=== cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer [12:58] source format 1.0 [12:58] wc :-) [12:58] but true :-) [12:58] oh I realize why I'm lurking here - MIR Team in two minutes [12:58] old school© [12:59] cyphermox: didrocks: jamespage: jdstrand: doko: ping for MIR Team IRC Meeting [12:59] hey hey [13:00] (I have nothing special to report here FTR) [13:00] I'm good as well, only wondering about the recent flatpack MIR activity [13:00] is that on you didrocks? [13:02] ah, I didn't follow that one, I can't find a MIR bug though on the flatpak package… [13:02] ah, libflatpak [13:02] let me handle it [13:03] I guess discussing directly to Robert in Paris will be quicker while being in the same room :) [13:05] yep [13:05] anyone else with active current topics? [13:06] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir [13:06] there are more new MIRs it seems [13:07] some like gnupnp-av and gupnp-dlna needs a final ack now that they had a security review [13:07] didrocks: you handled those int he past [13:07] will you do the re-check on those? [13:07] yeah, if nobody beats me, that will be Paris material [13:07] libheif was under foundations control last time [13:08] leaves libxml, why is that here ... [13:09] ok by raof [13:09] for wayland [13:09] I can take a look at this one if no one beats me [13:10] that was the list of NEW [13:10] the incompletes have nothing new, tpm2-tss (talked last week) being the last with an update [13:10] it seems we never officially started the meeting today, so no need to end id [13:11] if there is anything else by anyone else speak up ... [13:11] I think that's ok :) [13:13] o/ [13:13] hiho cyphermox [13:13] sorry, I was at lunch [13:13] np [13:13] read the backlog and let us know if there is something to add [13:14] didrocks: uh, why flatpak? [13:14] that seems like something really unnecessary [13:14] cyphermox: I wasn't aware before this meeting as you can see on the backlog. Seems gnome-control-center is depending on libflatpak [13:14] ah, sorry, I misread [13:14] fair enough :) [13:38] cpaelzer: sorry missed the ping but here if needed [13:39] jdstrand: np - we had no open items, do you have some to share? [13:39] cpaelzer: I do not