[00:10] <timClicks> thumper: PR up to document root-disk-source for openstack https://github.com/juju/docs/pull/3497
[00:32] <pmatulis> interesting setup guys :) ^^^
[08:26] <stickupkid> nammn_de, when you get a second, can you review this https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/10675
[11:33] <stickupkid> can some CR this one? https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/10676
[11:51] <achilleasa> stickupkid: looking
[11:53] <achilleasa> stickupkid: done
[11:54] <achilleasa> jam: or manadart can you please take a look at https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/10680?
[12:23] <Mudchains> stickupkid I submitted a bugreport : https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1846487 :)
[12:24] <mup> Bug #1846487: Conjure-up Kubernetes vpshere <juju:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1846487>
[14:38] <manadart> achilleasa: QA is good.
[16:38] <pmatulis> so when a relation is missing 'juju status' shows a note about it. after adding the relation the note goes away. but if i remove the relation the note does not return. normal?
[16:46] <stickupkid> pmatulis, probably, think i've see that - is it right, not sure tbh
[16:56] <rick_h> pmatulis:  which note do you mean?
[17:00] <pmatulis> rick_h, stuff like "Missing relations: database"
[17:01] <rick_h> pmatulis:  that's from the charm though right?
[17:02] <pmatulis> rick_h, that's my understanding yes
[17:02] <pmatulis> so "charm problem"?
[17:06] <rick_h> pmatulis:  well just that yea it's not reoutputting the status once it loses the relation. It's on their logic to say "hey I want this" based on config/etc.
[17:31] <pmatulis> makes sense
[20:08] <timClicks> which tracker should feature requests be filed for github.com/juju/cmd/?
[21:39] <babbageclunk> timClicks: it must be a feature request for juju right? The implementation might be a feature in juju/cmd, but there'll be some visible change in juju as a result.