=== ichoquo0Aigh9ie is now known as jalcine === jalcine is now known as jacky [11:29] Howdy folks [15:42] seems I found a bluetooth bug [16:05] Please share the link to the bug report. I will see if I can duplicate here. [16:30] Beta Live Session and Install worked great on an old Dell laptop. Other than the 3rd party driver checkbox, I did not see an option for installing graphics drivers during install-did I miss it or just not enabled? Regardless manual install of NVidia driver worked well (sometimes it's a fight on this old hw). [16:32] I tried to add comments to the Beta tracker, but comments are disabled-is this due to a beta respin? [16:35] The Beta is out, so testing moves on [16:36] Nvidia did not install with 3rd party? [16:38] Correct, NVidia driver did not auto install. It's legacy 8600M-get Nvidia HW so not sure if older hw is the issue. [16:40] s/get/gt [16:42] @DarinMiller, 340? [16:43] yes, nvidia-340 driver [16:43] That is not on the iso [16:43] ah, makes sense! [16:44] How did you determine what drivers were on the iso? [16:45] we have 390, 430 and 435 [16:45] @DarinMiller, The same wildcard that Ubuntu used [16:46] @DarinMiller https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~kubuntu-dev/ubuntu-seeds/kubuntu.eoan/view/head:/ship-live#L18 [16:47] I gues doesn't match 340, as they come from before Ubuntu changed how the driver meta package was named [16:47] exactly [16:49] In fact, I blindly attempted to install nvidia-driver-340 which obviously failed...then I had to to find the correct package name from the apt list. [16:49] ISOs are already huge. I am scared to add another nvidia, as it adds about 100MB 😱 [16:50] I don't think adding to the iso is necessary. However, we should advertise legacy driver are not included to properly set expectations. [16:51] Yeah, we need to add info about the nvidia driver on release notes anyway, so we can explain there [17:23] good afternoon everyone [17:23] @RikMills, I have been thinking a bit about the branch checking in KA [17:23] good afternoon santa :) [17:24] after some pondering my conclusions is that it may be a good idea to remove it completely [17:24] so what do you think? [17:25] my original idea was to just keep it for gbp-newrelease and gbp-archive, but even in those commands it could be annoying [17:25] for instance, wrt gbp-nr, see your plasma-5.17 branches [17:26] with branch checking that would fail, so I have the impression it would be better to just let the KA user do whatever [17:28] another alternative would be just printing a non-fatal, orange colored warning (instead of just removing the functionality) [17:29] but I think I'm more in favour of removing [17:35] sounds reasonable [17:38] ok, I will work on the removal [17:39] I also plan to remove the "-u" option from uploadsource, which is annoying in a similar way than branch checking. also to see if they are uncommited changes in a git local clone we have now "check-changes" [17:40] so no point to check that in uploadsource [17:40] Yeah that is annoying 😋 [17:41] indeed it isn't as great as I pictured it in my mind some time ago XD