[07:25] <ricotz> good morning desktoppers :)
[07:25] <ricotz> robert_ancell, hey :), could you take a look at https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/accountsservice/accountsservice/merge_requests/43
[07:27] <ricotz> seb128, hi
[07:30] <seb128> hey ricotz , how are you?
[07:31] <ricotz> seb128, good, warm and sunny weekend ;), how are you?
[07:32] <seb128> ricotz, I'm good, in Paris for the week with other Canonicalers
[07:35] <ricotz> seb128, great
[07:52] <seb128> jbicha, hey, nice to see you active on Debian/Ubuntu :-) Just as a reminder in case you didn't pay attention to the schedule, we are in feature freeze (you updates some things to a newer serie like gnome-boxes which probably technically should go through a ffe)
[09:09] <willcooke> Logged a bug in Yaru re: battery icon colour:  https://github.com/ubuntu/yaru/issues/1531
[09:33] <clobrano> morning all 0/
[09:33] <willcooke> hey clobrano
[09:33] <clobrano> wow, I must have made some mess configuring the bouncer, it was a pain to connect this morning :D
[09:34] <clobrano> hi willcooke, how are you?
[09:34] <willcooke> clobrano, doing good, here with the team in Paris!
[09:35] <clobrano> willcooke: nice!
[09:35] <clobrano> (no pun intended) :D
[09:36] <tjaalton> hi, mesa 19.2.0-rc3 available for testing at ppa:canonical-x/x-staging. works fine on my intel laptop
[09:39] <clobrano> willcooke and anyone could/want to test it :), I release a test branch for a third Yaru variant called Ambiance, to make the transition easier. There is still a problem though, Apps that prefer dark variant seem unable to take the Yaru-dark even if I make a copy of Yaru-dark called Yaru-ambiance-dark
[09:39] <clobrano> s/anyone could.../anyone who could.../
[09:44] <tjaalton> clobrano: you mean it'd keep the dark window top bar? I just noticed that latest eoan had it "white" with yaru, and changed to ambiance
[09:45] <clobrano> tjaalton: exactly, this Yaru-ambiance would be Yaru 19.04 with some changes to make headerbar buttons more visible (see https://github.com/ubuntu/yaru/issues/1477)
[09:45] <tjaalton> cool
[10:00] <clobrano> :)
[11:46] <GunnarHj> seb128: Where did that IBus update go? ;)
[11:46] <seb128> GunnarHj, it got rejected because I forgot to use -sa to include the orig tarball, I will reupload in a bit
[11:47] <GunnarHj> seb128: Ok.
[12:01] <GunnarHj> seb128: Do you have an idea offhand how to deal with those test failures which happen if I add a couple of recent upstream commits? This is an example build log:
[12:01] <GunnarHj> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/442793675/buildlog_ubuntu-eoan-amd64.ibus_1.5.21-1~exp2ubuntu1~test3_BUILDING.txt.gz
[12:01] <GunnarHj> At the same time it builds fine on my not-so-clean hard disk, so I suspect that there is some missing build dep. The question, in that case, is which one(s).
[12:15] <oSoMoN> Trevinho, I'm not seeing previews when clicking on an icon in the dock that has multiple windows open, is that a known regression?
[12:17] <oSoMoN> Trevinho, also I can't dismiss a context menu invoked by right-clicking on an icon in the dock
[12:17] <Trevinho> oSoMoN: yes, due to a last-second upload in mutter before release, so I've posted the patch fixing it if you want it already.
[12:18] <oSoMoN> Trevinho, yeah, happy to test the patch, can you share the link?
[12:18] <Trevinho> oSoMoN: sure
[12:19] <Trevinho> oSoMoN: https://github.com/micheleg/dash-to-dock/commit/bb5b0c545292549525ab1ceda6bbce633f49cfbd.patch
[12:20] <Trevinho> I wanted to do a release, but I was trying to get the fix for that crash in first... but since I still wasn't able to reproduce...
[12:20] <Trevinho> I should probably patch that in first.
[12:20] <Trevinho> oSoMoN: can you open a bug for it please :)
[12:21] <oSoMoN> Trevinho, for the issue with the previews, or the one with the context menu? or two separate bugs for both?
[12:21] <Trevinho> ah I think it's the same... https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock/+bug/1843520
[12:21] <Trevinho> already there
[12:26] <oSoMoN> Trevinho, I confirm the patch fixes both issues, nice one
[12:29] <Trevinho> oSoMoN: I'm about to board now, but in a while the package will be built in https://bileto.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/3805 (might need to trigger "build" once it's actually done in ppa), so once it's done there, you are free to sponsor it :)
[12:31] <oSoMoN> I'll let La_ney handle it
[12:45] <GunnarHj> seb128: It's kind of funny... One of the IBus commits which I would like to have seen included has now been added to the stable releases as a security update. Maybe you should wait with that upload after all? (I wonder if security bypasses the tests....)
[12:46] <seb128> GunnarHj, I doubt they do
[12:46] <seb128> is that what creates the issue you mentioned before?
[12:46] <seb128> I looked at the log but not idea offhand
[12:47] <GunnarHj> seb128: Not sure. The patch I dropped contains two commits, so it may be the other one which affects the tests.
[12:47] <seb128> we should include that security patch in eoan
[12:49] <seb128> amurray, dunno if you planned to upload ibus/eoan but we have other changes ready to upload so maybe not do it to avoid conflicts
[12:50] <GunnarHj> seb128: Yeah.. I can try with only that one in a PPA and see if it passes. Can do that tonight or tomorrow.
[12:50] <amurray> seb128: I have a debdiff ready which I was going to get mdeslaur to sponsor but am happy to hold off and redo it once you folks are done
[12:51] <GunnarHj> amurray: It would make things easier is you hold it back for now.
[12:52] <amurray> GunnarHj: sure no worries
[12:52] <amurray> GunnarHj: the security issue is not critical
[12:53] <GunnarHj> amurray: Right.
[12:55] <seb128> amurray, or email me the diff if you can so we can look at integrating that patch with the upload
[12:56] <seb128> amurray, thx
[12:56] <amurray> seb128: done
[13:10] <Laney> Trevinho: +backgroud-opacity=0.7
[13:10] <Laney> fail
[13:16] <Trevinho> Laney: see https://github.com/ubuntu/yaru/pull/1518
[13:17] <Trevinho> Laney: so we need to do it at dock level instead, otherwise we'd break the d2d settings
[13:17] <Laney> Trevinho: read more closely
[13:17] <Trevinho> Laney: what?
[13:17] <Laney> +backgroud-opacity=0.7
[13:19] <Trevinho> damned n...
[13:19] <Laney> :D
[13:19] <Trevinho> let me try to push again from the plaaane
[13:24] <Trevinho> Laney: ok building again.... FLYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYing
[13:26] <Laney> GOOOOOOOOOOOO
[13:27] <Laney> don't forget to fix the PR too
[13:43] <GunnarHj> seb128: The security thing built successfully in the PPA:
[13:43] <GunnarHj> https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj/+archive/ubuntu/ibus
[13:43] <GunnarHj> You may want to upload that instead.
[13:43] <GunnarHj> (So it looks like it was the other commit which caused the test failures.)
[13:44] <seb128> GunnarHj, k
[13:45] <dupondje> Didn't Gnome 3.34 had a fix for non-wayland apps to run as root? :)
[13:45] <seb128> not that I know
[13:46] <seb128> (bbiab, coffee time)
[13:53] <dupondje> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/commit/a8984a81c2e887623d69ec9989ae8a5025f7bd47
[14:03] <dupondje> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/synaptic/+bug/1713313
[14:04] <dupondje> And: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/synaptic/+bug/1771158
[14:04] <dupondje> added comment on the latest bug, pkexec synaptic now works fine on wayland, but synaptic still gives a prompt that its not supported on wayland
[14:04] <dupondje> might be nice to fix that before release? :)
[14:05] <dupondje> seb128: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/commit/a8984a81c2e887623d69ec9989ae8a5025f7bd47 fyi
[14:09] <seb128> dupondje, thx
[14:13] <seb128> GunnarHj, we have a ubuntu-dock upload with add a bit of transparency, do you think we need a formal UIFe bug or is that ok to upload?
[14:14] <GunnarHj> seb128: No need to be formal. We don't have any screenshots which are affected anyway.
[14:14] <seb128> GunnarHj, thx
[14:45] <seb128> tkamppeter, Debian has a new cups-filters version, should we sync that?
[15:33] <GunnarHj> amurray: Is this fine with you?
[15:33] <GunnarHj> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ibus/1.5.21-1~exp2ubuntu1