/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2019/09/30/#ubuntu-release.txt

-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: graphene (eoan-proposed/main) [1.9.6-1 => 1.10.0-1] (desktop-core) (sync)01:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: runc (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.0.0~rc8-0ubuntu1 => 1.0.0~rc8+git20190923.3e425f80-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)01:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted runc [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.0.0~rc8+git20190923.3e425f80-0ubuntu1]01:19
LocutusOfBorgplease accept python-json-patch, it should solve the autopkgtest regressions in binutils, due to the current archive being broken (two packages providing jsondiff binary)05:54
tjaaltonsanta_: it's fixed in debian git05:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted thunderbird [source] (eoan-proposed) [1:68.1.0+build3-0ubuntu1]07:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.2.10-1ubuntu2]07:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (eoan-proposed/main) [1.2.10-1ubuntu1 => 1.2.10-1ubuntu2] (core)07:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (eoan-proposed/main) [1.2.10-1ubuntu2 => 1.2.10-1ubuntu2] (core)07:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (eoan-proposed/main) [1.2.10-1ubuntu2 => 1.2.10-1ubuntu2] (core)07:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (eoan-proposed/main) [1.2.10-1ubuntu2 => 1.2.10-1ubuntu2] (core)07:21
dokolooks like the armhf autopkg testers are down. could somebody have a look?08:44
dokoLaney, juliank, vorlon: ^^^08:44
juliankdoko: all workers seem to be active08:46
juliankwell except one08:46
juliankbut there have not been any requests in 2 hours08:47
dokojuliank: update_excuses shows everything "in progress" for uploads since yesterday08:47
juliankrabbitmq down maybe?08:48
xnoxvorlon:  rbalint: re:snapd change, we have tested latest -updates systemd and it is all good. I do expect snapd sru to go in, and finally fix /snap/bin in path.08:50
xnoxvorlon:  re: amd64-microcode => yeah =/08:50
juliankno idea what happens08:51
julianktests are running, I just triggered one08:51
juliankbut I don't see it in the log08:51
juliankah, wrong arch08:51
juliankdoko: so the queues are empty, probably the britney requests have been lost somewhere08:53
juliankdoko: hmm, no, there are only like 10 in progress tests, and they're in the queue08:54
juliankah, all amrhf08:54
juliankyeah, the lxd worker is down08:55
Laneythe controller?08:55
LaneyWTF08:55
Laneycheck the conole-log08:55
Laneyif it's something about ksplice, please go bug IS with that information08:56
LaneyI don't think I rebooted that one on Friday when some of the other machines were down08:56
Laneybut that update was suppsoed to not be hitting machines any mroe08:56
juliank[11243666.512952] Out of memory: Kill process 12446 (uptrack-upgrade) score 7 or sacrifice child08:56
juliank[11243666.514985] Killed process 13791 (ksplice-apply) total-vm:45276kB, anon-rss:11104kB, file-rss:1504kB08:56
juliankLaney: ^08:57
Laneyyes08:57
Laneysame thing as the other machines then08:57
Laneynova reboot it, it should come back08:57
juliankLaney: issued reboot request a few secs ago08:57
LaneyIS should be told that machines are still being killed by this update08:58
juliankdoko: should be back up09:03
LocutusOfBorgcan we reschedule the pending tests please?09:21
LocutusOfBorgbtw please accept python-json-patch, it fixes an RC bug that prevents its installation09:21
juliankLocutusOfBorg: reschedule, why?09:23
juliankthe few armhf ones were queued, just not processed09:23
juliankthe queue is being processed, we're down to 24 now09:24
LocutusOfBorgack09:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted keystone [source] (disco-proposed) [2:15.0.0-0ubuntu1.2]09:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ibm-java80 [sync] (xenial-release) [8.0.5.40-0ubuntu1]10:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ibm-java80 [sync] (bionic-release) [8.0.5.40-0ubuntu1]10:32
apw^ accepted to xenial-release ?  that is not going to go well at all10:33
xnoxapw:  why not? it's propietary stand-alone binary, and we copy up from xenial to bionic. Just like any other build, of an unchanged thing10:37
xnoxoh10:38
xnoxoh10:38
xnoxoh10:38
xnoxit should be partner, right?!10:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [1.2.10-1ubuntu2]10:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [armhf] (eoan-proposed) [1.2.10-1ubuntu2]10:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-json-patch [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.23-2ubuntu1]10:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [1.2.10-1ubuntu2]10:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [i386] (eoan-proposed) [1.2.10-1ubuntu2]10:38
xnoxapw:  looks fine on https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ibm-java80/+publishinghistory10:39
dokojuliank, Laney: while the armhf tests triggered by binutils were run, the ones triggered by mesa are not. could you have a look again?10:39
xnoxapw:  can you explain what's "not going well at all" ?10:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected fwupd [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.2.10-1ubuntu2]10:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupdate [sync] (eoan-proposed) [12-7]10:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-mate-guide [source] (eoan-proposed) [19.10.1-0ubuntu1]10:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-mahjongg [sync] (eoan-proposed) [1:3.34.0-1]10:42
dokojuliank, Laney: while the armhf tests triggered by binutils were run, the ones triggered by mesa are not. could you have a look again?10:46
apwxnox, it was accepted into a closed pocket10:47
juliankdoko: yup, the mesa ones got lost10:47
apwxnox, or perhaps it somehow is not closed in partner, so that is a thing10:48
dokojuliank: not just limited to those ...10:48
juliankdoko: well yes, git-annex got lost too10:49
juliankah but there also seem to be some test bed failures for apport triggered by binutils10:51
juliankThe remote "lxd-armhf-10.44.44.116" doesn\'t exist10:51
juliankbut it does exist10:52
Laneythat looks like it's running ok to me10:54
Laneyfor the lost ones, probably failed to submit when rabbitmq was down10:54
Laneyfeel free to retry10:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: anjuta (eoan-proposed/universe) [2:3.34.0-1~ubuntu1 => 2:3.34.0-2] (desktop-extra) (sync)10:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-builder (eoan-proposed/universe) [3.32.0-1 => 3.32.4-2] (desktop-extra) (sync)10:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: jhbuild (eoan-proposed/universe) [3.15.92+20180504~8974bbc4-1 => 3.34.0-1] (no packageset) (sync)11:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted jhbuild [sync] (eoan-proposed) [3.34.0-1]11:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted exim4 [source] (eoan-proposed) [4.92.1-1ubuntu3]11:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-menu [source] (eoan-proposed) [19.10.2-0ubuntu1]11:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (eoan-proposed/main) [19.10.12 => 19.10.13] (core)11:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libtext-charwidth-perl [sync] (eoan-proposed) [0.04-9]11:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libtext-wrapi18n-perl [sync] (eoan-proposed) [0.06-9]11:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted spice-vdagent [sync] (eoan-proposed) [0.19.0-2]11:14
sil2100apw: yeah, that's a thing11:15
sil2100apw: for partner there's just proposed and release basically, so all is good11:15
sil2100apw: did you reject the partner upload for bionic?11:16
sil2100Since I was sure I accepted that one11:16
sil2100But I see a reject here instead11:16
sil2100apw: if that was you and your only concern was the pocket it was targetting, I'll accept it from Rejected11:18
apwsil2100, i didn't reject (or indeed accpet anyting) i was just supprised by -release11:19
sil2100hm, so a misclick!11:21
sil2100eh, "FAILED: ibm-java80 (Can't resurrect rejected syncs)", will just re-sync11:22
LocutusOfBorgjuliank, e.g. git-annex on armhf is seen as "running", but seems not11:22
juliankI said that11:22
LocutusOfBorglol sorry you are right11:23
LocutusOfBorgcan I retry armhf?11:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ibm-java80 (bionic-release/partner) [8.0.5.35-0ubuntu1 => 8.0.5.40-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) (sync)11:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ibm-java80 [sync] (bionic-release) [8.0.5.40-0ubuntu1]11:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-caja (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.22.1-0ubuntu1 => 1.22.1-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-mate)11:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntustudio-menu [source] (eoan-proposed) [0.34]11:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntustudio-meta [source] (eoan-proposed) [0.195]11:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice (eoan-proposed/main) [1:6.3.1-0ubuntu2 => 1:6.3.2-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)11:50
Laneyyes, if only one person does it12:30
juliankI retried12:31
juliankeverything in eoan should be retried afaict12:32
juliankor rather has been12:32
juliankother releases might need some look at12:32
* juliank had a look12:33
juliankNo SRUs affected it seems12:33
Laneycheers12:38
LocutusOfBorg+ show=Source: binutils-mipsen (4~c4ubuntu1)13:29
LocutusOfBorgdoko, ^^ binutils is sad on amd64 and i386...13:29
dokoknown. needs an autopkg fix, or a permanent hint13:31
LocutusOfBorgthanks, I really would like to see binutils migrate, since abi-monitor is now fixed13:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: yaru-theme (eoan-proposed/main) [19.10.3 => 19.10.4] (desktop-core)13:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pidgin [source] (eoan-proposed) [1:2.13.0-2.2ubuntu1]13:59
santa_tjaalton: I see, there's a commit doing something similar compared with what I did in those test builds, thanks14:28
santa_tjaalton: I guess you a are going to merge all the -2 debian package changes in the ubuntu package?14:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cups-filters [sync] (eoan-proposed) [1.25.6-1]14:36
tjaaltonsanta_: eventually, yes14:37
santa_tjaalton: ok, I will leave that entirely on your hands then, thanks for your time14:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1046.49] (kernel)14:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (eoan-proposed) [1:6.3.2-0ubuntu1]15:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-builder [sync] (eoan-proposed) [3.32.4-2]15:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-caja [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.22.1-0ubuntu2]15:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kstars (eoan-proposed/universe) [5:3.2.3-0ubuntu2 => 5:3.3.6-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)15:25
RikMills^^ LP: #184592215:26
ubot5Launchpad bug 1845922 in kstars (Ubuntu) "[FFE] Update to latest kstars (3.3.6) in Eoan" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/184592215:26
RikMillsI am committing to doing fixes/SRU on that if needed &15:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kubuntu-settings [source] (eoan-proposed) [1:19.10ubuntu9]15:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: evince (eoan-proposed/main) [3.32.0-1ubuntu3 => 3.34.0-1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)16:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evince [sync] (eoan-proposed) [3.34.0-1]16:13
bdmurrayI want to rescue something out of the rejected queue for disco but there are two of the same version number there. Any ideas? Manually review / accept then figure out how to use sru-accept?16:47
cjwatsonHack sru-review a bit to accept a queue item ID?16:50
cjwatsonThe queue tool does that by constructing URLs manually, which is icky but functional16:50
bdmurraycjwatson: Ah thanks, I realized I just wanted the most recent one which is what it uses anyway. ;-)16:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (bionic-proposed/main) [237-3ubuntu10.29 => 237-3ubuntu10.30] (core)17:00
infinitybdmurray: perhaps sru-review wants a --no-accept switch added to all its other Don't Do Stuff options, so sru-accept can be deleted.17:40
infinityThen for your case above, you could have done --no-diff --no-accept.17:40
infinity(Or --no-queue might be more apporpriate, telling it to entirely not do anything with the queue, including looking at it?)17:40
bdmurrayinfinity: I wanted to accept it out of rejected but there were 2 packages with the same version #17:41
infinitybdmurray: Right, my point was sru-review that didn't touch the queue would be the same as sru-accept, then you could accept it out of band (with web UI or queue tool or whatever).17:48
bdmurrayinfinity: Ah, I see now.17:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: finalrd (eoan-proposed/main) [3 => 4] (core)17:51
xnoxinfinity:  i would appreciate if above is reviewed and accepted =) i'm sure you will enjoy the fact that initramfs-tools uses ${verbose?} these days17:52
infinityxnox: Gross.  Looks like someone blindly following recommendations from a static syntax checker.18:03
infinityhttps://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/initramfs-tools/commit/f277309e0b6b57ff2f8f9411c026394b7635f3d618:03
infinityBut no harm in your change, so accepting it.18:03
infinityxnox: Also, shouldn't v3 and v4 have been 2.1 and 2.2, so the fake os-release-like file would still be accurate? :)18:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted finalrd [source] (eoan-proposed) [4]18:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (eoan-proposed) [19.10.13]18:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted yaru-theme [source] (eoan-proposed) [19.10.4]18:06
xnoxinfinity:  so i changed it from Kelly's Eye to One little duck when i change the calling convention / naming / behaviour of the .finalrd scripts. And all other uploads were stable / unchanged behaviour so far.18:08
xnoxinfinity:  i really have no idea if that file is needed at all. but it keeps systemd-shutdown happy and it's "standard" (lennart) compliant.18:09
xnoxbut yeah, will ponder bumping versions inside it.18:09
infinityxnox: Yeah, 3 and 4 didn't deserve major versions, but too late now. :)18:11
infinity(I guess systemd has dragged you down the All Versions Are Equal road)18:11
xnoxinfinity:  pondering to upload casper. i guess you want one-tiny-upload per bug, rather than a pile of goo?18:11
infinityI do?18:12
infinityAssuming the bugs and changes are all called out in the changelog in a way I can review without going insane, I don't mind it all at once.18:12
xnoxwell, mixing critical bugfix with subiquity-netboot-feature is not a good look =)18:12
infinityAnd casper isn't so complex that I expect the changes to intertwine and cause paddedroomery.18:12
powersjvorlon, if you have time today there is a cloud-init SRU that is ready for release18:12
infinityxnox: But you do you, man.  If there's a small crit you can bang out now, and something more featureful that you might want to intentionally keep in proposed for a few days with a blocking bug while you exercise it, that might be an excuse to break them up.18:13
xnoxwell, i will want to spin up daily desktop, to ensure reboot thing is gone18:21
infinitywin 16518:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: e2fsprogs (eoan-proposed/main) [1.45.3-4ubuntu1 => 1.45.3-4ubuntu2] (core)18:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted e2fsprogs [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.45.3-4ubuntu2]18:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gedit-plugins [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [3.34.0-2~build1]18:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gedit-plugins [armhf] (eoan-proposed) [3.34.0-2~build1]18:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gedit-plugins [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [3.34.0-2~build1]18:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gedit-plugins [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [3.34.0-2~build1]18:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gedit-plugins [s390x] (eoan-proposed) [3.34.0-2~build1]18:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gedit-plugins [i386] (eoan-proposed) [3.34.0-2~build1]18:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mysql-workbench [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [8.0.17+dfsg-1ubuntu2]18:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mysql-workbench [armhf] (eoan-proposed) [8.0.17+dfsg-1ubuntu2]18:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mysql-workbench [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [8.0.17+dfsg-1ubuntu2]18:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mysql-workbench [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [8.0.17+dfsg-1ubuntu2]18:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mysql-workbench [s390x] (eoan-proposed) [8.0.17+dfsg-1ubuntu2]18:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mysql-workbench [i386] (eoan-proposed) [8.0.17+dfsg-1ubuntu2]18:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (bionic-proposed/main) [237-3ubuntu10.29 => 237-3ubuntu10.30] (core)20:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected systemd [source] (bionic-proposed) [237-3ubuntu10.30]20:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected systemd [source] (bionic-proposed) [237-3ubuntu10.30]20:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1046.49]20:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (bionic-proposed/main) [237-3ubuntu10.30 => 237-3ubuntu10.31] (core)21:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (bionic-proposed) [237-3ubuntu10.31]21:32

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!