[00:14] release team, anybody interested in ack'ing https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/catfish/+bug/1844464? (xubuntu, budgie, studio all A-OK) If so, I can trigger a sync from unstable [00:14] Launchpad bug 1844464 in catfish (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Include catfish 1.4.10 in eoan (xubuntu, ubuntu-budgie, ubuntu-studio)" [Undecided,New] [05:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem-osp1 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-1023.25] [05:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1026.29] [05:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1057.66] [06:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-65.74] (core, kernel) [06:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-65.74] (core, kernel) [07:04] LocutusOfBorg: cheers :) [07:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added language-pack-szl-base to langpack in eoan [07:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nat-rtsp (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.7+1.g2ea3cb6-1ubuntu1~18.04.1 => 0.7+1.g2ea3cb6-1ubuntu1~18.04.2] (no packageset) [07:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xtables-addons (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.0-0.1ubuntu2 => 3.0-0.1ubuntu3] (no packageset) [08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-30.32~18.04.1] (kernel) [08:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-30.32~18.04.1] (kernel) [08:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-30.32~18.04.1] (kernel) [08:18] hi there, thermald for bionic has been stuck in -proposed "due to block request by freeze" https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thermald/1.7.0-5ubuntu5 - can this be promoted sometime soon? [08:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-65.74~16.04.1] (kernel) [08:24] cking: that's misleading - the real status of the SRU is what is shown on https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html [08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-65.74~16.04.1] (kernel) [08:26] Laney, now I'm more confused :-/ - so is it chugging through the system and will be released sometime? (how can I tell?) [08:28] cking: Based on pending-sru, it has a metric whackton of bugs that haven't been verified. [08:28] cking: green good, blue bad. [08:30] infinity, ah, the blue ones are historical bugs that have already been verified in the past - i screwed up because I accidentally uploaded the package with the entire old history. [08:34] cking: Ah-ha. [08:34] cking: Released. [08:34] infinity, thanks, \o/ [08:37] cking: I note on the bug that the task is still open for the devel series. Is that a paperwork bug on your part, or a missing upload? [08:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-30.32~18.04.1] [08:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-30.32~18.04.1] [08:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-65.74] [08:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-30.32~18.04.1] [08:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-65.74] [09:07] infinity: thanks a bunch! [09:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qemu (bionic-proposed/main) [1:2.11+dfsg-1ubuntu7.18 => 1:2.11+dfsg-1ubuntu7.19] (ubuntu-server, virt) [09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-drivers-common [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:0.5.2.4] [09:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-drivers-common (bionic-proposed/main) [1:0.5.2.3 => 1:0.5.2.4] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) [09:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: binutils-mipsen [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [4~c4ubuntu1] (kubuntu) [09:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: binutils-mipsen [i386] (eoan-proposed/universe) [4~c4ubuntu1] (kubuntu) [09:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted binutils-mipsen [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [4~c4ubuntu1] [09:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [1.37.0+dfsg1+llvm-1ubuntu1] [09:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [armhf] (eoan-proposed) [1.37.0+dfsg1+llvm-1ubuntu1] [09:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [1.37.0+dfsg1+llvm-1ubuntu1] [09:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted binutils-mipsen [i386] (eoan-proposed) [4~c4ubuntu1] [09:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [i386] (eoan-proposed) [1.37.0+dfsg1+llvm-1ubuntu1] [09:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [1.37.0+dfsg1+llvm-1ubuntu1] [09:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [s390x] (eoan-proposed) [1.37.0+dfsg1+llvm-1ubuntu1] [11:48] Laney, juliank: https://code.launchpad.net/~ddstreet/autopkgtest-cloud/+git/autopkgtest-cloud/+merge/369620 [12:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added language-pack-gnome-szl to langpack in eoan [12:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added language-pack-gnome-szl-base to langpack in eoan [12:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added language-pack-szl to langpack in eoan [12:59] [14:38:46] ruby-gnome can't migrate because of ruby-gnome2 old package, but ruby-gnome replaces ruby-gnome2... [12:59] [14:39:02] so removing src:ruby-gnome2 (transitional package) will make everybody happy [12:59] [14:39:40] is this possible? [12:59] everyday I look at ruby-gnome sadness [12:59] and everyday I forget why it doesn't build [12:59] can any AA please fix it? [13:02] LocutusOfBorg: I thought seb128 said he was taking care of it [13:02] seb128: ^^ ping [13:03] vorlon, LocutusOfBorg, ruby-gnome migrated [13:03] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-gnome [13:03] no? [13:04] seb128: right, seems so, so you were only taking care of migrating ruby-gnome and not removing the ruby-gnome2 source? [13:05] vorlon, I was waiting for the migration to happen because it felt wrong to remove the binaries before that happened, they would have gone missing [13:05] ack [13:05] doing now [13:05] thx for the reminder, I just got busy with other things here and didn't though it was urgent [13:05] no urgency for me :) [13:07] yes, thanks! I admit I didn't check ruby-gnome, I had a tab open in my browser, with a build failure log of gnome2 [13:08] thanks for fixing it twice then [13:09] LocutusOfBorg, vorlon, old name removed [13:13] do you think we can kick out unanimity, because of https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=939506 and see a transition finish? [13:13] Debian bug 939506 in src:unanimity "unanimity ftbfs in unstable" [Serious,Open] [13:14] second question, is it possible to cleanup NBS-proposed django-ajax-selects package? [13:17] seb128, I also can't find references of your command on https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-gnome2 page... does it take some more time? [13:19] LocutusOfBorg, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-gnome2/+publishinghistory [13:19] see the top entry [13:19] Deleted 32 seconds ago by Sebastien Bacher [13:19] yes, so I just didn't wait too much :) [13:19] thanks! [13:24] np! [13:25] LocutusOfBorg: removing unanimity has a knock-on effect of making pbgenomicconsensus build-deps unsatisfiable; I would not want to kick unanimity out to finish this transition before Debian had taken a decision that this is the right tradeoff [13:27] oh, I missed it because I did only search for -b unanimity, instead of -b python-consensuscore2 [13:27] makes sense, thanks [13:28] in any case autoremoval already started... [13:28] vorlon, I did upload a "little patch" for unanimity, if somebody has more c++ skill I think it can be fixed up, but I failed to parse the syntax of the failure [13:28] fwiw -b src:unanimity [13:29] I stopped doing src:foo because sometimes it fails, but I don't remember when... [13:29] also fwiw once it does get autoremoved it would show up on the new report https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/eoan/rcbuggy-problem-packages.html (h/t mwhudson) [13:30] I wasn't aware of such awesome page [13:30] thanks [13:30] it's recent and not yet publicized [13:30] mwhudson: ^^ do you want to announce that to ubuntu-release@lists? [13:38] doko, I'm trying to fix it up once more your gtk-d transition (ldc), but I think we should at some point kick armhf binaries out, same failure in Debian apparently? [14:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-edge [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-12.13~18.04.2] (kernel) [14:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-edge [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-12.13~18.04.2] (kernel) [14:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-edge [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-12.13~18.04.2] (kernel) [15:03] rapmap is now an amd64 only package... reverse-dependencies are amd64only too... [15:03] NBS cleanup please? [15:06] Laney, juliank: is ./worker-config-production/worker-bos01.conf redundant obsoleted by worker-config-production/worker-bos01-ppc64el.conf and should be removed? [15:06] LocutusOfBorg: done [15:07] think so [15:07] it's all obsolete in the new world order though [15:07] so don't sweat too much over it [15:15] thanks [20:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-edge [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-12.13~18.04.2] [20:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-edge [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-12.13~18.04.2] [20:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-edge [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-12.13~18.04.2] [20:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-65.74~16.04.1] [20:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-65.74~16.04.1] === msalvatore_ is now known as msalvatore [21:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1060.65] (kernel) [21:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1026.29~16.04.1] (kernel) [21:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1018.18] (core, kernel) [21:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1003.4] (core) [21:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-1018.18] [21:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-1003.4] [22:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1060.65] [22:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1026.29~16.04.1]