[03:36] <FourDollars> rbasak: Could you help to SRU https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/bionic/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=systemd?
[05:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: bitshuffle [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.3.5-1] (no packageset)
[05:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-hansrodtang-randomcolor [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20160512.d27108b-1] (no packageset)
[05:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: bitshuffle [i386] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.3.5-1] (no packageset)
[05:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-gopkg-go-playground-colors.v1 [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.2.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: bitshuffle [s390x] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.3.5-1] (no packageset)
[05:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-networkx [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [2.2-1ubuntu2]
[05:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: bitshuffle [arm64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.3.5-1] (no packageset)
[05:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: bitshuffle [armhf] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.3.5-1] (no packageset)
[05:37] <FourDollars> rbasak: Hi, could you help to approve https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/bionic/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=systemd?
[07:26] <RikMills> vorlon: ack. I thought someone told me the opposite once, but fair enough
[07:58] <GunnarHj> Anybody who can override the sane-backends autopkgtest regression? Given all the overrides already there, it looks like somebody just forgot to do it for gscan2pdf/armhf:
[07:58] <GunnarHj> https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#sane-backends
[08:02] <Laney> cpaelzer: looks like it timed out eventually
[08:08] <cpaelzer> oh
[08:08] <cpaelzer> did the instance go away
[08:08] <cpaelzer> Laney: what you gave me for debugging still is good for me
[08:08] <cpaelzer> if you can leafe it up
[08:08] <cpaelzer> leave
[08:09] <cpaelzer> I submitted an RFC patch and a lot of text upstream and I assume that when they get back to me I will need to continue checking/testing things on this instance
[08:09] <Laney> it's timed out here
[08:09] <Laney> if the instance is still there, cool
[08:09] <cpaelzer> yeah, so far it is
[08:10] <cpaelzer> but ppc64 cleanup is slow
[08:10] <cpaelzer> if it dies I might get in touch with you once there is feedback from upstream
[08:10] <Laney> don't think it'll go down by my action
[08:10] <Laney> just tell me when you're finished
[08:10] <Laney> good that it helped
[08:11] <cpaelzer> it did, thanks ++
[08:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libgdata [s390x] (eoan-proposed/main) [0.17.10-1~ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[09:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libgdata [arm64] (eoan-proposed/main) [0.17.10-1~ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[09:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libgdata [armhf] (eoan-proposed/main) [0.17.10-1~ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[09:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: llvm-toolchain-9 (eoan-proposed/primary) [1:9~+rc2-1~exp1]
[09:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-toolchain-9 [sync] (eoan-proposed) [1:9~+rc2-1~exp1]
[09:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected llvm-toolchain-9 [sync] (eoan-proposed) [1:9~+rc2-1~exp1]
[09:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libgdata [amd64] (eoan-proposed/main) [0.17.10-1~ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[09:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libgdata [i386] (eoan-proposed/main) [0.17.10-1~ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[09:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-27.28] (core, kernel)
[09:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libgdata [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/main) [0.17.10-1~ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-27.28] (core, kernel)
[10:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [arm64] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-27.28] (core, kernel)
[10:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-27.28]
[10:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-27.28]
[10:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [arm64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-27.28]
[10:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1018.19] (core, kernel)
[10:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1015.15] (core, kernel)
[10:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shadow (bionic-proposed/main) [1:4.5-1ubuntu2 => 1:4.5-1ubuntu2.1] (core)
[10:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shadow (disco-proposed/main) [1:4.5-1.1ubuntu2 => 1:4.5-1.1ubuntu2.1] (core)
[10:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shadow (xenial-proposed/main) [1:4.2-3.1ubuntu5.4 => 1:4.2-3.1ubuntu5.5] (core)
[10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-1018.19]
[10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-1015.15]
[12:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lttng-modules (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.10.5-1ubuntu1.3 => 2.10.5-1ubuntu1.3] (no packageset)
[13:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgdata [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [0.17.10-1~ubuntu1]
[13:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgdata [armhf] (eoan-proposed) [0.17.10-1~ubuntu1]
[13:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgdata [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [0.17.10-1~ubuntu1]
[13:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgdata [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [0.17.10-1~ubuntu1]
[13:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgdata [s390x] (eoan-proposed) [0.17.10-1~ubuntu1]
[13:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgdata [i386] (eoan-proposed) [0.17.10-1~ubuntu1]
[13:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mesa (bionic-proposed/main) [19.0.8-0ubuntu0~18.04.1 => 19.0.8-0ubuntu0~18.04.2] (core, xorg)
[14:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-9 [i386] (eoan-proposed/main) [9.2.1-3ubuntu1] (core)
[15:26] <lordcirth> Did the root-on-ZFS installer option make it into 19.10? I don't see it in the daily ISO
[15:29] <xnox> lordcirth:  if it's on phoronix, it must be true =))))) right?! =)))))
[15:30] <xnox> lordcirth:  we have canary images that do install desktop root-on-zfs, but that's not the default image, but rather an experiment of the underlying tech
[15:30] <lordcirth> xnox, ah, ok. So it definitely won't be in the official 19.10 ISO?
[15:31] <xnox> lordcirth:  i made no forward looking statements =) we do time based releases, so we will know what's on the official 19.10 iso.... when it is published in 2019 October.
[15:31] <xnox> lordcirth:  nobody has a time-machine )
[15:31] <xnox> lordcirth:  nobody has a time-machine =)
[15:32] <xnox> lordcirth:  i only explained to you why you don't see it on the current daily iso.... i have no idea the status of that work or plans otherwise.
[15:32] <lordcirth> xnox, but feature freeze is tomorrow according to: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/EoanErmine/ReleaseSchedule
[15:33] <xnox> lordcirth:  feel free to play with the canary image off cdimage
[15:33] <lordcirth> So isn't that the deadline for it to be merged?
[15:33] <xnox> lordcirth:  and then there are FFe
[15:33] <xnox> lordcirth:  featurefreeze does not mean that development and merging features stops, simply that one needs more reviews and featurefreezeexcpetion approval.
[15:34] <lordcirth> Ok, I see.
[15:34] <xnox> lordcirth:  most flagship things we ever shipped, always landed post FF =)))))
[15:34] <lordcirth> lol
[15:34] <xnox> lordcirth:  see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess
[15:54] <doko> apw: linux-oem (4.15.0-1050.57 to 4.15.0-1051.60)
[15:54] <doko> linux-oem-tools-4.15.0-1051/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: libbinutils (<< 2.30.1)
[16:00] <apw> doko, damn
[16:06] <xnox> doko:  apw: argh
[16:07] <xnox> doko:  apw: did we not get rid of that dep, by statically linking before?!
[16:07] <xnox> or was it something else.......
[16:07] <apw> it was a bug in something which meant we were using it for demangling in perf, when we should not
[16:08] <xnox> you lost me with that sentence
[16:08]  * xnox smiles and nods
[16:09] <doko> apw, xnox: it's only in this variant
[16:09] <apw> doko, ok so ... i am going to guess we have a missing build-dep
[16:12] <doko> apw: is this a package built on bionic, and then copied?
[16:22] <xnox> doko:  yes
[16:22] <xnox> intentionally
[20:20] <apw> doko, yes, and it is broken if it is using binutils for anything linking wise
[20:39] <vorlon> Locutusofborg: uh so mdeslaur has closed LP: #1839596 as wontfix, and you uploaded https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/imagemagick/8:6.9.10.23+dfsg-2.1ubuntu5 which reverted the security update; please reconcile this with the security team
[20:39] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1839596 in imagemagick (Ubuntu Eoan) "imagemagick 8:6.9.10.23+dfsg-2.1ubuntu3 broke reverse-deps" [Critical,Won't fix] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1839596
[20:40] <vorlon> (the package is stuck in -proposed anyway due to an MIR right now, but we definitely don't want the MIR to unstick it and have it land unexpectedly in eoan release)
[21:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: llvm-toolchain-9 [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1:9~+rc2-1~exp1] (no packageset)
[21:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-toolchain-9 [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [1:9~+rc2-1~exp1]
[22:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: net-snmp (disco-proposed/main) [5.7.3+dfsg-5ubuntu1 => 5.7.3+dfsg-5ubuntu1.1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[22:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: net-snmp (bionic-proposed/main) [5.7.3+dfsg-1.8ubuntu3.1 => 5.7.3+dfsg-1.8ubuntu3.2] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[22:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: net-snmp (xenial-proposed/main) [5.7.3+dfsg-1ubuntu4.2 => 5.7.3+dfsg-1ubuntu4.3] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)