[00:14] <bluesabre> release team, anybody interested in ack'ing https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/catfish/+bug/1844464?  (xubuntu, budgie, studio all A-OK) If so, I can trigger a sync from unstable
[05:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem-osp1 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-1023.25]
[05:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1026.29]
[05:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1057.66]
[06:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-65.74] (core, kernel)
[06:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-65.74] (core, kernel)
[07:04] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: cheers :)
[07:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added language-pack-szl-base to langpack in eoan
[07:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nat-rtsp (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.7+1.g2ea3cb6-1ubuntu1~18.04.1 => 0.7+1.g2ea3cb6-1ubuntu1~18.04.2] (no packageset)
[07:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xtables-addons (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.0-0.1ubuntu2 => 3.0-0.1ubuntu3] (no packageset)
[08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-30.32~18.04.1] (kernel)
[08:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-30.32~18.04.1] (kernel)
[08:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-30.32~18.04.1] (kernel)
[08:18] <cking> hi there, thermald for bionic has been stuck in -proposed "due to block request by freeze" https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thermald/1.7.0-5ubuntu5 - can this be promoted sometime soon?
[08:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-65.74~16.04.1] (kernel)
[08:24] <Laney> cking: that's misleading - the real status of the SRU is what is shown on https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html
[08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-65.74~16.04.1] (kernel)
[08:26] <cking> Laney, now I'm more confused :-/  - so is it chugging through the system and will be released sometime? (how can I tell?)
[08:28] <infinity> cking: Based on pending-sru, it has a metric whackton of bugs that haven't been verified.
[08:28] <infinity> cking: green good, blue bad.
[08:30] <cking> infinity, ah, the blue ones are historical bugs that have already been verified in the past - i screwed up because  I accidentally uploaded the package with the entire old history.
[08:34] <infinity> cking: Ah-ha.
[08:34] <infinity> cking: Released.
[08:34] <cking> infinity, thanks, \o/
[08:37] <infinity> cking: I note on the bug that the task is still open for the devel series.  Is that a paperwork bug on your part, or a missing upload?
[08:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-30.32~18.04.1]
[08:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-30.32~18.04.1]
[08:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-65.74]
[08:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-30.32~18.04.1]
[08:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-65.74]
[09:07] <bluesabre> infinity: thanks a bunch!
[09:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qemu (bionic-proposed/main) [1:2.11+dfsg-1ubuntu7.18 => 1:2.11+dfsg-1ubuntu7.19] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-drivers-common [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:0.5.2.4]
[09:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-drivers-common (bionic-proposed/main) [1:0.5.2.3 => 1:0.5.2.4] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[09:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: binutils-mipsen [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [4~c4ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[09:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: binutils-mipsen [i386] (eoan-proposed/universe) [4~c4ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[09:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted binutils-mipsen [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [4~c4ubuntu1]
[09:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [1.37.0+dfsg1+llvm-1ubuntu1]
[09:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [armhf] (eoan-proposed) [1.37.0+dfsg1+llvm-1ubuntu1]
[09:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [1.37.0+dfsg1+llvm-1ubuntu1]
[09:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted binutils-mipsen [i386] (eoan-proposed) [4~c4ubuntu1]
[09:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [i386] (eoan-proposed) [1.37.0+dfsg1+llvm-1ubuntu1]
[09:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [1.37.0+dfsg1+llvm-1ubuntu1]
[09:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [s390x] (eoan-proposed) [1.37.0+dfsg1+llvm-1ubuntu1]
[11:48] <vorlon> Laney, juliank: https://code.launchpad.net/~ddstreet/autopkgtest-cloud/+git/autopkgtest-cloud/+merge/369620
[12:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added language-pack-gnome-szl to langpack in eoan
[12:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added language-pack-gnome-szl-base to langpack in eoan
[12:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added language-pack-szl to langpack in eoan
[12:59] <LocutusOfBorg> [14:38:46] <LocutusOfBorg> ruby-gnome can't migrate because of ruby-gnome2 old package, but ruby-gnome replaces ruby-gnome2...
[12:59] <LocutusOfBorg> [14:39:02] <LocutusOfBorg> so removing src:ruby-gnome2 (transitional package) will make everybody happy
[12:59] <LocutusOfBorg> [14:39:40] <LocutusOfBorg> is this possible?
[12:59] <LocutusOfBorg> everyday I look at ruby-gnome sadness
[12:59] <LocutusOfBorg> and everyday I forget why it doesn't build
[12:59] <LocutusOfBorg> can any AA please fix it?
[13:02] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: I thought seb128 said he was taking care of it
[13:02] <vorlon> seb128: ^^ ping
[13:03] <seb128> vorlon, LocutusOfBorg, ruby-gnome migrated
[13:03] <seb128> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-gnome
[13:03] <seb128> no?
[13:04] <vorlon> seb128: right, seems so, so you were only taking care of migrating ruby-gnome and not removing the ruby-gnome2 source?
[13:05] <seb128> vorlon, I was waiting for the migration to happen because it felt wrong to remove the binaries before that happened, they would have gone missing
[13:05] <vorlon> ack
[13:05] <seb128> doing now
[13:05] <seb128> thx for the reminder, I just got busy with other things here and didn't though it was urgent
[13:05] <vorlon> no urgency for me :)
[13:07] <LocutusOfBorg> yes, thanks! I admit I didn't check ruby-gnome, I had a tab open in my browser, with a build failure log of gnome2
[13:08] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks for fixing it twice then
[13:09] <seb128> LocutusOfBorg, vorlon, old name removed
[13:13] <LocutusOfBorg> do you think we can kick out unanimity, because of https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=939506 and see a transition finish?
[13:14] <LocutusOfBorg> second question, is it possible to cleanup NBS-proposed django-ajax-selects package?
[13:17] <LocutusOfBorg> seb128, I also can't find references of your command on https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-gnome2 page... does it take some more time?
[13:19] <seb128> LocutusOfBorg, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-gnome2/+publishinghistory
[13:19] <seb128> see the top entry
[13:19] <LocutusOfBorg> Deleted 32 seconds ago by Sebastien Bacher
[13:19] <LocutusOfBorg> yes, so I just didn't wait too much :)
[13:19] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks!
[13:24] <seb128> np!
[13:25] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: removing unanimity has a knock-on effect of making pbgenomicconsensus build-deps unsatisfiable; I would not want to kick unanimity out to finish this transition before Debian had taken a decision that this is the right tradeoff
[13:27] <LocutusOfBorg> oh, I missed it because I did only search for -b unanimity, instead of -b  python-consensuscore2
[13:27] <LocutusOfBorg> makes sense, thanks
[13:28] <LocutusOfBorg> in any case autoremoval already started...
[13:28] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, I did upload a "little patch" for unanimity, if somebody has more c++ skill I think it can be fixed up, but I failed to parse the syntax of the failure
[13:28] <vorlon> fwiw -b src:unanimity
[13:29] <LocutusOfBorg> I stopped doing src:foo because sometimes it fails, but I don't remember when...
[13:29] <vorlon> also fwiw once it does get autoremoved it would show up on the new report https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/eoan/rcbuggy-problem-packages.html (h/t mwhudson)
[13:30] <LocutusOfBorg> I wasn't aware of such awesome page
[13:30] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks
[13:30] <vorlon> it's recent and not yet publicized
[13:30] <vorlon> mwhudson: ^^ do you want to announce that to ubuntu-release@lists?
[13:38] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, I'm trying to fix it up once more your gtk-d transition (ldc), but I think we should at some point kick armhf binaries out, same failure in Debian apparently?
[14:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-edge [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-12.13~18.04.2] (kernel)
[14:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-edge [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-12.13~18.04.2] (kernel)
[14:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-edge [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-12.13~18.04.2] (kernel)
[15:03] <LocutusOfBorg> rapmap is now an amd64 only package... reverse-dependencies are amd64only too...
[15:03] <LocutusOfBorg> NBS cleanup please?
[15:06] <vorlon> Laney, juliank: is ./worker-config-production/worker-bos01.conf redundant obsoleted by worker-config-production/worker-bos01-ppc64el.conf and should be removed?
[15:06] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: done
[15:07] <Laney> think so
[15:07] <Laney> it's all obsolete in the new world order though
[15:07] <Laney> so don't sweat too much over it
[15:15] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks
[20:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-edge [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-12.13~18.04.2]
[20:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-edge [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-12.13~18.04.2]
[20:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-edge [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-12.13~18.04.2]
[20:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-65.74~16.04.1]
[20:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-65.74~16.04.1]
[21:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1060.65] (kernel)
[21:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1026.29~16.04.1] (kernel)
[21:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1018.18] (core, kernel)
[21:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1003.4] (core)
[21:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-1018.18]
[21:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-1003.4]
[22:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1060.65]
[22:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1026.29~16.04.1]