[20:42] <Eickmeyer> cyphermox: If you're available, I have updated slideshow images and text for ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu. bug 1843196 has everything you might need, but let me know if there's anything else you need. :)
[21:35] <mwhudson> cjwatson: i presume you've seen openssh-server in eoan-proposed depends on runit-helper?
[21:48] <cjwatson> mwhudson: Yes.  I don't consider this a problem, although it might need to be MIRed
[21:48] <cjwatson> It's a tiny package and IMO the cost of avoiding it (in the absence of support from dh-runit for it being conditional) is greater than the cost of including it
[21:49] <mwhudson> cjwatson: yeah, it's keeping it from migrating, that's how i noticed
[21:49] <cjwatson> mwhudson: This will especially be true as more packages get runit support added in Debian, which I imagine will happen.  openssh is probably just one of the first ones they filed a bug against
[21:50] <mwhudson> can you use runit alongside systemd?
[21:50] <cjwatson> Dunno
[21:50] <mwhudson> does this all have any effect on ubuntu?
[21:50] <cjwatson> mwhudson: Anyway - I didn't sync it, LocutusOfBorg did it without asking me and if they had asked I would have said not to bother
[21:51] <mwhudson> ah
[21:51] <cjwatson> mwhudson: Other than needing an MIR I don't see why it should
[21:51] <cjwatson> LocutusOfBorg: Why did you sync this, anyway?  It has no benefit to eoan
[21:51] <cjwatson> Like, there ought to be some kind of reason
[21:51] <mwhudson> if it's going to happen to lots of packages, MIRing the support seems like the path of least resistance
[21:51] <mwhudson> or patching dh-runit to be a noop on ubuntu or something
[21:52] <cjwatson> From my end I mostly just accepted an MR
[21:52] <mwhudson> certainly not making some change to each package
[21:52] <cjwatson> Yeah, definitely not
[21:52] <cjwatson> I don't know what the Debian runit plans are in any detail