[08:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (bionic-proposed/main) [2.525.29 => 2.525.30] (desktop-core)
[08:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (xenial-proposed/main) [2.408.50 => 2.408.51] (desktop-core)
[08:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (disco-proposed/main) [2.578.7 => 2.578.8] (desktop-core)
[09:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.4.0-163.191] (core, kernel)
[09:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1043.45] (kernel)
[09:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1043.45]
[09:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-163.191]
[09:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kdeplasma-addons (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.8-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.9-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu)
[09:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ksysguard (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.8-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.9-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu)
[09:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kwin (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.8-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.9.1-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu)
[09:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: milou (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.8-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.9-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu)
[09:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: plasma-desktop (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.8-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.9.1-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu)
[09:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: plasma-workspace (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:5.12.8-0ubuntu0.1 => 4:5.12.9-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu)
[09:46] <RikMills> sil2100: New plasma SRU for bionic ^^. You'll be please to see that this time due to the very small number of sources with changes worth having, I have cherry-picked just 6
[09:48] <sil2100> RikMills: I like such new upstream releases!
[09:51] <RikMills> sil2100: I thought as much! Plasma 5.12 also now goes in emergency bugfix mode only. no new 'scheduled' releases
[11:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kdeplasma-addons [source] (bionic-proposed) [4:5.12.9-0ubuntu0.1]
[11:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ksysguard [source] (bionic-proposed) [4:5.12.9-0ubuntu0.1]
[11:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kwin [source] (bionic-proposed) [4:5.12.9.1-0ubuntu0.1]
[11:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted milou [source] (bionic-proposed) [4:5.12.9-0ubuntu0.1]
[11:18] <slashd> o/ sil2100, (re: lp1843036) all good on my side if it's still okay for an early release.
[11:19] <sil2100> slashd: excellent
[11:19] <sil2100> slashd: will proceed in a moment
[11:19] <slashd> sil2100, thanks
[11:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted plasma-desktop [source] (bionic-proposed) [4:5.12.9.1-0ubuntu0.1]
[11:26] <sil2100> slashd: btw. wanted to poke you about LP: #1838771
[11:26] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1838771 in apt (Ubuntu Disco) "http:Fix Host header in proxied https connections" [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1838771
[11:26] <sil2100> slashd: Julian verified it via the autopkgtest, but before proceeding I would like you - if possible - to confirm the fix is working at least for one series
[11:27] <sil2100> On a closer-to-real environment
[11:27] <sil2100> Of course if it's not easily doable, I can accept things as they are if you're fine with it as well
[11:33] <slashd> sil2100, let's see if I can recreate the issue easily, I'll ping you in a couple of mintes
[11:33] <slashd> minutes ^
[11:34] <sil2100> slashd: thanks!
[11:39] <slashd> sil2100, look good to me with testing the test case
[11:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted plasma-workspace [source] (bionic-proposed) [4:5.12.9-0ubuntu0.1]
[11:40] <rbalint> sil2100, could you please merge this for next systemd upload?: https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/britney/autopkgtest-eoan-hints/+merge/372682
[12:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dkms [source] (disco-proposed) [2.6.1-4ubuntu2.3]
[12:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dkms [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.3-3ubuntu9.6]
[12:15] <RikMills> sil2100: wow. thank you for the quick turnaround on plasma. I was genuinely not expecting that until maybe next week
[12:20] <slashd> thanks sil2100 for net-snmp and apt.
[12:22]  * Laney wants to join in
[12:22] <Laney> thanks sil2100!
[12:27]  * sil2100 feels bad now that he didn't do anything for Laney today but still got thanked
[12:27] <sil2100> slashd, RikMills: yw!
[12:27] <sil2100> Laney: need anything by any chance? ;p
[12:27] <Laney> haha
[12:27] <Laney> no, there's no debt system here
[12:27] <sil2100> rbalint: on it
[13:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1019.20~18.04.1] (kernel)
[14:59] <rbalint> sil2100, could you please check this, too? LP: #1843755
[14:59] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1843755 in systemd (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Please accept systemd 242 to Eoan " [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1843755
[15:00] <sil2100> rbalint: will try, but not sure if I'll have the capacity today
[15:00] <rbalint> sil2100, thanks, no problem
[15:11] <vorlon> ok so I'd seen a number of packages ftbfs when trying to do a naive drop of python2 because the distutils buildsystem required the python2 'pyversions' command - but python-openstackdocstheme dropped python2 in this way, and builds fine from source in Debian
[15:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-1019.20~18.04.1]
[15:11] <vorlon> anyone know what we're missing between sid and eoan for this and if it's safe to copy?
[15:12] <vorlon> looks like there's a new debhelper in unstable
[15:12] <doko> missing dh-python b-d?
[15:13] <vorlon> no; dh-python doesn't pull in python / pyversions
[15:13] <vorlon> and the build-dep is there
[15:13] <vorlon> and the same package builds fine in sid, *not* in eoan
[15:19] <vorlon> oh wait, pull-lp-source gave me the wrong version; let me retest this
[15:25] <vorlon> ok, yeah, the Debian maintainer worked around this by neutering the dh_auto_* targets in debian/rules
[15:37] <rbasak> sil2100: fyi, I'm reviewing libvirt in the Bionic SRU queue - carried over from yesterday, and I have the context from the previous qemu review
[15:37] <rbasak> If it looks good I'll accept it today
[15:39] <sil2100> rbasak: ok, thanks for the heads up! I'm done with my shift for today I guess
[15:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvirt [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.0.0-1ubuntu8.13]
[15:47] <didrocks> is there any issue in ppa uploads? /me tried 15 minutes ago to upload something to a ppa and no email of accept/denial
[15:48] <didrocks> (retried to reupload 5 minutes ago -> nothing here)
[15:50] <cjwatson> didrocks: should ask that in #launchpad
[15:51] <didrocks> right, sorry cjwatson
[15:51] <cjwatson> didrocks: but looks like a keyserver outage
[15:51] <didrocks> cjwatson: thanks, keep me posted if I need to reupload
[15:52] <cjwatson> I'll get the failures reprocessed once stuff's back
[15:53] <didrocks> perfect, thanks
[16:28] <rbalint> sil2100, maybe vorlon could take a look at the systemd FFe above?
[16:33] <vorlon> rbalint: launchpad is timing out on me, but I'm in the process of trying to comment and mark the bug incomplete, because I don't think your FFe request includes compelling rationale for why this is an important update, nor analysis wrt the actual upstream changes about what the risks are of this update
[16:33] <vorlon> ok, now the comment has gone through
[19:04] <vorlon> coreycb: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/nbs.html is looking excitingly short now; don't know if it's worth revisiting python-pbr revdeps for 19.10?
[19:10] <coreycb> vorlon: oh yeah that's looking a whole lot better
[19:11] <coreycb> vorlon: realistically we will probably punt pbr until next cycle unless we get pushed to do it this cycle
[19:11] <vorlon> fair enough
[19:12] <coreycb> vorlon: thanks again for helping me with all the proposed migrations
[19:13] <vorlon> sure thing
[19:27] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, hello, I finally fixed nbsphinx, the package regressed because of pandoc
[19:27] <LocutusOfBorg> unfortunately it needs a little tiny python script to work, and I uploaded it in Debian new and Ubuntu
[19:27] <LocutusOfBorg> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/442049218/sphinxcontrib-svg2pdfconverter_0.1.0-1~ubuntu1_source.changes
[19:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: sphinxcontrib-svg2pdfconverter (eoan-proposed/primary) [0.1.0-1~ubuntu1]
[19:28] <LocutusOfBorg> I would appreciate if you could have a look, it is made of two python scripts, that calls imagemagick and friends to convert svg to png
[19:28] <LocutusOfBorg> https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/sphinxcontrib-svg2pdfconverter_0.1.0-1.html
[20:00] <sergiusens> is there a way to get reverse/test deps autopkgtests to get redone with a newer package (ref: snapcraft -> ubuntu-image to use the newer ubuntu-image)
[20:06] <vorlon> sergiusens: click the 'retry' button, given that current ubuntu-image is in the release pocket
[20:07] <vorlon> (the 'recycle' icon)
[20:08] <LocutusOfBorg> we should probably rekick automatically tests if the package in question has migrated...
[20:10] <vorlon> no
[20:10] <vorlon> because the previous test wouldn't have had ubuntu-image as the trigger
[20:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fwupdate [sync] (eoan-proposed) [12-6]
[20:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ocaml-stdcompat [sync] (eoan-proposed) [10-1]
[20:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ocaml-charinfo-width [sync] (eoan-proposed) [1.1.0-1]
[20:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-c2-chacha [sync] (eoan-proposed) [0.2.2-1]
[20:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sphinxcontrib-svg2pdfconverter [source] (eoan-proposed) [0.1.0-1~ubuntu1]
[20:19] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, I mean, if there is a failing autopkgtest about a version of a package that is outdated, because a new version is in release, can't we just automatically retry the test?
[20:19] <LocutusOfBorg> the trigger changes, but at least we have a fresh run against the new "baseline" in release pocket
[20:19] <LocutusOfBorg> I know, something else might change and break/fix it, not the package itself...
[20:20] <LocutusOfBorg> like firewalld, it is not triggered on nftables updates, but each time nftables is updated... it breaks
[20:20] <LocutusOfBorg> I wish we had a way to force tests in some way
[20:20] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks for accepting the stuff!
[20:27] <vorlon> so the long-term plan is to have rolling baseline re-tests of everything in the archive
[20:27] <vorlon> but that would test against the release pocket *only*, it wouldn't help a new snapcraft in -proposed migrate
[20:28] <vorlon> and we shouldn't automatically retest a package in -proposed with a failing autopkgtest every time one of its dependencies updates in the release pocket
[20:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: llvm-defaults [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.48.2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[20:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: llvm-defaults [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.48.2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[20:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: llvm-defaults [i386] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.48.2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[20:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: llvm-defaults [arm64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.48.2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[20:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: llvm-defaults [s390x] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.48.2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[20:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: llvm-defaults [armhf] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.48.2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[20:59] <sergiusens> thanks vorlon
[20:59] <sergiusens> wasn't sure that would cause the desired effect as the line with the failure explicitly mentions the previous version of the package was used
[21:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fwupdate [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [12-6] (lubuntu)
[21:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fwupdate [armhf] (eoan-proposed/universe) [12-6] (lubuntu)
[21:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fwupdate [i386] (eoan-proposed/universe) [12-6] (lubuntu)
[21:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ocaml-charinfo-width [i386] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[21:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ocaml-charinfo-width [s390x] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[21:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ocaml-stdcompat [s390x] (eoan-proposed/universe) [10-1] (no packageset)
[21:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ocaml-stdcompat [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [10-1] (no packageset)
[21:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ocaml-charinfo-width [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[21:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fwupdate [arm64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [12-6] (lubuntu)
[21:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ocaml-charinfo-width [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[21:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ocaml-charinfo-width [armhf] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[21:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ocaml-stdcompat [armhf] (eoan-proposed/universe) [10-1] (no packageset)
[21:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ocaml-stdcompat [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/universe) [10-1] (no packageset)
[21:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ocaml-stdcompat [arm64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [10-1] (no packageset)
[21:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ocaml-charinfo-width [arm64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[21:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ocaml-stdcompat [i386] (eoan-proposed/universe) [10-1] (no packageset)
[21:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sphinxcontrib-svg2pdfconverter [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [0.1.0-1~ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[21:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fwupdate [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [12-6]
[21:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ocaml-charinfo-width [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [1.1.0-1]
[21:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ocaml-stdcompat [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [10-1]
[21:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ocaml-stdcompat [i386] (eoan-proposed) [10-1]
[21:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ocaml-charinfo-width [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [1.1.0-1]
[21:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ocaml-stdcompat [armhf] (eoan-proposed) [10-1]
[21:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ocaml-charinfo-width [armhf] (eoan-proposed) [1.1.0-1]
[21:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ocaml-stdcompat [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [10-1]
[21:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fwupdate [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [12-6]
[21:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fwupdate [i386] (eoan-proposed) [12-6]
[21:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ocaml-charinfo-width [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [1.1.0-1]
[21:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ocaml-stdcompat [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [10-1]
[21:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fwupdate [armhf] (eoan-proposed) [12-6]
[21:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ocaml-charinfo-width [s390x] (eoan-proposed) [1.1.0-1]
[21:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ocaml-charinfo-width [i386] (eoan-proposed) [1.1.0-1]
[21:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ocaml-stdcompat [s390x] (eoan-proposed) [10-1]
[21:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sphinxcontrib-svg2pdfconverter [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [0.1.0-1~ubuntu1]
[22:58] <vorlon> jamespage: you were the last uploader of python-ibm-db-sa (in 2015) which is python2-only and removed in Ubuntu. any reason to keep it?