| doko | jamespage, coreycb: just as a heads up for openstack ftbfs ... https://people.canonical.com/~doko/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20190906-eoan.html | 05:36 |
|---|---|---|
| oysteins | The wrapper script debian/initramfs/cryptroot-unlock contains texts that are not translatable (at least I cannot find cryptroot-unlock on translations.launchpad.net). An example is this text (shown upon boot when disk has LUKS encryption): "Please unlock disk $CRYPTTAB_NAME" | 13:15 |
| oysteins | Can I report this as a bug? | 13:15 |
| juliank | hey, who synced keepassxc without a FFe? | 19:16 |
| juliank | I added a block-proposed bug 1843143 | 19:17 |
| ubottu | bug 1843143 in keepassxc (Ubuntu) "Needs FFe" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1843143 | 19:17 |
| juliank | ugh, it's already in release | 19:17 |
| juliank | ah, damnit LocutusOfBorg | 19:18 |
| juliank | Don't sync new major upstream releases without a FFe | 19:18 |
| juliank | also, help appreciated, the clipboard tests are flaky, they are run in xvfb-run, and copying stuff to clipboard fails like 10% of the time | 19:22 |
| LocutusOfBorg | juliank, sorry must have been a mistake, can I revert? | 19:44 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I can upload an ubuntu1 that is the previous version so we are happy? | 19:44 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I syncd some python2 removals and probably I got trapped by some mistake while parsing output... | 19:45 |
| juliank | LocutusOfBorg: Or I file a FFe retroactively and then get it decided? | 19:57 |
| juliank | I did want to file a FFe, but I did not get around to it yet | 19:58 |
| juliank | Worst case, we revert if FFe is rejected | 19:58 |
| juliank | I repurposed the bug for that | 20:04 |
| LocutusOfBorg | as you wish, in the meanwhile I upload the old version in my ppa so I can copy it to eoan if needed | 20:14 |
| LocutusOfBorg | juliank, do you happen to understand where they come from such packages? e.g. node-hapi-teamwork | 20:15 |
| LocutusOfBorg | https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=node-sntp&arch=all&ver=3.1.2-2&stamp=1567681310&raw=0 | 20:15 |
| LocutusOfBorg | of course ubuntu is dep waiting on them... | 20:15 |
| juliank | LocutusOfBorg: what do you mean? | 20:18 |
| juliank | what is they? | 20:18 |
| LocutusOfBorg | juliank, node-sntp build-depends on node-hapi-teamwork | 21:21 |
| LocutusOfBorg | but node-hapi-teamwork doesn't exist | 21:21 |
| LocutusOfBorg | at least according to rmadison | 21:21 |
| LocutusOfBorg | https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=node-hapi-teamwork&literal=1 | 21:21 |
| LocutusOfBorg | Provides: node-hapi-b64 (= 4.2.1), node-hapi-bounce (= 1.3.1), node-hapi-hoek (= 8.2.2+~4.2.1+~1.3.1+~3.3.1-2), node-hapi-teamwork (= 3.3.1) | 21:22 |
| LocutusOfBorg | got it | 21:22 |
| LocutusOfBorg | its a provide | 21:22 |
| adrian15 | Should I open a bug so that grub-efi-amd64-signed-template 2.04-3 version gets ported into Ubuntu? Or will it eventually ported into Ubuntu and I should not rush it ? Thank you. | 23:11 |
| adrian15 | * from Debian | 23:11 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!