[01:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: graphene (eoan-proposed/main) [1.9.6-1 => 1.10.0-1] (desktop-core) (sync)
[01:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: runc (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.0.0~rc8-0ubuntu1 => 1.0.0~rc8+git20190923.3e425f80-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[01:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted runc [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.0.0~rc8+git20190923.3e425f80-0ubuntu1]
[05:54] <LocutusOfBorg> please accept python-json-patch, it should solve the autopkgtest regressions in binutils, due to the current archive being broken (two packages providing jsondiff binary)
[05:58] <tjaalton> santa_: it's fixed in debian git
[07:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted thunderbird [source] (eoan-proposed) [1:68.1.0+build3-0ubuntu1]
[07:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.2.10-1ubuntu2]
[07:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (eoan-proposed/main) [1.2.10-1ubuntu1 => 1.2.10-1ubuntu2] (core)
[07:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (eoan-proposed/main) [1.2.10-1ubuntu2 => 1.2.10-1ubuntu2] (core)
[07:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (eoan-proposed/main) [1.2.10-1ubuntu2 => 1.2.10-1ubuntu2] (core)
[07:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (eoan-proposed/main) [1.2.10-1ubuntu2 => 1.2.10-1ubuntu2] (core)
[08:44] <doko> looks like the armhf autopkg testers are down. could somebody have a look?
[08:44] <doko> Laney, juliank, vorlon: ^^^
[08:46] <juliank> doko: all workers seem to be active
[08:46] <juliank> well except one
[08:47] <juliank> but there have not been any requests in 2 hours
[08:47] <doko> juliank: update_excuses shows everything "in progress" for uploads since yesterday
[08:48] <juliank> rabbitmq down maybe?
[08:50] <xnox> vorlon:  rbalint: re:snapd change, we have tested latest -updates systemd and it is all good. I do expect snapd sru to go in, and finally fix /snap/bin in path.
[08:50] <xnox> vorlon:  re: amd64-microcode => yeah =/
[08:51] <juliank> no idea what happens
[08:51] <juliank> tests are running, I just triggered one
[08:51] <juliank> but I don't see it in the log
[08:51] <juliank> ah, wrong arch
[08:53] <juliank> doko: so the queues are empty, probably the britney requests have been lost somewhere
[08:54] <juliank> doko: hmm, no, there are only like 10 in progress tests, and they're in the queue
[08:54] <juliank> ah, all amrhf
[08:55] <juliank> yeah, the lxd worker is down
[08:55] <Laney> the controller?
[08:55] <Laney> WTF
[08:55] <Laney> check the conole-log
[08:56] <Laney> if it's something about ksplice, please go bug IS with that information
[08:56] <Laney> I don't think I rebooted that one on Friday when some of the other machines were down
[08:56] <Laney> but that update was suppsoed to not be hitting machines any mroe
[08:56] <juliank> [11243666.512952] Out of memory: Kill process 12446 (uptrack-upgrade) score 7 or sacrifice child
[08:56] <juliank> [11243666.514985] Killed process 13791 (ksplice-apply) total-vm:45276kB, anon-rss:11104kB, file-rss:1504kB
[08:57] <juliank> Laney: ^
[08:57] <Laney> yes
[08:57] <Laney> same thing as the other machines then
[08:57] <Laney> nova reboot it, it should come back
[08:57] <juliank> Laney: issued reboot request a few secs ago
[08:58] <Laney> IS should be told that machines are still being killed by this update
[09:03] <juliank> doko: should be back up
[09:21] <LocutusOfBorg> can we reschedule the pending tests please?
[09:21] <LocutusOfBorg> btw please accept python-json-patch, it fixes an RC bug that prevents its installation
[09:23] <juliank> LocutusOfBorg: reschedule, why?
[09:23] <juliank> the few armhf ones were queued, just not processed
[09:24] <juliank> the queue is being processed, we're down to 24 now
[09:55] <LocutusOfBorg> ack
[09:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted keystone [source] (disco-proposed) [2:15.0.0-0ubuntu1.2]
[10:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ibm-java80 [sync] (xenial-release) [8.0.5.40-0ubuntu1]
[10:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ibm-java80 [sync] (bionic-release) [8.0.5.40-0ubuntu1]
[10:33] <apw> ^ accepted to xenial-release ?  that is not going to go well at all
[10:37] <xnox> apw:  why not? it's propietary stand-alone binary, and we copy up from xenial to bionic. Just like any other build, of an unchanged thing
[10:38] <xnox> oh
[10:38] <xnox> oh
[10:38] <xnox> oh
[10:38] <xnox> it should be partner, right?!
[10:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [1.2.10-1ubuntu2]
[10:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [armhf] (eoan-proposed) [1.2.10-1ubuntu2]
[10:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-json-patch [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.23-2ubuntu1]
[10:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [1.2.10-1ubuntu2]
[10:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [i386] (eoan-proposed) [1.2.10-1ubuntu2]
[10:39] <xnox> apw:  looks fine on https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ibm-java80/+publishinghistory
[10:39] <doko> juliank, Laney: while the armhf tests triggered by binutils were run, the ones triggered by mesa are not. could you have a look again?
[10:39] <xnox> apw:  can you explain what's "not going well at all" ?
[10:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected fwupd [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.2.10-1ubuntu2]
[10:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupdate [sync] (eoan-proposed) [12-7]
[10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-mate-guide [source] (eoan-proposed) [19.10.1-0ubuntu1]
[10:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-mahjongg [sync] (eoan-proposed) [1:3.34.0-1]
[10:46] <doko> juliank, Laney: while the armhf tests triggered by binutils were run, the ones triggered by mesa are not. could you have a look again?
[10:47] <apw> xnox, it was accepted into a closed pocket
[10:47] <juliank> doko: yup, the mesa ones got lost
[10:48] <apw> xnox, or perhaps it somehow is not closed in partner, so that is a thing
[10:48] <doko> juliank: not just limited to those ...
[10:49] <juliank> doko: well yes, git-annex got lost too
[10:51] <juliank> ah but there also seem to be some test bed failures for apport triggered by binutils
[10:51] <juliank> The remote "lxd-armhf-10.44.44.116" doesn\'t exist
[10:52] <juliank> but it does exist
[10:54] <Laney> that looks like it's running ok to me
[10:54] <Laney> for the lost ones, probably failed to submit when rabbitmq was down
[10:54] <Laney> feel free to retry
[10:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: anjuta (eoan-proposed/universe) [2:3.34.0-1~ubuntu1 => 2:3.34.0-2] (desktop-extra) (sync)
[10:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-builder (eoan-proposed/universe) [3.32.0-1 => 3.32.4-2] (desktop-extra) (sync)
[11:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: jhbuild (eoan-proposed/universe) [3.15.92+20180504~8974bbc4-1 => 3.34.0-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[11:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted jhbuild [sync] (eoan-proposed) [3.34.0-1]
[11:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted exim4 [source] (eoan-proposed) [4.92.1-1ubuntu3]
[11:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-menu [source] (eoan-proposed) [19.10.2-0ubuntu1]
[11:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (eoan-proposed/main) [19.10.12 => 19.10.13] (core)
[11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libtext-charwidth-perl [sync] (eoan-proposed) [0.04-9]
[11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libtext-wrapi18n-perl [sync] (eoan-proposed) [0.06-9]
[11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted spice-vdagent [sync] (eoan-proposed) [0.19.0-2]
[11:15] <sil2100> apw: yeah, that's a thing
[11:15] <sil2100> apw: for partner there's just proposed and release basically, so all is good
[11:16] <sil2100> apw: did you reject the partner upload for bionic?
[11:16] <sil2100> Since I was sure I accepted that one
[11:16] <sil2100> But I see a reject here instead
[11:18] <sil2100> apw: if that was you and your only concern was the pocket it was targetting, I'll accept it from Rejected
[11:19] <apw> sil2100, i didn't reject (or indeed accpet anyting) i was just supprised by -release
[11:21] <sil2100> hm, so a misclick!
[11:22] <sil2100> eh, "FAILED: ibm-java80 (Can't resurrect rejected syncs)", will just re-sync
[11:22] <LocutusOfBorg> juliank, e.g. git-annex on armhf is seen as "running", but seems not
[11:22] <juliank> I said that
[11:23] <LocutusOfBorg> lol sorry you are right
[11:23] <LocutusOfBorg> can I retry armhf?
[11:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ibm-java80 (bionic-release/partner) [8.0.5.35-0ubuntu1 => 8.0.5.40-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) (sync)
[11:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ibm-java80 [sync] (bionic-release) [8.0.5.40-0ubuntu1]
[11:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-caja (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.22.1-0ubuntu1 => 1.22.1-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-mate)
[11:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntustudio-menu [source] (eoan-proposed) [0.34]
[11:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntustudio-meta [source] (eoan-proposed) [0.195]
[11:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice (eoan-proposed/main) [1:6.3.1-0ubuntu2 => 1:6.3.2-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[12:30] <Laney> yes, if only one person does it
[12:31] <juliank> I retried
[12:32] <juliank> everything in eoan should be retried afaict
[12:32] <juliank> or rather has been
[12:32] <juliank> other releases might need some look at
[12:33]  * juliank had a look
[12:33] <juliank> No SRUs affected it seems
[12:38] <Laney> cheers
[13:29] <LocutusOfBorg> + show=Source: binutils-mipsen (4~c4ubuntu1)
[13:29] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, ^^ binutils is sad on amd64 and i386...
[13:31] <doko> known. needs an autopkg fix, or a permanent hint
[13:31] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks, I really would like to see binutils migrate, since abi-monitor is now fixed
[13:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: yaru-theme (eoan-proposed/main) [19.10.3 => 19.10.4] (desktop-core)
[13:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pidgin [source] (eoan-proposed) [1:2.13.0-2.2ubuntu1]
[14:28] <santa_> tjaalton: I see, there's a commit doing something similar compared with what I did in those test builds, thanks
[14:31] <santa_> tjaalton: I guess you a are going to merge all the -2 debian package changes in the ubuntu package?
[14:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cups-filters [sync] (eoan-proposed) [1.25.6-1]
[14:37] <tjaalton> santa_: eventually, yes
[14:37] <santa_> tjaalton: ok, I will leave that entirely on your hands then, thanks for your time
[14:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1046.49] (kernel)
[15:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (eoan-proposed) [1:6.3.2-0ubuntu1]
[15:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-builder [sync] (eoan-proposed) [3.32.4-2]
[15:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-caja [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.22.1-0ubuntu2]
[15:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kstars (eoan-proposed/universe) [5:3.2.3-0ubuntu2 => 5:3.3.6-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[15:26] <RikMills> ^^ LP: #1845922
[15:27] <RikMills> I am committing to doing fixes/SRU on that if needed &
[15:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kubuntu-settings [source] (eoan-proposed) [1:19.10ubuntu9]
[16:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: evince (eoan-proposed/main) [3.32.0-1ubuntu3 => 3.34.0-1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[16:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evince [sync] (eoan-proposed) [3.34.0-1]
[16:47] <bdmurray> I want to rescue something out of the rejected queue for disco but there are two of the same version number there. Any ideas? Manually review / accept then figure out how to use sru-accept?
[16:50] <cjwatson> Hack sru-review a bit to accept a queue item ID?
[16:50] <cjwatson> The queue tool does that by constructing URLs manually, which is icky but functional
[16:56] <bdmurray> cjwatson: Ah thanks, I realized I just wanted the most recent one which is what it uses anyway. ;-)
[17:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (bionic-proposed/main) [237-3ubuntu10.29 => 237-3ubuntu10.30] (core)
[17:40] <infinity> bdmurray: perhaps sru-review wants a --no-accept switch added to all its other Don't Do Stuff options, so sru-accept can be deleted.
[17:40] <infinity> Then for your case above, you could have done --no-diff --no-accept.
[17:40] <infinity> (Or --no-queue might be more apporpriate, telling it to entirely not do anything with the queue, including looking at it?)
[17:41] <bdmurray> infinity: I wanted to accept it out of rejected but there were 2 packages with the same version #
[17:48] <infinity> bdmurray: Right, my point was sru-review that didn't touch the queue would be the same as sru-accept, then you could accept it out of band (with web UI or queue tool or whatever).
[17:49] <bdmurray> infinity: Ah, I see now.
[17:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: finalrd (eoan-proposed/main) [3 => 4] (core)
[17:52] <xnox> infinity:  i would appreciate if above is reviewed and accepted =) i'm sure you will enjoy the fact that initramfs-tools uses ${verbose?} these days
[18:03] <infinity> xnox: Gross.  Looks like someone blindly following recommendations from a static syntax checker.
[18:03] <infinity> https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/initramfs-tools/commit/f277309e0b6b57ff2f8f9411c026394b7635f3d6
[18:03] <infinity> But no harm in your change, so accepting it.
[18:04] <infinity> xnox: Also, shouldn't v3 and v4 have been 2.1 and 2.2, so the fake os-release-like file would still be accurate? :)
[18:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted finalrd [source] (eoan-proposed) [4]
[18:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (eoan-proposed) [19.10.13]
[18:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted yaru-theme [source] (eoan-proposed) [19.10.4]
[18:08] <xnox> infinity:  so i changed it from Kelly's Eye to One little duck when i change the calling convention / naming / behaviour of the .finalrd scripts. And all other uploads were stable / unchanged behaviour so far.
[18:09] <xnox> infinity:  i really have no idea if that file is needed at all. but it keeps systemd-shutdown happy and it's "standard" (lennart) compliant.
[18:09] <xnox> but yeah, will ponder bumping versions inside it.
[18:11] <infinity> xnox: Yeah, 3 and 4 didn't deserve major versions, but too late now. :)
[18:11] <infinity> (I guess systemd has dragged you down the All Versions Are Equal road)
[18:11] <xnox> infinity:  pondering to upload casper. i guess you want one-tiny-upload per bug, rather than a pile of goo?
[18:12] <infinity> I do?
[18:12] <infinity> Assuming the bugs and changes are all called out in the changelog in a way I can review without going insane, I don't mind it all at once.
[18:12] <xnox> well, mixing critical bugfix with subiquity-netboot-feature is not a good look =)
[18:12] <infinity> And casper isn't so complex that I expect the changes to intertwine and cause paddedroomery.
[18:12] <powersj> vorlon, if you have time today there is a cloud-init SRU that is ready for release
[18:13] <infinity> xnox: But you do you, man.  If there's a small crit you can bang out now, and something more featureful that you might want to intentionally keep in proposed for a few days with a blocking bug while you exercise it, that might be an excuse to break them up.
[18:21] <xnox> well, i will want to spin up daily desktop, to ensure reboot thing is gone
[18:24] <infinity> win 165
[18:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: e2fsprogs (eoan-proposed/main) [1.45.3-4ubuntu1 => 1.45.3-4ubuntu2] (core)
[18:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted e2fsprogs [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.45.3-4ubuntu2]
[18:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gedit-plugins [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [3.34.0-2~build1]
[18:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gedit-plugins [armhf] (eoan-proposed) [3.34.0-2~build1]
[18:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gedit-plugins [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [3.34.0-2~build1]
[18:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gedit-plugins [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [3.34.0-2~build1]
[18:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gedit-plugins [s390x] (eoan-proposed) [3.34.0-2~build1]
[18:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gedit-plugins [i386] (eoan-proposed) [3.34.0-2~build1]
[18:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mysql-workbench [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [8.0.17+dfsg-1ubuntu2]
[18:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mysql-workbench [armhf] (eoan-proposed) [8.0.17+dfsg-1ubuntu2]
[18:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mysql-workbench [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [8.0.17+dfsg-1ubuntu2]
[18:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mysql-workbench [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [8.0.17+dfsg-1ubuntu2]
[18:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mysql-workbench [s390x] (eoan-proposed) [8.0.17+dfsg-1ubuntu2]
[18:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mysql-workbench [i386] (eoan-proposed) [8.0.17+dfsg-1ubuntu2]
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (bionic-proposed/main) [237-3ubuntu10.29 => 237-3ubuntu10.30] (core)
[20:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected systemd [source] (bionic-proposed) [237-3ubuntu10.30]
[20:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected systemd [source] (bionic-proposed) [237-3ubuntu10.30]
[20:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1046.49]
[21:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (bionic-proposed/main) [237-3ubuntu10.30 => 237-3ubuntu10.31] (core)
[21:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (bionic-proposed) [237-3ubuntu10.31]