/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2019/08/23/#ubuntu-release.txt

tsimonq2Eickmeyer: It'll be removed mid next month anyway: https://bugs.debian.org/87518000:00
tsimonq2Eickmeyer: You're welcome to make a case to sync from Experimental.00:00
Eickmeyertsimonq2: I was just in the process of checking on the status of a Qt 5 port, but maybe you could tell me for sure just offhand?00:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: util-linux (xenial-proposed/main) [2.27.1-6ubuntu3.7 => 2.27.1-6ubuntu3.8] (core)00:02
tsimonq2Eickmeyer: mapreri says in the bug that there's scribus-ng in Experimental that's "stable" but not prod-ready.00:02
Eickmeyertsimonq2: *le sigh*00:03
Eickmeyertsimonq2: Well, at least we have some time before we have to go down that road as this doesn't affect Eoan. In the meantime, I'm going to nuke the Qt 4 dep in carla and see what happens in my PPA before I do an actual upload.00:04
tsimonq2Eickmeyer: That's your call. Give the new scribus a test and see if Mattia's just being on the safe side (wouldn't be unlike him to be extra cautious, he was a sponsor of mine pre-MOTU :) ) or if it's really unstable.00:06
tsimonq2Eickmeyer: doesn't effect Eoan> Please don't procrastinate though. :P00:06
tsimonq2Wimpress: ^ Qt 4 removal also affects Ubuntu MATE.00:07
Eickmeyertsimonq2: Of course not, but 1) I'm technically on vacation this week, and 2) other reasons.00:07
tsimonq2Eickmeyer: Alright.00:08
tsimonq2Eickmeyer: That was the point of the email, to communicate that some gears should start moving here. :)00:08
Eickmeyertsimonq2: I'm just lucky I have some time to look at carla atm.00:09
tsimonq2Eickmeyer: No worries, get it done when you can.00:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (bionic-proposed) [237-3ubuntu10.26]00:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (disco-proposed) [240-6ubuntu5.4]00:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-9-cross [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/main) [10ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)00:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-9-cross [amd64] (eoan-proposed/main) [10ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)00:34
tsimonq2Eickmeyer: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/qt4-rm.html00:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-9-cross-ports [i386] (eoan-proposed/universe) [9ubuntu1] (no packageset)00:47
Eickmeyertsimonq2: ack, and dep in carla is now removed (UNRELATED: You and I are in the same time zone rn).00:51
tsimonq2Eickmeyer: Oh yeah?00:52
tsimonq2The best timezone.00:52
EickmeyerCST. Dallas. Sis-in-law's wedding.00:52
Eickmeyer*CDT00:52
tsimonq2Nice!00:52
tsimonq2Congrats to them :)00:52
EickmeyerShe says thanks. Wedding is Tuesday.00:54
* Eickmeyer goes back to lurk mode00:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-9-cross [i386] (eoan-proposed/main) [10ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)00:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: lubuntu-update-notifier (eoan-proposed/primary) [0.1]03:44
tsimonq2vorlon: ^^ easy package, it's Lintian-clean.03:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-9-cross-ports [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [9ubuntu1] (no packageset)05:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-9-cross-ports [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [9ubuntu1]06:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-9-cross [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [10ubuntu1]06:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-9-cross-ports [i386] (eoan-proposed) [9ubuntu1]06:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-9-cross [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [10ubuntu1]06:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-9-cross [i386] (eoan-proposed) [10ubuntu1]06:29
LocutusOfBorghello, looks like somebody accepted gnuradion everywhere modulo ppc64el... can you please accept it too?06:52
vorlonrbalint: it looks like your systemd ppa is killing the armhf test runners06:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnuradio [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [3.8.0.0-2]06:54
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: ^^06:54
vorlonrbalint: removing netplan.io seems ill-advised.  https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/kPJ67gyy8F/  I'll flush the rest of these tests from the queue so that the rest of the tests can run06:56
LocutusOfBorgthanks!06:59
vorlondoko: cctools has been ftbfs for 233 days in -proposed with compiler errors about failed inlining; but this error isn't reproducible in Debian, including with libc6-dev from experimental.  How do I see what's different in the compiler defaults between Debian and Ubuntu?07:07
LocutusOfBorgvorlon, kicking out sagemath sagetex from eoan to proposed will probably make a lot of stuff migrate, e.g. texlive and so on07:09
LocutusOfBorgthey are utterly broken07:09
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: utterly broken> evidence?07:09
LocutusOfBorgsagemath has 4 rc bugs07:09
LocutusOfBorgfor different failures07:09
LocutusOfBorgthey don't build because of new readline, new python, new gcc07:10
LocutusOfBorgand test failures07:10
vorlonok07:10
dokovorlon: glibc07:10
LocutusOfBorgthe new release works, but needs another set of dependencies07:10
LocutusOfBorgand debian maintainer is slowly adapting it07:10
* LocutusOfBorg finds that debian tracker is down07:10
vorlondoko: so there's a relevant glibc difference between the 2.29 in disco/eoan and in experimental?07:13
dokovorlon: I didn't look07:25
dokohmm, but if it's 233 days, then it's not a glibc version difference07:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-defaults [s390x] (eoan-proposed/main) [1.184ubuntu1] (core)07:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-defaults [armhf] (eoan-proposed/main) [1.184ubuntu1] (core)07:37
tsimonq2https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-transition-trackers/ubuntu-transition-tracker/configs/revision/718 too07:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-defaults [amd64] (eoan-proposed/main) [1.184ubuntu1] (core)07:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-defaults [i386] (eoan-proposed/main) [1.184ubuntu1] (core)07:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-defaults [arm64] (eoan-proposed/main) [1.184ubuntu1] (core)07:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-defaults [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/main) [1.184ubuntu1] (core)07:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-defaults [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [1.184ubuntu1]07:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-defaults [armhf] (eoan-proposed) [1.184ubuntu1]07:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-defaults [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [1.184ubuntu1]07:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-defaults [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [1.184ubuntu1]07:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-defaults [s390x] (eoan-proposed) [1.184ubuntu1]07:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-defaults [i386] (eoan-proposed) [1.184ubuntu1]07:48
LocutusOfBorgvorlon, is it possible to remove deal.ii on arm64 please?07:51
LocutusOfBorgI spent at least one week trying to fix the failure, no luck, old gcc, old binutils, less parallelism, another linker07:51
LocutusOfBorgDebian has similar failures on ppc64el...  and meh: 92566807:52
LocutusOfBorgwe should make some transition move forward, and deal.ii is blocking 6 transitions07:53
LocutusOfBorgTrying easy from autohinter: dijitso/2019.1.0-2 dolfin/2019.1.0-4 fenics/1:2019.1.0.2 ffc/2019.1.0.post0-2 fiat/2019.1.0-2 getdp/3.0.4+dfsg1-1build1 hypre/2.16.0-4 mshr/2019.1.0+dfsg1-4 petsc/3.11.3+dfsg1-2 petsc4py/3.11.0-2 pybind11/2.3.0-2 slepc/3.11.2+dfsg1-1 slepc4py/3.11.0-2 sundials/3.1.2+dfsg-3build3 ufl/2019.1.0-207:53
LocutusOfBorgthis one will go if we remove one single binary07:53
LocutusOfBorgI suspect ginggs will fix the failures in a Debian upload eventually :D07:54
LocutusOfBorgif this one migrates, I can focus then on haskell and finish ocaml07:55
LocutusOfBorg(ocaml needs few removals too, I filed bugs already)07:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-defaults-ports [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.184ubuntu1] (no packageset)08:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-defaults-ports [arm64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.184ubuntu1] (no packageset)08:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-defaults-ports [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.184ubuntu1] (no packageset)08:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-defaults-ports [i386] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.184ubuntu1] (no packageset)08:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mesa [source] (bionic-proposed) [19.0.8-0ubuntu0~18.04.2]08:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-defaults-ports [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [1.184ubuntu1]08:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-defaults-ports [i386] (eoan-proposed) [1.184ubuntu1]08:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-defaults-ports [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [1.184ubuntu1]08:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-defaults-ports [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [1.184ubuntu1]08:13
=== alan_g is now known as alan_g_
dokosforshee, apw: is this something which can be solved by retrying?10:47
dokoII: dkms-build downloading nvidia-430 (nvidia-kernel-source-430_430.40-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb)10:47
doko--2019-08-23 01:19:43--  http://ftpmaster.internal/ubuntu/pool/restricted/n/nvidia-graphics-drivers-430/nvidia-kernel-source-430_430.40-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb10:47
dokoResolving ftpmaster.internal (ftpmaster.internal)... 91.189.89.9910:47
dokoConnecting to ftpmaster.internal (ftpmaster.internal)|91.189.89.99|:80... connected.10:47
dokoHTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found10:47
doko2019-08-23 01:19:43 ERROR 404: Not Found.10:47
apwdoko, nope10:47
apwdoko, it needs that bit turning off ... i think sforshee is working on that ... if that is hte last failure i can hint it10:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: smc-tools (disco-proposed/universe) [1.2.0-0ubuntu1 => 1.2.0-0ubuntu1.1] (no packageset)10:52
dokoapw: it is, for gcc-9, afaics10:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted util-linux [source] (disco-proposed) [2.33.1-0.1ubuntu3]11:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted util-linux [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.31.1-0.4ubuntu3.4]11:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted util-linux [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.27.1-6ubuntu3.8]11:25
LocutusOfBorgLaney, can you please blacklist tests for: rust-byteorder rust-rayon rust-derive-more rust-doc-comment rust-quick-xml ?11:43
LocutusOfBorgthey are all result of "hey we suck at going from neutral to bad, so we consider them bad now and dh-cargo is blocked"11:43
LocutusOfBorgthe last three packages have been patched by me to just hide the issue, but I would like to sync them again11:44
Laneybadtest?11:44
LocutusOfBorgignore forever11:44
Laneythat would not normally be blacklist11:44
Laneybut no, not me, sorry, I'm at guadec right now11:44
LocutusOfBorgLaney, I think badtest yes11:48
LocutusOfBorghttps://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/britney/hints-ubuntu/revision/381011:48
LocutusOfBorgsame as here11:48
LocutusOfBorgapw, ^^ can you please add rust-byteorder rust-rayon rust-derive-more rust-doc-comment rust-quick-xml to that list?11:49
mitya57Can someone please process bug 1840190? We really don’t want *two* qt4 webkit sources in Eoan, ideally we want none of them.12:08
mitya57no bot, so: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtwebkit-source/+bug/1840190 [qtwebkit-source] Remove from eoan archive12:11
LocutusOfBorgmitya57, actually the old qtwebkit-source should be binary free12:11
LocutusOfBorgso, an old cruft around that shouldn't hurt too much, binaries have been taken over by qtwebkit12:12
LocutusOfBorgthere might be some -dbg package probably12:12
LocutusOfBorgbut meh12:12
mitya57LocutusOfBorg: I am right now looking at what still uses qt4 webkit in Eoan. There are just a few packages that use it directly (https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/qtwebkit-rm.html) but some other are using it indirectly (e.g. via pyside).12:16
mitya57I hope we will be able to remove them all from Eoan, so I decided to start from a low hanging fruit first :)12:16
LocutusOfBorg:)12:17
mitya57LocutusOfBorg: do you mind if we remove qutim? You touched it last12:27
mitya57Or if you care, maybe you can update it from 0.2.0 (released in 2009) to a newer release from https://github.com/euroelessar/qutim/releases?12:29
LocutusOfBorgI don't really care, I just no-change rebuilt to pick up new webkit12:31
LocutusOfBorgyou should probably ask somebody who worked on it, no change rebuilds doesn't count :P12:32
mitya57From the changelog, I think the only person who realy cared about it was Maia Kozheva, but that was in 2010. So filing RM :)12:49
mitya57Done @ https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qutim/+bug/184117812:57
ubot5Launchpad bug 1841178 in qutim (Ubuntu) "Please remove qutim from Eoan archive" [Undecided,New]12:57
dokorbasak: are you trying to do a php transition?12:58
dokophp7.3 doesn't have a subscriber12:58
rbasakdoko: yes, and sorry, I've subscribed ~ubuntu-server now.13:20
dokoapw: did you override anything gor the linux autopkg test?13:36
apwdoko, not as yet, sorry missed your reply13:37
apwdoko, done13:38
dokota13:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1018.19~18.04.1] (kernel)15:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-1018.19~18.04.1]15:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: featherpad [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.11.1-1~build1] (lubuntu)15:46
vorlondoko: right, so my question was where's the right place to look for differences in compiler options used between Debian and Ubunut16:22
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: deal.ii> that gcc-9 build failure doesn't show up on https://people.canonical.com/~doko/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20190614-gcc9-eoan.html so doesn't seem to be a good rationale for removal.  And it's an Ubuntu-specific build failure - you mention Debian having a similar failure on ppc64el, but the package is up-to-date on ppc64el in Debian.  However, I think a rationale that16:30
vorlonsatisfies me here is that it's a leaf package blocking transitions, which justifies removal, and if we removed it it would come right back in from Debian without the arm64 binary16:30
vorlonLP: #1841209 for the desktop image builds now being broken after yesterday's migration16:42
ubot5Launchpad bug 1841209 in libreoffice (Ubuntu) " libreoffice-help-common : Depends: libjs-normalize.css but it is not installable" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/184120916:42
vorlonI have no idea why this wasn't caught by britney on the frontend, a main->universe dependency should've kept libreoffice from being a candidate16:43
LocutusOfBorgvorlon, in debian no builds with gcc-9 defaults have been done yet16:46
LocutusOfBorgbut tomorrow ginggs will do one :)16:46
LocutusOfBorgso, you can't easily say if Debian is broken or not...16:46
LocutusOfBorgin any case I hope tomorrow to have an answer to you16:47
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: no, but I can say that deal.ii doesn't ftbfs in *Ubuntu* with gcc-916:47
ginggsi will be uploading deal.ii tomorrow, or as soon as trilinos is built16:47
ginggs^ in debian16:48
LocutusOfBorgvorlon, meh, gcc changed a lot since that rebuild16:48
ginggsLocutusOfBorg: didn't deal.ii ftbfs with gcc 8 in your ppa?16:49
LocutusOfBorgyes ginggs16:49
LocutusOfBorgalso deal.ii version changed16:49
LocutusOfBorgthat is my best bet then16:49
LocutusOfBorgso the new deal.ii version is broken on arm64?16:50
ginggsLocutusOfBorg: not in debian with gcc 8 as default16:51
LocutusOfBorgsome combo of different factors, for sure16:51
* vorlon sorts out pcc-libs + pcc, is a stupid circular dep that requires deleting pcc to rebootstrap16:51
LocutusOfBorgvorlon, I did sourceful fixes for haskell levels 2-3 and 416:54
LocutusOfBorgthis requires lot of time16:54
* vorlon nods16:54
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: are you fixing these in Ubuntu or Debian?  Where are the Debian maintainers on this?16:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pcc-libs [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.2.0~DEVEL+20180604-2.1] (no packageset)17:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pcc-libs [i386] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.2.0~DEVEL+20180604-2.1] (no packageset)17:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pcc-libs [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [1.2.0~DEVEL+20180604-2.1]17:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pcc-libs [i386] (eoan-proposed) [1.2.0~DEVEL+20180604-2.1]17:09
RikMillsvorlon: new debian sysbench in proposed now excludes building on armhf, so can we lose that binary in release?17:12
vorlonRikMills: having confirmed that Debian has also dropped the armhf binary from the archive, yes17:16
vorlon(done)17:17
LocutusOfBorgvorlon, both, at the same time17:31
vorlonok17:31
LocutusOfBorgI'll sync later tonight them, but ,meh, they are the same17:32
LocutusOfBorgmodulo one, I did a mistake "0.2.0.5-8~builld1" (double l"17:32
LocutusOfBorgalso, two builds, were stuck on s390x during testsuite17:32
LocutusOfBorgI just disabled the testsuite and didn't forward in Debian17:33
LocutusOfBorgI'll see how they fix it, and they are called ubuntu117:33
LocutusOfBorghaskell-prettyprinter-ansi-terminaland haskell-terminal-progress-bar17:33
LocutusOfBorgif you want to have a look!17:33
LocutusOfBorgbuild was killed after 120 minutes17:33
LocutusOfBorghttps://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haskell-terminal-progress-bar/0.4.1-1build1/+build/1736881817:34
LocutusOfBorg(btw reverse-deps are good)17:34
marcustomlinsonvorlon: re: bug 184120917:39
ubot5bug 1841209 in libreoffice (Ubuntu) " libreoffice-help-common : Depends: libjs-normalize.css but it is not installable" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/184120917:39
marcustomlinsonvorlon: could you sponsor the upload for me?17:39
vorlonmarcustomlinson: link to upload?17:39
marcustomlinsonvorlon: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1NeNKRY3Rex3SXgcTTKlRloCZr0_S-QNw?usp=sharing17:40
vorlonmarcustomlinson: (does this also drop the gstreamer bad/ugly?)17:40
marcustomlinsonvorlon: yes17:40
vorlonexcellent17:40
vorlonmarcustomlinson: why the jump from 0ubuntu1 to 0ubuntu5?17:42
marcustomlinsonvorlon: the desktop team has been stacking builds here: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/3762/+packages17:42
marcustomlinsonfor ff17:43
vorlonok17:44
vorlonmarcustomlinson: changelog has the wrong syntax for bug closures (missing the # before the bug #)18:19
vorlonmarcustomlinson: what is the effect on the usability of the help to have normalize.css absent?18:21
marcustomlinsonvorlon: sorry I'll fix that now18:30
marcustomlinsonvorlon: no effect, there is a builtin fallback for when the normalize.css package is not found18:31
marcustomlinsonvorlon: have you uploaded already? Can I reuse 0ubuntu5?18:33
marcustomlinsonvorlon: or are you just saying the syntax is wrong, fix it in vcs, and now watch the bugs manually18:34
vorlonmarcustomlinson: please reuse the number and reupload :)18:35
vorlonand then I'll sponsor18:35
marcustomlinsonvorlon: ok loading...18:35
marcustomlinsonvorlon: ok update, same link18:43
marcustomlinson*updated18:44
vorlonmarcustomlinson: ok.  .changes file also built with the wrong -v version (we want the changes for all versions since the one currently in eoan), but I will fix that up on my side and upload18:52
marcustomlinsonthank you so much vorlon. sorry for the pain18:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (disco-proposed/main) [19.1-1-gbaa47854-0ubuntu1~19.04.1 => 19.2-21-ge6383719-0ubuntu1~19.04.1] (core, edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud)19:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (bionic-proposed/main) [19.1-1-gbaa47854-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 => 19.2-21-ge6383719-0ubuntu1~18.04.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)19:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (xenial-proposed/main) [19.1-1-gbaa47854-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 => 19.2-21-ge6383719-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)19:19
coreycbvorlon: i'd really like to clear out these eoan-proposed openstack packages but i'm having a hard time finding what the issue is19:22
coreycbvorlon: i'm assuming there's a py2 binary that's been removed that is still being used as a dependency19:23
blackboxswtjaalton: or vorlon(backup SRU), if possible, we'd have cloud-init in queue for (xenial|bionic|disco)-proposed  that we'd like to start testing if we get a chance to approve today19:23
vorlonblackboxsw: by any reasonable measure it's past eod for tjaalton; I'll try to take a look this afternoon19:26
coreycbvorlon: if you have any tips let me know. i've been looking at a few different reports but not making progress (nbs and update_output.txt)19:26
vorloncoreycb: give me a package name to key off?19:26
coreycbvorlon: a simple one from https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/nbs.html is python-aodhclient19:27
blackboxswthx vorlon, I just don't like pinging 'the backup' in my primary SRU request :)19:28
vorloncoreycb: well, nbs is different than proposed-migration19:28
vorloncoreycb: what's a package that's currently stuck in proposed?  since aodh doesn't seem to be there19:28
coreycbvorlon: i want to figure out what's blocking the ones that are listed as candidate here: http://michael.hudsondoyle.geek.nz/team-summary.html#ubuntu-openstack19:29
vorloncoreycb: ok - fwiw that report now officially lives at https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/eoan/update_excuses_by_team.html#ubuntu-openstack19:31
coreycbok thanks19:32
vorloncoreycb: alright, some of these are clearly chicken-and-egg issues, the line 'trying: python-oslo.messaging python-futurist nova python-os-service-types python-openstacksdk senlin python-keystoneauth1 python-neutronclient python-keystoneclient python-osc-lib python-os-client-config python-glanceclient python-cinderclient ceilometer python-novaclient watcher python-openstackclient python-amqp kombu'19:34
vorlonin update_output fails mostly because it makes a bunch of packages, which are already NBS and only held in because they're build-dependencies of the old versions, uninstallable19:34
vorloncoreycb: so I'll clear some of that out by hand, but e.g. python-celery is listed as being made uninstallable and is not NBS19:34
vorloncoreycb: these are not NBS, so require further investigation: python-celery python-flower python-heatclient python-keystonemiddleware python-mistralclient python-swiftclient19:38
coreycbvorlon: awesome thanks so much. i'll take a closer look at those.19:39
vorloncoreycb: flower has a removal bug LP: #1838213, that will also unblock celery19:40
ubot5Launchpad bug 1838213 in twitter-bootstrap (Ubuntu) "remove twitter-bootstrap from eoan" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/183821319:40
coreycbvorlon: great19:40
vorlonah and flower just got removed from unstable today so I'll run that through19:41
RikMillsI assume mysql-5.7 is going to be removed completely soon?19:42
vorlonI can't speak to the timeline on that19:43
vorlonI expect it would be removed before release19:43
RikMillsright. 'soon' is before release for me19:43
RikMillsKDE akonadi doesn't work with 8 at the moment, so if can't depend on 5.7 we have to switch to mariadb19:44
dokovorlon: well, we have the two new hardening flags in eoan now, which are not yet in unstable19:46
vorlondoko: remind me which ones those are, so I can test reverting them?19:46
dokoapw (or vorlon): please ignore the linux autopkg test for gcc-defaults (as done for gcc-9)19:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (disco-proposed) [19.2-21-ge6383719-0ubuntu1~19.04.1]19:48
dokovorlon: see u-d ("New gcc hardening defaults in eoan (-fstack-clash-protection + -fcf-protection)")19:48
dokobut if the package is that long in -proposed, then it's certainly not that one19:49
vorlonright19:49
vorlonok19:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (bionic-proposed) [19.2-21-ge6383719-0ubuntu1~18.04.1]19:52
vorloncoreycb: python-heatclient should be unblocked now that python-senlinclient is removed19:53
vorlonpython-keystonemiddleware is blocked by nova autopkgtest on armhf19:53
vorlonpython-mistralclient should be unblocked now that python-troveclient is removed19:53
coreycbvorlon: great. ok will take a look. i'll chat with dan watkins about simplestreams as it depends on python-swiftclient.19:53
coreycbvorlon: thanks should cover everything. thanks again.19:54
vorlonok19:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (xenial-proposed) [19.2-21-ge6383719-0ubuntu1~16.04.1]19:56
blackboxswwoot! thx Mr V19:56
vorlonRAOF: lintian -I points out that the wlcs debian/copyright has some wrong filenames... I think that should be tests/xdg* instead of xdg*19:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wlcs [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.1.0-0ubuntu1]19:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted featherpad [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [0.11.1-1~build1]20:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wlcs [amd64] (eoan-proposed/none) [1.1.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)20:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wlcs [i386] (eoan-proposed/none) [1.1.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)20:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wlcs [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/none) [1.1.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)20:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wlcs [armhf] (eoan-proposed/none) [1.1.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)20:12
ginggsLocutusOfBorg: spoiler alert: deal.ii built on arm64 with gcc 9 on debian porterbox20:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wlcs [arm64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)20:13
vorlontsimonq2: so, uh20:18
vorlontsimonq2: licensecheck on lubuntu-update-notifier clearly picks up that the files are licensed under GPL-3+20:19
vorlontsimonq2: and your debian/copyright claims GPL-2+20:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected lubuntu-update-notifier [source] (eoan-proposed) [0.1]20:20
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: deal.ii is no longer blocked by the ftbfs... just by its autopkgtests all failing20:21
Odd_Blokepowersj: coreycb has reached out to me asking for a new upload of simplestreams to drop a Build-Depends on python-swiftclient.  I've prepared this (https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/Qwhjps6M6R/) but need a sponsor again.  Who should I bug?20:27
powersjOdd_Bloke, coreycb is there a bug?20:28
powersjif not, please file one and attach your patch20:28
coreycbOdd_Bloke: thanks wasn't expecting such a quick turn-around20:30
coreycbpowersj: no it just unblocks python-swiftclient from eoan-proposed but I can20:31
coreycbOdd_Bloke: powersj: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/simplestreams/+bug/184127720:32
ubot5Launchpad bug 1841277 in simplestreams (Ubuntu) "please drop python-swiftclient BD" [Undecided,New]20:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wlcs [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [1.1.0-0ubuntu1]20:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wlcs [armhf] (eoan-proposed) [1.1.0-0ubuntu1]20:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wlcs [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [1.1.0-0ubuntu1]20:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wlcs [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [1.1.0-0ubuntu1]20:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wlcs [i386] (eoan-proposed) [1.1.0-0ubuntu1]20:33
powersjOdd_Bloke, can you update your patch. Do we actually need to drop python-glanceclient as well?20:35
Odd_Blokepowersj: No, but we can.  I tried dropping keystoneclient and that _does_ cause problems.20:36
powersjcoreycb, thanks for the bug, I'll get someone to upload probably monday20:36
coreycbpowersj: that'll work20:37
coreycbOdd_Bloke: hmm yeah we'll have to drop keystoneclient too20:38
Odd_Blokecoreycb: We have reverse deps on the Python 2 packages which mean we can't just remove them, so that one is harder to address.20:41
Odd_Blokepowersj: Patch attached (and also pushed to the ubuntu/devel branch of the repo).20:42
coreycbOdd_Bloke: ok. we've deopped all py2 openstack pkgs in eoan.   maybe we can chat more next week.20:45
coreycbdropped20:45
ginggsvorlon, LocutusOfBorg: seems a bit odd that the deal.ii autopkgtest pulls in libp4est-1.1 and libp4est-2.220:47
vorlonmaybe retry with --all-proposed?20:47
ginggsvorlon: ack, doing...20:48
Odd_Blokecoreycb: I'm out next week, so you probably need to talk to powersj.20:56
coreycbOdd_Bloke: ok enjoy20:57
ginggsvorlon: al-proposed did it, but please 'force-badtest deal.ii/9.1.1-3/arm64' for now21:28
vorlonginggs: done21:33
ginggsvorlon: thanks!21:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-60.67] (core, kernel)21:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-60.67] (core, kernel)21:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem-osp1 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.0.0-1020.22] (no packageset)21:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/main) [1.4.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)21:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [i386] (eoan-proposed/main) [1.4.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)22:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [armhf] (eoan-proposed/main) [1.4.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)22:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [arm64] (eoan-proposed/main) [1.4.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)22:53

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!