[05:36] <doko> jamespage, coreycb: just as a heads up for openstack ftbfs ... https://people.canonical.com/~doko/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20190906-eoan.html
[13:15] <oysteins> The wrapper script debian/initramfs/cryptroot-unlock contains texts that are not translatable (at least I cannot find cryptroot-unlock on translations.launchpad.net). An example is this text (shown upon boot when disk has LUKS encryption): "Please unlock disk $CRYPTTAB_NAME"
[13:15] <oysteins> Can I report this as a bug?
[19:16] <juliank> hey, who synced keepassxc without a FFe?
[19:17] <juliank> I added a block-proposed bug 1843143
[19:17] <ubottu> bug 1843143 in keepassxc (Ubuntu) "Needs FFe" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1843143
[19:17] <juliank> ugh, it's already in release
[19:18] <juliank> ah, damnit LocutusOfBorg
[19:18] <juliank> Don't sync new major upstream releases without a FFe
[19:22] <juliank> also, help appreciated, the clipboard tests are flaky, they are run in xvfb-run, and copying stuff to clipboard fails like 10% of the time
[19:44] <LocutusOfBorg> juliank, sorry must have been a mistake, can I revert?
[19:44] <LocutusOfBorg> I can upload an ubuntu1 that is the previous version so we are happy?
[19:45] <LocutusOfBorg> I syncd some python2 removals and probably I got trapped by some mistake while parsing output...
[19:57] <juliank> LocutusOfBorg: Or I file a FFe retroactively and then get it decided?
[19:58] <juliank> I did want to file a FFe, but I did not get around to it yet
[19:58] <juliank> Worst case, we revert if FFe is rejected
[20:04] <juliank> I repurposed the bug for that
[20:14] <LocutusOfBorg> as you wish, in the meanwhile I upload the old version in my ppa so I can copy it to eoan if needed
[20:15] <LocutusOfBorg> juliank, do you happen to understand where they come from such packages? e.g. node-hapi-teamwork
[20:15] <LocutusOfBorg> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=node-sntp&arch=all&ver=3.1.2-2&stamp=1567681310&raw=0
[20:15] <LocutusOfBorg> of course ubuntu is dep waiting on them...
[20:18] <juliank> LocutusOfBorg: what  do you mean?
[20:18] <juliank> what is they?
[21:21] <LocutusOfBorg> juliank, node-sntp build-depends on node-hapi-teamwork
[21:21] <LocutusOfBorg> but node-hapi-teamwork doesn't exist
[21:21] <LocutusOfBorg> at least according to rmadison
[21:21] <LocutusOfBorg> https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=node-hapi-teamwork&literal=1
[21:22] <LocutusOfBorg>  Provides: node-hapi-b64 (= 4.2.1), node-hapi-bounce (= 1.3.1), node-hapi-hoek (= 8.2.2+~4.2.1+~1.3.1+~3.3.1-2), node-hapi-teamwork (= 3.3.1)
[21:22] <LocutusOfBorg> got it
[21:22] <LocutusOfBorg> its a provide
[23:11] <adrian15> Should I open a bug so that grub-efi-amd64-signed-template 2.04-3 version gets ported into Ubuntu? Or will it eventually ported into Ubuntu and I should not rush it ? Thank you.
[23:11] <adrian15> * from Debian