[00:00] <tsimonq2> Eickmeyer: It'll be removed mid next month anyway: https://bugs.debian.org/875180
[00:00] <tsimonq2> Eickmeyer: You're welcome to make a case to sync from Experimental.
[00:02] <Eickmeyer> tsimonq2: I was just in the process of checking on the status of a Qt 5 port, but maybe you could tell me for sure just offhand?
[00:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: util-linux (xenial-proposed/main) [2.27.1-6ubuntu3.7 => 2.27.1-6ubuntu3.8] (core)
[00:02] <tsimonq2> Eickmeyer: mapreri says in the bug that there's scribus-ng in Experimental that's "stable" but not prod-ready.
[00:03] <Eickmeyer> tsimonq2: *le sigh*
[00:04] <Eickmeyer> tsimonq2: Well, at least we have some time before we have to go down that road as this doesn't affect Eoan. In the meantime, I'm going to nuke the Qt 4 dep in carla and see what happens in my PPA before I do an actual upload.
[00:06] <tsimonq2> Eickmeyer: That's your call. Give the new scribus a test and see if Mattia's just being on the safe side (wouldn't be unlike him to be extra cautious, he was a sponsor of mine pre-MOTU :) ) or if it's really unstable.
[00:06] <tsimonq2> Eickmeyer: doesn't effect Eoan> Please don't procrastinate though. :P
[00:07] <tsimonq2> Wimpress: ^ Qt 4 removal also affects Ubuntu MATE.
[00:07] <Eickmeyer> tsimonq2: Of course not, but 1) I'm technically on vacation this week, and 2) other reasons.
[00:08] <tsimonq2> Eickmeyer: Alright.
[00:08] <tsimonq2> Eickmeyer: That was the point of the email, to communicate that some gears should start moving here. :)
[00:09] <Eickmeyer> tsimonq2: I'm just lucky I have some time to look at carla atm.
[00:10] <tsimonq2> Eickmeyer: No worries, get it done when you can.
[00:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (bionic-proposed) [237-3ubuntu10.26]
[00:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (disco-proposed) [240-6ubuntu5.4]
[00:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-9-cross [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/main) [10ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[00:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-9-cross [amd64] (eoan-proposed/main) [10ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[00:43] <tsimonq2> Eickmeyer: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/qt4-rm.html
[00:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-9-cross-ports [i386] (eoan-proposed/universe) [9ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[00:51] <Eickmeyer> tsimonq2: ack, and dep in carla is now removed (UNRELATED: You and I are in the same time zone rn).
[00:52] <tsimonq2> Eickmeyer: Oh yeah?
[00:52] <tsimonq2> The best timezone.
[00:52] <Eickmeyer> CST. Dallas. Sis-in-law's wedding.
[00:52] <Eickmeyer> *CDT
[00:52] <tsimonq2> Nice!
[00:52] <tsimonq2> Congrats to them :)
[00:54] <Eickmeyer> She says thanks. Wedding is Tuesday.
[00:54]  * Eickmeyer goes back to lurk mode
[00:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-9-cross [i386] (eoan-proposed/main) [10ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[03:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: lubuntu-update-notifier (eoan-proposed/primary) [0.1]
[03:45] <tsimonq2> vorlon: ^^ easy package, it's Lintian-clean.
[05:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-9-cross-ports [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [9ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[06:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-9-cross-ports [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [9ubuntu1]
[06:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-9-cross [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [10ubuntu1]
[06:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-9-cross-ports [i386] (eoan-proposed) [9ubuntu1]
[06:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-9-cross [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [10ubuntu1]
[06:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-9-cross [i386] (eoan-proposed) [10ubuntu1]
[06:52] <LocutusOfBorg> hello, looks like somebody accepted gnuradion everywhere modulo ppc64el... can you please accept it too?
[06:53] <vorlon> rbalint: it looks like your systemd ppa is killing the armhf test runners
[06:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnuradio [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [3.8.0.0-2]
[06:54] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: ^^
[06:56] <vorlon> rbalint: removing netplan.io seems ill-advised.  https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/kPJ67gyy8F/  I'll flush the rest of these tests from the queue so that the rest of the tests can run
[06:59] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks!
[07:07] <vorlon> doko: cctools has been ftbfs for 233 days in -proposed with compiler errors about failed inlining; but this error isn't reproducible in Debian, including with libc6-dev from experimental.  How do I see what's different in the compiler defaults between Debian and Ubuntu?
[07:09] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, kicking out sagemath sagetex from eoan to proposed will probably make a lot of stuff migrate, e.g. texlive and so on
[07:09] <LocutusOfBorg> they are utterly broken
[07:09] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: utterly broken> evidence?
[07:09] <LocutusOfBorg> sagemath has 4 rc bugs
[07:09] <LocutusOfBorg> for different failures
[07:10] <LocutusOfBorg> they don't build because of new readline, new python, new gcc
[07:10] <LocutusOfBorg> and test failures
[07:10] <vorlon> ok
[07:10] <doko> vorlon: glibc
[07:10] <LocutusOfBorg> the new release works, but needs another set of dependencies
[07:10] <LocutusOfBorg> and debian maintainer is slowly adapting it
[07:10]  * LocutusOfBorg finds that debian tracker is down
[07:13] <vorlon> doko: so there's a relevant glibc difference between the 2.29 in disco/eoan and in experimental?
[07:25] <doko> vorlon: I didn't look
[07:26] <doko> hmm, but if it's 233 days, then it's not a glibc version difference
[07:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-defaults [s390x] (eoan-proposed/main) [1.184ubuntu1] (core)
[07:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-defaults [armhf] (eoan-proposed/main) [1.184ubuntu1] (core)
[07:37] <tsimonq2> https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-transition-trackers/ubuntu-transition-tracker/configs/revision/718 too
[07:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-defaults [amd64] (eoan-proposed/main) [1.184ubuntu1] (core)
[07:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-defaults [i386] (eoan-proposed/main) [1.184ubuntu1] (core)
[07:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-defaults [arm64] (eoan-proposed/main) [1.184ubuntu1] (core)
[07:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-defaults [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/main) [1.184ubuntu1] (core)
[07:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-defaults [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [1.184ubuntu1]
[07:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-defaults [armhf] (eoan-proposed) [1.184ubuntu1]
[07:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-defaults [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [1.184ubuntu1]
[07:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-defaults [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [1.184ubuntu1]
[07:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-defaults [s390x] (eoan-proposed) [1.184ubuntu1]
[07:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-defaults [i386] (eoan-proposed) [1.184ubuntu1]
[07:51] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, is it possible to remove deal.ii on arm64 please?
[07:51] <LocutusOfBorg> I spent at least one week trying to fix the failure, no luck, old gcc, old binutils, less parallelism, another linker
[07:52] <LocutusOfBorg> Debian has similar failures on ppc64el...  and meh: 925668
[07:53] <LocutusOfBorg> we should make some transition move forward, and deal.ii is blocking 6 transitions
[07:53] <LocutusOfBorg> Trying easy from autohinter: dijitso/2019.1.0-2 dolfin/2019.1.0-4 fenics/1:2019.1.0.2 ffc/2019.1.0.post0-2 fiat/2019.1.0-2 getdp/3.0.4+dfsg1-1build1 hypre/2.16.0-4 mshr/2019.1.0+dfsg1-4 petsc/3.11.3+dfsg1-2 petsc4py/3.11.0-2 pybind11/2.3.0-2 slepc/3.11.2+dfsg1-1 slepc4py/3.11.0-2 sundials/3.1.2+dfsg-3build3 ufl/2019.1.0-2
[07:53] <LocutusOfBorg> this one will go if we remove one single binary
[07:54] <LocutusOfBorg> I suspect ginggs will fix the failures in a Debian upload eventually :D
[07:55] <LocutusOfBorg> if this one migrates, I can focus then on haskell and finish ocaml
[07:56] <LocutusOfBorg> (ocaml needs few removals too, I filed bugs already)
[08:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-defaults-ports [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.184ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-defaults-ports [arm64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.184ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-defaults-ports [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.184ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-defaults-ports [i386] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.184ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mesa [source] (bionic-proposed) [19.0.8-0ubuntu0~18.04.2]
[08:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-defaults-ports [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [1.184ubuntu1]
[08:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-defaults-ports [i386] (eoan-proposed) [1.184ubuntu1]
[08:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-defaults-ports [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [1.184ubuntu1]
[08:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-defaults-ports [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [1.184ubuntu1]
=== alan_g is now known as alan_g_
[10:47] <doko> sforshee, apw: is this something which can be solved by retrying?
[10:47] <doko> II: dkms-build downloading nvidia-430 (nvidia-kernel-source-430_430.40-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb)
[10:47] <doko> --2019-08-23 01:19:43--  http://ftpmaster.internal/ubuntu/pool/restricted/n/nvidia-graphics-drivers-430/nvidia-kernel-source-430_430.40-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb
[10:47] <doko> Resolving ftpmaster.internal (ftpmaster.internal)... 91.189.89.99
[10:47] <doko> Connecting to ftpmaster.internal (ftpmaster.internal)|91.189.89.99|:80... connected.
[10:47] <doko> HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found
[10:47] <doko> 2019-08-23 01:19:43 ERROR 404: Not Found.
[10:47] <apw> doko, nope
[10:48] <apw> doko, it needs that bit turning off ... i think sforshee is working on that ... if that is hte last failure i can hint it
[10:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: smc-tools (disco-proposed/universe) [1.2.0-0ubuntu1 => 1.2.0-0ubuntu1.1] (no packageset)
[10:52] <doko> apw: it is, for gcc-9, afaics
[11:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted util-linux [source] (disco-proposed) [2.33.1-0.1ubuntu3]
[11:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted util-linux [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.31.1-0.4ubuntu3.4]
[11:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted util-linux [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.27.1-6ubuntu3.8]
[11:43] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, can you please blacklist tests for: rust-byteorder rust-rayon rust-derive-more rust-doc-comment rust-quick-xml ?
[11:43] <LocutusOfBorg> they are all result of "hey we suck at going from neutral to bad, so we consider them bad now and dh-cargo is blocked"
[11:44] <LocutusOfBorg> the last three packages have been patched by me to just hide the issue, but I would like to sync them again
[11:44] <Laney> badtest?
[11:44] <LocutusOfBorg> ignore forever
[11:44] <Laney> that would not normally be blacklist
[11:44] <Laney> but no, not me, sorry, I'm at guadec right now
[11:48] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, I think badtest yes
[11:48] <LocutusOfBorg> https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/britney/hints-ubuntu/revision/3810
[11:48] <LocutusOfBorg> same as here
[11:49] <LocutusOfBorg> apw, ^^ can you please add rust-byteorder rust-rayon rust-derive-more rust-doc-comment rust-quick-xml to that list?
[12:08] <mitya57> Can someone please process bug 1840190? We really don’t want *two* qt4 webkit sources in Eoan, ideally we want none of them.
[12:11] <mitya57> no bot, so: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtwebkit-source/+bug/1840190 [qtwebkit-source] Remove from eoan archive
[12:11] <LocutusOfBorg> mitya57, actually the old qtwebkit-source should be binary free
[12:12] <LocutusOfBorg> so, an old cruft around that shouldn't hurt too much, binaries have been taken over by qtwebkit
[12:12] <LocutusOfBorg> there might be some -dbg package probably
[12:12] <LocutusOfBorg> but meh
[12:16] <mitya57> LocutusOfBorg: I am right now looking at what still uses qt4 webkit in Eoan. There are just a few packages that use it directly (https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/qtwebkit-rm.html) but some other are using it indirectly (e.g. via pyside).
[12:16] <mitya57> I hope we will be able to remove them all from Eoan, so I decided to start from a low hanging fruit first :)
[12:17] <LocutusOfBorg> :)
[12:27] <mitya57> LocutusOfBorg: do you mind if we remove qutim? You touched it last
[12:29] <mitya57> Or if you care, maybe you can update it from 0.2.0 (released in 2009) to a newer release from https://github.com/euroelessar/qutim/releases?
[12:31] <LocutusOfBorg> I don't really care, I just no-change rebuilt to pick up new webkit
[12:32] <LocutusOfBorg> you should probably ask somebody who worked on it, no change rebuilds doesn't count :P
[12:49] <mitya57> From the changelog, I think the only person who realy cared about it was Maia Kozheva, but that was in 2010. So filing RM :)
[12:57] <mitya57> Done @ https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qutim/+bug/1841178
[12:57] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1841178 in qutim (Ubuntu) "Please remove qutim from Eoan archive" [Undecided,New]
[12:58] <doko> rbasak: are you trying to do a php transition?
[12:58] <doko> php7.3 doesn't have a subscriber
[13:20] <rbasak> doko: yes, and sorry, I've subscribed ~ubuntu-server now.
[13:36] <doko> apw: did you override anything gor the linux autopkg test?
[13:37] <apw> doko, not as yet, sorry missed your reply
[13:38] <apw> doko, done
[13:38] <doko> ta
[15:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1018.19~18.04.1] (kernel)
[15:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-1018.19~18.04.1]
[15:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: featherpad [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.11.1-1~build1] (lubuntu)
[16:22] <vorlon> doko: right, so my question was where's the right place to look for differences in compiler options used between Debian and Ubunut
[16:30] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: deal.ii> that gcc-9 build failure doesn't show up on https://people.canonical.com/~doko/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20190614-gcc9-eoan.html so doesn't seem to be a good rationale for removal.  And it's an Ubuntu-specific build failure - you mention Debian having a similar failure on ppc64el, but the package is up-to-date on ppc64el in Debian.  However, I think a rationale that
[16:30] <vorlon> satisfies me here is that it's a leaf package blocking transitions, which justifies removal, and if we removed it it would come right back in from Debian without the arm64 binary
[16:42] <vorlon> LP: #1841209 for the desktop image builds now being broken after yesterday's migration
[16:42] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1841209 in libreoffice (Ubuntu) " libreoffice-help-common : Depends: libjs-normalize.css but it is not installable" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1841209
[16:43] <vorlon> I have no idea why this wasn't caught by britney on the frontend, a main->universe dependency should've kept libreoffice from being a candidate
[16:46] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, in debian no builds with gcc-9 defaults have been done yet
[16:46] <LocutusOfBorg> but tomorrow ginggs will do one :)
[16:46] <LocutusOfBorg> so, you can't easily say if Debian is broken or not...
[16:47] <LocutusOfBorg> in any case I hope tomorrow to have an answer to you
[16:47] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: no, but I can say that deal.ii doesn't ftbfs in *Ubuntu* with gcc-9
[16:47] <ginggs> i will be uploading deal.ii tomorrow, or as soon as trilinos is built
[16:48] <ginggs> ^ in debian
[16:48] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, meh, gcc changed a lot since that rebuild
[16:49] <ginggs> LocutusOfBorg: didn't deal.ii ftbfs with gcc 8 in your ppa?
[16:49] <LocutusOfBorg> yes ginggs
[16:49] <LocutusOfBorg> also deal.ii version changed
[16:49] <LocutusOfBorg> that is my best bet then
[16:50] <LocutusOfBorg> so the new deal.ii version is broken on arm64?
[16:51] <ginggs> LocutusOfBorg: not in debian with gcc 8 as default
[16:51] <LocutusOfBorg> some combo of different factors, for sure
[16:51]  * vorlon sorts out pcc-libs + pcc, is a stupid circular dep that requires deleting pcc to rebootstrap
[16:54] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, I did sourceful fixes for haskell levels 2-3 and 4
[16:54] <LocutusOfBorg> this requires lot of time
[16:54]  * vorlon nods
[16:54] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: are you fixing these in Ubuntu or Debian?  Where are the Debian maintainers on this?
[17:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pcc-libs [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.2.0~DEVEL+20180604-2.1] (no packageset)
[17:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pcc-libs [i386] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.2.0~DEVEL+20180604-2.1] (no packageset)
[17:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pcc-libs [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [1.2.0~DEVEL+20180604-2.1]
[17:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pcc-libs [i386] (eoan-proposed) [1.2.0~DEVEL+20180604-2.1]
[17:12] <RikMills> vorlon: new debian sysbench in proposed now excludes building on armhf, so can we lose that binary in release?
[17:16] <vorlon> RikMills: having confirmed that Debian has also dropped the armhf binary from the archive, yes
[17:17] <vorlon> (done)
[17:31] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, both, at the same time
[17:31] <vorlon> ok
[17:32] <LocutusOfBorg> I'll sync later tonight them, but ,meh, they are the same
[17:32] <LocutusOfBorg> modulo one, I did a mistake "0.2.0.5-8~builld1" (double l"
[17:32] <LocutusOfBorg> also, two builds, were stuck on s390x during testsuite
[17:33] <LocutusOfBorg> I just disabled the testsuite and didn't forward in Debian
[17:33] <LocutusOfBorg> I'll see how they fix it, and they are called ubuntu1
[17:33] <LocutusOfBorg> haskell-prettyprinter-ansi-terminal	and haskell-terminal-progress-bar	
[17:33] <LocutusOfBorg> if you want to have a look!
[17:33] <LocutusOfBorg> build was killed after 120 minutes
[17:34] <LocutusOfBorg> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haskell-terminal-progress-bar/0.4.1-1build1/+build/17368818
[17:34] <LocutusOfBorg> (btw reverse-deps are good)
[17:39] <marcustomlinson> vorlon: re: bug 1841209
[17:39] <ubot5> bug 1841209 in libreoffice (Ubuntu) " libreoffice-help-common : Depends: libjs-normalize.css but it is not installable" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1841209
[17:39] <marcustomlinson> vorlon: could you sponsor the upload for me?
[17:39] <vorlon> marcustomlinson: link to upload?
[17:40] <marcustomlinson> vorlon: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1NeNKRY3Rex3SXgcTTKlRloCZr0_S-QNw?usp=sharing
[17:40] <vorlon> marcustomlinson: (does this also drop the gstreamer bad/ugly?)
[17:40] <marcustomlinson> vorlon: yes
[17:40] <vorlon> excellent
[17:42] <vorlon> marcustomlinson: why the jump from 0ubuntu1 to 0ubuntu5?
[17:42] <marcustomlinson> vorlon: the desktop team has been stacking builds here: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/3762/+packages
[17:43] <marcustomlinson> for ff
[17:44] <vorlon> ok
[18:19] <vorlon> marcustomlinson: changelog has the wrong syntax for bug closures (missing the # before the bug #)
[18:21] <vorlon> marcustomlinson: what is the effect on the usability of the help to have normalize.css absent?
[18:30] <marcustomlinson> vorlon: sorry I'll fix that now
[18:31] <marcustomlinson> vorlon: no effect, there is a builtin fallback for when the normalize.css package is not found
[18:33] <marcustomlinson> vorlon: have you uploaded already? Can I reuse 0ubuntu5?
[18:34] <marcustomlinson> vorlon: or are you just saying the syntax is wrong, fix it in vcs, and now watch the bugs manually
[18:35] <vorlon> marcustomlinson: please reuse the number and reupload :)
[18:35] <vorlon> and then I'll sponsor
[18:35] <marcustomlinson> vorlon: ok loading...
[18:43] <marcustomlinson> vorlon: ok update, same link
[18:44] <marcustomlinson> *updated
[18:52] <vorlon> marcustomlinson: ok.  .changes file also built with the wrong -v version (we want the changes for all versions since the one currently in eoan), but I will fix that up on my side and upload
[18:52] <marcustomlinson> thank you so much vorlon. sorry for the pain
[19:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (disco-proposed/main) [19.1-1-gbaa47854-0ubuntu1~19.04.1 => 19.2-21-ge6383719-0ubuntu1~19.04.1] (core, edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud)
[19:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (bionic-proposed/main) [19.1-1-gbaa47854-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 => 19.2-21-ge6383719-0ubuntu1~18.04.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)
[19:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (xenial-proposed/main) [19.1-1-gbaa47854-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 => 19.2-21-ge6383719-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)
[19:22] <coreycb> vorlon: i'd really like to clear out these eoan-proposed openstack packages but i'm having a hard time finding what the issue is
[19:23] <coreycb> vorlon: i'm assuming there's a py2 binary that's been removed that is still being used as a dependency
[19:23] <blackboxsw> tjaalton: or vorlon(backup SRU), if possible, we'd have cloud-init in queue for (xenial|bionic|disco)-proposed  that we'd like to start testing if we get a chance to approve today
[19:26] <vorlon> blackboxsw: by any reasonable measure it's past eod for tjaalton; I'll try to take a look this afternoon
[19:26] <coreycb> vorlon: if you have any tips let me know. i've been looking at a few different reports but not making progress (nbs and update_output.txt)
[19:26] <vorlon> coreycb: give me a package name to key off?
[19:27] <coreycb> vorlon: a simple one from https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/nbs.html is python-aodhclient
[19:28] <blackboxsw> thx vorlon, I just don't like pinging 'the backup' in my primary SRU request :)
[19:28] <vorlon> coreycb: well, nbs is different than proposed-migration
[19:28] <vorlon> coreycb: what's a package that's currently stuck in proposed?  since aodh doesn't seem to be there
[19:29] <coreycb> vorlon: i want to figure out what's blocking the ones that are listed as candidate here: http://michael.hudsondoyle.geek.nz/team-summary.html#ubuntu-openstack
[19:31] <vorlon> coreycb: ok - fwiw that report now officially lives at https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/eoan/update_excuses_by_team.html#ubuntu-openstack
[19:32] <coreycb> ok thanks
[19:34] <vorlon> coreycb: alright, some of these are clearly chicken-and-egg issues, the line 'trying: python-oslo.messaging python-futurist nova python-os-service-types python-openstacksdk senlin python-keystoneauth1 python-neutronclient python-keystoneclient python-osc-lib python-os-client-config python-glanceclient python-cinderclient ceilometer python-novaclient watcher python-openstackclient python-amqp kombu'
[19:34] <vorlon> in update_output fails mostly because it makes a bunch of packages, which are already NBS and only held in because they're build-dependencies of the old versions, uninstallable
[19:34] <vorlon> coreycb: so I'll clear some of that out by hand, but e.g. python-celery is listed as being made uninstallable and is not NBS
[19:38] <vorlon> coreycb: these are not NBS, so require further investigation: python-celery python-flower python-heatclient python-keystonemiddleware python-mistralclient python-swiftclient
[19:39] <coreycb> vorlon: awesome thanks so much. i'll take a closer look at those.
[19:40] <vorlon> coreycb: flower has a removal bug LP: #1838213, that will also unblock celery
[19:40] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1838213 in twitter-bootstrap (Ubuntu) "remove twitter-bootstrap from eoan" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1838213
[19:40] <coreycb> vorlon: great
[19:41] <vorlon> ah and flower just got removed from unstable today so I'll run that through
[19:42] <RikMills> I assume mysql-5.7 is going to be removed completely soon?
[19:43] <vorlon> I can't speak to the timeline on that
[19:43] <vorlon> I expect it would be removed before release
[19:43] <RikMills> right. 'soon' is before release for me
[19:44] <RikMills> KDE akonadi doesn't work with 8 at the moment, so if can't depend on 5.7 we have to switch to mariadb
[19:46] <doko> vorlon: well, we have the two new hardening flags in eoan now, which are not yet in unstable
[19:46] <vorlon> doko: remind me which ones those are, so I can test reverting them?
[19:48] <doko> apw (or vorlon): please ignore the linux autopkg test for gcc-defaults (as done for gcc-9)
[19:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (disco-proposed) [19.2-21-ge6383719-0ubuntu1~19.04.1]
[19:48] <doko> vorlon: see u-d ("New gcc hardening defaults in eoan (-fstack-clash-protection + -fcf-protection)")
[19:49] <doko> but if the package is that long in -proposed, then it's certainly not that one
[19:49] <vorlon> right
[19:49] <vorlon> ok
[19:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (bionic-proposed) [19.2-21-ge6383719-0ubuntu1~18.04.1]
[19:53] <vorlon> coreycb: python-heatclient should be unblocked now that python-senlinclient is removed
[19:53] <vorlon> python-keystonemiddleware is blocked by nova autopkgtest on armhf
[19:53] <vorlon> python-mistralclient should be unblocked now that python-troveclient is removed
[19:53] <coreycb> vorlon: great. ok will take a look. i'll chat with dan watkins about simplestreams as it depends on python-swiftclient.
[19:54] <coreycb> vorlon: thanks should cover everything. thanks again.
[19:54] <vorlon> ok
[19:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (xenial-proposed) [19.2-21-ge6383719-0ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[19:56] <blackboxsw> woot! thx Mr V
[19:59] <vorlon> RAOF: lintian -I points out that the wlcs debian/copyright has some wrong filenames... I think that should be tests/xdg* instead of xdg*
[19:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wlcs [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.1.0-0ubuntu1]
[20:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted featherpad [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [0.11.1-1~build1]
[20:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wlcs [amd64] (eoan-proposed/none) [1.1.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[20:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wlcs [i386] (eoan-proposed/none) [1.1.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[20:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wlcs [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/none) [1.1.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[20:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wlcs [armhf] (eoan-proposed/none) [1.1.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[20:13] <ginggs> LocutusOfBorg: spoiler alert: deal.ii built on arm64 with gcc 9 on debian porterbox
[20:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wlcs [arm64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[20:18] <vorlon> tsimonq2: so, uh
[20:19] <vorlon> tsimonq2: licensecheck on lubuntu-update-notifier clearly picks up that the files are licensed under GPL-3+
[20:19] <vorlon> tsimonq2: and your debian/copyright claims GPL-2+
[20:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected lubuntu-update-notifier [source] (eoan-proposed) [0.1]
[20:21] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: deal.ii is no longer blocked by the ftbfs... just by its autopkgtests all failing
[20:27] <Odd_Bloke> powersj: coreycb has reached out to me asking for a new upload of simplestreams to drop a Build-Depends on python-swiftclient.  I've prepared this (https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/Qwhjps6M6R/) but need a sponsor again.  Who should I bug?
[20:28] <powersj> Odd_Bloke, coreycb is there a bug?
[20:28] <powersj> if not, please file one and attach your patch
[20:30] <coreycb> Odd_Bloke: thanks wasn't expecting such a quick turn-around
[20:31] <coreycb> powersj: no it just unblocks python-swiftclient from eoan-proposed but I can
[20:32] <coreycb> Odd_Bloke: powersj: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/simplestreams/+bug/1841277
[20:33] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1841277 in simplestreams (Ubuntu) "please drop python-swiftclient BD" [Undecided,New]
[20:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wlcs [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [1.1.0-0ubuntu1]
[20:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wlcs [armhf] (eoan-proposed) [1.1.0-0ubuntu1]
[20:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wlcs [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [1.1.0-0ubuntu1]
[20:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wlcs [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [1.1.0-0ubuntu1]
[20:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wlcs [i386] (eoan-proposed) [1.1.0-0ubuntu1]
[20:35] <powersj> Odd_Bloke, can you update your patch. Do we actually need to drop python-glanceclient as well?
[20:36] <Odd_Bloke> powersj: No, but we can.  I tried dropping keystoneclient and that _does_ cause problems.
[20:36] <powersj> coreycb, thanks for the bug, I'll get someone to upload probably monday
[20:37] <coreycb> powersj: that'll work
[20:38] <coreycb> Odd_Bloke: hmm yeah we'll have to drop keystoneclient too
[20:41] <Odd_Bloke> coreycb: We have reverse deps on the Python 2 packages which mean we can't just remove them, so that one is harder to address.
[20:42] <Odd_Bloke> powersj: Patch attached (and also pushed to the ubuntu/devel branch of the repo).
[20:45] <coreycb> Odd_Bloke: ok. we've deopped all py2 openstack pkgs in eoan.   maybe we can chat more next week.
[20:45] <coreycb> dropped
[20:47] <ginggs> vorlon, LocutusOfBorg: seems a bit odd that the deal.ii autopkgtest pulls in libp4est-1.1 and libp4est-2.2
[20:47] <vorlon> maybe retry with --all-proposed?
[20:48] <ginggs> vorlon: ack, doing...
[20:56] <Odd_Bloke> coreycb: I'm out next week, so you probably need to talk to powersj.
[20:57] <coreycb> Odd_Bloke: ok enjoy
[21:28] <ginggs> vorlon: al-proposed did it, but please 'force-badtest deal.ii/9.1.1-3/arm64' for now
[21:33] <vorlon> ginggs: done
[21:33] <ginggs> vorlon: thanks!
[21:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-60.67] (core, kernel)
[21:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-60.67] (core, kernel)
[21:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem-osp1 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.0.0-1020.22] (no packageset)
[21:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/main) [1.4.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[22:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [i386] (eoan-proposed/main) [1.4.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[22:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [armhf] (eoan-proposed/main) [1.4.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[22:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mir [arm64] (eoan-proposed/main) [1.4.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)