=== _thumper_ is now known as thumper [07:25] good morning desktoppers :) [07:25] robert_ancell, hey :), could you take a look at https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/accountsservice/accountsservice/merge_requests/43 [07:27] seb128, hi [07:30] hey ricotz , how are you? [07:31] seb128, good, warm and sunny weekend ;), how are you? [07:32] ricotz, I'm good, in Paris for the week with other Canonicalers [07:35] seb128, great [07:52] jbicha, hey, nice to see you active on Debian/Ubuntu :-) Just as a reminder in case you didn't pay attention to the schedule, we are in feature freeze (you updates some things to a newer serie like gnome-boxes which probably technically should go through a ffe) === pieq_ is now known as pieq === dan_ is now known as Guest27389 [09:09] Logged a bug in Yaru re: battery icon colour: https://github.com/ubuntu/yaru/issues/1531 [09:33] morning all 0/ [09:33] hey clobrano [09:33] wow, I must have made some mess configuring the bouncer, it was a pain to connect this morning :D [09:34] hi willcooke, how are you? [09:34] clobrano, doing good, here with the team in Paris! [09:35] willcooke: nice! [09:35] (no pun intended) :D [09:36] hi, mesa 19.2.0-rc3 available for testing at ppa:canonical-x/x-staging. works fine on my intel laptop [09:39] willcooke and anyone could/want to test it :), I release a test branch for a third Yaru variant called Ambiance, to make the transition easier. There is still a problem though, Apps that prefer dark variant seem unable to take the Yaru-dark even if I make a copy of Yaru-dark called Yaru-ambiance-dark [09:39] s/anyone could.../anyone who could.../ [09:44] clobrano: you mean it'd keep the dark window top bar? I just noticed that latest eoan had it "white" with yaru, and changed to ambiance [09:45] tjaalton: exactly, this Yaru-ambiance would be Yaru 19.04 with some changes to make headerbar buttons more visible (see https://github.com/ubuntu/yaru/issues/1477) [09:45] cool [10:00] :) [11:46] seb128: Where did that IBus update go? ;) [11:46] GunnarHj, it got rejected because I forgot to use -sa to include the orig tarball, I will reupload in a bit [11:47] seb128: Ok. [12:01] seb128: Do you have an idea offhand how to deal with those test failures which happen if I add a couple of recent upstream commits? This is an example build log: [12:01] https://launchpadlibrarian.net/442793675/buildlog_ubuntu-eoan-amd64.ibus_1.5.21-1~exp2ubuntu1~test3_BUILDING.txt.gz [12:01] At the same time it builds fine on my not-so-clean hard disk, so I suspect that there is some missing build dep. The question, in that case, is which one(s). [12:15] Trevinho, I'm not seeing previews when clicking on an icon in the dock that has multiple windows open, is that a known regression? [12:17] Trevinho, also I can't dismiss a context menu invoked by right-clicking on an icon in the dock [12:17] oSoMoN: yes, due to a last-second upload in mutter before release, so I've posted the patch fixing it if you want it already. [12:18] Trevinho, yeah, happy to test the patch, can you share the link? [12:18] oSoMoN: sure [12:19] oSoMoN: https://github.com/micheleg/dash-to-dock/commit/bb5b0c545292549525ab1ceda6bbce633f49cfbd.patch [12:20] I wanted to do a release, but I was trying to get the fix for that crash in first... but since I still wasn't able to reproduce... [12:20] I should probably patch that in first. [12:20] oSoMoN: can you open a bug for it please :) [12:21] Trevinho, for the issue with the previews, or the one with the context menu? or two separate bugs for both? [12:21] ah I think it's the same... https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock/+bug/1843520 [12:21] Launchpad bug 1843520 in gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock (Ubuntu) "ubuntu-dock right-click menu appears at the top-left corner of the desktop (which in some cases is the wrong monitor) and is permanent" [High,In progress] [12:21] already there [12:26] Trevinho, I confirm the patch fixes both issues, nice one [12:29] oSoMoN: I'm about to board now, but in a while the package will be built in https://bileto.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/3805 (might need to trigger "build" once it's actually done in ppa), so once it's done there, you are free to sponsor it :) [12:31] I'll let La_ney handle it [12:45] seb128: It's kind of funny... One of the IBus commits which I would like to have seen included has now been added to the stable releases as a security update. Maybe you should wait with that upload after all? (I wonder if security bypasses the tests....) [12:46] GunnarHj, I doubt they do [12:46] is that what creates the issue you mentioned before? [12:46] I looked at the log but not idea offhand [12:47] seb128: Not sure. The patch I dropped contains two commits, so it may be the other one which affects the tests. [12:47] we should include that security patch in eoan [12:49] amurray, dunno if you planned to upload ibus/eoan but we have other changes ready to upload so maybe not do it to avoid conflicts [12:50] seb128: Yeah.. I can try with only that one in a PPA and see if it passes. Can do that tonight or tomorrow. [12:50] seb128: I have a debdiff ready which I was going to get mdeslaur to sponsor but am happy to hold off and redo it once you folks are done [12:51] amurray: It would make things easier is you hold it back for now. [12:52] GunnarHj: sure no worries [12:52] GunnarHj: the security issue is not critical [12:53] amurray: Right. [12:55] amurray, or email me the diff if you can so we can look at integrating that patch with the upload [12:56] amurray, thx [12:56] seb128: done [13:10] Trevinho: +backgroud-opacity=0.7 [13:10] fail [13:16] Laney: see https://github.com/ubuntu/yaru/pull/1518 [13:17] Laney: so we need to do it at dock level instead, otherwise we'd break the d2d settings [13:17] Trevinho: read more closely [13:17] Laney: what? [13:17] +backgroud-opacity=0.7 [13:19] damned n... [13:19] :D [13:19] let me try to push again from the plaaane [13:24] Laney: ok building again.... FLYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYing [13:26] GOOOOOOOOOOOO [13:27] don't forget to fix the PR too === clobrano is now known as clobrano_ === clobrano_ is now known as clobrano [13:43] seb128: The security thing built successfully in the PPA: [13:43] https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj/+archive/ubuntu/ibus [13:43] You may want to upload that instead. [13:43] (So it looks like it was the other commit which caused the test failures.) [13:44] GunnarHj, k [13:45] Didn't Gnome 3.34 had a fix for non-wayland apps to run as root? :) [13:45] not that I know [13:46] (bbiab, coffee time) [13:53] https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/commit/a8984a81c2e887623d69ec9989ae8a5025f7bd47 [14:03] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/synaptic/+bug/1713313 [14:03] Launchpad bug 1713313 in xdiagnose (Ubuntu) "Unable to launch pkexec'ed applications on Wayland session" [Undecided,Confirmed] [14:04] And: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/synaptic/+bug/1771158 [14:04] Launchpad bug 1771158 in synaptic (Ubuntu) "Synaptic doesn't open with administrative privileges on wayland" [Undecided,Confirmed] [14:04] added comment on the latest bug, pkexec synaptic now works fine on wayland, but synaptic still gives a prompt that its not supported on wayland [14:04] might be nice to fix that before release? :) [14:05] seb128: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/commit/a8984a81c2e887623d69ec9989ae8a5025f7bd47 fyi [14:09] dupondje, thx [14:13] GunnarHj, we have a ubuntu-dock upload with add a bit of transparency, do you think we need a formal UIFe bug or is that ok to upload? [14:14] seb128: No need to be formal. We don't have any screenshots which are affected anyway. [14:14] GunnarHj, thx [14:45] tkamppeter, Debian has a new cups-filters version, should we sync that? [15:33] amurray: Is this fine with you? [15:33] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ibus/1.5.21-1~exp2ubuntu1