| mwhudson | vorlon: yes i guess i shuld | 06:24 |
|---|---|---|
| mwhudson | vorlon: did you deploy the latest change to https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/eoan/rcbuggy-problem-packages.html ? | 07:13 |
| doko | cjwatson: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg I demoted doxygen yesterday, and the -doc package wants to pull it again into main. Now I can add an extra exclude, but I'm wondering how many other packages like that do we have in main ... | 07:48 |
| cjwatson | I don't know, sorry, somebody else will have to investigate | 07:48 |
| doko | ok | 07:48 |
| vorlon | mwhudson: I had not deployed the latest changes; done now | 08:13 |
| mwhudson | vorlon: good that means i don't have to debug why they weren't working | 08:14 |
| vorlon | doko: fwiw I did check that there are a number of packages that declare Built-Using: doxygen, but it seems none in main (Built-Using would be a way that things might get non-obviously pulled into main by germinate) | 09:16 |
| RAOF | Oh, I should probably add Built-Using: doxygen to the mir packaging! | 09:26 |
| mdeslaur | could someone please release python-django, the remaining autopkgtest failures are caused by broken tests | 09:27 |
| vorlon | RAOF: why? | 09:32 |
| RAOF | vorlon: The mir-doc package is doxygen-built, and probably therefore includes bits of doxygen. | 09:40 |
| vorlon | hmm | 09:40 |
| vorlon | and are there licensing or security reasons to need to track which version of doxygen it is embedding bits from? | 09:41 |
| RAOF | Hm. mir-doc appears to embed a jquery, that would have to have come from the doxygen package? That's maybe a plausable target for security tracking? | 09:43 |
| RAOF | It is not obvious to me whether or not we need to track it for licencing reasons. | 09:45 |
| marcustomlinson | vorlon: could I ask you to please remove libreoffice and libreoffice-l10n 1:6.2.7-0ubuntu0.19.04.1 from the Disco unapproved queue | 10:06 |
| marcustomlinson | oh right, tjaalton ^ | 10:09 |
| tjaalton | marcustomlinson: sure | 10:10 |
| marcustomlinson | thanks | 10:10 |
| tjaalton | done | 10:10 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libreoffice-l10n [source] (disco-proposed) [1:6.2.7-0ubuntu0.19.04.1] | 10:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libreoffice [source] (disco-proposed) [1:6.2.7-0ubuntu0.19.04.1] | 10:11 | |
| === cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: v4l2loopback (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.10.0-1ubuntu1.1 => 0.10.0-1ubuntu1.2] (no packageset) | 11:26 | |
| doko | sforshee, apw: again re-introduced :-( linux: Depends: libbinutils (>= 2.32.51.20190905), libbinutils (<< 2.32.51.20190906) | 16:06 |
| doko | linux-tools-5.3.0-10 | 16:07 |
| doko | and -12 | 16:09 |
| LocutusOfBorg | vorlon, FYI I tried to fix bzr sadness, but the testsuite depends on python packages e.g. meliae you removed some time ago already from eoan | 18:48 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I think the best solution *might* be to land this bileto https://bileto.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/3810 | 18:49 |
| LocutusOfBorg | but for sure I need an ack, I can open a bug later | 18:49 |
| LocutusOfBorg | (bug opened) | 19:49 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1045.47] (kernel) | 19:59 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | anybody please bump this hint to 0.7.9? ./ubuntu-release:force-badtest reprotest/0.7.8/i386 | 20:12 |
| LocutusOfBorg | xnox, was the installer meant to point at kernel -12? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/20101020ubuntu587 | 20:45 |
| vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: I don't understand your bzr changelog, how did test removal breakn the reverse-deps? | 21:25 |
| vorlon | Laney, juliank: '/var/lib/dpkg/info/bacula-sd.postinst: 20: cannot create /tmp/bacula-sd.conf.ucftmp-evOGJc5OsD: Permission denied' is a surprising error (http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/b/bacula/eoan/amd64) | 21:26 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
