[03:07] <[rg]> hello, is there an interal bug list for ubiquity?
[07:43] <Skuggen> Anyone know the specifics of the user used to run dep8 tests? We have a test failing for MySQL 8.0.17 that gives the same failure as if it had been run as root, but the test does not have needs-root (and the test runner would give a warning if it detected being run as root)
[07:46] <Skuggen> Might be that the SUDO_USER environment variable is set
[08:48] <xnox> CarlFK:  i'm still not convinced it's a good idea =) sorry, setting to won't fix
[08:49] <xnox> CarlFK:  maybe you can find someone else who is more agreable to get that change in.
[08:54] <RAOF> Skuggen: as far as I know, there are no guarantees about the user your dep8 test is run under. If you need to be non-root, create a new user in the test and run under that.
[08:54] <RAOF> (I recently ran into this with colord; you could check its dep8 tests if you like)
[08:56] <Skuggen> RAOF: Thanks! Might be simpler to disable that one test (it is also run during the build)
[12:32] <ahasenack> vorlon: I am taking the bug, yes, thanks. Could I add a review slot for you when the time comes? I'm planning on not even activating the service unit, since the timer will call it.
[12:32] <ahasenack> just let it run over the weekend to confirm it works with just the timer unit activated
[12:32] <ahasenack> (I just let it run over the weekend ...)
[12:43] <Beret> I'm still hitting that weird bug reporting bug I've seen nearly all cycle
[12:43] <Beret> I filed it but it's weird - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1845950
[12:52] <rbasak> Beret: so that sort of happened to me yesterday, but in Bionic. It was the Privacy settings - disabling reporting there also seemed to disable manually requesting a report in the way you describe. It isn't that for you is it?
[12:54] <Beret> rbasak, problem reporting is set to "Automatic" on the affected system
[12:54] <Beret> so doesn't look like that's it here
[12:55] <rbasak> ack
[13:01] <rbasak> What's the current expectation for Python 2 in Eoan?
[13:01] <rbasak> If I have a port ready for a package in universe, do you want an FFe or should I wait for the next cycle?
[13:56] <vorlon> ahasenack: yes, I can review
[15:10] <rafaeldtinoco> rbasak: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/q58SPFKByt/
[15:11] <rafaeldtinoco> rbasak: the merge request that is accurate is
[15:11] <rafaeldtinoco> https://code.launchpad.net/~rafaeldtinoco/ubuntu/+source/simplestreams/+git/simplestreams/+ref/xenial-1686437-keystone-v3
[15:12] <rbasak> rafaeldtinoco: would it be best to get Bryce to sponsor it tomorrow?
[15:12] <rafaeldtinoco> yep
[15:12] <rafaeldtinoco> I think so
[15:13] <rafaeldtinoco> its complex enough for context switch
[15:13] <rafaeldtinoco> you're right
[17:21] <xnox> Laney:  vorlon: i hate initramfs-tools! end of message
 phew
[17:23] <xnox> ahasenack:  related
[17:23] <ahasenack> :)
[19:53] <bdmurray> juliank: Would using Version.section, seen in bug 1845593, also fix bug 1841675?
[19:54] <juliank> bdmurray: sounds like ir