[00:43] <tsimonq2> https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/qt4-rm.html
[06:43] <mitya57> tsimonq2: thanks. I expect it to greatly reduce when the Debian importer starts next cycle, as we have recently bumped our bugs to release-critical.
[06:45] <mitya57> Ah, you want to do that before the archive opens…
 The goal, yes
 Do I actually think it will happen? Probably not
 I definitely want to aim for before 20.04 is released though as a final date
 Well, if the archive admins agree to remove so many packages at once, it may happen.
 The tricky part may be some source packages where only a part of them needs Qt4 (see comments in https://wiki.debian.org/Qt4Removal, e.g. backintime, nfs-ganesha). In this case removing the whole source is not needed. … Also we need to fix 4 flavors.
 Right
 I think vorlon might do it
 (mass removal, if requested)
 Good for us then
 I don't think that's the hard part though. Finding trigger happy AAs isn't necessarily a hard thing to do :P
 I think most of the flavors just depend on fcitx
 Our next task really should be identifying those source packages that only partially depend on Qt 4
 There are some comments on that wiki page but they are not complete and not structured
 E.g. lightdm definitely shouldn't be removed, but there is no comment about it
 Also there are some Ubuntu-specific packages.
 Okay
 What do you think about removing qtwebkit & qtwebkit-source this cycle? At least one of them :)
 Sounds good to me
 I wonder who synced qtwebkit — it was not in disco (and I believe it was even in sync blacklist)
 @acheronuk ^ ?
 Looks like it was LocutusOfBorg actually
 One of the two I thought :)
 @mitya57 [What do you think about removing qtwebkit & qtwebkit-source this cycle? At least …], I'll set up a transition tracker now
 Thanks. There should be just a few packages but I'm from phone now so can't check.
 Yeah, just a couplke
 👍
 @mitya57 [I wonder who synced qtwebkit — it was not in disco (and I believe it was even in …], LOB did
 as somthing didn't build against: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtwebkit-source
 If something doesn't build the right thing would be removing it
 So… https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/qtwebkit-rm.html
 Quite some stuff uses PySide.QtWebKit: https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=from+PySide.QtWebKit+import
 And some of those don‘t even have bugs filed in Debian… Doing that now.
[15:43] <lisandro> Thanks