[06:24] <mwhudson> vorlon: yes i guess i shuld
[07:13] <mwhudson> vorlon: did you deploy the latest change to https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/eoan/rcbuggy-problem-packages.html ?
[07:48] <doko> cjwatson: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg  I demoted doxygen yesterday, and the -doc package wants to pull it again into main. Now I can add an extra exclude, but I'm wondering how many other packages like that do we have in main ...
[07:48] <cjwatson> I don't know, sorry, somebody else will have to investigate
[07:48] <doko> ok
[08:13] <vorlon> mwhudson: I had not deployed the latest changes; done now
[08:14] <mwhudson> vorlon: good that means i don't have to debug why they weren't working
[09:16] <vorlon> doko: fwiw I did check that there are a number of packages that declare Built-Using: doxygen, but it seems none in main (Built-Using would be a way that things might get non-obviously pulled into main by germinate)
[09:26] <RAOF> Oh, I should probably add Built-Using: doxygen to the mir packaging!
[09:27] <mdeslaur> could someone please release python-django, the remaining autopkgtest failures are caused by broken tests
[09:32] <vorlon> RAOF: why?
[09:40] <RAOF> vorlon: The mir-doc package is doxygen-built, and probably therefore includes bits of doxygen.
[09:40] <vorlon> hmm
[09:41] <vorlon> and are there licensing or security reasons to need to track which version of doxygen it is embedding bits from?
[09:43] <RAOF> Hm. mir-doc appears to embed a jquery, that would have to have come from the doxygen package? That's maybe a plausable target for security tracking?
[09:45] <RAOF> It is not obvious to me whether or not we need to track it for licencing reasons.
[10:06] <marcustomlinson> vorlon: could I ask you to please remove libreoffice and libreoffice-l10n 1:6.2.7-0ubuntu0.19.04.1 from the Disco unapproved queue
[10:09] <marcustomlinson> oh right, tjaalton ^
[10:10] <tjaalton> marcustomlinson: sure
[10:10] <marcustomlinson> thanks
[10:10] <tjaalton> done
[10:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libreoffice-l10n [source] (disco-proposed) [1:6.2.7-0ubuntu0.19.04.1]
[10:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libreoffice [source] (disco-proposed) [1:6.2.7-0ubuntu0.19.04.1]
=== cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer
[11:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: v4l2loopback (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.10.0-1ubuntu1.1 => 0.10.0-1ubuntu1.2] (no packageset)
[16:06] <doko> sforshee, apw: again re-introduced :-(  linux: Depends: libbinutils (>= 2.32.51.20190905), libbinutils (<< 2.32.51.20190906)
[16:07] <doko> linux-tools-5.3.0-10
[16:09] <doko> and -12
[18:48] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, FYI I tried to fix bzr sadness, but the testsuite depends on python packages e.g. meliae you removed some time ago already from eoan
[18:49] <LocutusOfBorg> I think the best solution *might* be to land this bileto https://bileto.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/3810
[18:49] <LocutusOfBorg> but for sure I need an ack, I can open a bug later
[19:49] <LocutusOfBorg> (bug opened)
[19:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1045.47] (kernel)
[20:12] <LocutusOfBorg> anybody please bump this hint to 0.7.9? ./ubuntu-release:force-badtest reprotest/0.7.8/i386
[20:45] <LocutusOfBorg> xnox, was the installer meant to point at kernel -12? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/20101020ubuntu587
[21:25] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: I don't understand your bzr changelog, how did test removal breakn the reverse-deps?
[21:26] <vorlon> Laney, juliank: '/var/lib/dpkg/info/bacula-sd.postinst: 20: cannot create /tmp/bacula-sd.conf.ucftmp-evOGJc5OsD: Permission denied' is a surprising error (http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/b/bacula/eoan/amd64)