerLaney: I guess the nova script is the one from https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/autopkgtest/blob/master/ssh-setup/nova ?14:52
cpaelzerwell I have autopkgtest checked out anyway14:53
Laneycpaelzer: yeah14:53
cpaelzerusing whatever I have locally atm14:53
LaneyI have a checkout, not sure if/where the package puts that14:54
cpaelzererror: argument <subcommand>: invalid choice: 'network-show'14:54
cpaelzerI might need to update my autopkgtest checkout ...14:54
cpaelzerLaney: are you on master or some tag?14:55
cpaelzerhmm, there are not mcuh differences to that script14:55
Laneyhmm, hang on, I might have a local hack to that14:56
LaneyI was playing with it a while ago14:56
Laneycpaelzer: -        OUT=$(nova network-show $NET_ID)14:56
Laney+        OUT=$(openstack network show $NET_ID)14:56
cpaelzerLaney: http://paste.ubuntu.com/p/sNpBTKfwHt/14:56
cpaelzerah ok14:56
cpaelzertrying that14:56
Laneyshould send that upstream but I'd need to check it works on trusty14:56
cpaelzershould I exchange all the other nova commands with openstack as well?14:57
Laneywouldn't bother, if it works - that's the only diff I have14:57
Laney(for a patch for upstream I would though)14:57
cpaelzerNow it is: http://paste.ubuntu.com/p/gnVxWXkq5w/14:58
LaneyO_O15:00
cpaelzerIf you don't know I can throw in some more debug tomorrow15:01
cpaelzerit is the nva script that breaks, and scripts are easy to debug15:02
cpaelzerLaney: just to check - if it works I have an instacne up that I can login with my key right?15:02
Laneyyeah15:02
Laneyyou should be able to 'set -x' in the nova script15:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sane-backends (disco-proposed/main) [1.0.27-3.2ubuntu1 => 1.0.27-3.2ubuntu1.1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)15:03
Laneybut autopkgtest buffers the output so don't be alarmed if you don't get anything immediately15:03
Laneyah, one thing - autopkgtest gets grumpy if the instance doesn't have your locale15:03
Laneybest to run in C.UTF-815:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sane-backends (bionic-proposed/main) [1.0.27-1~experimental3ubuntu2.1 => 1.0.27-1~experimental3ubuntu2.2] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)15:04
LocutusofborgLaney, we have a lot of "neutral" -> "fail" stuff in proposed pocket... would you mind badtesting in case I give you a list?15:04
cpaelzeryou mean when starting autopkgtest with the ssh runner I should be in C.UTF-8 locally ?15:04
Laneyyeah15:05
cpaelzerok, thanks15:05
LaneyI think you would have an explicit error about that though15:05
LaneyIIRC15:05
Laneyso it might not be this problem15:05
xnoxapw:  please force-badtest linux-oem-osp1 for any version, into eoan hints. It is a copy-up v5 kernel targetting bionic toolchain, and it FTBFS in eoan now and blocking proposed migration. Thus it seems to me that we shouldn't care about rebuild test for it, in eoan.15:07
xnox(~= oracle kernels, although that FTBFS was kind-of-ish real and affected generic kernels too and was fixed by patching source code)15:08
Laneycpaelzer: I could presumably just ssh-import-id you on an instance I run too15:12
cpaelzerLaney: if that is allowed I'm fine with that as well15:12
Laneydon't see why not15:12
cpaelzerI want/need to debug the broken case in the only environment where it breaks without consuming too mcuh of your time15:12
LaneyI can just set it running and then come back in a few minutes once it gets to the broken bit15:13
cpaelzergreat15:13
cpaelzerI'm EOD anyway, leave me a login and I'll work on it tomorrow15:14
Laneyok15:14
Laneysee you15:14
Laneycpaelzer: ssh ubuntu@10.48.131.17015:37
Laneyhope it doesn't time out15:37
vorlongpiccoli: merged, thanks15:52
gpiccolithank you vorlon =)15:52
gpiccolislashd, cascardo ^15:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openldap [source] (disco-proposed) [2.4.47+dfsg-3ubuntu2.2]15:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openldap [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.45+dfsg-1ubuntu1.4]16:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openldap [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.4.42+dfsg-2ubuntu3.7]16:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted uw-imap [source] (disco-proposed) [8:2007f~dfsg-5ubuntu0.19.04.1]16:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted uw-imap [source] (bionic-proposed) [8:2007f~dfsg-5ubuntu0.18.04.1]16:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [source] (disco-proposed) [20190801-0ubuntu1~19.04.0]16:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [source] (bionic-proposed) [20190801-0ubuntu1~18.04.0]16:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [source] (xenial-proposed) [20190801-0ubuntu1~16.04.0]16:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lttng-modules (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.10.5-1ubuntu1.2 => 2.10.5-1ubuntu1.3] (no packageset)16:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted amd64-microcode [source] (disco-proposed) [3.20181128.1ubuntu1.1]16:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted stress-ng [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.09.25-1ubuntu3]18:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nova [source] (bionic-proposed) [2:17.0.11-0ubuntu1]18:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted opencryptoki [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.9.0+dfsg-0ubuntu1.2]18:36
cpaelzerLaney: thanks - login works18:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted psmisc [source] (xenial-proposed) [22.21-2.1ubuntu0.1]18:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd-glib [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.49-0ubuntu0.16.04.0]18:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lttng-modules [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.10.5-1ubuntu1.3]19:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-networkx [amd64] (eoan-proposed/main) [2.2-1ubuntu2] (ubuntu-server)19:27
bdmurrayRAOF: Are you coming to the SRU team meeting?19:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: llvm-toolchain-9 (eoan-proposed/primary) [1:9~+rc2-1~exp1]19:47
RikMillsLP: #184074320:28
ubot5Launchpad bug 1840743 in smokegen (Ubuntu) "Remove smokegen from Eoan" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/184074320:28
RikMillsLP: #184074420:29
ubot5Launchpad bug 1840744 in krecipes (Ubuntu) "Remove krecipes from Eoan" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/184074420:29
RikMillsLP: #184076220:29
ubot5Launchpad bug 1840762 in baloo (Ubuntu) "Remove baloo from Eoan" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/184076220:29
RikMillsis anyone could process those, many thanks :)20:30
RikMills*if20:30
RAOFbdmurray: ah, crap. Sorry.21:36
bdmurrayRAOF: no big deal, I only asked since you'd responded yes21:40
RAOFYeah, I do intend to come.21:40
RAOFBut: (a) I need to set a better reminder, and (b) remember to cancel when I'm sick 😀21:41
vorlonRikMills: generally no reason to file a separate bug in Ubuntu for a package being removed from Debian21:47
bdmurraymwhudson: Did you do any testing of partman-base for bug 1828558 like requested in comment #10?23:01
ubot5bug 1828558 in partman-base (Ubuntu Disco) "installing ubuntu on a former md raid volume makes system unusable" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/182855823:01
mwhudsonbdmurray: no23:08
mwhudsonbdmurray: i can easily enough though23:08

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!