| RAOF | Boy, those gvfs autopkgtests really suck, don't they ☹️ | 00:19 |
|---|---|---|
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-notifier (trusty-proposed/main) [0.154.1ubuntu6 => 0.154.1ubuntu7] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 00:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-pangocairo-sys [sync] (eoan-proposed) [0.10.0-1] | 00:52 | |
| vorlon | ginggs: mkl-dnn is through NEW but I see it has failed its autopkgtest | 00:59 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.13 [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [1.13~rc2-1ubuntu1] | 01:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.13 [armhf] (eoan-proposed) [1.13~rc2-1ubuntu1] | 01:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.13 [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [1.13~rc2-1ubuntu1] | 01:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.13 [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [1.13~rc2-1ubuntu1] | 01:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.13 [s390x] (eoan-proposed) [1.13~rc2-1ubuntu1] | 01:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.13 [i386] (eoan-proposed) [1.13~rc2-1ubuntu1] | 01:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgeotiff [sync] (eoan-proposed) [1.5.1-1] | 01:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-http-link-header [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.0.3.1-2build1] (no packageset) | 04:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-http-link-header [i386] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.0.3.1-2build1] (no packageset) | 04:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-http-link-header [arm64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.0.3.1-2build1] (no packageset) | 04:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-http-link-header [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.0.3.1-2build1] (no packageset) | 04:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-http-link-header [armhf] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.0.3.1-2build1] (no packageset) | 04:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-http-link-header [s390x] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.0.3.1-2build1] (no packageset) | 04:10 | |
| doko | update_excuses isn't updated since yesterday night | 04:12 |
| vorlon | doko: not so, https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html has a timestamp of 2019.09.04 03:47:01 +0000 | 04:18 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: httpdirfs-fuse [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 04:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: httpdirfs-fuse [armhf] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 04:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-pangocairo-sys [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.10.0-1] (no packageset) | 04:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: httpdirfs-fuse [arm64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 04:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-pangocairo-sys [i386] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.10.0-1] (no packageset) | 04:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: httpdirfs-fuse [i386] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 04:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: httpdirfs-fuse [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 04:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-pangocairo-sys [arm64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.10.0-1] (no packageset) | 04:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-pangocairo-sys [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.10.0-1] (no packageset) | 04:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: httpdirfs-fuse [s390x] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 04:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-pangocairo-sys [s390x] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.10.0-1] (no packageset) | 04:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-pangocairo-sys [armhf] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.10.0-1] (no packageset) | 04:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-pangocairo-sys [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [0.10.0-1] | 04:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-pangocairo-sys [s390x] (eoan-proposed) [0.10.0-1] | 04:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-pangocairo-sys [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [0.10.0-1] | 04:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-pangocairo-sys [armhf] (eoan-proposed) [0.10.0-1] | 04:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-pangocairo-sys [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [0.10.0-1] | 04:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-pangocairo-sys [i386] (eoan-proposed) [0.10.0-1] | 04:38 | |
| doko | Laney: could you or somebody look at the mhash ftbfs? didn't reach yet the 5-day limit, but blocking glibc (multiarch-support removal) | 07:10 |
| tarzeau | https://launchpadlibrarian.net/439023089/buildlog_ubuntu-eoan-amd64.colmap_3.6+dev2-2_BUILDING.txt.gz | 08:19 |
| tarzeau | can i do anything about that? | 08:19 |
| tarzeau | i'm perfectly able to build it on my 19.10 eoan | 08:19 |
| ginggs | tarzeau: isn't that the same as debian #925655 ? | 08:25 |
| ubot5 | Debian bug 925655 in src:colmap "colmap: ftbfs with GCC-9" [Serious,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/925655 | 08:25 |
| ginggs | tarzeau: fix it in debian then request a sync | 08:26 |
| tarzeau | can't built it with gcc9 either :( indeed | 08:26 |
| Laney | should probably use #ubuntu-motu for discussing that (and #ubuntu-devel for doko's question) | 08:28 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-simple-templates [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.9.0.0-1] (no packageset) | 08:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-simple-templates [i386] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.9.0.0-1] (no packageset) | 08:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-simple-templates [armhf] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.9.0.0-1] (no packageset) | 09:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-simple-templates [arm64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.9.0.0-1] (no packageset) | 09:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-simple-templates [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.9.0.0-1] (no packageset) | 09:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected update-notifier [source] (trusty-proposed) [0.154.1ubuntu7] | 09:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-notifier (trusty-proposed/main) [0.154.1ubuntu6 => 0.154.1ubuntu7] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 09:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-simple-templates [s390x] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.9.0.0-1] (no packageset) | 09:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-notifier [source] (trusty-proposed) [0.154.1ubuntu7] | 09:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 (eoan-proposed/primary) [435.21-0ubuntu1] | 09:46 | |
| tseliot | sil2100: hey, any chance you can reject nvidia-settings (435.21-0ubuntu1) in eoan? | 09:56 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 [source] (eoan-proposed) [435.21-0ubuntu1] | 09:59 | |
| apw | tseliot, ^ | 09:59 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-simple-templates [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [0.9.0.0-1] | 09:59 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-simple-templates [armhf] (eoan-proposed) [0.9.0.0-1] | 09:59 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-simple-templates [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [0.9.0.0-1] | 09:59 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-simple-templates [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [0.9.0.0-1] | 09:59 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-simple-templates [s390x] (eoan-proposed) [0.9.0.0-1] | 09:59 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-simple-templates [i386] (eoan-proposed) [0.9.0.0-1] | 09:59 | |
| tseliot | apw: err... why did that happen? | 10:00 |
| tseliot | I only wanted nvidia-settings rejected, the driver was fine | 10:00 |
| apw | tseliot, ahh ok i missed sorry | 10:00 |
| apw | tseliot, shove it back in | 10:00 |
| tseliot | I can re-upload | 10:01 |
| apw | my fault | 10:01 |
| apw | tseliot, odly the other is not there so that is confusing | 10:02 |
| tseliot | apw: no problem. Apparently, nvidia-settings was accepted. Nothing major, but I messed up the changelog (too many git branches), so two releases were dropped from the changelog | 10:03 |
| === M_hc[m] is now known as _hc | ||
| tseliot | apw: I fixed it on my end, thanks | 10:13 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 (eoan-proposed/primary) [435.21-0ubuntu1] | 10:34 | |
| doko | Trying easy from autohinter: apitrace/7.1+git20170623.d38a69d6+repack-3build5 bro/2.5.5-1build2 dante/1.4.2+dfsg-6build2 gcc-7/7.4.0-12ubuntu1 gcc-9/9.2.1-6ubuntu3 gcc-snapshot/1:20190903-0ubuntu1 glibc/2.30-0ubuntu1 isc-dhcp/4.4.1-2ubuntu5 libnss-db/2.2.3pre1-6build5 nvidia-cuda-toolkit/10.1.168-1build1 unscd/0.53-1build3 | 11:00 |
| doko | * amd64: hidrd, indicator-sound-gtk2, libhidrd0, libhidrd0-dbg, libhidrd0-dev, libido-0.1-0, libido-0.1-dev, libkqoauth-dbg, libkqoauth-dev, libkqoauth0 | 11:00 |
| doko | ^^^ all these have removal bugs pending | 11:00 |
| ginggs | vorlon: thanks. i think mkl-dnn needs moar rams for a couple of the new tests. | 11:38 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: sagemath (eoan-proposed/primary) [8.8-1] | 11:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: pplpy (eoan-proposed/primary) [0.8.4-2] | 12:00 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | please accept it ^^ it should fix sagemath sadness | 12:00 |
| LocutusOfBorg | we kicked it out because of "transitions" :) | 12:01 |
| tarzeau | ah was looking for sagemath today on eoan, thanks for re-adding it | 12:13 |
| LocutusOfBorg | please accept also haskell-http-link-header | 13:28 |
| tseliot | apw: hey, can you approve nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 in eoan, please? | 14:12 |
| apw | tseliot, what is the official previous version | 14:16 |
| tseliot | apw: the driver doesn't replace any other series. It's a short lived branch | 14:16 |
| tseliot | and it's the first release in the archive | 14:17 |
| apw | tseliot, right i want someething to compare it to; and they all have random numbers making them hard to guess | 14:18 |
| tseliot | apw: oh, well, you can compare the packaging to the one of nvidia-graphics-drivers-430, also in eoan | 14:18 |
| apw | great | 14:19 |
| tseliot | apw: it's based off the same git branch. Actually, if you want, I can give you the links to both branches, so that you can see the changes | 14:20 |
| apw | tseliot, sure send me those in PM as well | 14:20 |
| tseliot | all right | 14:20 |
| doko | apw: could you override the linux autopkg tests based on sforshee's comment? | 14:24 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pplpy [sync] (eoan-proposed) [0.8.4-2] | 14:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sagemath [sync] (eoan-proposed) [8.8-1] | 14:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pplpy [amd64] (eoan-proposed/none) [0.8.4-2] (no packageset) | 14:59 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pplpy [s390x] (eoan-proposed/none) [0.8.4-2] (no packageset) | 14:59 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pplpy [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/none) [0.8.4-2] (no packageset) | 15:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pplpy [i386] (eoan-proposed/none) [0.8.4-2] (no packageset) | 15:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pplpy [arm64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.8.4-2] (no packageset) | 15:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pplpy [armhf] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.8.4-2] (no packageset) | 15:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-simple [i386] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.11.3-1] (no packageset) | 15:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-simple [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.11.3-1] (no packageset) | 15:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-simple [s390x] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.11.3-1] (no packageset) | 15:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-simple [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.11.3-1] (no packageset) | 15:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-http-link-header [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [1.0.3.1-2build1] | 15:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-http-link-header [armhf] (eoan-proposed) [1.0.3.1-2build1] | 15:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-http-link-header [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [1.0.3.1-2build1] | 15:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-simple [arm64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.11.3-1] (no packageset) | 15:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-http-link-header [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [1.0.3.1-2build1] | 15:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-http-link-header [s390x] (eoan-proposed) [1.0.3.1-2build1] | 15:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-http-link-header [i386] (eoan-proposed) [1.0.3.1-2build1] | 15:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-simple [armhf] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.11.3-1] (no packageset) | 15:44 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | vorlon, ccls has been removed on armhf and i386 in Debian... can we do the same? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ccls/0.20190823-3ubuntu3 | 15:45 |
| vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: ack | 15:45 |
| LocutusOfBorg | fixing 32 bits for me is a waste of time :) | 15:45 |
| LocutusOfBorg | thanks I tried to fix them btw, but I can't understand the error, and two days of attempts are way too much for a leaf package | 15:46 |
| LocutusOfBorg | btw haskell is getting near an end | 15:46 |
| vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: done | 15:46 |
| LocutusOfBorg | lovely thanks | 15:46 |
| Laney | you know leaf packages are the ones people actually use | 15:47 |
| Laney | not passing judgement on this case, but 'leaf package → waste of time' is probably not a criterion you should be applying in general | 15:48 |
| LocutusOfBorg | Laney, fixing 32 bits in Ubuntu when Debian stopped caring is a waste of time... | 15:48 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I never give up on leaf packages unless I can't figure them out | 15:49 |
| Laney | fine, but I'm responding to 'two days of attempts are way too much for a leaf package' | 15:49 |
| vorlon | for me the straightforward rationale is that we should not be blocking migration of a package because of a build failure on an architecture for which Debian has already removed the binaries | 15:49 |
| Laney | which is maybe more general than you mean | 15:49 |
| LocutusOfBorg | sure, and in general you are right! | 15:49 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I hoped to fix 32 bit and forward the patch to Debian... | 15:49 |
| vorlon | Description: C/C++/ObjC language server | 15:49 |
| vorlon | language... server | 15:49 |
| LocutusOfBorg | and I'll probably try again while waiting for haskell | 15:49 |
| LocutusOfBorg | also please accept haskell-simple | 15:59 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-simple [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [0.11.3-1] | 16:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-simple [armhf] (eoan-proposed) [0.11.3-1] | 16:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-simple [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [0.11.3-1] | 16:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pplpy [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [0.8.4-2] | 16:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pplpy [armhf] (eoan-proposed) [0.8.4-2] | 16:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pplpy [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [0.8.4-2] | 16:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-simple [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [0.11.3-1] | 16:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-simple [s390x] (eoan-proposed) [0.11.3-1] | 16:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pplpy [i386] (eoan-proposed) [0.8.4-2] | 16:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-simple [i386] (eoan-proposed) [0.11.3-1] | 16:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pplpy [s390x] (eoan-proposed) [0.8.4-2] | 16:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pplpy [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [0.8.4-2] | 16:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted httpdirfs-fuse [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [1.0.1-1ubuntu1] | 16:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted httpdirfs-fuse [armhf] (eoan-proposed) [1.0.1-1ubuntu1] | 16:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted httpdirfs-fuse [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [1.0.1-1ubuntu1] | 16:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted httpdirfs-fuse [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [1.0.1-1ubuntu1] | 16:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted httpdirfs-fuse [s390x] (eoan-proposed) [1.0.1-1ubuntu1] | 16:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted httpdirfs-fuse [i386] (eoan-proposed) [1.0.1-1ubuntu1] | 16:04 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | I syncd bladerf, I hope to see gnuradio going to an end... | 16:06 |
| LocutusOfBorg | something needs a kick out from release, I'll have a deeper look once things settle down, and open RC bugs in Debian too | 16:06 |
| vorlon | RikMills[m]: you uploaded language-pack-kde-wa, it's in NEW and it was previously removed because it depends on language-pack-wa which doesn't exist | 16:14 |
| vorlon | RikMills[m]: so this looks to me like it should be rejected | 16:14 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: bladerf [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.2019.07-4] (no packageset) | 16:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: bladerf [s390x] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.2019.07-4] (no packageset) | 16:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: bladerf [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.2019.07-4] (no packageset) | 16:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: bladerf [i386] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.2019.07-4] (no packageset) | 16:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: bladerf [arm64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.2019.07-4] (no packageset) | 16:16 | |
| doko | vorlon: please could you process the multiarch-support related removal bugs? | 16:16 |
| doko | hidrd, indicator-sound-gtk2, libhidrd0, libhidrd0-dbg, libhidrd0-dev, libido-0.1-0, libido-0.1-dev, libkqoauth-dbg, libkqoauth-dev, libkqoauth0 | 16:17 |
| vorlon | doko: why does reverse-depends not show me that any removals are needed? | 16:17 |
| doko | I don't undestand the question ... | 16:17 |
| vorlon | doko: 'reverse-depends multiarch-support' -> no output | 16:18 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted bladerf [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [0.2019.07-4] | 16:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted bladerf [i386] (eoan-proposed) [0.2019.07-4] | 16:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted bladerf [s390x] (eoan-proposed) [0.2019.07-4] | 16:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted bladerf [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [0.2019.07-4] | 16:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted bladerf [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [0.2019.07-4] | 16:18 | |
| doko | $ apt-cache rdepends multiarch-support | 16:18 |
| doko | multiarch-support | 16:18 |
| doko | Reverse Depends: | 16:18 |
| doko | libhidrd0 | 16:18 |
| doko | libkqoauth0 | 16:18 |
| doko | libido-0.1-0 | 16:18 |
| vorlon | doko: ah, the answer is that it's pre-depends and the reverse-depends command doesn't look at those | 16:20 |
| xnox | vorlon: because it's Pre-Depends? | 16:35 |
| xnox | and my irc is stuck in bad scroll mode | 16:36 |
| LocutusOfBorg | vorlon, btw, also sigil has been removed on ppc64el and s390x in Debian, because of missing qtwebengine support... | 16:42 |
| LocutusOfBorg | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sigil/+bug/1839607 | 16:44 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1839607 in sigil (Ubuntu) "rm sigil where libqtwebengine5-dev is not built" [Undecided,New] | 16:44 |
| vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: done | 16:45 |
| LocutusOfBorg | lovely! | 16:45 |
| vorlon | doko: I'm going through all the ubuntu-archive bugs right now and I see LP: #1835803. Does this also need blacklisted? | 16:45 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1835803 in openjdk-12 (Ubuntu) "remove openjdk-12 in eoan" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1835803 | 16:45 |
| vorlon | n/m I'm sure the answer is yes | 16:46 |
| doko | I'm not uploading -12 again to debian, so it doesn't matter | 16:46 |
| vorlon | but haven't asked for its removal from unstable? | 16:47 |
| doko | https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-eoan/eoan/amd64/c/cross-toolchain-base-mipsen/20190904_151459_18be5@/log.gz | 16:47 |
| doko | can we run this on a big instance? | 16:47 |
| doko | tracker is down, can't check | 16:48 |
| ahasenack | doko: Reason: Cannot perform Post-Handshake Authentication.<-- that? | 16:56 |
| ahasenack | funny, I have a bug open against the browsers for that | 16:57 |
| ahasenack | saw it while testing some apache regressions due to openssl 1.1.1 in bionic | 16:57 |
| doko | yes | 16:57 |
| ahasenack | https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1834671 | 16:57 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1834671 in firefox (Ubuntu Eoan) "TLSv1.3 client certificate authentication with renegotiation unsupported in browsers" [Undecided,New] | 16:57 |
| xnox | sounds like tracker had upgraded openssl to 1.1.1 and has a broken older apache still. | 16:58 |
| ahasenack | cert auth is one way to trigger it | 16:58 |
| doko | ahasenack: but I see that in bionic | 16:58 |
| ahasenack | doko: if the negotiation settles on tls v1.3, and a post-handshake authentication is needed ("pha"), then most browsers don't have support for that, and the server will complain like that error page we see | 16:59 |
| xnox | doko: yeh... and? as a client you are providing authentication cert, and that bombs out on tracker end. | 17:00 |
| ahasenack | "The connection to this site is encrypted and authenticated using TLS 1.3, X25519, and AES_256_GCM." | 17:03 |
| ahasenack | it used tls3.1, as expected | 17:03 |
| ahasenack | er, 1.3 | 17:03 |
| xnox | but we have had client tls 1.3 for a long time now; so it must be that tracker.d.o that was recently upgraded and shows miscompat. | 17:09 |
| xnox | i guess they upgraded it to the new debian stable | 17:09 |
| ahasenack | I don't think this is triggered by client cert | 17:11 |
| ahasenack | it's triggered by a different set of ssl config options inside a <directory> or similar block | 17:12 |
| ahasenack | so ssl to the vhost was established, and then a directory access triggers the renegotiation because of the changed ssl settings inside it | 17:12 |
| ahasenack | doko: I see you added apache2 back to that bug, why? Is it not a client issue, as shown by the bug links I added to the description? | 17:16 |
| ahasenack | unless you are thinking we should disable tls 1.3 in apache until all browsers have support for tls 1.3 PHA? | 17:16 |
| ahasenack | this is the firefox commit, for example: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/1bb8ad865648 | 17:17 |
| doko | ahasenack: no, I just added a bionic task | 17:19 |
| ahasenack | doko: ah, I see, the bionic line was added to all pckages | 17:19 |
| ahasenack | I fixed the apache bit | 17:19 |
| ahasenack | doko: if you use firefox, you can enable it. I just saw it's disabled by default | 17:21 |
| ahasenack | doko: about:config, search for security.tls.enable_post_handshake_auth | 17:21 |
| ahasenack | I just tried, and can open tracker.debian.org again | 17:21 |
| doko | ta | 17:21 |
| ahasenack | I'm also on bionic | 17:21 |
| ahasenack | xnox: ^ | 17:23 |
| ahasenack | i added this to the bug | 17:23 |
| doko | vorlon: there is https://bugs.debian.org/915650 for openjdk-12. will file the removal issue once the next security update is out (but not updated for 12) | 17:23 |
| ubot5 | Debian bug 915650 in src:openjdk-12 "openjdk-12 should not release with bullseye" [Important,Open] | 17:23 |
| vorlon | xnox: I don't see mingw-ocaml being made uninstallable at a glance at https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_output.txt; why did this come to your attention? | 18:06 |
| vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: sagemath is dep-wait. | 18:09 |
| vorlon | on a removed python2 package | 18:09 |
| vorlon | removing sagemath again | 18:09 |
| vorlon | why does a package named 'boxer-data' need autopkgtests, and how do its autopkgtests manage to regress with a new version of 'boxer' | 20:19 |
| === fginther` is now known as fginther | ||
| LocutusOfBorg | vorlon, I already opened a new RC in Debian about sagemath | 20:27 |
| LocutusOfBorg | vorlon, hinting autopkgtest for ddcci-driver-linux/*/s390x will make me really happy | 20:28 |
| LocutusOfBorg | it can't work there, the kernel doesn't support the driver on s390x | 20:28 |
| LocutusOfBorg | (theoretically dkms should just return true in that case, but the code doesn't work on autopkgtests) | 20:29 |
| LocutusOfBorg | http://launchpadlibrarian.net/434046705/dkms_2.7.1-1ubuntu1_2.7.1-1ubuntu2.diff.gz | 20:29 |
| vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: why was the autopkgtest passing before? | 20:29 |
| LocutusOfBorg | probably because it is apt erroring out | 20:29 |
| LocutusOfBorg | vorlon, previous kernel had that module built | 20:29 |
| LocutusOfBorg | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1837073 | 20:30 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1837073 in linux (Ubuntu) "linux 5.2.0-8.9 disabled backlight on s390x." [High,Confirmed] | 20:30 |
| LocutusOfBorg | you can link that bug ^^ | 20:30 |
| vorlon | ok | 20:30 |
| vorlon | because I remember that having been a problematic autopkgtest on s390x before and then it started passing | 20:30 |
| LocutusOfBorg | actually the driver was building ok (so testsuite was green), but the resulting kernel driver was totally broken because backlight never worked correctly on s390x | 20:31 |
| LocutusOfBorg | so kernel folks decided to stop shipping a broken support | 20:31 |
| vorlon | ack; hinted | 20:32 |
| * LocutusOfBorg tries to debug why that test still fails, hopefully he will find a solution | 20:36 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | thanks for the hint | 20:36 |
| mwhudson | https://code.launchpad.net/~mwhudson/autopkgtest-cloud/+git/autopkgtest-cloud/+merge/372302 <- thoughts | 21:37 |
| vorlon | mwhudson: is basically what doko asked for above, so sure | 21:47 |
| vorlon | mwhudson: is it only needed for amd64? | 21:47 |
| mwhudson | vorlon: i386 too | 21:47 |
| mwhudson | vorlon: but yeah probably best to not have it unnecessarily in big_packages on other arches | 21:48 |
| mwhudson | (where the test basically does nothing) | 21:48 |
| mwhudson | vorlon: which config file is for amd64? worker-bos01.conf? is that i386 too? | 21:49 |
| vorlon | mwhudson: the one with no suffix is amd64+i386 | 21:49 |
| mwhudson | oh ok so the one i edited? | 21:50 |
| mwhudson | neat | 21:50 |
| mwhudson | vorlon: so my branch is ok? i can't merge it | 21:56 |
| vorlon | mwhudson: y, merged && pushed && working on deployment | 21:57 |
| vorlon | mwhudson: was delayed somewhat by the curiosity that git+ssh://git.launchpad.net/~mwhudson/autopkgtest-cloud did not work as a remote for your repo unlike all the others | 21:58 |
| vorlon | mwhudson: pkill -HUPed and the x86 queue is empty according to http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/running so you should be able to retry the test now and get it on the right VMs | 21:59 |
| vorlon | package naming schema consistency is so disappointing, haskell-esqueleto really could've been named has-queleto | 22:00 |
| mwhudson | vorlon: thx | 22:03 |
| mwhudson | vorlon: wow http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/l/linux/eoan/amd64 looks great | 22:04 |
| mwhudson | jvmti/jvmti_agent.c:48:21: error: static declaration of ‘gettid’ follows non-static declaration | 22:05 |
| mwhudson | ok so that is caused by glibc 2.30 yay | 22:05 |
| vorlon | fsvo "great"? | 22:06 |
| mwhudson | vorlon: do you know if the kernel team has been poked about this already? | 22:08 |
| vorlon | mwhudson: I do not know | 22:09 |
| mwhudson | i think we want upstream commit 4541a8bb13a86e504416a13360c8dc64d2fd612a | 22:10 |
| mwhudson | ah it's in ubuntu-eoan/master-next | 22:11 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sosreport (xenial-proposed/main) [3.6-1ubuntu0.16.04.2 => 3.6-1ubuntu0.16.04.3] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 22:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sosreport (bionic-proposed/main) [3.6-1ubuntu0.18.04.2 => 3.6-1ubuntu0.18.04.3] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 22:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sosreport (disco-proposed/main) [3.6-1ubuntu2 => 3.6-1ubuntu2.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 22:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: fwupdate (eoan-proposed/primary) [12-6] | 23:56 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!